3800Alexis It is POSSIBLE for a player, having given appropriate notice and received Agoran satisfaction, to clean Rule 2496 by replacing the word 'result' in the phrase 'times the adoption index of the result' with either of 'decision' or 'proposal', at eir option. FALSE by twg
29 Jan 2020 3799twg If the report referenced by my previous CFJ were to ratify, its 'specified time' for the purposes of Rule 1551 would be 00:00 UTC on 2020-01-20. TRUE by G.
09 Feb 2020 3798twg I published a Referee report today. TRUE by G.
09 Feb 2020 3797Jason Cobb Coming into existence is a regulated action. DISMISS by G.
08 Feb 2020 3796Gaelan Gaelan has the patent title "The Powerless." FALSE by omd
31 Jan 2020 3795Aris Falsifian would have won the game in the below message if e had originally specified intent to win by apathy without objection. FALSE by G.
14 Feb 2020 3794G. G. earned 12 coins for earning a blue ribbon for CFJ 3792. FALSE by Alexis
25 Jan 2020 3793Gaelan Rance’s master switch is set to Gaelan. FALSE by Alexis
15 Feb 2020 3792Alexis The above-quoted message contained a valid Promotor's weekly report. FALSE by G.
14 Jan 2020 3791Alexis As a result of the quoted messages, Gaelan and twg are parties to a contract with the text in Gaelan's message. TRUE by Jason Cobb
14 Jan 2020 3790Jason Cobb The sending of this message (the entire message, not the enclosed message) caused the Officeholder of Comptrollor to be flipped. FALSE by G.
19 Jan 2020 3789twg Alexis is a player. FALSE by Falsifian
17 Jan 2020 3788Aris If the two documents quoted above were ratified, the first one would have the effect of modifying the historical record twice and the publicity switches of the relevant fora twice, in the manner stated as interpretation a above. TRUE by Jason
08 Feb 2020 3787Murphy Murphy initiated an election for Prime Minister on or about Sun, Dec 22 2019 (18:48:16) UTC. FALSE by omd
23 Jan 2020 3786Aris or G. Proposal 8277 identifies a distributed proposal. TRUE by omd
23 Jan 2020 3785Murphy or G. Adopting Proposal 8277 would cause coins to be transferred from G. FALSE by Aris
18 Jan 2020 3784Murphy or G. Adopting Proposal 8277 would cause coins to be transferred from Agora. FALSE by Aris
18 Jan 2020 3783Jason Cobb Jason Cobb has more than 2000 Coins. FALSE by Alexis
12 Jan 2020 3782G. There is a proposal in the proposal pool with the title "Swimming". TRUE by Falsifian
09 Jan 2020 3781Jason Cobb In this message, Jason Cobb transferred a Coin. FALSE by G.
23 Nov 2019 3780Gaelan There exists a CFJ, created by twg in November 2019, with the text "I am a candidate for prime minister." FALSE by Falsifian
09 Jan 2020 3779twg I am a candidate for Prime Minister. FALSE by Jason Cobb
06 Dec 2019 3778Gaelan Changing B to C, or vice versa, is "generally insignificant" under Rule 2429. TRUE by omd
01 Nov 2019 3777Gaelan Changing A to B, or vice versa, is "generally insignificant" under Rule 2429. TRUE by omd
01 Nov 2019 3776pikhq The person known as ais523 is a player. FALSE by twg
05 Nov 2019 3775G. Ratifying the SLR also ratifies the fact that no other Rules (other than those in the ratified SLR) exist. TRUE by Falsifian
27 Oct 2019 3774G. If G. has no more fines levied on em in September, and is Arbitor during that entire time, e will earn 5 coins as Arbitor due to the Oct 1 payday. FALSE by Jason Cobb
23 Sep 2019 3773twg It is POSSIBLE for me to deputise for the Referee to impose the Cold Hand of Justice by levying a fine of 1 blot on Jason Cobb for the crime stated above. TRUE by Murphy
15 Sep 2019 3772Jason Cobb Existing is a regulated action. FALSE by G.
02 Sep 2019 3771G. When a CFJ judgement finds that conditions for awarding a contested patent title are valid, that constitutes the "announcement of the authorizing conditions" for the REQUIREMENT to make the award in a timely fashion. FALSE by D. Margaux
31 Aug 2019 3770G. G. is currently permitted and enabled to award at least one instance of the Patent Title Champion to Jason Cobb. TRUE by Falsifian
24 Aug 2019 3769Jason Cobb When the action of ratification of a public document is performed, Rule 1551 is the agent that performs certain changes to the gamestate. TRUE by twg
13 Aug 2019 3768Jason Cobb A party to the contract in evidence CAN act on behalf of the other party to transfer a coin. FALSE by omd
28 Aug 2019 3767Jason Cobb The base value of the Crime of Endorsing Forgery is 2. FALSE by G.
10 Aug 2019 3766D. Margaux Rule 1698 (Ossification) is in effect. TRUE by Jason Cobb
09 Aug 2019 3765D. Margaux Agora is ossified. FALSE by Jason Cobb
03 Aug 2019 3764Murphy If a proposal purporting to register nch was adopted now, then one second later, e would be bound by the rules. FALSE by D. Margaux
03 Aug 2019 3763G. If an Unregistered person's citizenship switch is flipped to Registered by the effect of a power-3.1 proposal, without that person expressing any sort of consent, then 1 second after the proposal has taken effect, that person is bound to abide by the Rules. FALSE by Murphy
14 Aug 2019 3762Jason Cobb The investigator of the Finger-pointing done in this message CAN impose a fine on Jason Cobb for the Crime of Oathbreaking for the pledge in evidence. TRUE by twg
03 Aug 2019 3761Jason Cobb A party to the contract in evidence CAN create a gift by some method. FALSE by G.
03 Aug 2019 3760G. If an Officer's report is CoE'd, and the Office changes hands before the deadline for CoE response, then the original publisher (not the new officer) is REQUIRED to respond by R2201. TRUE by omd
08 Aug 2019 3759Jason Cobb Jason Cobb has Declared Apathy. FALSE by Aris
30 Jul 2019 3758Jason Cobb It is possible to publish a notice that satisfies condition 4 of Rule 683. TRUE by Trigon
18 Jul 2019 3757Jason Cobb omd has 1 Blot. FALSE by Falsifian
21 Jul 2019 3756Jason Cobb Jason Cobb qualifies for a Transparent ribbon. FALSE by twg
23 Jul 2019 3755Jason Cobb The time window of R. Lee's Oath to vote against certain proposals is 60 days. FALSE by Murphy via G.
18 Jul 2019 3754twg Rule 2598 has been repealed. TRUE by G.
12 Jul 2019 3753Jason Cobb The investigator of the Finger-pointing done in this message CAN impose a fine on Jason Cobb for the Crime of Oathbreaking for the pledge in evidence. FALSE by omd
03 Jul 2019 3752Jason Cobb Jason Cobb is guilty of the Class "I'm a string!" Crime of Oathbreaking. FALSE by omd
12 Jul 2019 3751Murphy A player who quotes the number and title of a proposal followed by "FOR" thereby votes FOR that proposal, provided that e is otherwise able to do so. IRRELEVANT by Falsifian
07 Jul 2019 3750G. In this message, G. destroyed a coin. FALSE by twg
03 Jul 2019 3749Jason Cobb The ordered list [Agora] is a valid vote in the ongoing ADoP election. TRUE by Trigon
07 Jul 2019 3748Jason Cobb Jason Cobb is guilty of the crime of Oathbreaking for the pledge that was made in this message. FALSE by G.
30 Jun 2019 3747G. Jason Cobb made an announcement of intent to banish the Ritual with 2.1 Agoran Consent that meets the clarity standards of R2595/0. TRUE by Aris
07 Jul 2019 3746G. An Agoran decision to select the winner of the election has a voting method of AI-Majority. FALSE by R. Lee
01 Jul 2019 3745Jason Cobb There exists an Agoran Decision to adopt a proposal with the title 'It's caused enough trouble already' and with a valid adoption index. FALSE by R. Lee
11 Jul 2019 3744Jason Cobb There exists a proposal with the title 'It's caused enough trouble already' and with a valid adoption index. FALSE by R. Lee
11 Jul 2019 3743Jason Cobb The investigator of the Finger-pointing done in this message CAN impose a fine on Jason Cobb for the Crime of Oathbreaking. FALSE by omd
03 Jul 2019 3742Baron von Vaderham Baron von Vaderham's bid of 11 coins in the most recent zombie auction of June 6th was UNSUCCESSFUL. FALSE by G.
21 Jun 2019 3741Falsifian A zombie auction was initiated on June 6. TRUE by G.
30 Jun 2019 3740omd In Rule 2125, "required to be a recordkeepor" refers only to recordkeepors as defined in Rule 2166. FALSE by G.
30 Jun 2019 3739G. A person earns a Cyan Ribbon when e temporarily deputises for an office. TRUE by Falsifian
22 Jun 2019 3738twg Rule 2571 is guilty of violating Rule 105. FALSE by R. Lee
18 Jun 2019 3737Jason Cobb If the contract in evidence were to come into force, breathing would be a regulated action. FALSE by D. Margaux
21 Jun 2019 3736D. Margaux When the Referee MUST impose the Cold Hand of Justice, e CAN do so by announcement. FALSE by omd
17 Jun 2019 3735Baron von Vaderham There was only one valid bid, namely for 1 coin by CuddleBeam. TRUE by Falsifian
18 Jun 2019 3734Jason Cobb A Player with Blots CAN destroy a Blot in eir possession if e has neither gained blots nor expunged any blots from emself in the current Agoran week. FALSE by V.J. Rada
14 Jun 2019 3733Falsifian On June 7, 2019, omd earned 5 Coins for publishing a duty-fulfilling report. FALSE by G.
18 Jun 2019 3732twg In the message quoted below, Corona gave eir 'explicit or reasonably implied consent', as required by Rule 1006, to be made the holder of Prime Minister. TRUE by Murphy
17 Jun 2019 3731D. Margaux The ADoP did not EFFECTIVELY commence any election for the office of Prime Minister on 19 May 2019. TRUE by Trigon
02 Jun 2019 3730V.J. Rada If no player activates Rule 2596 'The Ritual' in a certain week, all players who are players that week have violated the rule, which provides that (1) "Any player CAN perform The Ritual" and (2) "The Ritual MUST be performed at least once in every Agoran week. FALSE by D. Margaux
12 Jun 2019 3729Falsifian The Lost and Found department owns no more than 87 Coins. TRUE by D. Margaux
02 Jun 2019 3728omd It would be LEGAL for me to create a proposal with text 'omd violated Rule 2450 by creating this proposal' and no optional attributes. FALSE by Trigon
02 Jun 2019 3727D. Margaux D. Margaux has more than 0 blots. TRUE by Falsifian
04 Jun 2019 3726Aris The most recent attempted imposition of the Cold Hand of Justice by Aris was effective. TRUE by Falsifian
04 Jun 2019 3725D. Margaux Aris’s attempt to distribute Proposal 8164 in the message below was EFFECTIVE. TRUE by twg via Aris
30 Apr 2019 3724D. Margaux An Agoran Decision whether to adopt Proposal 8164 was initiated and its outcome is ADOPTED. FALSE by twg via Aris
30 Apr 2019 3723D. Margaux The Assessor currently CAN and MAY resolve an Agoran Decision whether to adopt Proposal 8164 to be ADOPTED. FALSE by twg via Aris
30 Apr 2019 3722D. Margaux It was POSSIBLE for D. Margaux acting on behalf of ATMunn to issue a Cabinet Order of Manifesto in the message quoted below. TRUE by twg via Aris
30 Apr 2019 3721G. G. has earned 5 coins for the Herald's Report of 17-Feb-2019. TRUE by D. Margaux
06 Mar 2019 3720G. Whether or not a Proposal CAN make a Secured change is determined by the power and precedence of R1688, as deferred to by R106. TRUE by Trigon
24 Feb 2019 3719Falsifian Falsifian and G. won the game. FALSE by D. Margaux
24 Feb 2019 3718twg By sending a message at about 7:03pm UTC on 2019-02-18, G. earned 5 coins. FALSE by D. Margaux
20 Feb 2019 3717D. Margaux twg is the Speaker. FALSE by Aris
26 Feb 2019 3716D. Margaux D. Margaux is the Prime Minister. FALSE by Aris
26 Feb 2019 3715D. Margaux This CFJ is FALSE. DISMISS by D. Margaux
17 Feb 2019 3714G. Prior to calling this CFJ, G. earned 5 coins for judging CFJ 3698. DISMISS by D. Margaux
15 Feb 2019 3713twg Gaelan is impure. FALSE by G.
15 Feb 2019 3712Falsifian Agora is not Satisfied with an intent to perform an action unless it is to be performed With Notice or With T Notice. In particular, Gaelan's recent attempt to Declare Apathy on February 7, 2019 was ineffective, and D. Margaux's dependent actions in their recent message that starts 'I thought for sure people would object...' were ineffective. TRUE by Trigon
18 Feb 2019 3711Falsifian It is Falsifian's Agoran Birthday today (the day beginning at midnight UTC on February 13, 2019). FALSE by D. Margaux
13 Feb 2019 3710Gaelan Gaelan won the game twice by the above declarations of apathy. TRUE by Aris
14 Feb 2019 3709Gaelan Gaelan won the game by one of the above declarations of apathy. TRUE by Aris
14 Feb 2019 3708D. Margaux The parties to an existing contract CAN agree to amend it by adding additional players as parties, even if those additional players did not expressly agree to be party to that contract apart from agreeing to be bound by the Rules generally. FALSE by G.
13 Feb 2019 3707CuddleBeam The Ruleset (as a contract) now has 1 coin. DISMISS by G.
11 Feb 2019 3706CuddleBeam All Players are parties to the Rules as a contract. TRUE by G.
14 Feb 2019 3705twg I own an Indigo Ribbon. FALSE by G.
13 Feb 2019 3704D. Margaux There were no objections made to D. Margaux's January 29 intent to transfer to players other than emself and eir zombie the spaceships in the lost & found department. TRUE by Trigon
18 Feb 2019 3703twg If and when -N (negative N) coins are revoked from an entity, where N is a natural number, that entity's coin balance increases by N. IRRELEVANT by Murphy
10 Feb 2019 3702CuddleBeam Gaelan's (only) ship is at Sector 4. TRUE by D. Margaux
12 Feb 2019 3701G. If the definition of quanging a player had not been explicitly included in the message in evidence, the attempt to transfer currencies on behalf of Tenhigitsune would have failed. TRUE by D. Margaux
17 Feb 2019 3700G. In the message quoted in evidence, D. Margaux earned at least 1 coin. TRUE by Murphy
10 Feb 2019 3699Telnaior A Spaceship owned by the Lost and Found Department is in Sector 05. TRUE by Trigon
02 Feb 2019 3698D. Margaux D. Margaux committed at least 1,000,000,000 rule violations. FALSE by G.
30 Jan 2019 3697D. Margaux D. Margaux won the game by politics in this message. TRUE by G.
01 Feb 2019 3696twg D. Margaux has fulfilled eir obligation, detailed in the rule entitled 'Space Battles', to 'once communicate to the resolver the amount of Energy [e wishes] to spend" in Space Battle 0001. FALSE by G.
29 Jan 2019 3695twg Tenhigitsune has fulfilled eir obligation, detailed in the rule entitled 'Space Battles', to 'once communicate to the resolver the amount of Energy [e wishes] to spend" in Space Battle 0001. FALSE by G.
29 Jan 2019 3694twg It is generally IMPOSSIBLE for a zombie to be transferred to the winner of a lot in a zombie auction. FALSE by D. Margaux
20 Jan 2019 3693G. The zombie auction for January 2019 has been terminated. Withdrawn by G.
11 Jan 2019 3692ATMunn In the message quoted below, twg successfully earned 5 coins for publishing the Treasuror's most recent report. IRRELEVANT by Trigon
19 Jan 2019 3691Jacob Arduino The last person to vote FOR a proposal' is the last person to submit a ballot regarding that proposal which evaluates to FOR. DISMISS by D. Margaux
25 Dec 2018 3690twg G. possesses at least one blot. FALSE by D. Margaux
25 Dec 2018 3669Aris Oathbreaking is per se prohibited by law. TRUE by D. Margaux
24 Oct 2018 3668Aris Committing a Crime is per se prohibited by law. TRUE by D. Margaux
24 Oct 2018 3667D. Margaux D. Margaux’s declaration of apathy in this message was EFFECTIVE. TRUE by G.
27 Oct 2018 3666D. Margaux G.'s attempt in the message quoted below to transfer coins to the contract between em and D. Margaux is EFFECTIVE. TRUE by ATMunn
27 Oct 2018 3665D. Margaux D. Margaux's attempt in this message to transfer coins to the contract between em and G. is EFFECTIVE. TRUE by ATMunn
27 Oct 2018 3664G. Corona and D. Margaux made a Contract in the last 24 hours. TRUE by twg
18 Oct 2018 3663Aris My definition of the reiteration of votes is effective. FALSE by G.
12 Oct 2018 3662Trigon This Notice of Honour causes a player's karma to change by exactly one and then change back. FALSE by D. Margaux
28 Sep 2018 3661D. Margaux The fines attempted to be imposed in this message are EFFECTIVE. INSUFFICIENT by Aris
07 Oct 2018 3660D. Margaux The Referee CAN act on behalf of eir zombie to Point the zombie’s Finger at a player. TRUE by G.
16 Sep 2018 3659G. D Margaux has won the game by apathy. FALSE by Aris
07 Oct 2018 3658twg The Treasuror's report of August 27, 2018, or a portion thereof, is doubted. TRUE by G.
29 Sep 2018 3657twg This message contains a valid Notice of Honour. FALSE by G.
07 Sep 2018 3656D. Margaux D. Margaux currently has in eir possession 5 incense. TRUE by Murphy
16 Sep 2018 3655twg Aris CAN add Proposal 8077 back to the Proposal Pool by announcement. TRUE by Murphy
16 Sep 2018 3654V.J. Rada Quorum on the Agoran Decisions on whether or not to adopt Proposals 8066-8076 was 5.0. FALSE by Murphy
26 Aug 2018 3653G. If a facility has an upkeep cost of 0 (i.e. null), the owner must announce an attempt to pay 0 in a month (or otherwise publicly note) the upkeep cost of 0 to prevent its end-of-the-month destruction. FALSE by Aris
04 Sep 2018 3652G. If a person pays the (nonzero) upkeep cost for eir Rank 1 facility and then upgrades it to Rank 2 in the same month, e must pay the full Rank 2 upkeep cost to prevent its end-of-the-month destruction. IRRELEVANT by D. Margaux
27 Oct 2018 3651Aris At least one Agoran regulation exists. TRUE by G.
16 Jul 2018 3650Aris The Herald may amend the tournament regulations without objection. TRUE by G.
16 Jul 2018 3649Kenyon At the time this CFJ was initiated, Kenyon qualified for a Magenta Ribbon. TRUE by V.J. Rada
11 Jul 2018 3648G. The fine levied on Corona for late Herald Tournament Regulations is unforgivable for the purposes of R2559. TRUE by D. Margaux
01 Oct 2018 3647ATMunn Before the sending of this message, ATMunn voted FOR proposal 8053. FALSE by Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
26 Jun 2018 3646Corona My conditional vote in the appended message evaluates to FOR each proposal. FALSE by V.J. Rada
27 Jun 2018 3645Aris G. has satisfied eir weekly obligation with regard to the FLR and SLR. TRUE by Murphy
01 Oct 2018 3644Publius Scribonius Scholasticus Corona issued a humiliating public reminder in the below quoted text. TRUE by G.
01 Jul 2018 3643ais523 In the above-quoted message, Corona published a self-ratifying report. TRUE by V.J. Rada
23 Jul 2018 3642Aris Proposal 8050 has been resolved. FALSE by Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
26 Jun 2018 3641V.J. Rada The four below actions are each extremely silly, and none significantly harm my standing in the game. DISMISS by Corona
17 Jun 2018 3640Aris FAILED QUORUM was awarded a Medal of Honor. FALSE by V.J. Rada
17 Jun 2018 3639ais523 This is a CFJ. TRUE by Aris
11 Jun 2018 3638CuddleBeam The above is a notice of honor. TRUE by V.J. Rada
02 Aug 2018 3637G. If the Rules say you CAN do something by paying assets, without specifying a destination for the payment, you CAN do it by transferring those assets to anyone. FALSE by G.
30 Apr 2018 3636V.J. Rada If an Agoran Decision were now initiated, the quorum would be 8. FALSE by G.
08 May 2018 3635Aris Corona has violated of Rule 2532, "Zombies", and/or Rule 2466, "Acting on Behalf", by causing Quazie to violate Rule 2550 "Bidding". FALSE by V.J. Rada
30 Apr 2018 3634Aris Rule 2532, "Zombies", enables zombie owners to act on behalf of their zombies. TRUE by V.J. Rada
30 Apr 2018 3612ATMunn VJ Rada successfully called the quoted CFJ. TRUE by Aris
06 Dec 2017 3611Publius Scribonius Scholasticus Rule 2507 does not exist. TRUE by Aris
06 Dec 2017 3610G. G. owns a Black Ribbon. FALSE by V.J. Rada
27 Nov 2017 3609Alexis It is LEGAL for me to pend the proposal "Self-Indulgence". FALSE by G.
28 Nov 2017 3608Ørjan An Official Proposal is always pending, even after being retracted, distributed or adopted. FALSE by Corona
27 Nov 2017 3607V.J. Rada The Door cannot be Slammed on V.J. Rada. TRUE by G.
28 Nov 2017 3606G. G. CAN assign this CFJ to emself by announcement. TRUE by G.
26 Jan 2018 3605V.J. Rada A blue card can only have a penalty imposed in shinies. FALSE by Aris
23 Nov 2017 3604V.J. Rada THIS IS A CFJ. TRUE by Alexis
22 Nov 2017 3603o In the above message, V.J Rada called a CFJ using Shinies. TRUE by Alexis
22 Nov 2017 3602V.J. Rada [A]buses of official power for personal gain" are "prohibited by law". FALSE by Telnaior
27 Nov 2017 3601Alexis Proposal 7924 succeeded in amending Rule 1023. TRUE by o
28 Nov 2017 3600Alexis If a proposal specifies to "amend" a rule by changing its title (and no other change), it succeeds in retitling the rule. TRUE by o
28 Nov 2017 3599Alexis If a proposal specifies an amendment to a rule consisting of multiple parts, one of which is a title change, then the entire amendment fails. FALSE by o
28 Nov 2017 3598Aris If adopted, the proposal 'Sky Pillars' would create a new rule. TRUE by ATMunn
20 Nov 2017 3597o V.J Rada owns the Estate of Erehwon. FALSE by Aris
19 Nov 2017 3596Telnaior A player does not need to pay any shinies in order to remit under the rule Poetry Duel Challenge Writ. IRRELEVANT by G.
19 Nov 2017 3595o It is impossible to issue writs which start a poetry duel challenge. TRUE by G.
19 Nov 2017 3594V.J. Rada G. is eligible for a Medal of Honour. FALSE by Telnaior
19 Nov 2017 3593V.J. Rada Alexis's proposal 'Backed Out the Door' is a 'truly hideous pun' under rule 1650. TRUE by ATMunn
13 Nov 2017 3592V.J. Rada The below document claiming to be the Registrar's Weekly Report was not a report. TRUE by o
17 Nov 2017 3591G. G. won the game at some point after October 22, 2017. FALSE by Alexis
01 Dec 2017 3590OscarMeyr ATMunn bought a Stamp in the referenced message (posted on or about 2 Nov 2017 14:34 Z). FALSE by o
05 Nov 2017 3589Telnaior VJ Rada is required to give G. a million dollars. IRRELEVANT by Aris
06 Nov 2017 3588V.J. Rada Judicial Activism: the Contract has 'fulfilled its purpose, does not specify any gamestate affecting statements, or otherwise seems unlikely to be used' (quote from rule 2522). TRUE by Alexis
30 Oct 2017 3587V.J. Rada The pending of the above proposal is illegal because it breaks the obligations imposed by the Contract named Judicial Activism: the Contract FALSE by Alexis
30 Oct 2017 3586ATMunn In the below quoted message, V.J. Rada reposted a message to a discussion forum to a public forum. DISMISS by Telnaior
30 Oct 2017 3585Ørjan PSS issued a humiliating public reminder in the above quoted text. TRUE by V.J. Rada
30 Oct 2017 3584Telnaior Telnaior attempted to publish a Notice of Honour that was invalid solely because she had already posted a valid Notice of Honour within the current week. TRUE by o
02 Nov 2017 3583V.J. Rada ais523 is a player. FALSE by nichdel
28 Oct 2017 3582Alexis In the below-quoted message, PSS resolved an Agoran Decision. TRUE by G.
23 Oct 2017 3581Ørjan In a below quoted message of 19 October, ATMunn succeeded in changing eir votes. TRUE by Alexis
29 Oct 2017 3580Aris If there were currently a power 3.9 rule purpoting to allow any person to destroy the universe by announcement, without defining the effect of this action, and I announced that I destroyed the universe in that way (all other aspects of the gamestate being as they are now), my announcement would, as far as the game is concerned, have the effect it purported to have. TRUE by G.
26 Oct 2017 3579ATMunn Aris's intent to destroy the universe is valid. TRUE by G.
22 Oct 2017 3578Ørjan The ADOP SHALL NOT distribute Campaign Proposals for ongoing elections. FALSE by Aris
22 Oct 2017 3577Ørjan There exists a Rule entitled "Campaign Proposals, with power 3", with power 1. TRUE by Aris
22 Oct 2017 3576Alexis The below-quoted document contains a self-ratifying list of proposals in the Proposal Pool. TRUE by Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
29 Oct 2017 3575G. G. owns the Estate of Dawsbergen. TRUE by V.J. Rada
15 Oct 2017 3574V.J. Rada C♥U and C♥N are agencies. TRUE by Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
21 Oct 2017 3573V.J. Rada G. was the speaker from September 28, 2017 to October 2 2017. TRUE by Alexis
13 Oct 2017 3572V.J. Rada With the below message, Gaelan won by apathy. FALSE by o
11 Oct 2017 3571V.J. Rada G: Overlord of Dunce is an Agency. TRUE by nichdel
15 Oct 2017 3570V.J Rada Ben Öyle Öneriyorum is an agency. FALSE by nichdel
15 Oct 2017 3569G. If grok had not deregistered, e would have issued trust tokens to both Aris and G. by eir vote on Proposal 7899. FALSE by Alexis
11 Oct 2017 3568Alexis V.J. Rada issued a claim of error. FALSE by o
24 Oct 2017 3567V.J. Rada With the below resolution of intent, VJ Rada won the game by apathy. FALSE by G.
01 Oct 2017 3566V.J. Rada The Pink Slip below issued is both INEFFECTIVE and ILLEGAL. FALSE by Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
12 Oct 2017 3565Ørjan In the below quoted message, VJ Rada endorsed G. FALSE by o
04 Oct 2017 3564Nichdel A pledge can only be broken once. TRUE by Gaelan
29 Sep 2017 3563V.J. Rada The Green card o. issued emself in the below message was illegally issued, as the green card e issued nichdel was legally issued. FALSE by G.
21 Oct 2017 3562o The above-quoted part of Proposal 7871 had no effect. TRUE by Aris
09 Oct 2017 3561o In the above-quoted message, Gaelan destroyed exactly zero stamps. TRUE by Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
02 Oct 2017 3560Cuddlebeam Cuddlebeam has earned a Platinum Ribbon. FALSE by Quazie
06 Sep 2017 3559Aris The statement "Lines beginning with hashmarks ('#') and comments in square brackets ('[]') have no effect on the behavior of this proposal. They are not part of any rules created or amended herein, and may be considered for all game purposes to have been removed before its resolution.", as it appears near the beginning of the contracts proposal I sent to agora-discussion, has the clearly intended effect. Assigned to o
15 Sep 2017 3558V.J. Rada VJ Rada is a player. TRUE by Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
14 Sep 2017 3557o My most recent attempt to flip the Floating Value to 22 was ineffective. Motion to Reconsider filed
14 Sep 2017 3556Cuddlebeam Cuddlebeam has a Platinum Ribbon. Motion to Reconsider filed
10 Sep 2017 3555G. G. and Cuddlebeam, and no one else, have won the game via tournament since July 1, 2017. Assigned to Aris
14 Sep 2017 3554o When nichdel resolved proposal 7867, he neither published a duty- fulfilling report nor resolved an Agoran Decision, for the purposes of the rule "Rewards." TRUE by ais523
24 Aug 2017 3553Aris The most recent document, published to agora-official, and purporting to be the Registrar's report, was not in fact a report. TRUE by o
02 Sep 2017 3552Publius Scribonius Scholasticus babelian has pended eir most recently submitted proposal. FALSE by o
03 Aug 2017 3551V.J. Rada If V.J. Rada posted the following text contained in braces to a public forum {{I CoE my Reportor's report for no reason, accept it, publish the following report and claim 5 Shinies. Title: Newspaper ---Words---}} Agora would transfer em 5 Shinies. TRUE by o
19 Aug 2017 3550o Nichdel has 1 Stamp (nichdel) and 9 Shinies. Assigned to Quazie
01 Aug 2017 3549o I issued Gaelan a green card in the last 24 hours. TRUE by Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
07 Aug 2017 3548V.J. Rada A player that announces intent to perform an action without N objections does not need to wait four days before performing it. TRUE by G.
27 Aug 2017 3547V.J. Rada The rule change purporting to enact a rule entitled Economics Overhaul 2.0 is "wholly void and without effect" under rule 217, which prohibits any rule that would "prevent a person from initiating a formal process to resolve matters of controversy, in the reasonable expectation that the controversy will thereby be resolved. FALSE by Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
03 Sep 2017 3546Publius Scribonius Scholasticus CuddleBeam received consent from omd by eir response to the below quoted message. FALSE by Aris
03 Aug 2017 3545Publius Scribonius Scholasticus CuddleBeam received consent from Publius Scribonius Scholasticus by this response to the below quoted message. FALSE by Aris
03 Aug 2017 3544Publius Scribonius Scholasticus C♥U is an agency. FALSE by grok
27 Jul 2017 3543CuddleBeam No rule other than rule 2166 can be a backing document. FALSE by Aris
31 Jul 2017 3542CuddleBeam All Players except Cuddlebeam now have enough Trust Tokens to win the game. FALSE by Quazie
25 Aug 2017 3541o A nickle's worth of shinies is exactly 5 shinies. DISMISS by grok
20 Jul 2017 3540G. The message quoted in Evidence has created a publicly-made pledge. TRUE by Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
20 Jul 2017 3539o I am the Surveyor. TRUE by Murphy
11 Jul 2017 3538V.J. Rada In the message to agora discussion stating "haha suck it", V.J. Rada broke a Pledge. TRUE by omd
07 Jul 2017 3537CuddleBeam There is currently more than one auction for Estates. Assigned to V.J. Rada
03 Jul 2017 3536G. أدعو إلى إصدار حكم بشأن البيان التالي DISMISS by ais523
29 Jun 2017 3535Quazie In the below quoted message, a CFJ was initiated on the phrase 'أدعو إلى إصدار حكم بشأن البيان التالي'. TRUE by ais523
29 Jun 2017 3534Quazie In the below quoted message, a CFJ was initiated on the phrase 'I call for judgement on the following statement'. FALSE by ais523
14 Jul 2017 3533V.J. Rada V.J. Rada initiated three elections on 27 June. TRUE by omd
02 Jul 2017 3532omd Shinies are assets. TRUE by Aris
23 Jul 2017 3531V.J Rada A player other than the ADoP may initiate elections for an office by announcement if that office has been deputized for within the last 2 weeks or no election has occured for that office within the last 90 days. V.J. Rada initiated 3 such elections on 27 June. DISMISS by omd
29 Jun 2017 3530V.J. Rada The Japanese message filed by 天火狐 on 27 June deputized him as the Reportor. FALSE by o
07 Jul 2017 3529Publius Scribonius Scholasticus omd "most recently became a player" on the 3rd of February, 2011. TRUE by G.
15 Sep 2017 3528o PSS has enjoyed Quazie's typos at all times within the last seven days. IRRELEVANT by ais523
27 Jun 2017 3527omd ais523 has 0 shinies. FALSE by V.J Rada
21 Jun 2017 3526V.J Rada CFJ 3509 has no judgement. TRUE by o
15 Jun 2017 3525ais523 Alexis does not have a White Ribbon, but ais523 does have a White Ribbon. FALSE by Murphy
23 Jun 2017 3524ais523 Murphy has a White Ribbon. FALSE by Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
20 Jun 2017 3523Murphy V.J Rada barred ais523 from being assigned as judge of the above- quoted CFJ. TRUE by Aris
04 Jul 2017 3522V.J. Rada The Tailor's recent statement in the preamble of his June 6 report that "the well-known "disputed" mark in reports has... no legal effect." was legally correct. FALSE by Murphy
10 Jun 2017 3521G. The proposal "Throw off Your Chains" is a competition proposal for the current proposal competition. FALSE by Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
28 Jun 2017 3520G. Quazie is the author of the proposal "Throw off Your Chains". TRUE by Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
28 Jun 2017 3519CuddleBeam All actions are regulated actions, or are not actions. FALSE by Aris
11 Jun 2017 3518G. When a player performs a dependent action, e is the recordkeepor of supporters and/or objectors to the action, for the purposes of R2125. FALSE by ais523
05 Jun 2017 3517G. Sending a public message that says "I do [illegal thing X]", where X is an illegal thing that Rules say the sender CAN but MUST NOT do by announcement, is in itself a regulated action. FALSE by Aris
04 Jun 2017 3516Publius Scribonius Scholasticus The Registrar must track any switches defined in Agencies or Organizations. FALSE by Quazie
06 Jun 2017 3515CuddleBeam The act of perfoming a '24 hours Notice' is an action. TRUE by Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
31 May 2017 3514Quazie The judge assigned to this CFJ will be kind enough to include eir favorite cookie recipe in eir judgment. YUMMY by grok
26 May 2017 3513G. In a message dated Mon, 22 May 2017 15:31:30 -0400, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus initiated an Agoran Decision. TRUE by Quazie
12 Jun 2017 3512Quazie I paid Gaelan 1 Shiney via QPS. FALSE by Sprocklem
08 Jun 2017 3511o Posting a message on a public forum is itself an action, for the purposes of rule 2467. TRUE by Gaelan
24 May 2017 3510o In the last seven days, I conditionally paid Publius Scribonius Scholasticus 20 shinies on three separate occasions. FALSE by Quazie
24 May 2017 3509Gaelan o committed a cardable offense in issuing a Pink Slip to Gaelan. TRUE by Murphy
29 Jun 2017 3508Gaelan Any player may take the office of Rulekeepor with 2 support. TRUE by CuddleBeam
29 May 2017 3507CuddleBeam With a proper choice of what language to employ for an Agoran activity which requires language, any content in the Universe (which is sufficiently accessible to the intended audience of the use of such language) can be made relevant to Agora. DISMISS by grok
23 May 2017 3506CuddleBeam In Rule 2467/1, there exists text content which is "(...) or that depends on information that is impossible or unreasonably difficult to determine(...)". Whether if such a task of information determination is "unreasonably difficult" or not lies in what the person who would be beared with such a task considers it to be. DISMISS by Sprocklem
08 Jun 2017 3505CuddleBeam Can this statement have a Judge? TRUE by Quazie
24 May 2017 3504Quazie A player may award emself a White Ribbon. TRUE by ais523
21 May 2017 3503Quazie It is possible to create an agency such that its acronym contains at least one non-english alphabetic character (芋, Ñ, Æ). TRUE by o
22 May 2017 3502Quazie It is possible to create an agency such that its acronym contains at least one integer symbol (e.g. 0-9). TRUE by o
22 May 2017 3501Quazie Gaelan is a player. TRUE by ais523
19 May 2017 3500Publius Scribonius Scholasticus Agora can be played in any language. DISMISS by nichdel
19 May 2017 3499Publius Scribonius Scholasticus Agora need not be played in English. DISMISS by nichdel
19 May 2017 3498天火狐 Every statement is ambiguous. FALSE by Gaelan
26 May 2017 3497o The rules forbid a player named 'no Player' from taking any action that requires posting to a public forum. FALSE by Aris
01 Jun 2017 3496Publius Scribonius Scholasticus This report was not actually an officer's report as I published it via deputisation, but I held the office. FALSE by Sprocklem
08 Jun 2017 3495Publius Scribonius Scholasticus A non-player can hold an office and judge judgments. FALSE by o
22 May 2017 3494G. Immediately after my most recent deregistration, I had a Balance Switch with a value greater than 0. FALSE by Aris
28 May 2017 3493Publius Scribonius Scholasticus G.'s heir switch is set to o. FALSE by Aris
30 May 2017 3492grok 天火狐 is a member of 蘭亭社. TRUE by Quazie
22 May 2017 3491grok An Agency's Head is currently defined by the rules. TRUE by ais523
19 May 2017 3490grok An Agency's Head and an Agency Director do not have the same powers. TRUE by ais523
19 May 2017 3489o At this time, AAaAA has not paid any Shinies to any player whatsoever. TRUE by Aris
24 May 2017 3488G. I CAN assign a valid judgement to CFJ 3471 by announcement. TRUE by Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
19 May 2017 3487Aris I am not the Judge of CFJ 3481. FALSE by Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
20 May 2017 3486o My heir switch is now set to Publius Scribonius Scholasticus. FALSE by Aris
24 May 2017 3485Publius Scribonius Scholasticus ais523 successfully transferred a shiny to G. TRUE by o
10 May 2017 3484Aris If proposal 7847 were resolved as passed right now, it would succeed in reenacting rule 2166 at power 2.0. TRUE by ais523
11 May 2017 3483Quazie At least one player regulated action has been performed by Quazie the player, initiated by a message sent by Quazie the person since e became a player. TRUE by G.
5 May 2017 3482G. Repealed Rule 2469 (Dictatorship) is an Instrument with Power-3. FALSE by o
22 May 2017 3481Roujo I own at least one Shiny. FALSE by Aris
13 May 2017 3480Publius Scribonius Scholasticus Zachary Watterson is a player. TRUE by nichdel
5 May 2017 3479Publius Scribonius Scholasticus Agora's To-Do List is a proposal that was in the proposal pool and has been pended. FALSE by Sprocklem
19 May 2017 3478o 蘭亭社's highest allowable budget for a single player is 50. DISMISS by ais523
29 Apr 2017 3477Aris Assuming that Quazie is a player, e has, within the past week, exceeded the Income Cap. TRUE by o
29 Apr 2017 3476o The Warrigal and Zachary Watterson are the same person. DISMISS by P.S.S.
30 Apr 2017 3475Publius Scribonius Scholasticus The dictatorship is an office. DISMISS by G.
28 Apr 2017 3474Publius Scribonius Scholasticus Quazie is a player TRUE by Aris
03 May 2017 3473G. On or around 05-Jan-17 08:07:23 UTC, o caused Agora to pay 10 Shinies to G. TRUE by Quazie
19 May 2017 3472Murphy Josh T has voted PRESENT on the decision on Proposal 7837. FALSE by G.
23 May 2017 3471Murphy Josh T has voted AGAINST on the decision on Proposal 7836. FALSE by G.
23 May 2017 3470�rjan Rule 2168 (Extending the voting period) is capable of extending the voting period of an Agoran decision. FALSE by o
14 Nov 16 3469ais523 At least one Patent Title to be held by something other than a person. DISMISS by Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
20 May 2017 3468ais523 It is possible for circumstances to exist under which is possible to initiate a new Era by announcement. TRUE by Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
20 May 2017 3467ais523 天火狐 is a player. FALSE by G.
06 Jan 2017 3466ais523 It is possible to ratify an Agoran Credit Union report, and have the ratification have some effect. TRUE by nichdel
21 May 2017 3465Alexis If Proposal 7821 were resolved right now, the outcome would be ADOPTED. TRUE by nichdel
19 May 2017 3464Alexis I own a Platinum Ribbon. TRUE by Gaelan
19 May 2017 3463Alexis I own a White Ribbon. TRUE by Gaelan
19 May 2017 3462G. aranea published an ADoP's Report on 20-Oct-16, satisfying eir weekly reporting duties for that office. TRUE by Aris
25 Oct 2016 3461ais523 I voted PRESENT on proposal 7809. FALSE by Alexis
17 Sep 2016 3460G. ais523 holds the patent title Silver Quill 2015/07. FALSE by ais523
14 Sep 2016 3459omd A CFJ was initiated in the last few days whose statement contains the text "BUS:". DISMISS by Murphy
13 Nov 2016 3458ais523 The above-quoted message is a claim of error. FALSE be Sprocklem
13 Oct 2016 3457OscarMeyr OscarMeyr has joined The Agoran Betting Market. FALSE by G.
05 Jan 2017 3456nichdel OscarMeyr hasn't been a player since January 28th, 2014. TRUE by G.
23 Aug 2016 3455nichdel OscarMeyr is not currently a player. TRUE by G.
23 Aug 2016 3454G. Some Agoran Decisions have authors. TRUE by ais523
6 Jan 2017 3453Bucky There is a rule called "Trust Tokens". TRUE by omd
17 Aug 2015 3452G. The text of Rule 1728/33 contains exactly 14 paragraphs. FALSE by o
10 Jun 2017 3451Tristan Bredeweg Proposals 7773 and 7774 will have no effect if passed TRUE by Tiger
10 Aug 2015 3450G. Quazie is a player. FALSE by Roujo
06 Aug 2015 3449scshunt I possess the patent title "Head of the Agoran Ceremonial Mint". FALSE by G.
28 Sep 2015 3448scshunt It is POSSIBLE for a player to win by Raising a Banner and, if a player wins the game, a new game begins. TRUE by G.
22 May 2015 3447aranea aranea won the game. TRUE by scshunt
23 May 2015 3446G. In Rule 2447/0, the "first week" of a month is the Agoran week in which the 1st of the month occurs. FALSE by aranea
28 May 2015 3445G. A violation of R2446 has occurred this week. TRUE by omd
23 May 2015 3444omd scshunt is a player. TRUE by ais523
26 Apr 2015 3443Henri The Short Logical Ruleset published by the Rulekeepor on Wed, 15 Oct 2014 16:48:31 is misleading and therefore is a violation of Rule 2143 (Official Reports and Duties). FALSE by G.
10 Nov 2014 3442omd Points awards for voting are made at the end of the voting period (rather than the time of resolution). DISMISS by G.
10 Nov 2014 3441Murphy The adoption of Proposal 7701 replaced at least two instances of the word "points" in the ruleset with "credits". FALSE by ais523
11 Nov 2014 3440omd I violated Rule 2143 (Official Reports and Duties) on November 3 by publishing a message titled "OFF: [Rulekeepor] Full Logical Ruleset". FALSE by Sprocklem
11 Nov 2014 3439G. CFJ 3429 has exactly one judgement, TRUE. FALSE by omd
10 Nov 2014 3438G. CFJ 3429 has exactly one judgement, FALSE. TRUE by omd
11 Nov 2014 3437G. CFJ 3429 has exactly one judgement, DISMISS. FALSE by omd
10 Nov 2014 3436henri G submitted Proposal: Defining Reasonable Review. TRUE by the Warrigal
25 Nov 2014 3435omd For the purposes of Rule 105, "general player review through a reasonably public process" cannot be achieved with a process which (a) is completed in any fewer than 96 hours, and (b) does not inform players in advance about the amount of time it will take to complete. FALSE by Murphy
15 Nov 2014 3434omd For the purposes of Rule 105, "general player review through a reasonably public process" requires a process whose formal details are known in advance. FALSE by Murphy
15 Nov 2014 3433omd If the Rules unconditionally allow someone to perform a certain rule change by announcement (not as the result of, e.g., a dependent action), then it is generally possible for the "general player review" clause in Rule 105 to be satisfied (e.g. through a formal but non-Rules-specified process). TRUE by Eritivus
13 Nov 2014 3432omd The original version of Rule 2437 (The Dungeon Master) generally allows/allowed the Dungeon Master to set properties of the rule itself. TRUE by Nichdel
12 Nov 2014 3431G. G. is the Arbitor. FALSE by G.
15 Oct 2014 3430nichdel Rule 2429 is paradoxical. FALSE by ais523
09 Oct 2014 3429omd Rule 2437 contains the text "omd CAN cause this rule to amend itself by announcement." FALSE by G.
09 Oct 2014 3428Warrigal If a player X deputises for the IADoP to resolve an IADoP election, and the winner of the election is a player Y other than X, then, one second after the deputisation, barring any intervening effects, Y will be the IADoP. TRUE by Sprocklem
03 Oct 2014 3427ais523 If G. publishes a formal apology that does not contain the words I attempted to prescribe above, this will suffice to let em cast votes other than PRESENT within the next 30 days. FALSE by omd
07 Oct 2014 3426G. G. successfully ratified the document indicated in evidence on 29-Jul-14. FALSE by Sprocklem
01 Oct 2014 3425Murphy If the rules state that a person CAN perform an action, but do not explicitly state how, then e CAN perform it by announcement. FALSE by G.
02 Oct 2014 3424omd There is ambiguity in a rule change specification of the form "Create the following Rule, AI=2, Moving Goalposts { text text text }". FALSE by Henri
29 Jul 2014 3423ais523 The above-quoted statement is true. Mooted by omd
24 Jul 2014 3422G. omd is known as oddly marked derriere. DISMISS by Tiger
27 Jul 2014 3421G. omd is known as offense most dire. DISMISS by Tiger
27 Jul 2014 3420ais523 With the above-quoted message, Henri fulfilled eir obligation under Rule 2201 to deny, publish a revision, or initiate a CFJ in response to G.'s above-quoted CoE. FALSE by Sprocklem
24 Jul 2014 3419scshunt If Rule 1789 were repealed, the obligation on the Registrar to note the method of deregistration of players deregistered by Writ of FAGE would remain. FALSE by Tiger
27 Jul 2014 3418Henri Midnight Monday is defined as 24:00. FALSE by Murphy
13 Jul 2014 3417Henri Scshunt, the Promotor, for violating Rule 1607 (Distribution) for violating Rule 2143 (Official Reports and Duties), and for committing the Class-2 Crime of Tardiness, deserves to be awarded a punishment no less severe than a Yellow Card. TRUE by omd
08 Jul 2014 3416ais523 omd's recent Apology has a signature, and thus did not violate rule 2428. TRUE by Tiger
04 Jul 2014 3415G. Henri has a Red Card. DISMISS by Murphy
13 Jul 2014 3414Yally In the above quoted message, Henri intended, for each mentioned player, to, without objection, deregister em. TRUE by Sprocklem
22 Jul 2014 3413Tiger Rule 2426 (Cards) exists. TRUE by scshunt
19 Jun 2014 3412G. A player CANNOT die. DISMISS by Murphy
15 May 2014 3411G. Dying while a player is a regulated action. DISMISS by Murphy
15 May 2014 3410scshunt The most recent document published by the Registrar purporting to be eir report does not contain all information required by the rules to be included in a Registrar's report. TRUE by ais523
22 Jun 2014 3409ais523 CFJ 3408 is assigned to omd. TRUE by G.
30 Jun 2014 3408Henri The Assessor, scshunt, failed to end the voting period for proposals 7641-7642 in 7 days, thereby violating Rules 107 and 2143. Scshunt has therefore committed the Class-2 Crime of Tardiness. FALSE
09 May 2014 3407G. omd assigned CFJ 3406 using a process that, over time, would allow all interested players have a reasonably equal opportunity to judge DISMISS by scshunt
28 Apr 2014 3406Roujo whether that is a CFJ FALSE by Fool
30 May 2014 3405omd scshunt won the game on 14 April 2014. FALSE by G.
30 Apr 2014 3404ais523 After the above-quoted message by G., my Score was 0. FALSE by omd
24 Mar 2014 3403omd There is generally a conflict between the second paragraph of Rule 2125 and the first paragraph of Rule 478. FALSE by Tiger
24 Feb 2014 3402omd My family's dog Lilly is a person. FALSE by ais523
14 Feb 2014 3401ais523 omd is a player. TRUE by nichdel
27 Feb 2014 3400Tiger The game of Agora has ended. FALSE by woggle
22 Feb 2014 3399Teucer I am the Leader of the Ludocratic Party. UNDETERMINED by omd
22 Oct 2013 3398Bayushi Suppose a player A has breached two different rules B and C simultaneously, such that the breach of B was unavoidable (without breaching a rule creating a crime of higher Class), but not the breach of C, and the crimes created by the breach of the rules both have the same Class; both trials should return NOT GUILTY by cause of requirement e. FALSE by ais523
26 Oct 2013 3397Fool Proposal 7568 passed. Noted unresolved due to rule change
16 Jan 2014 3396omd aperfectring revoked a promise in the quoted message. Noted unresolved due to rule change
16 Jan 2014 3395Walker scshunt of violating rule 1504 by failing to pay this fine in a timely manner. GUILTY by woggle
01 Sep 2013 3394G. aperfectring had declined eir nomination for herald. Noted unresolved due to rule change
16 Jan 2014 3393Walker I violated Rule 2170 by selecting the nickname "wobble" in ##nomic. FALSE by G.
03 Sep 2013 3392Woggle The above-quoted message contained an R2170 claim that it was published by Walker, namely in the From: header. TRUE by ais523
04 Sep 2013 3391Woggle The above-quoted message contained an R2170 claim that it was published by Walker, namely in the From: header. FALSE by ais523
04 Sep 2013 3390roujo Sam is a player. TRUE by ais523
04 Sep 2013 3389Wooble omd, the Registrar, did violate Rule 1789 by failing to public my Cantus Cygneus in a timely fashion after receiving it. GUILTY by woggle
27 Oct 2013 3388Walker omd changed eir posture in the above message. FALSE by Fool
13 Aug 2013 3387teucer Teucer CAN destroy the promise entitled "I've had the time of my life" by announcement. FALSE by ais523
17 Aug 2013 3386Roujo Providing an audio version of the ruleset is a reasonable way to allow vision-impaired persons to play. IRRELEVANT by Fool (affirmed on appeal)
14 Aug 2013⇒3386aAppeal of CFJ 3386Assigned to scshunt (panelist)
12 Aug 2013 3385teucer I am a player. TRUE by Walker
07 Aug 2013 3384ais523 The above-quoted resolution failed because the voting limits of nonplayers and quorum were both stated incorrectly. FALSE by omd
07 Aug 2013 3383scshunt Fool violated Rule 101 by failing to treat Agora right good forever, by purporting to deregister all other players and subsequently lock them out of the game. Appeal 3383a
07 Aug 2013⇒3383aAppeal of CFJ 3383Assigned to Wooble (panelist)
12 Aug 2013 3382Walker I am a player. IRRELEVANT by omd
05 Aug 2013 3381omd I am a player. TRUE by ais523
07 Aug 2013 3380ais523 G.'s votes in the recent General Election were submitted before the voting period ended. FALSE by woggle
06 Sep 2013 3379G. I transferred 1 Yak to omd within 1 second of 17 Jul 2013 15:50:42 +0000. FALSE by ais523
26 Jul 2013 3378G. I have transferred exactly 1 Yak to omd in the past 24 hours. TRUE by ais523
26 Jul 2013 3377Bucky If ais523 immediately replies to that intent with 'I support and do so', I become a member of the same alliance as ais523. FALSE by omd
15 Jul 2013 3376G. Immediately after this message is published, it will be ILLEGAL to cash the promise cited in evidence. FALSE by scshunt
15 Jul 2013 3375G. Immediately after this message is published, it will be IMPOSSIBLE to cash the promise cited in evidence. FALSE by scshunt
15 Jul 2013 3374Bucky If such an agreement existed, would judging that the agreement is effective violate Rule 101? FALSE by scshunt
15 Jul 2013 3373Bucky Would paying omd to not post on the public forums as part of a legally binding agreement between myself and omd cause a violation of Rule 101? FALSE by scshunt
15 Jul 2013 3372lindar Announcing in Agora-Business the creation of a promise that, upon being cashed, causes the player cashing said promise to break a rule, does not cause the creator of said promise to violate R2394, nor does it cause the creator of said promise to violate R2394 upon the cashing of said promise. TRUE by OscarMeyr
07 Aug 2013 3371lindar The term 'player' is incorrect. FALSE by Fool
18 Jul 2013 3370omd In the quoted message, scshunt spent a VC. FALSE by woggle
20 Jul 2013 3369G. This is a frivolous CFJ. IRRELEVANT by omd
15 Jul 2013 3368G. This is a frivolous CFJ. IRRELEVANT by woggle
27 Jul 2013 3367omd I violated the rule enacted by Proposal 7490 by discussing my vote on Proposal 7491 when listing all votes in its resolution. NOT GUILTY by Murphy
17 Jul 2013 3366arkestra I am an elder. FALSE by ais523
21 Jul 2013 3365omd scshunt has violated Rule 2143 (Official Reports and Duties) by failing to publish the holder of each office, etc. last week. Assigned to OscarMeyr
12 Aug 2013⇒3365aAppeal of CFJ 3365Final decision (REMIT)
27 Jul 2013 3364omd The judgement of CFJ 3334 was appropriate. TRUE by woggle
13 Jul 2013 3363Bucky Did Machiavelli successfully attempt to to take an action in the quoted message? TRUE by woggle
13 Jul 2013 3362Walker A party can be a nomic. TRUE by OscarMeyr
25 Jul 2013 3361scshunt It is POSSIBLE for Roujo to, at this time, support and resolve the quoted intent. FALSE by Yally
24 Jul 2013 3360omd scshunt's Victory Announcement of 3 Jul was correct. TRUE by Fool
29 Jul 2013 3359omd scshunt's Victory Announcement of 30 Jun was correct. TRUE by Fool
29 Jul 2013 3358Sgeo It is LEGAL for the Clerk of the Courts to award Yaks to Walker without additional awards or transfers in the same message. TRUE by OscarMeyr
15 Jul 2013 3357Walker Machiavelli violated Rule 1504 by failing to pay this fine. NOT GUILTY by Fool
15 Jul 2013 3355woggle ais523 violated Rule 2170 by selecting a confusing nickname by selecting the nickname "woggle" on an Agoran forum in the quoted message. NOT GUILTY by Murphy
06 Jul 2013 3354woggle Ambassador Abuse is a nomic. UNDETERMINED by omd
04 Jul 2013 3353woggle Ambassador Abuse is an agreement. FALSE by omd
04 Jul 2013 3352Fool Fool has commited the Class-1 Crime of Naughtiness (violating Rule 2356) when he sent the quoted message. GUILTY/DISCHARGE by scshunt
03 Jul 2013 3351Bucky monkey purple dishwasher IRRELEVANT by G.
27 Jun 2013 3350Bucky The answer to the question 'is YES ever a valid judgment to a CfJ that is not in the form of a question?' is yes. FALSE by scshunt
27 Jun 2013 3349ais523 This is another CFJ. TRUE by Walker
01 Jul 2013 3348ais523 This is a CFJ. TRUE by Walker
01 Jul 2013 3347G. If a player is required to make an officer's report, but also holds the Office of Governmental Waste, resigning the office of Governmental Waste is a reasonable way (as per R1504d) to avoid breaking Rule 2395. TRUE by lindar
18 Jul 2013 3346G. scshunt violated R2395 (Government Waste) by publishing the IADoP Report on or about 23-Jun-13. FALSE by lindar
18 Jul 2013 3345FSX Only sentient artificial intelligence systems are second-class persons. FALSE by omd
19 Jun 2013 3344omd Michael Norrish CAN form a government by announcement. FALSE by scshunt
21 Jun 2013 3343omd It is generally possible for a party to send messages. Appealed by ais523
04 Jul 2013⇒3343aAppeal of CFJ 3343
3342scshunt In the quoted text, G. objected to a dependent action. FALSE by Walker
20 Jun 2013 3341Machiavelli If the rules contained the statement "The Assessor CAN revive Benjamin Franklin by announcement", and this statement were not overridden by another rule, then it would be POSSIBLE for the Assessor to revive Benjamin Franklin by announcement. FALSE by woggle
23 Jun 2013 3340Machiavelli If the rules contained the statement "The Assessor CAN revive Benjamin Franklin by announcement", and this statement were not overridden by another rule, and a CFJ were called on the statement "The Assessor CAN revive Benjamin Franklin by announcement", then TRUE would be an appropriate judgement for that CFJ, and FALSE would be an inappropriate judgement for that CFJ. FALSE by woggle
23 Jun 2013 3339Machiavelli If the rules contained the statement "It is LEGAL to shout 'CREAMPUFF' if and only if it is ILLEGAL to shout 'CREAMPUFF'", and this contradiction were not resolved, overridden, or otherwise mitigated by another rule, and a CFJ were called on the statement "It is LEGAL to shout 'CREAMPUFF' if and only if it is ILLEGAL to shout 'CREAMPUFF'", then TRUE would be an appropriate judgement for that CFJ, and FALSE would be an inappropriate judgement for that CFJ. FALSE by woggle
23 Jun 2013 3338Walker Murphy violated Rule 2403 (Judicial Fees) by failing to award the Standard Case Fee to omd as soon as possible after omd judged CFJ 3322. GUILTY/DISCHARGE by omd
17 Jun 2013 3337omd scshunt is an eligible voter on the decision to adopt Proposal 7436. TRUE by G.
19 Jun 2013 3336omd The Assessor violated Rule 208 by failing to resolve Proposals 7437-7452 (two distributions' worth) in a timely fashion after the end of their voting periods. GUILTY/TIME OUT by scshunt
16 Jun 2013 3335scshunt G. failed to report on Ribbons last week and in doing so violated Rule 2143. NOT GUILTY by omd
09 Jun 2013 3334omd It was POSSIBLE for me to destroy '!!!' when I attempted to do so immediately before the initiation of this case. UNDECIDABLE by Walker
11 Jun 2013 3333woggle Rule 649 contains the phrase "As soon as possible after a patent title is awarded or revoked". TRUE by G.
10 Jun 2013 3332Bucky This message successfully initiated a criminal CfJ. TRUE by scshunt
30 May 2013 3331Bucky Bucky committed the class-3 crime of Naughtiness (violating Rule 2356) when he sent the message whose body was "I taunt the police, specifying 3." on June 22nd, 2013. NOT GUILTY by G.
30 May 2013 3330G. Having a salary withheld for failure to complete an officer's duty in a month constitutes a penalty as per R101(vi). FALSE by Murphy
30 May 2013 3329scshunt scshunt has failed to submit an IADoP's report for this week, and in doing so has violated Rule 2143. OVERRULED to NOT GUILTY on Appeal
04 Jul 2013⇒3329aAppeal of CFJ 3329Final decision (OVERRULE/NOT GUILTY)
04 Jul 2013 3328omd In the quoted message, G. paid a cost to cash a promise. TRUE by scshunt
30 May 2013 3327omd It was POSSIBLE for me to cash 'ZipZop Series G-002' when I attempted to do so. TRUE by woggle
23 Jun 2013 3326scshunt It was excessively ambiguous TRUE by woggle
31 May 2013 3325G. Wes CAN cash The Unexpected Cashing 5. FALSE by Walker
01 Jun 2013 3324G. Wes CAN transfer the DOA promise to emself. FALSE by Walker
01 Jun 2013 3323scshunt Murphy violated Rule 2143 by failing to submit the mentioned reports last week. GUILTY/FINE by Walker
27 May 2013 3322Murphy The message quoted in evidence is equivalent to an announcement of intent to register. FALSE by omd
27 May 2013 3321scshunt omd violated Rule 2143 by failing to report on Adoption Index and Chamber last week. NOT GUILTY by ais523
18 May 2013 3320scshunt woggle violated Rule 2143 by failing to report the Short Logical Ruleset last week. NOT GUILTY by omd
09 Jun 2013⇒3320aAppeal of CFJ 3320Final decision (REMAND)
04 Jun 2013 3319scshunt G. violated Rule 2143 by failing to report on Ribbons and Trading Cards last week. GUILTY/APOLOGY by Wes
13 May 2013 3318scshunt Murphy violated Rule 2143 by failing to report on the PVN and on Virtue last week. GUILTY/DISCHARGE by G.
23 Jun 2013⇒3318aAppeal of CFJ 3318Final decision (REMAND)
09 Jun 2013 3317G. djanatyn is a Player. FALSE by scshunt
12 May 2013 3316G. Machiavelli, by publishing the statement cited in Evidence, has violated Rule 2170 (Who am I?) by making a public statement intended to mislead others as to the identity of its publisher. NOT GUILTY by scshunt
12 May 2013 3315G. An agreement exists between a first-class person known as djanatyn and the player Machiavelli, that taken on its own would allow Machiavelli to act on behalf of djanatyn, to register em. FALSE by scshunt
12 May 2013 3314woggle It is POSSIBLE for Horton woggle to destroy a promise titled ODY-1 without objection. FALSE by Murphy
28 Apr 2013 3313woggle It is POSSIBLE to take from the Tree and cash a promise titled ODY-1 by announcement. TRUE by Murphy
28 Apr 2013 3312woggle A promise titled ODY-1 exists. TRUE by Murphy
28 Apr 2013 3311scshunt Murphy violated Rule 2143 by failing to publish a VVLOP report in the previous week. GUILTY/COMMUNITY SERVICE by G.
14 May 2013 3310scshunt Machiavelli violated Rule 2143 by failing to publish the IADoP's report last week. GUILTY/FINE by woggle
18 May 2013 3309Bucky Proposal 7386 failed to fully take effect because it attempted to modify a substantial aspect of Proposal 7411 FALSE by woggle
04 May 2013 3308Roujo scshunt objects to the Ambassador-at-Large's latest intention regarding Psychose Nomic. TRUE by ais523
25 Apr 2013 3307Machiavelli A proposal titled 'Nerf VCs' and authored by omd was distributed within the past seven days. FALSE by scshunt
22 Apr 2013 3306Bucky scshunt satisfies the Victory Condition of Junta due to Rule 2380 FALSE by omd
29 Apr 2013 3305ais523 Rule 2361 has been informed of CFJ 3301. IRRELEVANT by G.
14 Apr 2013 3304scshunt The office of Registrar is Postulated. TRUE by Machiavelli
15 Apr 2013 3303scshunt The office of Registrar is Postulated. TRUE by Machiavelli
15 Apr 2013 3302Wes scshunt CAN, by announcement, cause a proposal to take effect. FALSE by Murphy
14 Apr 2013 3301omd Rule 2361 has violated Rule 101 by failing to treat Agora right good forever. NOT GUILTY by woggle
16 Apr 2013 3300scshunt Rule 2361 is a Slave Golem. FALSE by Murphy
12 May 2013⇒3300aAppeal of CFJ 3300Final decision (REMIT)
12 May 2013 3299woggle It is possible for Rule 2380 to change the text of a proposal. FALSE by omd
14 Apr 2013 3298G. The term "fortnight" in Rule 2143 refers to a span of two Agoran Weeks. TRUE by Machiavelli
30 Mar 2013 3297omd Rule 2386 has been repealed. TRUE by ais523
16 Mar 2013 3296Machiavelli At the time that I judged CFJ 3293 IRRELEVANT, the judgement of IRRELEVANT was appropriate. TRUE by woggle
15 Feb 2013 3295ais523 I CAN nominate Tweedledee in the Herald election TRUE by G.
15 Feb 2013 3294woggle With 1.5 Agoran consent, I CAN destroy the judicial panel composed of Agora and woggle. FALSE by Wes
16 Mar 2013 3293woggle With 1.5 Agoran consent, I CAN destroy the Lost and Found Department. FALSE by Machiavelli
11 Feb 2013 3292woggle The Cayman Islands (a Slave Golem recently in the possession of G.) exists. TRUE by ais523
15 Feb 2013 3291G. When Pavitra published eir 16-Jan-13 Victory Announcement, e satisfied the Victory Condition of Belligerence. FALSE by Murphy
09 Feb 2013 3290Machiavelli there exists a Slave Golem that is a unit. FALSE by Murphy
22 Jan 2013 3289Murphy A Rule titled "The Dictionary" exists. TRUE by G.
11 Mar 2013 3288omd I own multiple Machiavelli trading cards. FALSE by Roujo
13 Nov 2012 3287Roujo The Promise quoted above can be cashed. FALSE by omd
12 Nov 2012 3285ais523 I own a Max Schutz card. TRUE by Murphy
11 Nov 2012 3284Murphy Yally is active. FALSE by G.
14 Nov 2012 3283Pavitra agora-business is a public forum. TRUE by G.
22 Jan 2013 3282omd Proposal 7174 was enacted. AFFIRMED on Appeal
15 Nov 2012⇒3282aAppeal of CFJ 3282Final decision (AFFIRM)
15 Nov 2012 3281scshunt Murphy violated the power 2 Rule 1868 by failing to assign, as soon as possible, a judge to the above cases. GUILTY/APOLOGY by FKA441344
20 Oct 2012 3280scshunt In this message, I caused (possibly indirectly) the repeal of rule 2380 and, at the time, it included the word 'omd'. [My scam failed, and omd's succeeded] FALSE by FKA441344
13 Oct 2012 3279scshunt There is a rule with ID number 2382. [My scam succeeded, as did omd's, but my follow-up repeal failed.] FALSE by FKA441344
13 Oct 2012 3278scshunt In this message, I caused (possibly indirectly) the repeal of rule 2382 and, at the time, it included the word 'omd'. [My scam succeeded, as did omd's, as did my repeal] FALSE by FKA441344
13 Oct 2012 3277scshunt There is a rule with ID number 2384. [My scam succeeded] FALSE by FKA441344
13 Oct 2012 3276FKA441344 I have cashed the promise titled "Agoran Bank of scshunt" TRUE by Machiavelli
16 Nov 2012 3275omd A rule titled "Win by Junta" was enacted in the last 48 hours. FALSE by FKA441344
13 Oct 2012 3274Arkady In the above quoted message of 17th September 2012 at 15:28, Arkady became active. FALSE by Murphy
13 Oct 2012 3273Murphy scshunt's voting limit on the decision to adopt Proposal 7310 is 6. TRUE by omd
27 Sep 2012 3272FKA441344 In the below-quoted message, Arkady spent a ruble. FALSE by G.
27 Sep 2012 3271omd At least one of these decisions was not required to be resolved (R208) because the corresponding proposal was never in the Proposal Pool at the beginning of a week, so a requirement was never created to distribute it (R1607), and the decision was therefore not resolved by deputisation. TRUE by scshunt
27 Sep 2012 3270FKA441344 In the above-quoted message omd spent or destroyed 2 rubles. FALSE by scshunt
27 Sep 2012 3269FKA441344 scshunt violated Rule 2143 by failing to publish the Promotor's report in the week Mon 27 Aug - Sun 02 Sep. GUILTY/APOLOGY by Murphy
13 Oct 2012 3268FKA441344 I have published an ATC report. TRUE by omd
27 Sep 2012 3267scshunt FKA443144 violated Rule 2143 by publishing an IADoP's report indicating that the office of ATC was empty when it was held by FKA443144. GUILTY/APOLOGY by Murphy
27 Sep 2012 3264Machiavelli I have already called a CFJ in this message. (Plaz) TRUE by FKA441344
30 Sep 2012 3263Machiavelli I have already called a CFJ in this message. (Bar) TRUE by FKA441344
30 Sep 2012 3262Machiavelli I have already called a CFJ in this message. (Foo) FALSE by FKA441344
30 Sep 2012 3261G. The bench needs a rotation. FALSE by Murphy
23 Aug 2012 3260omd CFJ 3257 is about the possibility or legality of a rule-defined action. FALSE by ais523
14 Aug 2012 3259scshunt I can cash a promise named A Million Bucks. UNDETERMINED by omd
14 Aug 2012 3258ais523 The message in which this CFJ was initiated is the Ambassador-At-Large's Weekly Report. FALSE by G.
24 Aug 2012 3257Murphy Agora could unlock B Nomic by enacting a rule with Power > 1.1 stating that B Nomic is not in a state of emergency, other rules (in either nomic) to the contrary notwithstanding. UNDETERMINED by omd
14 Aug 2012 3256ais523 In the last few minutes, G. transferred exactly one ruble to ais523. IRRELEVANT by scshunt
01 Aug 2012 3255G. ais523 CAN destroy a ruble. FALSE by scshunt
01 Aug 2012 3254ais523 ais523 CAN destroy a ruble. FALSE by scshunt
01 Aug 2012 3253Pavitra WoodsPam called a CFJ in the quoted message. FALSE by ais523
16 Jul 2012 3252ehird I have cast a vote in the current Promotor election. TRUE by Murphy
16 Jul 2012 3251ais523 omd violated rule 478 by prohibiting me from participating in all the fora. NOT GUILTY by FKA441344
01 Aug 2012 3250omd ais523 violated the rule "The Ambassador-At-Large" (which I haven't numbered yet) by using a power granted to Agora's ambassadors other than as allowed by the rules. NOT GUILTY by FKA441344
01 Aug 2012 3249omd I CAN destroy a promise with the text "CREAMPUFF!". UNDECIDABLE by Murphy
25 Jul 2012 3248G. In the last few minutes, G. transferred exactly one ruble to ais523. FALSE by scshunt
18 Jul 2012 3247G. ais523 CAN destroy a ruble. FALSE by scshunt
18 Jul 2012 3246ais523 ais523 CAN destroy a ruble. FALSE by scshunt
18 Jul 2012 3245Bucky CfJ 3212 is a turtle TRUE by G.
18 Jul 2012 3244Murphy It would be ILLEGAL for a player to publish a message whose body consisted solely of the text "I intend, without objection, to ratify the statement of CFJ 3240.". TRUE by FKA441344
23 Jul 2012 3243Murphy omd initiated a CFJ in the above-quoted message. FALSE by ais523
09 Jul 2012 3242omd 🎩❓ MALFORMED by ais523
09 Jul 2012 3241Phlogistique I have cast a vote on proposal 7261. FALSE by FKA441344
08 Jul 2012 3240Ozymandias The statement "Ozymandias has won the game." and this one have the same truth value. UNDECIDABLE by Murphy
06 Jul 2012 3239FKA441344 omd violated Rule 2143 by failing to distribute by the end of Sun. 24 June proposals in the proposal pool that were in there at the beginning of Mon. 18 June. NOT GUILTY by ais523
05 Jul 2012 3238Murphy Phlogistique registered in the message quoted in evidence. TRUE by G.
28 Jun 2012 3237ais523 The above-quoted message created a CFJ. FALSE by omd
28 Jun 2012 3235Yally In the above quoted Census, FKA441344 created a Slave Golem. FALSE by scshunt
28 Jun 2012 3234OscarMeyr ehird is capable of evoking the power of UNDEAD. UNDECIDABLE by omd
28 Jun 2012 3233Roujo Henri Bouchard is a player. FALSE by FKA441344
28 Jun 2012 3232FKA441344 ais523 violated Rule 2158 by failing to assign judgement to case 3218 ASAP after it was assigned to em. GUILTY/FINE by G.
21 Jun 2012 3231Murphy On or about Tue, 19 Jun 2012 00:43:19 -0400, scshunt transferred a ruble to Machiavelli. FALSE by ais523
25 Jun 2012 3230FKA441344 omd violated Rule 2143 by failing to publish the promotor's weekly report in the week Mon. 11 - Sun. 17. GUILTY/APOLOGY by Murphy
21 Jun 2012 3229FKA441344 scshunt violated Rule 2158 by failing to assign judgement to case 3218 ASAP after it was assigned to em. NOT GUILTY by G.
06 Jul 2012 3228FKA441344 omd violated Rule 2158 by failing to assign judgement to case 3215 ASAP after it was assigned to em. GUILTY/FINE by ais523
25 Jun 2012 3227Bucky Someone committed the crime of Not Doing Your Own Dirty Work when Scapegoat taunted the police. FALSE by Murphy
12 Jun 2012 3226omd I violated Rule 2143 by publishing inaccurate information in the quoted report. GUILTY/COMMUNITY SERVICE by Murphy
12 Jun 2012 3225ehird As [whatever Tanner's name is this month] didn't actually do anything, this is ineffective. FALSE by G.
12 Jun 2012 3224FKA441344 Yes e did. TRUE by scshunt
12 Jun 2012 3223omd Sun, 27 May 2012 14:14:46 +0100 FALSE by G.
12 Jun 2012 3222ais523 There exist CFJs with ID numbers 3217 and 3218, and they are assigned to ais523. TRUE by G.
25 Jul 2012 3221FKA441344 I created more than one CFJ with the above text. FALSE by Machiavelli
04 Jun 2012 3220Machiavelli It is illegal for a player to announce intent to use Ratification Without Objection to ratify a document whose contents are identical to this sentence, without also specifying a reason for ratifying it. UNDECIDABLE by FKA441344
24 Jun 2012 3219Bucky GUILTY (regardless of the sentence) is never an appropriate judgment on a criminal case where the defendant is a Slave Golem. TRUE by G.
08 Jun 2012 3218FKA441344 Earlier in this message, FKA441344 submitted a proposal without paying a cost. TRUE by ais523
19 Jun 2012 3217FKA441344 Earlier in this message, FKA441344 violated Rule 2365 by submitting a proposal without paying the cost. NOT GUILTY by ais523
19 Jun 2012 3216FKA441344 Rule 2350 contains the text "A proposal is a type of entity" TRUE by omd
18 Jun 2012 3215FKA441344 Rule 2350 contains the text "which places the proposal in the Proposal Pool". TRUE by omd
18 Jun 2012 3214omd Creating a proposal adds it to the Proposal Pool. FALSE by scshunt
22 Jun 2012 3213omd Proposals generally take effect before the decision to adopt them is resolved. TRUE by FKA441344
04 Jun 2012 3212Bucky It is illegal for a player to announce intent to use Ratification Without Objection to ratify a document whose contents are identical to this sentence, without also specifying a reason for ratifying it. UNDECIDABLE by FKA441344
19 Jun 2012 3211omd omd violated Rule 2356 by taunting the police. GUILTY/APOLOGY by scshunt
26 May 2012 3210Bucky omd, satisfied the winning condition of Anarchy in connection with that event FALSE by G.
06 Jun 2012 3209Yally scshunt won the game in the above quoted message. TRUE by G.
06 Jun 2012 3208omd A rule-defined entity's name generally CAN be initialized to be the same as another rule-defined entity's name. FALSE by ais523
01 Jun 2012 3207omd A proposal's title generally CAN be changed to be the same as another proposal's title. TRUE by FKA441344
13 May 2012 3206omd 441344 violated Rule 2143 (Official Reports and Duties) by incorrectly stating that there were 7 inactive players (but listing 8) in eir Registrar's Report of April 9. GUILTY/DISCHARGE by ais523
11 May 2012 3205omd 441344 violated Rule 2143 (Official Reports and Duties) by listing G. as active in eir Registrar's Report of March 27. GUILTY/APOLOGY by ais523
11 May 2012 3204FKA441344 omd failed to distribute the proposals currently in the proposal pool that were in there at the beginning of Mon. 16, violating Rule 2143 and committing the Class-2 Crime of Tardiness. GUILTY/APOLOGY by Murphy
06 May 2012 3203FKA441344 Murphy failed to publish the Assessor's report during the week Mon. 16 - Sun. 22, violating Rule 2143 and committing the Class-2 Crime of Tardiness. GUILTY/COMMUNITY SERVICE by scshunt
06 May 2012 3202Yally If I intentionally typed "became" instead of "become" I would currently be active. TRUE by G.
08 May 2012 3201Yally I am currently active. TRUE by G.
08 May 2012 3200Bucky The Executor of actions performed by announcement in a cashed promise is generally the same as the Executor of the message in which the promise was cashed. FALSE by scshunt
09 Apr 2012 3199omd Murphy violated Rule 2168 by failing to issue a humiliating public reminder to the slackers who did not cast any votes on Proposals 7191-7196 and 7198-7200 despite being eligible. GUILTY/APOLOGY by FKA441344
09 Apr 2012 3198Bucky BuckyBot's Rule 101 rights to initiate a process to resolve matters of controversy have been violated. UNDETERMINED by omd
08 Apr 2012 3197Murphy omd submitted a proposal in the message quoted in evidence. FALSE by scshunt
09 Apr 2012 3196Murphy scshunt has cast a valid vote on Proposal 7196. TRUE by omd
29 Mar 2012 3195FKA441344 BobTHJ was a player on or about Mar 15 2012 and on or about Mar 19 2012 FALSE by Murphy
07 Apr 2012 3194ais523 ehird violated rule 2205 by submitting a CFJ without submitting such arguments and/or evidence (relevant to that case) as e were reasonably able to collect, nor understanding the full implications of failing to submit such arguments and carefully weighing them. GUILTY/APOLOGY by Murphy
26 May 2012 3193ehird kcnomic is mister snuggles. FALSE by ais523
02 Apr 2012 3192ais523 kcnomic is a player. TRUE by Murphy
29 Mar 2012 3191Bucky The Executor of the message quoted in the evidence cannot be determined with reasonable effort except by judicial declaration IRRELEVANT by FKA441344
09 Apr 2012 3190Murphy omd violated Rule 2170 (Power=3) by selecting a confusing nickname for eir golem previously named Mr. Incredible. NOT GUILTY by ais523
11 May 2012 3189ehird I am Spartacus. IRRELEVANT by Murphy
06 May 2012 3188ais523 I am Mr. Snuggles. FALSE by scshunt
20 Mar 2012 3187Murphy Mister Snuggles is a player. FALSE by FKA441344
30 Mar 2012 3186Murphy To initiate a criminal case, Rule 1504 requires specifying exactly one action the Accused allegedly performed or failed to perform. TRUE by omd
11 Mar 2012 3185Murphy To initiate a criminal case, Rule 1504 requires specifying exactly one rule allegedly violated by the Accused's action/inaction. TRUE by omd
11 Mar 2012 3184Murphy To initiate a criminal case, Rule 1504 requires specifying exactly one person as the Accused. TRUE by omd
11 Mar 2012 3183FKA441344 The Golem created by omd is a player FALSE by Murphy
20 Mar 2012 3182ehird omd is a player. TRUE by G.
11 Mar 2012 3181FKA441344 Mr. Incredible changed his name to {'} to deregister. MALFORMED by ais523
16 Mar 2012 3180FKA441344 Mr. Incredible changed his name to {. I cause} to deregister. MALFORMED by ais523
16 Mar 2012 3179ais523 ais523 violated rule 2170 by selecting the confusing nickname "callforjudgement" on multiple non-Agoran fora. FALSE by FKA441344
15 Mar 2012 3178FKA441344 An Agoran Decision on proposal 7174 was initiated and Murphy was an eligible voter on it. FALSE by Murphy
09 Mar 2012 3177FKA441344 The notice of intent to initiate an Agoran Decision on proposal 7174 was invalid. TRUE by Murphy
09 Mar 2012 3176Yally The Registrar's Report includes within its list of all players a list of all Golems. UNDETERMINED by omd
09 Mar 2012 3175ehird comex would be a player if the quoted statement were sent to agora-business. TRUE by Murphy
24 Feb 2012 3174ehird comex is a player. TRUE by Murphy
24 Feb 2012 3173Murphy Number Two's Rule 101 rights have been violated. FALSE by FKA441344
11 Mar 2012 3172Murphy Number Two is a player. FALSE by FKA441344
27 Feb 2012 3171omd ais523 is inactive. FALSE by G.
26 Feb 2012 3170G. The Prisoner's R101(vii) rights have been violated. FALSE by FKA441344
27 Feb 2012 3169G. The Prisoner is a player. TRUE by ais523
10 Mar 2012 3168G. The Person Formerly Known As 441344 selected the nickname "The Person Formerly Known As 441344", violating Rule 2170 (Who Am I?). NOT GUILTY by omd
24 Feb 2012 3167scshunt Murphy is a complete idiot. IRRELEVANT by omd
24 Feb 2012 3166ehird I supported the intents to reconsider CFJs 3140 and 3141. TRUE by G.
16 Feb 2012 3165ais523 omd is a complete idiot. IRRELEVANT by Murphy
24 Feb 2012 3164FSX ehird committed the Class-14 Crime of Naughtiness. (Rule 2356) GUILTY/TIME OUT by ais523
02 Apr 2012 3163FSX I committed the Class-1 Crime of Naughtiness. (Rule 2356) GUILTY/APOLOGY by FKA441344
24 Feb 2012 3162G. G. is the only OmNom player. UNDETERMINED by omd
05 Feb 2012 3161G. Immediately prior to this messsage, 441344 was a player as defined by the published OmNom Constitution. UNDETERMINED by omd
05 Feb 2012 3160G. If OmNom becomes a player as a result of a recently-published intent-to-register, all OmNom reports must be published in Agora to be considered reports. IRRELEVANT by omd
05 Feb 2012 3159Machiavelli When 441344 registered, "441344" was a confusing nickname, for the purposes of Rule 2170. FALSE by G.
14 Feb 2012 3158Machiavelli The name "441344" has generally been used to refer to an entity other than 441344 within the three months preceding 441344's registration. UNDETERMINED by G.
14 Feb 2012 3157Machiavelli The name "441344" has generally been used to refer to the number 441344 within the three months preceding 441344's registration. UNDETERMINED by G.
14 Feb 2012 3156G. If a non-player is ratified to be a player via the register's report, without eir explicit permission, the ratification fails. FALSE by FKA441344
29 Jan 2012 3155G. If a report that contains a "recent history" section is ratified, it also ratifies the fact that any missing events pertaining to that report, that might have otherwise occurred between the earliest and latest recorded events, did not occur. FALSE by Murphy
05 Feb 2012 3154ais523 The above-quoted message caused Tiger to deregister. FALSE by FKA441344
29 Jan 2012 3153FKA441344 G. failed to publish the Herald's monthly report during the month December 2011, violating Rule 2143 and committing the Class-2 Crime of Tardiness. GUILTY/APOLOGY by Murphy
24 Feb 2012 3152FKA441344 Murphy failed to publish the IADoP's report, the Assessor's report, and the Registrar's report during the week Mon. 16 - Sun. 22, violating Rule 2143 and committing the Class-2 Crime of Tardiness. GUILTY/APOLOGY by Pavitra
09 Feb 2012 3151FKA441344 omd failed to publish the Promotor's report during the week Mon. 16 - Sun. 22 and distribute the proposals currently in the proposal pool that were in there at the beginning of Mon. 16, violating Rule 2143 and committing the Class-2 Crime of Tardiness. NOT GUILTY by G.
25 Feb 2012 3150FKA441344 There are currently no Objectors to any of my declared intents. TRUE by Murphy
28 Jan 2012 3148FKA441344 Initiating a CFJ on one's own playerhood does not reasonably unambiguously indicate intent to become a player TRUE by Pavitra
28 Jan 2012 3147FKA441344 No actions were performed by announcement due to the first 6 lines of the above-quoted message FALSE by omd
14 Jan 2012 3146Turiski I am a player. FALSE by Pavitra
24 Jan 2012 3145Arkady The statement "Amend Rule xxxx/yy" is equivalent to "Amend Rule xxxx IFF its revision number is yy." TRUE by omd
08 Feb 2012 3144FSX Rule 2351 indirectly allows players to make arbitrary modifications to the game state. FALSE by Machiavelli
15 Jan 2012 3143teucer Submitting a CFJ on one's own playerhood might reasonably be interpreted as a request to join this game. TRUE by Murphy
24 Jan 2012 3142ehird David Jackman is a player. TRUE by Murphy
10 Jan 2012 3141ais523 If, during a Holiday, the CotC assigns a judge to a judicial case other than emself, that judge has violated rule 1769. TRUE by FKA441344
13 Feb 2012 3140ais523 If, during a Holiday, the CotC assigns a judge to a judicial case other than emself, the CotC has violated rule 1769. FALSE by FKA441344
13 Feb 2012 3139omd Pavitra violated Rule 2143 (Official Reports and Duties) by publishing information stating that the report is about elephants, trees, and/or the EPA. NOT GUILTY by G.
29 Jan 2012 3138Pavitra A Promise titled "I want blood!" exists. FALSE by G.
16 Jan 2012 3137ais523 With no changes to rule 2333, nor to other rules that would change how rule 2333 is interpreted, if a contestmaster announces that one or more persons "win the contest", and then someone announces that all those players satisfy the Victory Condition of Victory, doing so would be a true Victory Announcement. FALSE by omd
14 Jan 2012 3136ais523 If and when the Victory Announcement in the same message that created this CFJ self-ratifies, if the rules regarding victory have not changed since, then ais523 will Win the Game. FALSE by Pavitra
15 Dec 2011 3135omd In the quoted message, Murphy assigned a judge to a CFJ. FALSE by Pavitra
19 Feb 2012 3134woggle mister snuggles violated rule 2170 making a public statement intended to mislead others as to the identity of the publisher, namely the above quoted message. NOT GUILTY by G.
12 Dec 2011 3133Wooble Wooble is a player. TRUE by Murphy
10 Dec 2011 3132Bucky A judgment of EXILE has no effect if the defendant is not a player when it has been continuously and effectively assigned for a week. FALSE by woggle
11 Dec 2011 3131Bucky Scshunt violated a rule with his judgment on the Criminal Case above. FALSE by woggle
11 Dec 2011 3130Murphy ehird is a player. FALSE by ais523
07 Dec 2011 3129ehird Do or did I register. ? UNDETERMINED by Pavitra
08 Dec 2011 3128Bucky The above purported attempt to initiate a criminal CfJ failed because it did not allege that the defendent violated the rule it named. FALSE by G.
05 Dec 2011 3127Murphy Bucky committed the Class-6 Crime of Naughtiness (as defined by Rule 2356) by publishing the message quoted in evidence. GUILTY/EXILE by scshunt
07 Dec 2011 3126Murphy Committing a crime violates the rule defining it as a crime, even if the rule does not explicitly define it as a violation. TRUE by scshunt
20 Nov 2011 3125ais523 scshunt broke rule 2338 by cashing a promise with insufficient context. NOT GUILTY by omd
19 Nov 2011 3124G. The text labelled in this message as a Victory Announcement is a factually-correct Victory Announcement. FALSE by omd
13 Dec 2011 3123ais523 I exist. TRUE by Pavitra
10 Nov 2011 3122scshunt I am sitting. TRUE by ais523
13 Nov 2011 3121scshunt Agora is stuck in an infinite loop. FALSE by Murphy
10 Nov 2011 3120ais523 ais523 violated a SHOULD requirement in rule 2205 by submitting this CFJ. FALSE by woggle
22 Nov 2011 3119woggle ais523 has submitted a ballot on the decision to adopt proposal 7135. TRUE by ais523
05 Nov 2011 3118Bucky This CfJ is a Delve TRUE by Machiavelli
10 Nov 2011 3117ais523 The set of rule picks in the above-quoted message was made at random. TRUE by woggle
14 Nov 2011 3116G. If the Promise cited in CFJ 3114 were cashed by ais523, G. would generally be found NOT GUILTY of the resulting violation. FALSE by Murphy
24 Oct 2011 3115ais523 It would be ILLEGAL for me to cash the above-quoted promise. FALSE by Pavitra
24 Oct 2011 3114ais523 If I cashed the above-quoted promise, it would cause G. to violate a rule. TRUE by woggle
24 Oct 2011 3113Machiavelli Agora wishes to counteract a decision if and only if the decision would substantially violate a person's rights as defined by Rule 101 FALSE by G.
21 Nov 2011 3112Machiavelli There does not exist a decision that could be made right now such that Agora wishes to counteract that decision. UNDETERMINED by scshunt
06 Nov 2011 3111Bucky The documents "Victory Condition of Being Bucky" and "Victory Condition of Being Pavitra" either are Victory Conditions or define specific Victory Conditions. FALSE by omd
23 Oct 2011 3110Pavitra I (Pavitra) satisfy the Victory Condition of Being Pavitra, by means of sending this message. Assigned to Murphy
23 Oct 2011 3109Bucky Bucky has satisfied the Victory Condition of Being Bucky UNDETERMINED by omd
24 Oct 2011 3108Bucky AmarChandra Ganna is a player FALSE by Pavitra
22 Oct 2011 3107Bucky omd has stirred up prejudice and ill-will against Agora among the Artists of Blognomic by sending the message quoted in Evidence to a public forum and several members of Blognomic. In doing so, he violated Rule 101 by failing to treat Agora right good forever. NOT GUILTY by G.
21 Oct 2011 3106omd A public message sent by mr.snuglz@gmail.com has caused the initiation of a CFJ. FALSE by G.
07 Nov 2011 3105scshunt In the above-quoted message, or as a direct result thereof, Mister Snuggles called a CFJ. FALSE by G.
07 Nov 2011 3104Murphy G. became a player as a result of ais523's message quoted in evidence. FALSE by scshunt
21 Oct 2011 3103Murphy G. became a player as a result of eir message quoted in evidence. FALSE by scshunt
21 Oct 2011 3102scshunt The quoted comment in square brackets constitutes a condition for Rule 1728(d). FALSE by Murphy
18 Oct 2011 3101Murphy This is a CFJ TRUE by woggle
18 Oct 2011 3100scshunt Wooble is a player TRUE by ais523
11 Oct 2011 3099omd freehsophia@gmail.com violated Rule 2170 by making a public statement intended to mislead others as to the identity of its publisher, specifically by including three different signatures in a single message. GUILTY/EXILE by scshunt
16 Sep 2011 3098woggle CFJ 3072a has been judged. FALSE by omd
11 Sep 2011 3097Wooble Walker violated the Power-2 Rule 2154 by failing to, in place of initiating an Agoran Decision, announce that there were no candidates for Promotor and ending the election, as soon as possible after the nomination period ended. GUILTY/APOLOGY by Murphy
10 Sep 2011 3096Wooble Walker violated the Power-2 Rule 2154 by failing to, in place of initiating an Agoran Decision, announce that there were no candidates for Rulekeepor and ending the election, as soon as possible after the nomination period ended. GUILTY/APOLOGY by Murphy
10 Sep 2011 3095scshunt Murphy violated the 1-Power Rule 2168 by failing to initiate a humiliating public reminder that the voting period for Proposal 7106 was extended. NOT GUILTY by Pavitra
10 Sep 2011 3094scshunt Murphy violated the 1-Power Rule 2168 by failing to initiate a humiliating public reminder that the voting period for Proposal 7105 was extended. NOT GUILTY by Pavitra
10 Sep 2011 3093scshunt Murphy violated the 1-Power Rule 2168 by failing to initiate a humiliating public reminder that the voting period for Proposal 7104 was extended. NOT GUILTY by Pavitra
10 Sep 2011 3092scshunt Murphy violated the 1-Power Rule 2168 by failing to initiate a humiliating public reminder that the voting period for Proposal 7103 was extended. NOT GUILTY by Pavitra
10 Sep 2011 3091scshunt Murphy violated the 1-Power Rule 2168 by failing to initiate a humiliating public reminder that the voting period for Proposal 7102 was extended. GUILTY/FINE by Pavitra
10 Sep 2011 3090Wooble Tiger violated the power-1 Rule 2352 by failing to attempt to cause Agora to become a player of BlogNomic as soon as possible after e became Ambassador. GUILTY/COMMUNITY SERVICE by Murphy
14 Aug 2011 3089Machiavelli I am Arkady English FALSE by omd
10 Sep 2011 3088Bucky If a non-player person who is not the game of Agora were otherwise able to make arbitrary gamestate changes by announcement, Rule 2351 would prevent em from doing so. FALSE by scshunt
27 Aug 2011 3087Bucky Agora can make arbitrary changes to the gamestate. UNDECIDABLE by scshunt
27 Aug 2011 3086G. Agora's right to participate in the fora is substantially limited. FALSE by woggle
12 Sep 2011 3085Bucky The repair shop mentioned in the evidence violated Rule 101(v) by detaining Roujo's laptop FALSE by Murphy
14 Aug 2011 3084Wooble H. CotC Murphy violated the Power-2 rule 1868 by failing to assign a judge to the above judicial case as soon as possible after it became Open. GUILTY/COMMUNITY SERVICE by omd
09 Aug 2011 3083Walker omd violated Rule 2143 (Official Reports and Duties) by failing to distribute proposals in the week beginning 27th June. GUILTY/DISCHARGE by woggle
13 Aug 2011 3082Walker scshunt violated Rule 2143 (Official Reports and Duties) by failing to publish the Horton's report in the week beginning 27th June. GUILTY/FINE by Pavitra
08 Aug 2011 3081Walker omd violated Rule 2143 (Official Reports and Duties) by failing to publish the SLR in the week beginning 27th June. GUILTY/FINE by woggle
13 Aug 2011 3080Walker omd violated Rule 1504 (Criminal Cases) by failing to destroy or transfer to the L&F Department the 25 Points e was FINED in relation to CFJ 3058 within the time limit. GUILTY/COMMUNITY SERVICE by woggle
13 Aug 2011 3079Walker Murphy violated Rule 1504 (Criminal Cases) by failing to destroy or transfer to the L&F Department the 7 Points e was FINED in relation to CFJ 3055 within the time limit. GUILTY/APOLOGY by scshunt
08 Aug 2011 3078woggle Tanner L. Swett has satisfied the Victory Condition of Anarchy. FALSE by Murphy
10 Sep 2011 3077omd An action taken with Agoran Consent "depends on objections or notice" as used in Rule 1728. TRUE by Machiavelli
12 Aug 2011 3076Arkady The player with the e-mail address 'geoffspear@gmail.com' (Wooble) is a player. UNDETERMINED by scshunt
10 Sep 2011 3075Walker Yally violated Rule 2157 (Judicial Panels) by failing to act to ensure that the judicial panel of scshunt, Yally and Pavitra satisfied its obligations with regards to CFJs 3028a and 3029a. GUILTY/DISCHARGE by ais523
23 Aug 2011 3074Walker omd violated Rule 1504 (Criminal Cases) by failing to destroy the 13 Points e was FINED in CFJ 3054 within the time limit. GUILTY/DISCHARGE by woggle
08 Aug 2011 3073Walker scshunt violated Rule 1504 (Criminal Cases) by failing to destroy the 4 Points e was FINED in CFJ 3053 within the time limit. GUILTY/DISCHARGE by Pavitra
11 Sep 2011⇒3073aAppeal of CFJ 3073Final decision (REMAND)
11 Sep 2011 3072Walker scshunt violated Rule 1504 (Criminal Cases) by failing to destroy the 4 Points e was FINED in CFJ 3052 within the time limit. GUILTY/DISCHARGE by Pavitra
11 Sep 2011⇒3072aAppeal of CFJ 3072Final decision (REMAND)
11 Sep 2011 3071omd Proposal 7095 created a rule. TRUE by ais523
12 Aug 2011 3070Arkady The president has been deregistered FALSE by Pavitra
14 Aug 2011 3069ais523 Arkady English was a player throughout the entire day of 16 July 2011 FALSE by Pavitra
25 Jul 2011 3068Walker scshunt violated Rule 2143 (Official Reports and Duties) by failing to publish the IADoP's report in the week beginning 27th June. GUILTY/APOLOGY by Pavitra
10 Sep 2011⇒3068aAppeal of CFJ 3068Final decision (REMIT)
13 Aug 2011 3067Walker omd violated Rule 2143 (Official Reports and Duties) by failing to publish the contents of the proposal pool in the week beginning 27th June. GUILTY/FINE by Murphy
08 Aug 2011 3066Walker omd violated Rule 2143 (Official Reports and Duties) by failing to publish the contents of the proposal pool in the week beginning 20th June. GUILTY/FINE by Murphy
08 Aug 2011 3065Walker Murphy violated Rule 208 by failing to resolve the decisions on whether to adopt proposals 7081-7083 as soon as possible after the end of their voting periods. GUILTY/FINE by woggle
27 Jul 2011 3064Murphy scshunt has cast two votes endorsing Murphy on Proposal 7086. FALSE by Machiavelli
30 Jul 2011 3063G. Rule 2344 contains the text "Murphy CAN cause this rule to make arbitrary rule changes by announcement." FALSE by Walker
12 Jul 2011 3062Pavitra One second after the above-quoted message was sent, Tanner L. Swett owned the Promise created in the quoted text. TRUE by G.
07 Jul 2011 3061ais523 ais523 has more than 50 points. FALSE by woggle
20 Aug 2011 3060Walker Murphy violated Rule 1868 (Judge Assignment Generally) by failing to assign a judge to the Criminal CFJ "accusing Murphy of failing to publish a CotC report in the week of May 30" within a week of its initiation. NOT GUILTY by woggle
04 Jul 2011 3059Walker omd violated Rule 2143 (Official Reports and Duties) by failing to distribute proposals in the week beginning 20th June. NOT GUILTY by Yally
12 Jul 2011 3058Walker omd violated Rule 2143 (Official Reports and Duties) by failing to publish the SLR in the week beginning 20th June. GUILTY/FINE by Yally
12 Jul 2011 3057Walker scshunt violated Rule 2143 (Official Reports and Duties) by failing to publish the Horton's weekly report in the week beginning 20th June. GUILTY/FINE by Pavitra
04 Jul 2011 3056Walker scshunt violated Rule 2143 (Official Reports and Duties) by failing to publish the IADoP's weekly report in the week beginning 20th June. GUILTY/FINE by Pavitra
04 Jul 2011 3055Walker Murphy violated Rule 1868 (Judge Assignment Generally) by failing to assign a judge to the CFJ on "The terms Winning Condition and Victory Condition are synonymous." within a week of its initiation. GUILTY/FINE by woggle
08 Jul 2011 3054Walker omd violated Rule 2143 (Official Reports and Duties) by failing to perform a distribution in the week beginning 20th June. GUILTY/FINE by Yally
12 Jul 2011 3053Walker scshunt violated Rule 2143 (Official Reports and Duties) by failing to publish the Horton's weekly report in the week beginning 13th June. GUILTY/FINE by Pavitra
04 Jul 2011 3052Walker scshunt violated Rule 2143 (Official Reports and Duties) by failing to publish the IADoP's weekly report in the week beginning 13th June. GUILTY/FINE by Pavitra
04 Jul 2011 3051Machiavelli I called a criminal CFJ in this message, with Ed Murphy as the Accused TRUE by omd
06 Jul 2011 3050Machiavelli I called a criminal CFJ in this message TRUE by omd
04 Jul 2011 3049Walker Chamber is a switch. FALSE by scshunt
03 Jul 2011 3048Walker Walker has satisfied the Victory Condition of Accumulation. GLORY by omd
05 Jul 2011 3047ais523 I created a CFJ, other than this one, in this message. TRUE by woggle
04 Jul 2011 3046ais523 (see evidence) MALFORMED by woggle
03 Jul 2011 3045Wooble Gondolier is a Player. TRUE by Murphy
04 Jul 2011 3044Bucky The terms Winning Condition and Victory Condition are synonymous. IRRELEVANT by Machiavelli
05 Jul 2011 3043Murphy Tanner L. Swett has voted (endorse Murphy, or if e doesn't vote then AGAINST) on Proposal 7083. TRUE by G.
07 Jul 2011 3042Murphy Tanner L. Swett has voted (endorse Murphy) on Proposal 7081. TRUE by G.
07 Jul 2011 3041Pavitra Pavitra is a player. FALSE by woggle
19 Sep 2011 3040Pavitra Pavitra is a player. FALSE by woggle
19 Sep 2011 3039Machiavelli Just now, I published the word 'smaller' a total of at least eight times. FALSE by Yally
12 Jul 2011 3038Machiavelli e^(i*pi) + 1 = 0 TRUE by Yally
12 Jul 2011 3037Yally It is possible to send the American Sign language word for "run" via a public message. TRUE by Walker
21 Jun 2011 3036omd Under the ruleset in place during the decision to adopt Proposal 7077, a vote of "FOR" is implicitly treated as "FOR, FOR" TRUE by woggle
24 Jun 2011 3035omd At least one vote of "FOR, FOR" on the decision to adopt Proposal 7077 is valid. TRUE by woggle
24 Jun 2011 3034Murphy Rule 2344 was amended in the same message that this case was initiated. FALSE by Walker
18 Jun 2011 3033Murphy Pavitra is a player. FALSE by Yally
16 Jun 2011 3032Wooble Wooble is a candidate in the current Promotor election. FALSE by scshunt
16 Jun 2011 3031Pavitra Droowl is a player. TRUE by Murphy
18 Jun 2011 3030scshunt When enacted, a proposal performs the changes stipulated in its text UNDETERMINED by G.
16 Jun 2011 3029omd I violated R2143 by failing to distribute proposals during the week of May 22-28. GUILTY/APOLOGY by Machiavelli
08 Aug 2011⇒3029aAppeal of CFJ 3029Final decision (REMAND)
14 Jul 2011 3028omd I violated R2143 by failing to distribute proposals during the week of May 8-14. GUILTY/APOLOGY by Machiavelli
08 Aug 2011⇒3028aAppeal of CFJ 3028Final decision (REMAND)
14 Jul 2011 3027scshunt It is POSSIBLE for the above promise to be cashed. TRUE by Murphy
26 May 2011 3026Murphy Agora is Satisfied with Wooble's recent intent to register with Agoran Consent. TRUE by omd
19 May 2011 3025Murphy In the message quoted in evidence, ehird did not clearly communicate the performance of any specific action other than publishing the message. TRUE by Machiavelli
19 May 2011 3024Murphy If the minimum period for Agoran consent was one day instead of four days, and Wooble's recent intent to register with Agoran consent had received more supporters than objectors, then Wooble would be a player. FALSE by scshunt
19 May 2011 3023Murphy scshunt has cashed a promise created by omd. FALSE by Walker
19 May 2011 3022Walker scshunt gained points for CFJ 3011. FALSE by omd
16 Jun 2011 3021Turiski Tanner Swett's most recent ENDORSE vote caused him to vote AGAINST. FALSE by G.
17 May 2011 3020scshunt If Proposal 7045 were enacted, The Speed would exist as a unique thing. FALSE by Walker
21 May 2011 3019scshunt There exists exactly one single. FALSE by Walker
21 May 2011 3018Bucky In the message quoted in the Evidence whose author was scshunt, the author violated Rule 2205 and/or 2152 by not carefully weighing the implications of failing to explicitly label his arguments and/or evidence FALSE by G.
19 May 2011 3017scshunt In the message quoted, Tanner L. Swett violated a rule. FALSE by ais523
17 May 2011 3016omd I have over 250 points. FALSE by Murphy
15 May 2011 3015omd I created points more than once in this message. FALSE by Murphy
15 May 2011 3014Murphy If the promise quoted in evidence with the alleged condition "This promise is not destroyed upon being cashed" was cashed, then it would not be destroyed. TRUE by ais523
28 Apr 2011 3013Yally Murphy's assignment of judges to the appeal case of this case's decision on sentencing was invalid, because he did not define Max(3, 1+2*R) judges. That is, e did not assign a panel of size undefined. TRUE by G.
29 Apr 2011 3012omd I violated Rule 2158 by failing to assign a judgement to CFJ 2664 ASAP. NOT GUILTY by Walker
30 Apr 2011 3011ais523 I can cash a promise made in the same message in which this CFJ was called. FALSE by scshunt
05 May 2011 3010scshunt An entity poorly qualified to judge a case is necessarily not unqualified to judge that case. TRUE by Machiavelli
16 May 2011 3009scshunt An entity poorly qualified to judge a case is necessarily qualified to judge that case. TRUE by Machiavelli
16 May 2011 3008Turiski The FLR published on 12 April 2011 is incomplete. IRRELEVANT by G.
26 Apr 2011 3007Bucky Two instances of the same sentence in different contexts are different statements. FALSE by scshunt
05 May 2011 3006Murphy Notice of Violation 20110420a is valid. TRUE by ais523
28 Apr 2011 3005G. A CFJ has been called by Turiski. FALSE by omd
24 Apr 2011 3004Walker Yally violated Rule 1504, a Power-2 Rule, by becoming active during eir TIME OUT period. AFFIRMED on Appeal
06 May 2011⇒3004aAppeal of CFJ 3004Final decision (AFFIRM)
28 Apr 2011⇒3004bAppeal of CFJ 3004Final decision (AFFIRM)
06 May 2011 3003G. If the Rules state that a person can do Y by "publishing" X, then it's functionally equivalent to saying Y can be done "by announcement" of X. FALSE by ais523
22 Apr 2011 3002omd CFJ 2999 exists. FALSE by G.
20 Apr 2011 3001Murphy G. performed at least one dependent action in the message quoted in evidence. TRUE by omd
28 Apr 2011 3000Murphy In general, if a purported action by announcement is accompanied by a disclaimer equivalent to "this may be ineffective", without indicating why it may be ineffective, then the action is ineffective due to ambiguity. FALSE by omd
20 May 2011 2998Roujo At least one of the actions in the quoted message succeeded. TRUE by Murphy
15 May 2011 2997omd Under the ruleset proposed by P7015, it is generally possible to cause the Registrar to change the publicity of a forum by cashing a promise. FALSE by Walker
22 Apr 2011 2996omd Under the ruleset proposed by P7015, the conditions under which a promise are not destroyed must also be conditions required to be true for the promise to be cashed. TRUE by ais523
22 Apr 2011 2995ais523 Yally is a player. TRUE by Murphy
19 Apr 2011 2994Wooble Walker withdrew the proposal that was purportedly distributed with the ID 6996. TRUE by Murphy
28 Apr 2011 2993ehird Florw is a player. omd recused
17 Apr 2011 2992Quazie I am a player. TRUE by Walker
16 Apr 2011 2991ehird Quazie is a player. TRUE by Walker
26 Apr 2011 2990Walker omd has more than 0 points. TRUE by Murphy
15 May 2011 2989Walker Wooble has more than 0 points. FALSE by Murphy
15 Apr 2011 2988Walker Walker has more than 0 points. FALSE by Murphy
15 Apr 2011 2987scshunt If a player were to win the game, the game would end. FALSE by G.
15 Apr 2011 2986Murphy There is at least one rule with ID number 1. FALSE by Wooble
06 Apr 2011 2985Walker Yally violated Rule 1504 (a Power 2 Rule) by becoming active during eir timeout period. GUILTY/TIME OUT by G.
06 Apr 2011 2984Wooble Yally became Active when he appealed the question on sentencing in CFJ 2982. TRUE by omd
06 Apr 2011 2983omd G. published an invalid NoV in the quoted message. TRUE by Wooble
31 Mar 2011 2982Wooble Yally violated R2143, committing the Class 2 crime of Tardiness, by failing to publish the Registrar's report last week. AFFIRMED on Appeal
04 Apr 2011⇒2982aAppeal of CFJ 2982Final decision (AFFIRM)
04 Apr 2011 2981omd It is generally possible for the Rulekeepor to assign rule ID numbers. TRUE by Murphy
21 Mar 2011 2980Murphy ais523 is a player. TRUE by omd
04 Apr 2011⇒2980aAppeal of CFJ 2980Final decision (REMAND)
01 Apr 2011 2979ais523 I register FALSE by scshunt
24 Apr 2011⇒2979aAppeal of CFJ 2979Final decision (REMIT)
15 Apr 2011 2978G. Tanner Swett is a player. TRUE by Murphy
20 Mar 2011 2977Murphy MRW and Associates is a second-class person. FALSE by G.
22 Mar 2011 2976omd The President is Rule 2326. FALSE by G.
11 Mar 2011 2975G. Scamster is currently a defined patent title. IRRELEVANT by omd
11 Mar 2011 2974Murphy Viewing the web page http://www.516.ru/ru/ counts as "reading the Vladivostok telephone directory". UNDETERMINED by G.
28 Feb 2011 2973omd If I registered in the quoted message, I would currently be District. TRUE by Murphy
27 Feb 2011 2972Murphy omd is a player. TRUE by G.
28 Feb 2011 2971G. In general, a conditional attempts to register fail. FALSE by Murphy
27 Feb 2011 2970Bucky It is generally possible for Bucky to register by a means of honorable deregistration. FALSE by omd
05 Mar 2011 2969Bucky Bucky CAN register emself. TRUE by Murphy
27 Feb 2011 2968omd At the time e most recently purported to do so, it was POSSIBLE for G. to make ehird Quiet. FALSE by G.
28 Feb 2011 2967ais523 Any statement I make is automatically correct, unless contradicted by a rule with higher precedence than rule 2316. FALSE by Murphy
27 Feb 2011 2966G. An instrument that generally CAN make announcements generally CAN make changes regulated by rules of equal or lower power, by announcement. FALSE by Murphy
27 Feb 2011 2965Roujo An instrument generally CAN make changes regulated by rules of equal or lower power. FALSE by Murphy
27 Feb 2011 2964ais523 If a player with exactly 2 ergs remaining attempts to destroy 1 erg in eir own possession via a fee-based action, after the attempt e will possess at least 1 erg. FALSE by Murphy
05 Feb 2011 2963ais523 It is legal for a player with exactly 2 ergs remaining to attempt to destroy 1 erg in eir own possession via a fee-based action. TRUE by Murphy
05 Feb 2011 2962ais523 A player with exactly 2 ergs remaining CAN destroy 1 erg in eir own possession via a fee-based action. TRUE by Murphy
05 Feb 2011 2961omd agora-public@googlegroups.com is a Public Forum. TRUE by G.
09 Feb 2011 2960ais523 Pariah Yally violated the Power-1 Rule 2215 by claiming to award emself a capacitor for judging CFJ 2953, when the message purporting to judge it contained no assignment of a valid judgement to the question on veracity. GUILTY/APOLOGY by Murphy
27 Feb 2011 2959omd BobTHJ violated R2143 (Power-1) by failing to complete the Anarchist's weekly duties in the week of August 10-16. NOT GUILTY by G.
28 Feb 2011 2958Wooble The Agoran month of January began at the beginning of 3 January. FALSE by Yally
14 Jan 2011 2957Wooble If the current rebellion fails, omd will gain 1 Rest. TRUE by Murphy
11 Jan 2011 2956Wooble For the purposes of the rebellion die roll, omd will count as a Rebel even if eir citizenship at the time is Unregistered. TRUE by Murphy
11 Jan 2011 2955Yally The notation in the Registrar's Report will ensure that, henceforth, all may know omd deregistered in a Writ of FAGE. FALSE by Roujo
10 Jan 2011 2954Yally omd bears the Patent Title Left in a Huff. FALSE by Roujo
10 Jan 2011 2953Murphy The procedure described in the first paragraph of Rule 1789 CANNOT be performed while the office of Registrar is vacant. FALSE by Yally
11 Jan 2011 2952Wooble ehird cast at least one vote FOR Proposal 6943. TRUE by Roujo
10 Jan 2011 2951Wooble The office of Assessor is vacant. TRUE by ais523
16 Jan 2011 2950omd coppro CAN cause any office to become vacant by announcement. TRUE by Murphy
11 Jan 2011 2949Bucky The quoted message would have initiated at least one referendum under the ruleset referenced in its body. IRRELEVANT by ais523
16 Jan 2011 2948omd coppro committed the Class C Crime of Misrepresentation (violating Rule 1497) by presenting as correct the information that e reordered the List of Succession, which is incorrect because the Order of Succession is defined by Rule 786 and immutable. FALSE by Murphy
11 Jan 2011 2947ehird In the message I initiated this CFJ, I also initiated a CFJ with the text "AmarS is a player." FALSE by Murphy
11 Jan 2011 2946Murphy The Agoran decision on Proposal 6939 has been resolved. FALSE by ais523
16 Jan 2011 2945Murphy Removing a decision's adoption index does not count as "changing" it for the purpose of Rule 106, and thus cannot be done except by taking precedence over Rule 106. FALSE by G.
28 Feb 2011 2944Murphy The power of Rule 2324 is 3. FALSE by ais523
23 Jan 2011 2943Murphy The power of Rule 2324 is 2. FALSE by ais523
23 Jan 2011 2942Wooble Wooble is a Player. TRUE by ais523
16 Jan 2011 2941G. At the beginning of the first week to begin during a holiday, all ergs will be destroyed due to R2282(a), but none will be created due to R2282(b-d) until 72 hours after the holiday ends. FALSE by Roujo
11 Jan 2011 2940Wooble If Agora had no players and no public fora, a person could become a Player by sending a message, clearly labelled as a public message and indicating eir wish to become a player, to the null device on a unix-like machine. TRUE by Yally
11 Jan 2011 2939omd This CFJ's interest index is 100. FALSE by ais523
05 Jan 2011 2938scshunt If A single appeal case (submitted to the CotC) had been assigned a panel of three players, none of whom is or was the Justiciar; and each of them opined for a different judgment within the time limit; and did not subsequently change their judgments; and the Justiciar had within the time limit published three Justiciar's Opinions on that case, each indicating one of judgments opined by a panelist; and the Justiciar published no other Justiciar's Opinions on that case; and the identity of the Justiciar remained unchanged throughout the entire hypothetical time period described in this CFJ; then more than four days after the time limit, it would be POSSIBLE for the Clerk of the Courts to act for the panel and deliver a judgment. TRUE by G.
20 Dec 2010 2936omd The voting period of Proposal 6938 has ended. FALSE by Murphy
09 Jan 2011 2935Murphy For the purpose of determining the effect of a rule change on an entity as regulated by Rule 1586, "the documents defining an entity" includes (at least) all rules purporting to define that entity before and/or after the rule change. IRRELEVANT by ais523
05 Jan 2011 2934G. If Proposal 6940 is adopted, it would award the patent title Nice Job Breaking It to G. TRUE by Yally
11 Jan 2011 2933ehird What, oh what did I do? What did I do, what did I do when I supported a hullabaloo? MALFORMED by Yally
23 Dec 2010 2932Murphy If Rule 2324 were amended as described in evidence, the adoption index of each existing Agoran decision with an adoption index would remain unchanged. TRUE by G.
20 Dec 2010 2931G. Given the current Ruleset, the Fearmongor is required to perform eir duties once for the week of Dec 27 and once for the week of Jan 3. FALSE by scshunt
22 Dec 2010 2930omd If the text in the evidence section were added to a Power-1 Rule, it would be the definition of adoption index of decisions for the purposes of higher-powered Rules. FALSE by ais523
05 Jan 2011 2929Murphy For a rule which purports to allow a person to perform an action "without objection", N (as defined by Rule 1728) is implicitly specified by that rule as 1. TRUE by G.
14 Feb 2011⇒2929aAppeal of CFJ 2929Final decision (REMAND)
18 Jan 2011 2928ais523 coppro violated the power-1 Rule 2215 by purporting to distribute a proposal, when e could not distribute the proposal as it was not in the Proposal Pool at the time. NOT GUILTY by G.
20 Dec 2010 2927G. An announcement of intent to ratify the future state of a document is not sufficiently clear to satisfy R1728 intent specification. FALSE by Murphy
09 Jan 2011 2926ais523 omd violated rule 2202, committing the Class 8 Crime of Endorsing Forgery, by knowingly announcing intent to ratify an incorrect document without objection, without specifying the general nature of the document's error, and when a corrected document could be produced by reasonable effort (e.g. by inserting the word "not"). AFFIRMED on Appeal
06 Jan 2011⇒2926aAppeal of CFJ 2926Final decision (AFFIRM)
06 Jan 2011 2925omd If I call an inquiry case as a doubt on an otherwise undoubted document, then retract the inquiry case, the document remains doubted. TRUE by ais523
05 Jan 2011 2924omd Since 202 has not been repealed, the action of Andy Latto to increase his score by 100 points was illegal. Andy Latto is therefore not The New Amazing Speaker, and the game did not end because of Andy Latto's declaring himself to get 100 points. MALFORMED by scshunt
20 Dec 2010 2923Yally scshunt did not have enough ergs to pay the above quoted fees. TRUE by omd
20 Dec 2010 2922Murphy ehird is a player. TRUE by G.
13 Dec 2010 2921Yally ais523's proposal became distributable upon entering the proposal pool. FALSE by ais523
19 Dec 2010 2920G. Upon publication of a valid notice of papal succession, the current Speaker ceases to be Speaker, the pope becomes the new Speaker, and the pope ceases to be a pope. FALSE by Yally
20 Dec 2010 2919Yally scshunt did not have enough ergs to pay the above quoted fee. UNDETERMINED by Murphy
13 Dec 2010 2918Yally scshunt violated Rule 2283, committing the Class-2 Crime of Assaulting the Batteries, by publishing the above quoted message. GUILTY/DISCHARGE by omd
17 Jan 2011⇒2918aAppeal of CFJ 2918Final decision (REMAND)
10 Jan 2011 2917scshunt Yally took an action in the quoted message. FALSE by G.
13 Dec 2010 2916omd Wooble is a player. FALSE by Murphy
13 Dec 2010 2915Yally Wooble violated Rule 2230, committing the Class-4 Crime of Libel, by publishing an NoV alleging that I published a Claim of Error regarding the previous week's ATC report, despite information to the contrary being readily available and therefore knowing that I did not. NOT GUILTY by Murphy
11 Jan 2011 2914Yally Wooble violated Rule 2230, committing the Class-4 Crime of Libel, by publishing an NoV alleging that I failed to publish the ATC's report last week, despite evidence to the contrary being readily available and therefore knowing that I did. NOT GUILTY by Murphy
11 Jan 2011 2913Wooble The Herald's report of 29 November correctly listed Wooble at position 14 on the List of Succession. FALSE by omd
13 Dec 2010 2912Wooble The Registrar's report of 29 November correctly listed Wooble as a non-Senator Player. FALSE by omd
13 Dec 2010 2911Murphy For the purpose of ratification, a "portion" of a document is limited to the type of information specified by the rules, and does not extend to other information solely due to its physical proximity to the specified information. TRUE by ais523
12 Dec 2010 2910omd Wooble violated the Power-1 Rule 2215 in eir "Registrar's Census" of 22 November by making the public statements that (a) that document was the Registrar's Census and (b) e was a player. NOT GUILTY by scshunt
13 Dec 2010 2909Wooble Wooble is the judge of CFJ 2908. FALSE by ais523
10 Dec 2010 2908omd There is a proposal in the Proposal Pool with the text "Repeal Rule 217." FALSE by Wooble
03 Dec 2010 2907G. When a player becomes speaker due to rebellion [R2270(b)(ii)], it is considered a Crowning. FALSE by Murphy
05 Dec 2010 2906ais523 It would be illegal for me to publish a public message consisting only of the following text: "I publish the following Notice of Violation: ais523 violated/is currently violating the power-2 rule 2230, committing the Class-4 Crime of Libel, by publishing this NoV.". FALSE by G.
13 Dec 2010 2905scshunt The document referred to above would be a group if 3 players consent to it. FALSE by omd
25 Nov 2010 2904scshunt The document referred to above is a group. FALSE by omd
25 Nov 2010 2903ais523 pikhq is a player. FALSE by G.
03 Dec 2010 2902scshunt If the Registrar's report should, by the rules, have included that Tiger became Inactive on 2 May, 2010, then Wooble would be able to resort to the defense of reasonable error in a criminal CFJ over that rules violation. IRRELEVANT by Yally
13 Dec 2010 2901omd This week, I paid a fee to destroy one of scshunt's rests. TRUE by Yally
23 Dec 2010 2900Yally The Registrar's most recent report should have included that Tiger became Inactive on 2 May, 2010, as the Registrar is required to include in eir report "when each Inactive player became Inactive." FALSE by G.
22 Nov 2010 2899Bucky Hillary Rodham Clinton has a prop. FALSE by Wooble
15 Nov 2010 2898G. If Yally was not the Crown Prince at the time e made the announcement quoted in Evidence, eir attempted action did not occur. FALSE by omd
15 Nov 2010 2897scshunt ehird was a Rebel in the most recent Rebellion. TRUE by ais523
23 Nov 2010 2896omd The Promotor SHALL distribute a proposal titled 'People are People' within four days. FALSE by Murphy
20 Nov 2010 2895omd G. violated the Power-1 Rule 2224 by making proposals disinterested as quoted in the evidence section. NOT GUILTY by Murphy
13 Dec 2010⇒2895aAppeal of CFJ 2895Final decision (REMAND)
21 Nov 2010 2894omd ais523 violated Rule 2215 in eir ruling on CFJ 2892, by saying that "the statement is true" while simultaneously admitting it is impossible to reasonably believe it is true. TRUE by Wooble
07 Nov 2010 2893ais523 The above-quoted proposal was submitted as part of Fearmongor duties. TRUE by omd
07 Nov 2010 2892Bucky Due to Rule 2215, it is illegal for any current player who has read Rule 2215 to make an unqualified public statement that is identical to this statement. TRUE by ais523
25 Oct 2010 2891ais523 Warrigal violated committed the Class-2 Crime of Restricted Behavior by violating rule 2125, because rule 1006 states that an officer may be referred to by the name of that office, and Warrigal violated the rules by being referred to by the name of Herald whilst not holding that office. NOT GUILTY by Wooble
22 Nov 2010 2890omd It is generally POSSIBLE for me to make a proposal Undistributable for a fee. TRUE by Murphy
14 Nov 2010⇒2890aAppeal of CFJ 2890Final decision (REMAND)
24 Oct 2010 2889scshunt Declaring one's intent to perform a dependent action is, in itself, an action. TRUE by G.
18 Oct 2010 2888Wooble Tiger moved at least one position on the List of Succession as a result of the quoted message. FALSE by ais523
14 Nov 2010 2887ais523 I won the game today. FALSE by G.
09 Nov 2010 2886Murphy In the message quoted in evidence, Tanner L. Swett gained at least one erg. FALSE by G.
17 Oct 2010 2885ais523 I am the Contestmaster. FALSE by Wooble
17 Oct 2010 2884Bucky Bucky CAN register by announcement TRUE by scshunt
17 Oct 2010 2883Bucky The second NoV quoted below is not valid TRUE by ais523
24 Oct 2010 2882Wooble The Herald's obligated action of selecting and announcing a random integer is a single game action. UNDETERMINED by Machiavelli
20 Oct 2010 2881omd The quoted NoV is valid. TRUE by Murphy
18 Oct 2010 2880ehird ehird can make emself the holder of IADoP by announcement TRUE by G.
18 Oct 2010 2879ais523 ehird can make emself the holder of IADoP by announcement TRUE by G.
18 Oct 2010 2878Bucky Due to Rule 2215, it would be illegal for me to make an unqualified public statement that is identical to this statement. UNDECIDABLE by omd
17 Oct 2010 2877Murphy The Registrar's report published on or about Mon, 4 Oct 2010 09:22:29 -0400 is incorrect because Ienpw III is a player. TRUE by ais523
08 Oct 2010 2876Murphy In the message quoted in evidence, omd initiated an appeal case. TRUE by Wooble
04 Oct 2010 2875Murphy Ienpw III is a player. TRUE by ais523
07 Oct 2010 2874ais523 At some time in the past, Keba was the Speaker TRUE by Murphy
18 Oct 2010 2873G. The message quoted in evidence is sufficiently unambiguous and clear to qualify as an intent to perform at least one specific dependent action. TRUE by Taral
08 Oct 2010 2872Taral Taral has objected to one or more of omd's intended actions in the quoted message. FALSE by omd
03 Oct 2010 2871ais523 There is a rule with ID number 2307 FALSE by omd
17 Oct 2010⇒2871aAppeal of CFJ 2871Final decision (REMAND)
17 Oct 2010 2870ais523 Warrigal (the Pariah) violated the Power-2 rule 2143 by publishing information that was misleading, via failing to mention that the given Distributability for Distributed Proposal 6830 was potentially, or even probably, wrong. NOT GUILTY by Murphy
03 Oct 2010 2869G. I CAN publish an effective judicial declaration due to being judge of CFJ 1273. TRUE by Wooble
18 Oct 2010 2868omd In the quoted message, Wooble published one or more judicial declarations. FALSE by ais523
24 Oct 2010 2867ais523 In the message in which I initiated this CFJ, I won by Clout. AFFIRMED on Appeal
11 Oct 2010⇒2867aAppeal of CFJ 2867Final decision (AFFIRM)
11 Oct 2010 2866scshunt Keba violated Rule 2143 and committed the Class-2 Crime of Tardiness by failing to publish the List of Succession in the week beginning on September 6 of this year. NOT GUILTY by ais523
26 Sep 2010 2865G. A document purporting to be a judicial declaration is only a judicial declaration if made by a judge who is explicitly required to make one. FALSE by Taral
26 Sep 2010 2864omd The Pariah violated Power-1 Rule 2143 by inaccurately listing this proposal in eir Proposal Pool report. GUILTY/APOLOGY by G.
17 Sep 2010 2862omd The Pariah violated Power-1 Rule 2215 by making a statement which e could not reasonably believe (with any kind of certainty) to be true, as, by eir own admission, e didn't check whether the violation actually occurred. NOT GUILTY by ais523
19 Sep 2010 2861omd The message quoted in the evidence section caused the office of Referee to become Postulated. FALSE by Machiavelli
14 Sep 2010 2860ais523 omd violated the power-3 rule 2201 by making an inappropriate Claim of Error, because the nature of the doubt is a matter of legal interpretation rather than of fact. NOT GUILTY by Taral
19 Sep 2010 2859ais523 "Distributed Proposal 6830" refers to an undistributed proposal. FALSE by Murphy
03 Oct 2010⇒2859aAppeal of CFJ 2859Final decision (REMAND)
21 Sep 2010 2858G. Wooble has a violet ribbon. FALSE by omd
14 Sep 2010 2857Wooble Tiger is a pope. FALSE by omd
03 Oct 2010⇒2857aAppeal of CFJ 2857Final decision (REMAND)
24 Sep 2010 2856G. A proposal adopted at AI-1.7 CAN create a leadership token in a person's possession without amending a rule. TRUE by Murphy
10 Sep 2010 2855G. A proposal adopted at AI-1 CAN create a leadership token in a person's possession without amending a rule. TRUE by Murphy
10 Sep 2010 2854Wooble A decision to adopt the proposal "voter defaults" exists. TRUE by G.
10 Sep 2010 2853ais523 ais523 committed the Class-1 Crime of Tardiness by breaking rule 2143 by failing to publish a Referee's Report last week. GUILTY/DISCHARGE by Taral
13 Sep 2010 2852G. G. cast 7 valid ballots on the decision to adopt proposal 6830. FALSE by Wooble
10 Sep 2010 2851Wooble coppro violated rule 2170 (power 3) by changing eir nickname to "The Robot", a confusing nickname. AFFIRMED on Appeal
08 Sep 2010⇒2851aAppeal of CFJ 2851Final decision (AFFIRM)
08 Sep 2010 2850G. G. has joined the Space Alert contest. UNDETERMINED by scshunt
28 Aug 2010 2849G. The Rule enacted by Proposal 6808 refers to coppro when it speaks of "The Robot". FALSE by Murphy
13 Sep 2010 2848G. coppro's name, for the purposes of Agoran Rules, was "The Robot" at the time Proposal 6808 took effect. TRUE by Murphy
13 Sep 2010 2847G. According to the current ruleset, "Robot" is a common-language descriptor, not a name. TRUE by Murphy
13 Sep 2010 2846scshunt I can cause the Rule enacted by Distributed Proposal 6808 to amend a rule. FALSE by ais523
03 Sep 2010 2845ais523 I have CFJed on this exact statement, except with 'City' and 'United' exchanged. TRUE by scshunt
28 Aug 2010 2844ais523 I have CFJed on this exact statement, except with 'United' and 'City' exchanged. FALSE by scshunt
28 Aug 2010 2843ais523 The Robot refers to coppro TRUE by Wooble
11 Sep 2010 2842omd Murphy violated Power-1 Rule 2143 by failing to publish an ATC's report in the week starting August 2. GUILTY/SILENCE by Machiavelli
01 Sep 2010 2841omd Warrigal violated Power-1 Rule 2215 by publicly stating that e perceives that a message by Alex Smith was not sent by em without any explanation. NOT GUILTY by Murphy
28 Aug 2010 2840Murphy A player's nickname is eir name. TRUE by omd
04 Sep 2010 2839Murphy In the section of Rule 106 quoted in caller's evidence, "permit" should be interpreted as referring to possibility and not legality. TRUE by ais523
03 Sep 2010 2838Murphy In the hypothetical situation described in caller's evidence, the final attempted act would fail. FALSE by G.
28 Aug 2010 2837Tiger On or about 00:00 August 19, Wooble was awarded a Leadership Token due to the shuttle being destroyed. FALSE by scshunt
26 Aug 2010 2836Wooble Wooble has a White Ribbon. FALSE by G.
22 Aug 2010 2835Murphy CFJ 2830a has been judged. FALSE by ais523
25 Aug 2010 2834G. If I publish a message stating "I vote FOR on all Agoran Decisions in their voting period" but do not further reference any particular group of decisions, I have legally acknowledged the existence of all Decisions in their voting period. TRUE by scshunt
28 Aug 2010 2833G. If I publish a message stating "I vote FOR on all Agoran Decisions in their voting period" but do not further reference any particular group of decisions, I have "clearly identified" the matter to be decided for all Decisions in their voting period, for the purposes of R683(b). Yally recused
20 Aug 2010 2832omd There is a Journey in place. FALSE by Wooble
13 Aug 2010 2831scshunt comex violated the Power-1 Rule 2215 (Truthines) by publishing a statement alleging that e awarded emself a Platinum Ribbon when e CANNOT do so. NOT GUILTY by Yally
13 Aug 2010 2830scshunt comex violated the Power-1 Rule 2215 (Truthiness) by publishing a statement alleging that e awarded emself a White Ribbon when e CANNOT do so. NOT GUILTY by Machiavelli
09 Sep 2010⇒2830aAppeal of CFJ 2830Final decision (REMAND)
21 Aug 2010 2829omd comex has a Leadership Token. FALSE by Murphy
13 Aug 2010 2828ais523 It is POSSIBLE for the CotC to assign a judge to a CFJ, other than this one, which has exactly this statement FALSE by G.
13 Aug 2010 2827Tiger comex has created five threats FALSE by Wooble
12 Aug 2010 2826scshunt Tiger is the Ship Computer. TRUE by ais523
15 Aug 2010 2825Yally A player awarding emself a capacitor as defined by Rule 2289, counts as an erg transaction as defined by Rule 2282. FALSE by scshunt
04 Aug 2010 2824G. If Proposal 6740 had been AI-3 and been adopted and taken effect at power-3, it would have awarded a win to one or more players. TRUE by Murphy
13 Aug 2010 2823G. Proposal 6740 awarded a win to one or more players. TRUE by Murphy
13 Aug 2010 2822scshunt As a result of the quoted win announcement, comex satisfied the Winning Condition of Legislation FALSE by G.
12 Aug 2010⇒2822aAppeal of CFJ 2822Final decision (REMAND)
31 Jul 2010 2821omd As a result of the above win announcement, a person other than comex satisfied the Winning Condition of Legislation. FALSE by G.
12 Aug 2010⇒2821aAppeal of CFJ 2821Final decision (REMAND)
31 Jul 2010 2820Yally Lower Deck is adjacent to Bridge. FALSE by Wooble
29 Jul 2010 2819omd comex has a Leadership Token. FALSE by ais523
24 Jul 2010 2818Wooble Yally is a candidate for Ship Computor. FALSE by scshunt
29 Jul 2010 2817ais523 P1 has a Patent Title FALSE by Yally
20 Jul 2010 2816ais523 In the above-quoted message, coppro submitted a CFJ. FALSE by G.
17 Jul 2010 2815ais523 In the above-quoted message, coppro purported a document to be part of an official report. OVERRULED to FALSE on Appeal
22 Jul 2010⇒2815aAppeal of CFJ 2815Final decision (OVERRULE/FALSE)
22 Jul 2010 2814Yally A Captain, as defined by Rule 2287, has no fewer than 11 ergs created in eir possession at the start of each week. FALSE by Wooble
23 Jul 2010 2813scshunt I can, without objection, ratify the document that I purported above to be part of an official report FALSE by Murphy
16 Jul 2010 2812Murphy In Proposal 6740, "Award a win to player..." should be interpreted as "Award a win to each player..." TRUE by G.
15 Jul 2010 2811Wooble Warrigal is a Player. TRUE by Yally
15 Jul 2010 2810Wooble The Enemy has a weekly report. FALSE by ais523
15 Jul 2010 2809omd Proposal 6745 is a proposal awarding a win to one or more persons. TRUE by Murphy
17 Jul 2010⇒2809aAppeal of CFJ 2809Final decision (REMAND)
16 Jul 2010 2808omd Proposal 6740 awarded a win to one or more players. TRUE by Wooble
09 Jul 2010 2807ehird I registered in the quoted message FALSE by ais523
27 Jun 2010 2806ais523 In this message, I submitted a Fragment FALSE by Wooble
20 Jun 2010 2805ais523 Tiger created a Fragment in the above-quoted message. TRUE by Yally
29 Jul 2010⇒2805aAppeal of CFJ 2805Final decision (REMAND)
28 Jun 2010 2804Sgeo On or about June 10, 2010, Wooble successfully intended to deregister multiple players. TRUE by G.
15 Jun 2010 2803G. coppro violated R2201 by not responding to a "claim of error" concerning a proposal being distributed with an incorrect chamber. TRUE by Murphy
13 Jun 2010 2802Murphy If Wooble had been Red when e attempted to vote on the decision whether to adopt Proposal 6727, then eir vote would have been ineffective as of the end of the voting period. UNDETERMINED by ais523
20 Jun 2010 2801scshunt Andon is the Speaker. TRUE by G.
25 May 2010 2800G. G. made two fee-based attempts to make proposal 6724 democratic. FALSE by Murphy
22 May 2010 2799G. G. has published a Granulator's report containing the Fragment submitted by comex on or about 4 May 2010. FALSE by ais523
23 May 2010 2798omd If the proposal entitled "Reassign the name" passed, but a Rule with Power > 1.7 contained the text "REASSIGN", it would successfully amend Rule 911. TRUE by scshunt
11 May 2010 2797omd If the proposal entitled "Reassign the name" passed, it would successfully null-amend a Rule with Power > 1.7. FALSE by scshunt
11 May 2010 2796omd If the proposal entitled "Reassign the name" had AI 3 and passed, the Rulekeepor would be required to record a historical annotation to each rule. FALSE by scshunt
11 May 2010 2795Murphy "Ministers" in Rule 2270 includes the Majority Leader (if any). TRUE by G.
09 May 2010 2794Murphy "Ministers" in Rule 2270 includes the Minister without Portfolio (if any). TRUE by G.
09 May 2010 2793Murphy The message quoted in evidence began a coup. TRUE by G.
10 May 2010 2792scshunt Earlier today, comex withdrew a Proposal that would enact a power-4 Rule. If that Rule were to actually get enacted, notwithstanding that it is probably IMPOSSIBLE for that to happen, would it repeal itself immediately? IRRELEVANT by G.
11 May 2010 2791ais523 Rule 101 is greater than rule 2029 UNDETERMINED by Wooble
22 May 2010 2790Wooble Wooble is a player. FALSE by scshunt
04 May 2010 2789ais523 I am obligated to judge CFJ 2785 within the next week FALSE by G.
29 Jun 2010 2788ais523 I CAN judge CFJ 2785 FALSE by G.
29 Jun 2010 2787ais523 I am the judge of CFJ 2785 FALSE by G.
29 Jun 2010 2786ais523 /dev/null (formerly an Agoran contract) is an entity FALSE by G.
30 Apr 2010 2785ais523 This is a CFJ TRUE by Murphy
29 Jun 2010 2784Murphy Murphy violated Rule 2168 (Power 1) by failing to issue a humiliating public reminder that Proposal 6686 was failing quorum. GUILTY/SILENCE by G.
15 Apr 2010 2783G. The Office of Speaker is vacant. TRUE by ais523
11 Apr 2010 2782Murphy The players who won due to Proposal 6685 did so in the order they were awarded Champion by Herald comex. FALSE by Machiavelli
14 Apr 2010 2781scshunt The message sent at 2010-04-01T23:58Z, containing "I deregister.", was authored by Wooble. TRUE by Murphy
16 Apr 2010 2780Wooble Wooble is a Player. UNDETERMINED by scshunt
08 Apr 2010 2779G. On or about 22-Mar 2010, CFJ 2777 was assigned to G. TRUE by omd
09 Apr 2010 2778Murphy coppro has voted on the decision to adopt Proposal 6686. TRUE by woggle
11 Apr 2010 2777ais523 I did it. TRUE by G.
29 Mar 2010 2776scshunt Yally violated Rule 2143, a 1-power Rule, by publishing inaccurate information in eir most recent Registrar's report, namely that Warrigal was an inactive player. 16 Apr 2010 15
24 2775allispaul Next Tuesday, U.S. Eastern time, a player will exist whose nickname is 'Warrigal' UNDETERMINED by ais523
22 Mar 2010 2774allispaul A player exists whose nickname is 'uorygl on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays U.S. Eastern time' FALSE by ais523
22 Mar 2010 2773Yally Wooble is a player. FALSE by Murphy
06 Mar 2010 2772ais523 The IBA is a player TRUE by scshunt
21 Mar 2010 2771omd When a proposal to create a new rule takes effect, two new rules are created. FALSE by scshunt
21 Mar 2010 2770Murphy Murphy satisfies the Winning Condition of Renaissance. TRUE by omd
16 Apr 2010⇒2770aAppeal of CFJ 2770Final decision (REMAND)
11 Mar 2010 2769Yally The IBA is a player. TRUE by scshunt
21 Mar 2010⇒2769aAppeal of CFJ 2769Final decision (REASSIGN)
06 Mar 2010 2768Yally The IBA is a person. FALSE by scshunt
21 Mar 2010⇒2768aAppeal of CFJ 2768Final decision (REASSIGN)
06 Mar 2010 2767scshunt My Title is Purple TRUE by Yally
27 Feb 2010 2766Yally Proposal 6632 successfully amended Rule 2282. TRUE by scshunt
27 Feb 2010 2765Yally coppro violated Rule 1922, a power-1 Rule, by failing to award me the Patent Title Three Months Long Service as soon as possible after I had continuously held the office for three months. NOT GUILTY by G.
29 Mar 2010⇒2765aAppeal of CFJ 2765Final decision (REMAND)
17 Mar 2010 2764scshunt If the election for IADoP were resolved right now, ais523's conditional vote would resolve to an endorsement of myself. FALSE by omd
22 Feb 2010 2763ais523 In an AI 4 proposal, "Change gamestate value X from 'Y' to 'Z'" has the same meaning as "If gamestate value X is currently 'Y', change it to 'Z'". TRUE by Murphy
06 Mar 2010 2762Yally If the above proposal were to pass, the title of Rule 2284 would change to "Fee-based Actions". FALSE by Murphy
20 Feb 2010 2761omd comex (c.) violated the power 3 Rule 101 by infringing the several rights of the collective Citizens United, when e caused them to cease to be persons. NOT GUILTY by G.
10 Feb 2010 2760scshunt Murphy CAN award me at least 20 x-points. FALSE by Yally
30 Jan 2010 2759scshunt Murphy violated the 1-power Rule 2168 by failing to issue a publicly humiliating message to slackers re Proposal 6604's voting period being extended. GUILTY/SILENCE by Yally
19 Jan 2010 2758Wooble c. violated Rule 2143 and committed the Class-3 Crime of Tardiness by failing to publish a Notary's monthly report last month. 08 Jan 2010 23
06 2757Wooble c. violated Rule 2143 and committed the Class-3 Crime of Tardiness by failing to publish a Notary's weekly report last week. 08 Jan 2010 23
06 2756Murphy Voting limits on an Agoran decision are measured when it is resolved, rather than when its voting period ends. TRUE by omd
08 Jan 2010 2755Murphy An Agoran decision for which the voting period has ended, but the decision has not yet been resolved, is ongoing. TRUE by omd
08 Jan 2010 2754Yally Walker is currently (at the time of the calling of this CFJ) a player. TRUE by scshunt
08 Jan 2010 2753Pavitra If adopted, the effects of "Library of Senate" would be canceled by R1698 (Agora Is a Nomic). FALSE by omd
06 Dec 2009 2752G. It is POSSIBLE to make a rule change to Rule 104 in a four-week period. TRUE by omd
06 Dec 2009 2751G. G.'s voting limit on the current decision to award coppro a thesis is 15. FALSE by Murphy
06 Dec 2009 2750Murphy If the Chief Whip announced that 2 + 2 = 5, it would be legal to publicly agree. UNDETERMINED by ais523
02 Dec 2009 2749scshunt If the Admiral of the Navy initiated a coup right now, and purported to give the CotC the Justiciar card when e Formed the Government, eir coup would be a chicken coup. TRUE by Murphy
29 Nov 2009 2748scshunt Murphy, by failing to publish a CotC report in the week beginning 2009-11-09, violated Rule 2143 and committed the Class-3 Crime of Tardiness. GUILTY/SILENCE by Yally
14 Dec 2009 2747scshunt If an active player were awarded 5 instances of Champion right now, e would be Speaker. UNDETERMINED by G.
01 Dec 2009 2746scshunt A player can appear more than once on the List of Succession. FALSE by G.
01 Dec 2009 2745scshunt Wooble is on the List of Succession. TRUE by G.
01 Dec 2009 2744Murphy In the hypothetical situation described in evidence, player 3 CAN transfer at least one Dunce Cap on December 11, 2009. FALSE by scshunt
29 Nov 2009 2743Murphy In the hypothetical situation described in evidence, player 2 CAN transfer at least one Dunce Cap on December 11, 2009. TRUE by scshunt
29 Nov 2009 2742Murphy In the hypothetical situation described in evidence, player 1 CAN transfer at least two Dunce Caps on December 11, 2009. FALSE by scshunt
29 Nov 2009 2741Murphy In the hypothetical situation described in evidence, player 1 CAN transfer at least one Dunce Cap on December 11, 2009. TRUE by scshunt
29 Nov 2009 2740Wooble It is POSSIBLE to assign a judgment of UNDETERMINED to this CFJ. TRUE by Yally
29 Nov 2009 2739G. Taral has earned a white ribbon. AFFIRMED on Appeal
14 Dec 2009⇒2739aAppeal of CFJ 2739Final decision (AFFIRM)
14 Dec 2009 2738scshunt If it were ADOPTED right now, the Citrine Fix proposal would amend a rule. FALSE by omd
29 Nov 2009 2737G. G. has cast an infinite number of votes on proposal 6581. FALSE by Murphy
19 Jan 2010 2736Murphy ais523 has initiated a CFJ on the statement 'This is a CFJ.' within the past 24 hours. AFFIRMED on Appeal
01 Dec 2009⇒2736aAppeal of CFJ 2736Final decision (AFFIRM)
01 Dec 2009 2735Murphy This is a CFJ. TRUE by omd
07 Dec 2009 2734Yally Publishing exactly one report that is not in plain text is the Class 2 Crime of Making My Eyes Bleed. TRUE by Murphy
28 Nov 2009 2733Tiger The decision on whether to adopt the proposal Pragmatize Strict Ordering has been initiated. TRUE by G.
13 Jan 2010 2732scshunt BobTHJ abused eir position as Secretary of Agriculture to award emself points and grant emself a victory when others were awaiting eir actions and report - myself in particular, waiting on a rather large sum of points to be awarded to myself. by omd
30 Jan 2010 2731Tiger the decision on whether to adopt the proposal Pragmatize Strict Ordering has been initiated. UNDETERMINED by omd
14 Nov 2009 2730omd c. violated Rule 2253 (Power-2) by creating the card Presto! in eir possession. NOT GUILTY by scshunt
09 Nov 2009 2729BobTHJ The Assumption of the Registrar is Postulated. TRUE by ais523
12 Nov 2009 2728ais523 G. has opined REASSIGN on CFJ 2696a. TRUE by scshunt
28 Nov 2009⇒2728aAppeal of CFJ 2728Final decision (REMAND)
28 Nov 2009 2727BobTHJ On or around Sat, Oct 24 2009 01:20 BobTHJ destroyed a total of 26 rests in eir possession. TRUE by Yally
27 Oct 2009 2726BobTHJ On or around Sat, Oct 24 2009 01:20 BobTHJ destroyed 24 rests in eir possession. TRUE by Yally
27 Oct 2009 2725Murphy ais523 acted on behalf of Murphy to publish a message resolving the Agoran Decision on whether to adopt proposal 6514, as quoted in evidence. UNDETERMINED by scshunt
14 Oct 2009 2724scshunt If it is determined that ais523 cannot act on behalf of Murphy to resolve the Agoran decision to adopt 6514, ais523's message purporting to do so is self-ratifying. TRUE by omd
25 Oct 2009 2723scshunt BobTHJ violated Rule 2230, a Power-2 Rule, by failing to announce publicly the validity of the NoV identified as #9 in eir reports. GUILTY/DISCHARGE by Murphy
25 Oct 2009 2722scshunt BobTHJ violated Rule 2230, a Power-2 Rule, by failing to announce publicly the validity of the NoV identified as #5 in eir reports. GUILTY/DISCHARGE by Murphy
25 Oct 2009 2721scshunt BobTHJ violated Rule 2230, a Power-2 Rule, by failing to announce publicly the validity of the NoV identified as #1 in eir reports. GUILTY/APOLOGY by Murphy
25 Oct 2009 2720omd Wooble is the Admiral of the Navy. FALSE by ais523
20 Oct 2009 2719scshunt If judged to be UNDECIDABLE, the CFJ initiated in the quoted text would be a tortoise. FALSE by Tiger
26 Oct 2009 2718ais523 At no point in time between the moment this CFJ is assigned to a judge, and the next moment at which either rule 2215 is repealed, amended, or otherwise fails to be enforceable with its current meaning, will it be legal for the judge of this CFJ to publically make an undisclaimed statement with the same meaning as this one (i.e. replacing 'the judge of this CFJ' with the actual judge, etc.). UNDETERMINED by scshunt
25 Oct 2009 2717BobTHJ On or around Wed, 07 Oct 2009 20:37 the office of Grand Poobah successfully audited ais523. FALSE by Tiger
15 Oct 2009 2716ais523 "Break the Presto Picking Loop" is Distributable. TRUE by Walker
15 Oct 2009 2715omd I am party to the Livenomic Partnership contract. FALSE by Murphy
25 Oct 2009 2714Murphy If a criminal case based on the NOV noted in evidence were judged GUILTY / SILENCE, it would create at least one Rest in Wooble's possession. FALSE by scshunt
14 Oct 2009 2713Murphy If a criminal case based on the NOV noted in evidence were judged GUILTY / SILENCE, it would create at least one Rest in coppro's possession. FALSE by scshunt
14 Oct 2009 2712Murphy If a criminal case based on the NOV noted in evidence were judged GUILTY / SILENCE, it would create at least one Rest. TRUE by scshunt
14 Oct 2009 2711scshunt A Government was Formed on September 1. TRUE by Walker
14 Oct 2009 2710Wooble coppro violated the power-2 Rule 1742 by failing to ensure that ə fulfilled all its obligations, specifically the obligation to assign a judgment to CFJ 2700. GUILTY/SILENCE by Walker
06 Oct 2009 2709scshunt Wooble violated the power-2 Rule 1742 by failing to ensure that ə fulfilled all its obligations, specifically the obligation to assign a judgment to CFJ 2700. GUILTY/SILENCE by Walker
05 Oct 2009 2708Wooble The Short Logical Ruleset is neither short nor logical. FALSE by Walker
04 Oct 2009 2707omd It is LEGAL to methodically spam the email accounts of former players. TRUE by Murphy
26 Sep 2009 2706ehird A player that "hard deregisters" (totally dissociating themselves from the game with eir R101(vii) right, as opposed to the action of deregistering) is a person. UNDETERMINED by ais523
14 Oct 2009 2705Pavitra If Pavitra were to deregister now, explicitly invoking eir R101(vii) right, the only appropriate judgement in a criminal CFJ against em for violating the Power-2 R1742 by violating Acid Test by deregistering would be GUILTY/DISCHARGE. TRUE by omd
26 Sep 2009 2704ais523 Darth Cliche (Kenner Gordon) registered yesterday. TRUE by Murphy
25 Oct 2009 2703scshunt I is a player. UNDETERMINED by ais523
28 Sep 2009 2702BobTHJ On or about Sept 20, 2009 22:51 (UTC) ais523 terminated Contract B. TRUE by scshunt
23 Sep 2009 2701ais523 The LNP is a player TRUE by G.
29 Nov 2009 2700Murphy ais523 has amended the Fantasy Rules Contest contract within the past 24 hours. FALSE by Tiger
15 Oct 2009 2699ais523 Murphy was audited today FALSE by Murphy
26 Sep 2009 2698ais523 If a player had a reasonable opportunity to review a change, then that player had notice of the change. TRUE by Murphy
25 Oct 2009 2697ais523 Intending to perform a change in a public forum, then waiting 4 days, is sufficient to give players a reasonable opportunity to review the change, for the purpose of rule 101(iv). UNDETERMINED by omd
03 Oct 2009 2696Murphy ais523 successfully amended Points Party in the message quoted in evidence. FALSE by G.
08 Nov 2009⇒2696aAppeal of CFJ 2696Final decision (REASSIGN)
03 Nov 2009 2695BobTHJ c. awarded emself 70 x-points via the Contract B contest. FALSE by Pavitra
24 Sep 2009 2694Murphy If the Chief Whip has caste 1 and 0 rests, then e CAN cast a second valid vote on an ordinary proposal. FALSE by ais523
21 Sep 2009 2693Pavitra If G.'s possible registration in the above message were successful, then G. would now be a party to the Fantasy Rules Contest. TRUE by BobTHJ
23 Sep 2009 2692G. G. is a player. FALSE by omd
19 Sep 2009 2690omd ais523 intended to amend The Cookie Jar to become a mousetrap, and claims to be able to go through with the amendment despite objections. by BobTHJ
01 Oct 2009 2689Wooble The most recent Scorekeepor's report was correct in reporting that BobTHJ revoked 3 points from ais523. FALSE by Walker
27 Sep 2009⇒2689aAppeal of CFJ 2689Final decision (REMAND)
24 Sep 2009 2687Murphy Murphy awarded at least one point on or about Tue, 15 Sep 2009 01:19:56 -0700. FALSE by Wooble
17 Sep 2009 2686Murphy Murphy awarded at least one point in the message in which this case was initiated. FALSE by Wooble
17 Sep 2009 2685ais523 I favoured a CFJ by Murphy with the statement 'It is legal to announce that CFJ 2670 was appealed.' FALSE by scshunt
18 Sep 2009 2684Walker BobTHJ violated Rule 2143, a Power 1 Rule, by publishing an Anarchist's report on the 10th of September, 2009 claiming that C-walker does not own any cards from the Deck of Change. GUILTY/APOLOGY by ə
19 Sep 2009 2683scshunt Murphy violated R208, a 3-power Rule, by failing to resolve the Agoran Decision to adopt proposal 6473 as soon as possible after the voting period ended. GUILTY/SILENCE by Wooble
17 Sep 2009 2682Wooble It is POSSIBLE to increase a player's voting limit on an ordinary decision by playing a Roll Call card. TRUE by BobTHJ
18 Sep 2009 2681omd BoBTHJ violated Rule 911 (Power-1.7) by failing to publish an opinion on CFJ 2670a ASAP after a panel containing em was assigned. NOT GUILTY by scshunt
15 Sep 2009 2680Murphy It is legal to announce that CFJ 2670 was appealed. FALSE by ə
19 Sep 2009 2679ais523 ais523 owns a Dunce Cap card TRUE by scshunt
04 Oct 2009⇒2679aAppeal of CFJ 2679Final decision (REMAND)
30 Sep 2009 2678Walker The proposals FRC Recognition and No Vacancy v.2 are both Distributable. FALSE by woggle
03 Oct 2009⇒2678aAppeal of CFJ 2678Final decision (REMAND)
30 Sep 2009 2677Tiger The cards named in the above message were destroyed due to C-walker's self-auditing. TRUE by Pavitra
16 Sep 2009 2676ais523 It is POSSIBLE to CoE on the identity of a message posted by the PerlNomic Partnership since 6pm today. TRUE by Murphy
22 Sep 2009 2675Wooble The Livenomic Partnership is a player. FALSE by Murphy
05 Sep 2009 2674scshunt BobTHJ violated Rule 2143, committing the Class-N Crime of Tardiness (with N=1) by failing to publish a Herald's report in the week prior to the one in which this message is published. GUILTY/SILENCE by ais523
14 Oct 2009⇒2674aAppeal of CFJ 2674Final decision (REMAND)
13 Oct 2009⇒2674bAppeal of CFJ 2674Final decision (REMAND)
13 Oct 2009 2673scshunt BobTHJ violated Rule 2143 and committed the Class-N (N=2) Crime of Tardiness by failing to pick one or more rules and submit proposals to repeal each of those rules in the week of August 17-23. GUILTY/SILENCE by ais523
08 Sep 2009 2672Wooble CFJ 2654 exists. FALSE by Pavitra
29 Aug 2009 2671ais523 comex violated R1504, committing the Class-3 Crime of Failure to Apologise, by failing to publish eir apology as soon as possible after the judgement for CFJ 2550 was delivered. GUILTY/SILENCE by scshunt
29 Aug 2009 2670ais523 Agora can be Satisfied with an intent to perform a dependent action With 2 Support (that does not also specify being performed With Notice). TRUE by omd
28 Aug 2009 2669Tiger The Grand Poobah is the dealer of the Deck of Government. TRUE by Murphy
27 Aug 2009 2668scshunt If I resolved the first quoted intent, a player who had given notice both 6 and 60 days previously would be able to join ə. TRUE by Walker
28 Aug 2009 2667scshunt I have at least 1 zm TRUE by BobTHJ
31 Aug 2009 2666G. This is to decide. UNDETERMINED by woggle
19 Aug 2009 2665scshunt coppro violated power=2 rule R2259 by deputizing for the Anarchist to deal emself cards before hand limits had been enforced for the month. NOT GUILTY by ais523
24 Aug 2009 2664BobTHJ The Ambassador has a weekly report TRUE by Murphy
16 Sep 2009 2663Murphy When a Rule is repealed, it continues to exist as a non-Rule instrument. TRUE by Wooble
24 Aug 2009 2662Yally When a judge with judicial rank 1 has eir judgement overruled on appeal, then it is decreased by 1 and e CANNOT increase it for 30 days afterward. TRUE by Pavitra
19 Aug 2009 2661ais523 No Call for Judgement before this one has had the same statement as this one. TRUE by scshunt
21 Aug 2009 2660Murphy The pledge quoted in evidence terminated when coppro performed the card transfers described by it. FALSE by ə
23 Aug 2009 2659Murphy "Viva la fuente!" is a Flag Candidate. FALSE by Wooble
13 Aug 2009 2658Murphy Rule 2105 (The Map of Agora) is a Flag Candidate. FALSE by Wooble
13 Aug 2009 2657Murphy Rule 2265 (Placeholder Arms), paragraph 2, sentence 1 should be interpreted as "...a [possibly hypothetical] Power-1 rule...". TRUE by Wooble
13 Aug 2009 2656Wooble coppro's destruction of Wooble's Lobbyist and Debate-o-Matic cards in the quoted message was LEGAL FALSE by woggle
17 Aug 2009⇒2656aAppeal of CFJ 2656Final decision (REMAND)
09 Aug 2009 2655scshunt I am owed a draw from the Government deck. FALSE by omd
01 Sep 2009⇒2655aAppeal of CFJ 2655Final decision (REMAND)
25 Aug 2009 2653G. coppro broke Rule 2253 (power-2) by creating the second in a set of Local Election Cards in a way not explicitly permitted by the rules. GUILTY/SILENCE by BobTHJ
16 Aug 2009 2652G. coppro broke Rule 2253 (power-2) by creating the first in a set of Local Election Cards in a way not explicitly permitted by the rules. GUILTY/SILENCE by BobTHJ
16 Aug 2009 2651omd If I don't receive 15 objections, it will be POSSIBLE for me to indirectly cause a Rule Change using Contract A. FALSE by Murphy
19 Aug 2009 2650scshunt I CAN destroy The Pier by announcement. UNDECIDABLE by Pavitra
12 Aug 2009 2649scshunt Warrigal is owed the patent Title Champion. FALSE by woggle
08 Aug 2009 2648BobTHJ BobTHJ has a Cyan ribbon FALSE by ə
09 Aug 2009 2647omd There is exactly one possible text and title for a valid Flag Candidate. UNDETERMINED by scshunt
08 Aug 2009 2646BobTHJ On or about Mon, 03 Aug 2009 19:15 a person with the e-mail address of yd17.agora@gmail.com registered. FALSE by Walker
08 Aug 2009 2645G. G. published a monthly Herald's report on Aug 3, 2009 thus satisfying the Herald's requirement to publish a monthly report in August. FALSE by Wooble
09 Aug 2009 2644Wooble The owner of a Local Election card CAN play it, causing it to be destroyed. FALSE by Walker
16 Aug 2009 2643omd It is generally POSSIBLE, if allowed by Rule 2264, to act on behalf of a player to deregister by announcement. TRUE by Murphy
31 Jul 2009 2642omd It is generally POSSIBLE, if allowed by Rule 2264, to act on behalf of a player to deregister. TRUE by Murphy
31 Jul 2009 2641BobTHJ BobTHJ violated R2143, a Power-1 rule, by publishing an Insulator's report with incorrect information on 23 July by means of claiming that C-walker had 0 rests. NOT GUILTY by ais523
02 Aug 2009 2640Murphy BobTHJ CAN cast more than 2 valid votes on Proposal 6413. FALSE by omd
03 Aug 2009 2639ehird Quazie is active. TRUE by G.
02 Aug 2009 2638BobTHJ BobTHJ's voting limit on proposal 6413 is 2. FALSE by Murphy
08 Aug 2009 2637Murphy Sending a public message is equivalent to acting on behalf of onself (in the absence of an attempt to act on behalf of someone else), and is thus restricted by the rule "Acting on Behalf". FALSE by Taral
01 Aug 2009 2636scshunt - The IBA does not have a functioning offer system as it cannot platonically act on behalf of a player. - The Rates of assets have not been kept updated. - The President has not recently published a report. by Taral
09 Aug 2009 2635G. The Promotor is a high-priority office. TRUE by scshunt
19 Jul 2009 2634scshunt comex is the Executor of this message. FALSE by Wooble
16 Jul 2009 2633scshunt The Can exists. TRUE by G.
20 Jul 2009 2632Walker The Conductor CAN publish a self-ratifying report. TRUE by Pavitra
16 Jul 2009 2631Wooble Rule 2254 has power 2. AFFIRMED on Appeal
31 Jul 2009⇒2631aAppeal of CFJ 2631Final decision (AFFIRM)
31 Jul 2009 2630scshunt There is an election for Janitor in its nomination period. FALSE by G.
16 Jul 2009 2629scshunt My judicial rank is 42. FALSE by woggle
10 Jul 2009 2628scshunt My judicial rank is 4. FALSE by woggle
10 Jul 2009 2627Wooble C-walker violated the Power 1 Rule 2215 by making the above statement while not reasonably believing the cited private contract existed, and thus not reasonably believing e could cause Lynn Shawcroft to register. GUILTY/SILENCE by ais523
18 Jul 2009 2626ais523 Earlier today I nkeplwgplxgioyzjvtxjnncsqscvntlbdqromyeyvlhkjgteaqnn eqgujjpwcbyfrpueoydjjked. IRRELEVANT by ə
14 Jul 2009 2625ais523 Earlier today I retracted my vote on proposal 6397. TRUE by ə
14 Jul 2009 2624ais523 If the Grand Poobah does not do a caste rotation within the first week of July, and I do not make any further intents to deputise until I attempt to deputise, I CAN deputise for em after the first week of July ends. TRUE by scshunt
19 Jul 2009 2623ehird comex - who (dubiously) counts as the CotC when performing Justiciar duties - rotated the bench without intending to mislead others as to the pointless conceptual games indulged in by mistake; furthermore, there hasn't been, to my knowledge, a case of two appeals panels trying said action - apparently an experiment - beforehand. Indeed, I cannot even find any record of em *asking* one to do so! by Taral
21 Jul 2009 2622Murphy If a judicial case is submitted to and accepted by the Justiciar, then the CotC CAN change its Interest Index without 3 objections. FALSE by Pavitra
03 Aug 2009⇒2622aAppeal of CFJ 2622Final decision (REMAND)
19 Jul 2009 2621scshunt I have a Magenta Ribbon. TRUE by Murphy
16 Jul 2009 2620Wooble 2.71828183... violated R2170, a Power-3 rule, by choosing the confusing nickname "e" as a short form. GUILTY/APOLOGY by omd
04 Jul 2009 2619omd Wooble is party to at least one private contract containing the word "inferences". UNDETERMINED by Pavitra
12 Jul 2009 2618omd ais523 is party to at least one private contract containing the word "inferences". UNDETERMINED by ais523
02 Jul 2009 2617omd 1 + 1 = 2 TRUE by Machiavelli
01 Jul 2009 2616allispaul Mojo's Disclosure has been flipped. FALSE by G.
06 Jul 2009 2615Wooble Goethe is the current Grand Poobah FALSE by ais523
04 Jul 2009 2614Yally If the Janitor submits an interested proposal and claims it to be a part of eir weekly duties, then it becomes Distributable upon entering the Proposal Pool. FALSE by Murphy
25 Jun 2009 2613ais523 The Speaker CAN publish an Honors List. TRUE by Taral
02 Jul 2009 2612ais523 On 29 February 2004, root called for (or attempted to call for) the appeal of the judgement of CFJ 1492. TRUE by Taral
02 Jul 2009 2611allispaul The Grid's Disclosure has been flipped. TRUE by Machiavelli
26 Jun 2009 2610Yally The PerlNomic Partnership was an eligible voter in the recent Grand Poobah election. FALSE by woggle
19 Jul 2009⇒2610aAppeal of CFJ 2610Final decision (REMAND)
10 Jul 2009 2609Pavitra Quazie MAY join Edge Case. FALSE by Murphy
21 Jun 2009 2608Pavitra Pavitra MAY leave Edge Case. FALSE by Murphy
21 Jun 2009 2607Pavitra Taral is sitting. FALSE by BobTHJ
24 Jun 2009 2606scshunt I accidentally published the list of what contracts are what and the contract provides no suitable remedy to ensure the integrity of the game. by Taral
07 Jul 2009 2605teucer Bdi ta Askatasuna joined Warrigal's unnamed contract. FALSE by Pavitra
05 Jul 2009 2604Rodlen Rodlen and Rolden are different players. FALSE by Yally
21 Jun 2009 2603Quazie Quazie is a caller of this CFJ TRUE by Wooble
23 Jun 2009 2602Quazie OscarMeyr is a caller of this CFJ FALSE by Wooble
23 Jun 2009 2601Quazie Human Point Two is the caller of this CFJ FALSE by Wooble
23 Jun 2009 2600ais523 In the above-quoted message, coppro went on hold FALSE by Rodlen
21 Jun 2009 2599ais523 Before immibis decided to no longer agree to 'that agreement', ais523 could act on behalf of immibis to cause em to register. FALSE by scshunt
26 Jun 2009 2598ais523 ais523 CAN act on behalf of immibis to cause em to register. FALSE by scshunt
26 Jun 2009 2597Machiavelli For the next second, I continuously CFJ on this statement. FALSE by ais523
24 Jun 2009 2596scshunt I can deregister Tiger Jr. TRUE by Taral
24 Jul 2009 2595Tiger Tiger Jr. is a player. TRUE by scshunt
21 Jun 2009 2594scshunt The proposal entitled It's the Thought That Counts, if adopted, would successfully cause the second Rule Change described in its text. TRUE by Pavitra
21 Jun 2009 2593scshunt The proposal entitled It's the Thought That Counts, if adopted, would successfully cause the first Rule Change described in its text. TRUE by Pavitra
21 Jun 2009 2592Murphy The declaration of a Skunk is part of a specific Win by High Score's cleanup procedure, and does not affect any other Win by High Score's cleanup procedure simultaneously in progress. TRUE by Wooble
16 Jul 2009 2591Yally I cast a valid vote in the recent Promotor election. FALSE by BobTHJ
24 Jun 2009 2590Yally It would be legal for for the IADoP to submit eir report with the date the report is being submitted, not the date eir previous report was submitted. TRUE by Wooble
23 Jun 2009 2589omd Taral violated the Power=4 Rule 2029 by failing to Dance a Powerful Dance. NOT GUILTY by ehird
03 Jul 2009 2588omd CFJ 2543 is a tortoise. FALSE by Murphy
21 Jun 2009 2587scshunt CFJ 2543 is a tortoise. FALSE by Murphy
21 Jun 2009 2586Wooble Myndzi is a player. OVERRULED to FALSE on Appeal
07 Jul 2009⇒2586aAppeal of CFJ 2586Final decision (OVERRULE/FALSE)
07 Jul 2009 2585allispaul It is ILLEGAL for me to vote for Quazie in the ongoing Janitor election. FALSE by ais523
17 Jun 2009 2584Yally Murphy cast two votes in the recent Anarchist election. TRUE by ə
19 Jul 2009⇒2584aAppeal of CFJ 2584Final decision (REMAND)
28 Jun 2009 2583ais523 G. made a pledge in the above-quoted message. TRUE by Wooble
01 Jul 2009 2582ais523 A Powerful Dance is an instrument. FALSE by omd
16 Jul 2009⇒2582aAppeal of CFJ 2582Final decision (REMAND)
04 Jul 2009 2581G. Intents to perform multiple dependent actions were announced in the first message in the Evidence section, and each intent was resolved and made each Proposal in the Proposal Pool (at the time of resolution) distributable. TRUE by Yally
21 Jun 2009 2580Murphy On or about Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:02:15 -0700, Rodlen initiated an inquiry case on the statement "What is forced by rule 2029 to Dance a Powerful Dance?". FALSE by BobTHJ
23 Jun 2009 2579Rodlen An election for the office of Anarchist was initiated on June 11, 2009. FALSE by allispaul
15 Jun 2009 2578Wooble A proposal was added to the Pool as a result of Tiger publishing the above-quoted message. FALSE by scshunt
17 Jun 2009 2577scshunt Sgeo has cast an unconditional vote on the Decision to adopt Proposal 6345 FALSE by Tiger
11 Jun 2009 2576Pavitra Rolden has published a message. TRUE by Wooble
11 Jun 2009 2575Pavitra The recent Scorekeepor's report included Rodlen's score. TRUE by Wooble
11 Jun 2009 2574Pavitra In the above-quoted message, comex attempted to flip eir key to Gravity Circumference Line Deja Vu Cardboard Duck e^(-kt). OVERRULED to FALSE on Appeal
18 Jun 2009⇒2574aAppeal of CFJ 2574Quazie moves to OVERRULE/FALSE
18 Jun 2009 2573Wooble I am the same person who held the office of IADoP for 12 months. TRUE by ais523
13 Jun 2009 2572Wooble You May Call Me Big Fucking Edward violated the Power 2 Rule 2158 by failing to assign a judgement to CFJ 2537 as soon as possible after it was assigned to em. GUILTY/APOLOGY by Murphy
03 Jul 2009 2571Rodlen If the proposal called Newbie Friendly passes, and someone called Joe wished to register, if they said "JOE IZ HARE", that would be enough to register in Agora. FALSE by ehird
26 Jun 2009 2570Wooble C-walker recently submitted a proposal containing the 'word' 'registeredcontinuously'. FALSE by Pavitra
07 Jun 2009 2569zeckalpha The first game of Agora lasted 100 years. FALSE by Wooble
06 Jun 2009 2568teucer Luke Lockhart is a player. TRUE by scshunt
06 Jun 2009 2566Wooble Pavitra owns at least 1 crop. TRUE by allispaul
24 Jun 2009 2565allispaul I was a player before the seventh sentence in this message. FALSE by Walker
06 Jun 2009 2564allispaul I was a player before the sixth sentence in this message. FALSE by Walker
06 Jun 2009 2563allispaul I was a player before the fifth sentence in this message. FALSE by Walker
06 Jun 2009 2562allispaul I was a player before the fourth sentence in this message. FALSE by Walker
06 Jun 2009 2561allispaul I was a player before the third sentence in this message. FALSE by Walker
06 Jun 2009 2560scshunt I can initiate an equity case regarding Test Subject 2. FALSE by ais523
09 Jun 2009 2559scshunt Test Subject is Yellow. FALSE by ais523
09 Jun 2009 2558scshunt Test Subject is Green. FALSE by ais523
09 Jun 2009 2557Rodlen Swine flu counts as pigs flying. FALSE by omd
25 Jun 2009⇒2557aAppeal of CFJ 2557Final decision (REASSIGN)
24 Jun 2009 2556Quazie A pledge I created that included the text 'pigs fly' has been terminated TRUE by Pavitra
26 Jun 2009⇒2556aAppeal of CFJ 2556Final decision (REMAND)
11 Jun 2009⇒2556bAppeal of CFJ 2556Final decision (REASSIGN)
17 Jun 2009 2555Rodlen Rule 105 is the only instrument that can be used to create, modify, or destroy rules. FALSE by Pavitra
07 Jun 2009 2554Rodlen Rule 2029 consists of two sentences. TRUE by allispaul
07 Jun 2009 2553Quazie My nomination for Cleck of the Courts has been accepted FALSE by Pavitra
26 Jun 2009⇒2553aAppeal of CFJ 2553Final decision (REMAND)
11 Jun 2009⇒2553bAppeal of CFJ 2553Final decision (REASSIGN)
17 Jun 2009 2552scshunt Canada bears the Patent Title Minister Without Portfolio. FALSE by Murphy
06 Jun 2009 2551Yally OscarMeyr violated Rule 2019, a power-2 rule, by failing to assign prerogatives in a timely fashion before the beginning of the month of June. GUILTY/SILENCE by Tiger
06 Jun 2009 2550Yally comex violated R1504, committing the Class-3 Crime of Failure To Apologize, by failing to publish eir apology as soon as possible after the judgment for CFJ 2531 was delivered. GUILTY/APOLOGY by ais523
06 Jun 2009 2549Wooble zeckalpha is a Player. TRUE by G.
07 Jun 2009 2548omd Proposal 6335 had the effect of submitting a proposal. FALSE by ehird
06 Jun 2009 2547omd Yally created a pledge in the above message TRUE by Pavitra
18 Jun 2009 2546scshunt In the quoted text, Yally supported a dependent action. FALSE by Wooble
02 Jun 2009 2545ais523 Yally violated Rule 2143, committing the Class-6 Crim of Making My Eyes Bleed, by means of publishing eir most recent IADoP's report in HTML. AFFIRMED on Appeal
08 Jun 2009⇒2545aAppeal of CFJ 2545Final decision (AFFIRM)
08 Jun 2009 2544ais523 The signature in the above quote is a self-ratifying that ais523 was the Herald for a brief period of time. FALSE by G.
12 Jun 2009⇒2544aAppeal of CFJ 2544Final decision (REASSIGN)
11 Jun 2009 2543Yally The IADoP's report includes the date eir previous report was submitted, not the date eir current report is being submitted. UNDECIDABLE by BobTHJ
02 Jun 2009 2542Quazie R2239 has now been repealed TRUE by Rodlen
30 May 2009 2541Quazie R2239 has been repealed FALSE by Rodlen
30 May 2009 2540omd It is POSSIBLE for a proposal to change the Rules. TRUE by Murphy
11 Jun 2009 2539omd It is POSSIBLE for ratification (e.g. by proposal) to change the Rules. TRUE by Murphy
11 Jun 2009 2538scshunt Tiger has two Rests. FALSE by Wooble
26 May 2009 2537omd Wooble violated R2202 and committed the Class-8 Crime of Endorsing Forgery by knowingly using Ratification Without Objection to ratify a (prior to ratification) incorrect document when a corrected document could be produced with reasonable effort. NOT GUILTY by OscarMeyr
09 Jun 2009 2536Wooble The nickname 'Goethe' unambiguously identifies the player who generally sends messages to the list from the address 'kerim@u.washington.edu'. TRUE by BobTHJ
26 May 2009 2535omd root violated R2143 by failing to publish a Scorekeepor's report in the week from 20-26 April. FALSE by ais523
28 May 2009 2534ais523 Warrigal would be party to all Agoran public contracts that allow em to join by announcement, if the fact were announced in an Agoran public forum. TRUE by Rodlen
29 May 2009 2533ais523 Quazie is a party to a pledge called '50/50 crop splitting' TRUE by Murphy
19 May 2009 2532ais523 A proposal with almost the same text as proposal 5269, but without the line 'I make the following proposal:' at the start, is in the Proposal Pool. TRUE by G.
25 May 2009 2531Wooble comex violated the Power 2 Rule 2158 by failing to assign a judgement to CFJ 2499 as soon as possible after e was assigned as its judge. GUILTY/APOLOGY by OscarMeyr
21 May 2009 2530ais523 ais523 published the NoVs which are the subject of CFJ 2480. FALSE by Quazie
18 May 2009 2529omd BobTHJ promoted me one time, not four times, even though I sent em 4*8=32 crops. by Tiger
26 May 2009 2528Murphy On or about Sat, 16 May 2009 20:15:44 -0500, Yally resolved the Agoran decision to decide the holder of the IADoP office. FALSE by scshunt
23 May 2009 2527Yally Wooble initiated an election for Registrar on 14 May, 2009. FALSE by Murphy
06 Jun 2009 2526Quazie In a message sent on may 14th, in which Quazie acted on behalf of Human Point Two, CFJs were initiated TRUE by Yally
31 May 2009 2525scshunt coppro violated the 1-Power Rule 2143 by publishing a report stipulating the Proposal Pool to be empty when it in fact contained a proposal entitled {Judicial Sanctions}. GUILTY/APOLOGY by Yally
20 May 2009 2524Tiger c-walker flipped the contestmaster of the C# Party to Murphy. OVERRULED on Appeal
01 Jun 2009⇒2524aAppeal of CFJ 2524Final decision (OVERRULE)
01 Jun 2009 2523Quazie A pledge that Quazie made on 1 May this year regarding musicianship still exists. TRUE by Wooble
18 May 2009 2522omd If the contestmaster of a contest is flipped to a person who is already the contestmaster of another contest, that person thereby becomes a contestmaster. TRUE by G.
11 May 2009 2521ais523 I awarded 5 x-points to Rodlen this week. FALSE by Human Point Two
03 Jun 2009 2520ais523 A pledge that Quazie made on 5 My this year still exists. TRUE by Rodlen
11 May 2009 2519ais523 At least one contract is Legalistic. TRUE by Tiger
11 May 2009 2518ais523 At least one contract is Public. TRUE by Tiger
11 May 2009 2517Yally A single attempted action that fails in part fails completely. FALSE by Murphy
12 May 2009 2516Quazie Flipping the contestmaster of a contract to Human Point Two would fail TRUE by scshunt
12 May 2009 2515Rodlen 'Please treat Agora right good forever' in rule 101 can be violated. TRUE by ais523
14 May 2009 2514G. The phrase "This takes precedence over any other rule" in Rule 2229/1 takes precedence over the first sentence in Rule 1482/2 for a matter of spending rests. TRUE by Yally
15 May 2009 2513G. The phrase "This takes precedence over any other rule" in Rule 2229/1 attempts to specify a means of determining precedence between rules of unequal as well as equal power for a particular matter of spending rests. TRUE by Yally
15 May 2009 2512scshunt If there were no rules of power greater than 3, it would be POSSIBLE to enact a power-3 rule reading in part {This rule takes precedence over all other rules with which it conflicts.} TRUE by Wooble
13 May 2009 2511scshunt If there were no rules of power greater than 3, it would be POSSIBLE to enact a power-3 rule reading in part {This rule takes precedence over all other rules.} TRUE by Wooble
13 May 2009 2510scshunt It is POSSIBLE to enact a power-3 rule reading in part {This rule takes precedence over all other rules with which it conflicts.} TRUE by ais523
22 May 2009 2509scshunt It is POSSIBLE to enact a power-3 rule reading in part {This rule takes precedence over all other rules.} TRUE by ais523
22 May 2009 2508scshunt It is POSSIBLE to enact a power-4 rule reading in part {This rule takes precedence over all other rules with which it conflicts.} TRUE by ais523
22 May 2009 2507scshunt It is POSSIBLE to enact a power-4 rule reading in part {This rule takes precedence over all other rules.} TRUE by ais523
22 May 2009 2506Yally If a member of an entity's basis nominates that entity for an election, then that entity has been self-nominated. UNDETERMINED by Quazie
08 May 2009 2505Rodlen Rodlen is here. IRRELEVANT by Murphy
06 May 2009 2504Rodlen Not treating Agora right good forever violates rule 101. UNDETERMINED by G.
06 May 2009 2503Taral comex has sent a message from a device with power 1. FALSE by Murphy
17 May 2009 2502ais523 CFJ 2500 has been appealed. TRUE by BobTHJ
22 May 2009 2501Wooble "As soon as possible" means "within 168 hours". TRUE by scshunt
12 May 2009 2500Wooble A player who does not deregister in the interval becomes a Senator exactly 1440 (60 * 24) hours after e registers. FALSE by Rodlen
15 May 2009⇒2500aAppeal of CFJ 2500Final decision (REASSIGN)
14 May 2009 2499Rodlen Two players may play Agora using the same email address. TRUE by ehird
17 May 2009 2498gwen gwen is the initiator of this cfj TRUE by ais523
09 May 2009 2497Quazie Quazie is the initiator of this CFJ TRUE by ais523
09 May 2009 2496Quazie Gwen is the initiator of this CFJ FALSE by ais523
09 May 2009 2495omd Murphy published at least one on-time judgement in the below-quoted message. TRUE by Tiger
05 May 2009 2494G. Rule 2221/1 describes a method for a player to amend a rule. TRUE by Quazie
20 May 2009⇒2494aAppeal of CFJ 2494Final decision (REMAND)
19 May 2009 2493Rodlen A proposal that fixes an obvious grammatical error that completely changes the meaning of a rule counts as modifying a substantive aspect of the meaning of the rule. TRUE by scshunt
05 May 2009 2492scshunt If the next Registrar's report did not list me as a player, and I subsequently ratified it using the mechanism specified in R2202 (Ratification Without Objection), I would be able to go on hold. AFFIRMED on Appeal
21 May 2009⇒2492aAppeal of CFJ 2492Final decision (AFFIRM)
21 May 2009 2491scshunt If, on April 26th, an IADoP's report had been published, listing Rodlen as holder of the Anarchist office, the report subsequently self-ratified, and Rodlen fulfilled all the Anarchist's duties during the month of May, e would earn a Green Ribbon at the end of May. TRUE by Yally
05 May 2009 2490root root has a rest. TRUE by omd
04 May 2009 2489ais523 root has won by Championship FALSE by Tiger
05 May 2009 2488ais523 The prohibition on excessive Notices of Violation in rule 2230 is ineffective due to rule 101 FALSE by G.
18 May 2009 2487G. The person who was deemed to be a player by CFJ 2461 has an Agoran nickname that must be tracked by the Registrar. FALSE by Murphy
04 May 2009 2486scshunt A Rule and its text can have different power. FALSE by Wooble
04 May 2009 2485Wooble The Lender has not been keeping track of Debt and Credit for the Agoran Loan Service. by OscarMeyr
19 May 2009 2484Yally ais523, Murphy, and coppro won the game on 02 May, 2009. FALSE by ehird
04 May 2009 2483omd It is ILLEGAL to grant certain powers (in the ordinary-language sense) and privileges to Agora's ambassador if one is not a nomic. FALSE by Murphy
04 May 2009 2482Murphy The right of participation in the fora (Rule 101) takes precedence over the prohibition against excessive Notices of Violation (Rule 2230). TRUE by ais523
18 May 2009⇒2482aAppeal of CFJ 2482Final decision (REMAND)
12 May 2009 2481Murphy ais523 has published a Notice of Violation alleging that Ben Daniel claimed that there are five lights. TRUE by Tiger
17 May 2009 2480Murphy ais523 violated Rule 2230 (Notices of Violation), committing the Class-4 Crime of Libel, twenty times by publishing the Notices of Violation in step 1 above. NOT GUILTY by Taral
05 Jun 2009⇒2480aAppeal of CFJ 2480Final decision (REMAND)
23 May 2009 2479Yally root violated Rule 2143, a power-1 rule by failing to publish the Herald's monthly report for the month of April. GUILTY/SILENCE by OscarMeyr
26 May 2009 2478ais523 The Herald CAN award comex a second instance of Champion. FALSE by Wooble
30 Apr 2009 2477scshunt coppro has won the game at least once. TRUE by ais523
02 May 2009 2476root The statement of CFJ 2469 is about the possibility of winning the game by announcement. FALSE by scshunt
01 May 2009 2475root Winning the game is a rule-defined action. TRUE by Wooble
07 May 2009 2474Quazie Quazie registered via eir recent public message stating "May I register?" FALSE by ais523
29 Apr 2009 2473Quazie Quazie registered via eir recent public message containing the capitol letters 'IREGISTER' FALSE by ais523
29 Apr 2009 2472Quazie Quazie registered via eir recent private message to Registrar Yally stating 'I request registration' FALSE by ais523
29 Apr 2009 2471Quazie Quazie became a player after his message stating "I registered" FALSE by ais523
29 Apr 2009 2470omd ais523 CAN win the game by announcement. FALSE by Murphy
04 May 2009 2469ais523 Interpreting 'If ... then' in the logical sense: If this statement is true, then it is possible for ais523 to win the game by announcement. OVERRULED to UNDECIDABLE on Appeal
28 Apr 2009⇒2469aAppeal of CFJ 2469Final decision (OVERRULE/UNDECIDABLE)
28 Apr 2009 2468Wooble Quazie is a player. FALSE by omd
27 Apr 2009 2467omd The Executor of the first public message sent by agoran@live.com can be determined within reasonable effort. TRUE by scshunt
01 May 2009 2466Yally Arnold Bros (est. 1905) is a confusing nickname. FALSE by omd
27 Apr 2009 2465scshunt If two players satisfy the Winning Condition of High Score, and exactly one of them has a Rest, the score of the player with the Rest is set to 0. TRUE by ais523
27 Apr 2009 2464scshunt The PNP has more than one G# Note. TRUE by Murphy
27 Apr 2009 2463ais523 It is possible for the Ambassador to flip the Recognition of Einos (http://einos-nomic.blogspot.com/) to Friendly. TRUE by root
28 Apr 2009 2462Wooble Agoran Decisions on whether to adopt comex's proposals "Extra votes?" and "wrong paragraph" have been initiated. TRUE by Tiger
23 Apr 2009 2461Nameless I (that is, the person who is requesting judgment here) am a player. TRUE by Murphy
23 Apr 2009 2460ais523 It is POSSIBLE for a player to register with a nickname that was used by a now-deregistered former player. TRUE by ehird
24 Apr 2009 2459Yally Yally violated Power=3 Rule 2202 by failing to list the date of most recent ratification of the Registrar's Report. NOT GUILTY by omd
20 Apr 2009 2458Yally Yally violated Power=2 Rule 1789 by failing to ensure that henceforth all may know that Kelly deregistered in a Writ of FAGE. GUILTY/APOLOGY by Taral
01 May 2009⇒2458aAppeal of CFJ 2458Final decision (REMAND)
22 Apr 2009 2457ais523 In the message in which I initiated this CFJ, I created three Water Rights Vouchers in my own possession. FALSE by Tiger
28 Apr 2009 2456scshunt On April 1, 2009, Goethe legally flipped j to Beta. TRUE by root
27 Apr 2009 2455scshunt Wooble violated R2230 and committing the Class-4 Crime of Libel by publishing a NoV regarding Andre's Writ of FAGE. NOT GUILTY by omd
20 Apr 2009 2454Wooble A player CAN deputize for the IADoP to end an election before its voting period has ended. TRUE by scshunt
26 Apr 2009⇒2454aAppeal of CFJ 2454Final decision (REMAND)
22 Apr 2009⇒2454bAppeal of CFJ 2454Final decision (REASSIGN)
24 Apr 2009 2453Wooble Wooble cast a vote in the recent Herald election. FALSE by Tiger
23 Apr 2009 2452ais523 Actions can be taken in plain-text attachments sent via a Public Forum. TRUE by Yally
10 May 2009 2451Tiger comex broke the power=3 rule 2125 six times by making the announcement "I hereby announce that I performed duties related to Enigma in a timely manner during this month." six times. AFFIRMED on Appeal
03 May 2009⇒2451aAppeal of CFJ 2451Final decision (AFFIRM)
03 May 2009 2450omd The Scorekeepor SHALL award me 6N points as defined by Rule 2234 in relation to Enigma. TRUE by ais523
25 Apr 2009 2449Yally If a legal voter votes to endorse an officer, but, after the casting of the original voter's vote and before the resolution of the decision, the holder of that office changes, then the voter has endorsed the final officer rather than the initial. TRUE by ais523
26 Apr 2009 2448ais523 Puzzles submitted by Enigma's contestmaster to emself count as puzzles within the definitions given by Enigma. TRUE by scshunt
15 Apr 2009 2447scshunt Immediately after this case is assigned to a judge, the set of appropriate judgments for this case is a subset of {FALSE, UNDECIDABLE}. IRRELEVANT by ehird
13 Apr 2009 2446scshunt This statement is FALSE. UNDECIDABLE by Murphy
13 Apr 2009 2445ais523 agora-business is a public forum TRUE by BobTHJ
13 Apr 2009 2444Yally Rule 2221 permits a method by which a Rule's title can be changed. TRUE by Wooble
16 Apr 2009 2443ais523 CFJ 2423 is a tortoise. FALSE by Yally
08 Apr 2009 2442ais523 A correct Win Announcement that states that a player has a score x + yi such that xy >= 2500 causes that player to satisfy a Winning Condition, even if that Win Announcement contains extra information not required by the rules. FALSE by Murphy
10 Apr 2009 2441Yally An officer CAN submit an attachment in lieu of a plain text email to satisfy his report provided the attachment in question contains all necessary materials. FALSE by ehird
07 Apr 2009 2440Murphy coppro's caste flips on or about Wed, 01 Apr 2009 22:08:13 -0600 were illegal. TRUE by Wooble
03 Apr 2009 2439root A non-player who is a party to a contest is a contestant in that contest. FALSE by woggle
04 Apr 2009 2438root The contestmaster of a contest is a contestant in that contest. FALSE by woggle
04 Apr 2009 2437Wooble Goethe recently flipped the Caste of at least 2 players to Alpha. FALSE by scshunt
11 Apr 2009⇒2437aAppeal of CFJ 2437Final decision (REMAND)
09 Apr 2009 2436Wooble comex willfully used the Partnership to distribute a proposal in eir own self interest which included a false statement of the proposal pool being empty. by Rodlen
06 May 2009⇒2436aAppeal of CFJ 2436Final decision (REMAND)
22 Apr 2009 2435ais523 comex broke Power-2 Rule 1742 by failing to act in accordance the PerlNomic Partnership contract by failing to ensure the PNP obeys the rules of Agora to the maximum extent by causing the PNP to publish that the proposal pool was empty when it was not. NOT GUILTY by Taral
01 Apr 2009 2434Murphy Rests are fungible. TRUE by BobTHJ
30 Mar 2009 2433omd I CAN spend 'one of my cubes'. TRUE by Murphy
28 Mar 2009 2432omd I CAN spend 'the cube that person A gave me'. TRUE by Murphy
28 Mar 2009 2431scshunt At the instant the quoted call for judgment was called, The Shell had an owner TRUE by Machiavelli
07 Apr 2009 2430scshunt At the instant this call for judgment was called, The Shell was owned by the Lost and Found Department TRUE by Machiavelli
07 Apr 2009 2429Murphy Proposal 6122 has taken effect. FALSE by ais523
25 Mar 2009 2428scshunt If a proposal is caused to take effect without explicitly being allowed to cause rule changes, it can cause rule changes FALSE by G.
25 Mar 2009 2427scshunt Rule 105 can, in whole or in part, prevent an instrument from taking effect TRUE by G.
25 Mar 2009 2426ehird This thing is a CFJ. TRUE by scshunt
23 Mar 2009 2425ais523 Murphy's recent attempt to cause Rule 2223 to amend itself to read 'This rule intentionally left blank' failed because it attempted to claim indirect authority from the non-existent Rule 6130. FALSE by Yally
26 Apr 2009⇒2425aAppeal of CFJ 2425woggle moves to REMAND
04 Apr 2009⇒2425bAppeal of CFJ 2425Final decision (REMAND)
12 Apr 2009 2424ais523 Murphy's recent attempt to cause Rule 2223 to amend itself to read 'This rule intentionally left blank' failed because it was ambiguous which of two mechanisms were used to do the amendment. FALSE by ehird
15 Apr 2009⇒2424aAppeal of CFJ 2424woggle moves to REMAND
04 Apr 2009⇒2424bAppeal of CFJ 2424Final decision (REMAND)
15 Apr 2009 2423ais523 Murphy's recent attempt to cause Rule 2223 to amend itself to read 'This rule intentionally left blank' was using the mechanism specified in rule 2223, rather than the mechanism specified in the rule created by proposal 6130. UNDECIDABLE by ehird
23 Mar 2009 2421omd A rule was amended in the message in which this CFJ was called. FALSE by woggle
19 Mar 2009 2420G. There is at least one player who is currently the ambassador (as the term "the ambassador" is used in the Rules). TRUE by Murphy
16 Mar 2009 2419Murphy Spent assets are transferred to the Lost and Found Department, unless they are specified as being transferred to a different owner than either their previous owner or the Lost and Found Department. FALSE by scshunt
16 Mar 2009 2418Murphy Spent assets are destroyed, unless they are specified as being transferred to a different owner than their previous owner. TRUE by scshunt
16 Mar 2009 2417Murphy Murphy destroyed at least one Rest in the same message in which e initiated this CFJ. FALSE by Wooble
17 Mar 2009 2416omd The Promotor MAY distribute a proposal that is not in the Proposal Pool. TRUE by ais523
23 Mar 2009 2415omd The Promotor CAN distribute a proposal that is not in the Proposal Pool. TRUE by ais523
23 Mar 2009 2414ais523 coppro has won at least once FALSE by woggle
19 Mar 2009 2413ais523 If a high-power rule states that a players SHOULD interpret a definition in a particular way, and a low-power rule implies that that particular definition is correct (or at least that all other alternative definitions are wrong), an interpretation of the definition other than the one suggested by the high-power rule can be correct. UNDETERMINED by woggle
19 Mar 2009 2412G. If Rule A says that a person SHALL perform an action by a specific mechanism, but Rule B says a person SHALL NOT perform an action by the mechanism, and no other mechanism for performing the action is specified, then the person CAN perform the action via the mechanism (though perhaps breaking Rule B). TRUE by ehird
14 Mar 2009 2411scshunt If a rule requires a player to perform an action without making it possible for em to do so, and there is a rule forbidding em from doing so, e can take no action that is not in violation of a rule. TRUE by G.
13 Mar 2009 2410ais523 coppro is a party to the Cookie Jar. TRUE by G.
18 Mar 2009 2409ehird I am obligated to post "ooɯ" to a Public Forum FALSE by ais523
18 Mar 2009 2408ehird I am obligated to post "moo" to a Public Forum FALSE by ais523
18 Mar 2009 2407ais523 this is a call for judgement. TRUE by woggle
19 Mar 2009 2406ais523 If an officer violates a time limit to perform a required action, then another player CAN perform that action as if e held that office via deputisation even if the officer in question performed the action after the time limit expired but before the deputisation, as long as it would be possible (but not necessarily mandatory) for the officer to perform the action in question a second time. FALSE by omd
12 Mar 2009 2405ais523 Taral violated the power-2 rule 2234 by not awarding me points as contestmaster of Enigma as soon as possible after the beginning of March. NOT GUILTY by omd
28 Mar 2009 2404G. If the scorekeepor announces that a contestmaster is not to be awarded points for a particular month as e did not perform duties for the contest, then the scorekeepor has performed all duties required by Rule 2234 with respect to that contest. FALSE by Wooble
18 Mar 2009 2403omd It is POSSIBLE for the Scorekeepor to R2234-award points to Wooble for the AAA. TRUE by scshunt
13 Mar 2009 2402Wooble Taral violated R2234, a power-2 rule, by not awarding me points as soon as possible after the end of February for completing the contestmaster duties for the AAA. OVERRULED to NOT GUILTY on Appeal
28 Mar 2009⇒2402aAppeal of CFJ 2402Final decision (REMAND)
19 Mar 2009⇒2402bAppeal of CFJ 2402ais523 moves to AFFIRM
28 Mar 2009 2401Machiavelli If a person can take an action by announcement, then e can take it by announcing that e "is taking" the action. TRUE by G.
08 Mar 2009 2400G. If a non-IADoP initiates an election decision via deputisation, e CAN resolve the decision immediately after its voting period ends, without announcing intent to deputise to resolve it. FALSE by omd
13 Mar 2009 2399omd The PNP violated Power=2 Rule 2215 by distributing proposals without taking appropriate measures to prevent errors in them. NOT GUILTY by Murphy
12 Mar 2009 2398Murphy Murphy's daughter Victoria is a person. UNDETERMINED by ais523
05 Mar 2009 2397omd ais523 can act on Murphy's behalf to cause Murphy to support ais523's own intent to make Einos (http://einos-nomic.blogspot.com/) a protectorate. TRUE by G.
05 Mar 2009 2396G. A conditional vote which would be clearly identify an option as defined by R2127 would clearly identify an option for the purposes of satisfying Rule 683(c). TRUE by Murphy
12 Mar 2009 2395G. If a player is required by a rule to do something by a time limit, and e deregisters before the time limit, then re-registers after the time limit expires (and didn't do the action), e has broken the rule either at, or immediately after, the time of eir re-registration. FALSE by Wooble
05 Mar 2009 2394Murphy A Notice of Violation pertaining to failure to act on time is necessarily invalid if the duty was first imposed before the adoption of Rule 2239, even if the deadline was not missed until after its adoption. FALSE by ais523
03 Mar 2009 2393Murphy A Notice of Violation pertaining to failure to act on time is necessarily invalid if the deadline occurred before the adoption of Rule 2239, even if the action remained unperformed after its adoption. TRUE by Wooble
01 Mar 2009 2392G. The rulekeepor published the Short Logical Ruleset, on or about 19-Feb-09, in such a way as to satisfy that part of eir weekly duties. FALSE by Murphy
28 Feb 2009 2391Murphy If a Power=1 rule was created with text "Upon the creation of this rule, the text of Proposal 6116 is changed to read 'CREAMPUFF'.", then it would succeed in changing the text of Proposal 6116. FALSE by woggle
03 Mar 2009 2390Murphy ehird initiated an inquiry case in the message archived at http://ww w.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2008-Novembe r/016124.html TRUE by ehird
27 Feb 2009 2389ais523 The message with message-ID 499FB01A.1060101@socal.rr.com was successful in assigning an appeals opinion to CFJ 2355a. TRUE by woggle
24 Feb 2009 2388G. comex broke Rule 2215 by attempting to mislead persons as to the contents of R2125 in eir publication of the SLR on or about Feb 19, 2009. NOT GUILTY by Taral
27 Feb 2009 2387ais523 Warrigal is a party to The Small Partial Mousetrap. TRUE by woggle
19 Mar 2009 2386Murphy On or about Wed, 18 Feb 2009 22:28:36 +0000, a rule was created or amended to contain the text "comex and ais523 were here". TRUE by Wooble
25 Feb 2009 2385Murphy On or about Wed, 18 Feb 2009 22:28:36 +0000, the AFO ceased to be a player. FALSE by G.
24 Feb 2009 2384Murphy On or about Tue, 10 Feb 2009 19:25:48 -0800, the AFO ceased to be a player. TRUE by G.
24 Feb 2009 2383ais523 Sgeo violated rule 1750 by failing to read the ruleset during Read the Ruleset week, and also failing to understand or to carefully weigh the consequences of this failure. AFFIRMED on Appeal
26 Feb 2009⇒2383aAppeal of CFJ 2383woggle moves to OVERRULE/NOT GUILTY
26 Feb 2009 2382Pavitra Warrigal CAN deregister. FALSE by G.
17 Feb 2009 2381Machiavelli I am a party to some contract UNDETERMINED by G.
17 Feb 2009 2380Machiavelli I am a player FALSE by G.
17 Feb 2009 2379omd It is possible to change the contestmaster of a contest through a contract-defined dependent action. TRUE by Murphy
14 Feb 2009 2378G. Rule 2238 is a power-3 rule. FALSE by ais523
24 Feb 2009 2377ais523 Rule 2211 is a proposal. TRUE by Wooble
15 Feb 2009 2376omd It is possible for a Rule to change a proposal's text. TRUE by G.
24 Feb 2009⇒2376aAppeal of CFJ 2376Final decision (REASSIGN)
24 Feb 2009 2375omd Murphy violated R1868 (power 2) by failing to assign a judge to CFJ 2201 as soon as possible after it came to require a judge. GUILTY/DISCHARGE by woggle
24 Feb 2009⇒2375aAppeal of CFJ 2375Final decision (REMAND)
21 Feb 2009 2374omd Murphy violated R1868 (power 2) by failing to assign a judge to CFJ 2171 as soon as possible after it came to require a judge. GUILTY/DISCHARGE by woggle
10 Feb 2009 2373omd Murphy violated R1868 (power 2) by failing to assign a judge to CFJ 2163 as soon as possible after it came to require a judge. GUILTY/DISCHARGE by woggle
24 Feb 2009⇒2373aAppeal of CFJ 2373Final decision (REMAND)
21 Feb 2009 2372omd Murphy violated R1868 (power 2) by failing to assign a judge to CFJ 2141 as soon as possible after it came to require a judge. GUILTY/DISCHARGE by woggle
10 Feb 2009 2371omd Murphy violated R1868 (power 2) by failing to assign a judge to CFJ 2140 as soon as possible after it came to require a judge. GUILTY/DISCHARGE by woggle
10 Feb 2009 2370omd Murphy violated R1868 (power 2) by failing to assign a judge to CFJ 2139 as soon as possible after it came to require a judge. GUILTY/SILENCE by woggle
10 Feb 2009 2369Wooble Murphy violated R911 by failing to publish an appeals opinion to CFJ 2346a as soon as possible after the panel was assigned. GUILTY/DISCHARGE by ais523
10 Feb 2009 2368Wooble comex violated R911 by failing to publish an appeals opinion to CFJ 2346a as soon as possible after the panel was assigned. GUILTY/DISCHARGE by Taral
13 Feb 2009 2367ais523 There is a rule with ID number 2105. TRUE by omd
21 Feb 2009 2366omd Rule 2238's Power is over 9000. FALSE by Wooble
10 Feb 2009 2365omd Rule 2238 exists. TRUE by Wooble
10 Feb 2009 2364ais523 An Enforceable judgement in an equity case CAN generally create an ability for arbitrary persons to act on behalf of persons bound by the judgement FALSE by G.
10 Feb 2009 2363omd Rule 2198 was amended recently. FALSE by Murphy
21 Feb 2009 2362ais523 ais523 has the patent title of H. FALSE by Murphy
14 Feb 2009 2361G. If the Rules specify that a player is to receive a Note for performing a required (i.e. a SHALL) action, and e fails to perform it, the withholding of the Note is, for the purposes of R101(vi), a penalty for breaking the SHALL. FALSE by ais523
18 Feb 2009 2360Wooble Assessor is a high-priority office. TRUE by G.
04 Feb 2009 2359Wooble Speaker is a high-priority office. FALSE by G.
04 Feb 2009 2358ehird If I submitted "The following is my Cantus Cygneus: {pigs are delicious!!}" to the Registrar, it would be a Cantus Cygneus FALSE by ais523
02 Feb 2009 2357Murphy On or about January 7, 2009, Wooble won. FALSE by woggle
28 Jan 2009 2356omd Wooble violated R2157 (power 1.7) by failing, collectively with woggle and comex, to ensure that the panel {woggle, comex, Wooble} assigned a judgement to CFJ 2087a. NOT GUILTY by Taral
04 Mar 2009⇒2356aAppeal of CFJ 2356Final decision (REMAND)
24 Feb 2009 2355omd Wooble violated R2157 (power 1.7) by failing, collectively with woggle and comex, to ensure that the panel {woggle, comex, Wooble} assigned a judgement to CFJ 2086a. NOT GUILTY by Taral
04 Mar 2009⇒2355aAppeal of CFJ 2355Final decision (REMAND)
24 Feb 2009 2354ehird Wooble violated R2157 (power 1.7) by failing, collectively with cdm014 and avpx, to ensure that the panel {Wooble, cdm014, avpx} assigned a judgement to CFJ 2069a. GUILTY/DISCHARGE by Taral
15 Feb 2009 2353Wooble comex violated R2158 (power 2) by failing to assign a judgement to CFJ 2317 as soon as possible after e become assigned to it as Judge. GUILTY/DISCHARGE by Taral
26 Jan 2009 2352Wooble comex violated R2158 (power 2) by failing to assign a judgement to CFJ 2316 as soon as possible after e become assigned to it as Judge. GUILTY/SILENCE by Taral
26 Jan 2009 2351omd ehird has, by repeatedly promising but neglecting to bring rutian up, caused Bayes to violate Rule 2143, which was not envisioned by the contract. by woggle
07 Feb 2009 2350ais523 Any player can flip the Conductor's Key by announcement, at most once per month. FALSE by omd
26 Jan 2009 2349ais523 Murphy is leaning. FALSE by G.
25 Jan 2009 2348Wooble H. Notary w1n5t0n violated R2143 by failing to publish the Notary's monthly report in December. GUILTY/SILENCE by OscarMeyr
25 Jan 2009 2347ais523 ehird selected a confusing nickname (the null string), which violates the power-3 Rule 2170. GUILTY/APOLOGY by Taral
25 Jan 2009 2346ais523 ehird blatantly broke a SHALL requirement in the Scam Secrecy Contract by revealing my mousetrap (or attempted mousetrap) to a person who was not a member of that contract. by Wooble
06 Feb 2009⇒2346aAppeal of CFJ 2346Final decision (REMAND)
06 Feb 2009 2345ais523 The Fantasy Rules Contest contestmaster's inactivity has meant that a large number of points which should have been awarded by the contract have gone unawarded. by Taral
25 Jan 2009 2344ais523 Props are a type of asset. TRUE by ehird
25 Jan 2009 2343ehird WoodsPam is a Player FALSE by Murphy
23 Jan 2009 2342Murphy ehird has gained a non-integral number of rests due to sentencing in CFJ 2326. FALSE by ais523
21 Jan 2009 2341Murphy ehird has gained at least 4 rests due to sentencing in CFJ 2326. FALSE by ais523
21 Jan 2009 2340Murphy ehird has gained at least 3 rests due to sentencing in CFJ 2326. FALSE by ais523
21 Jan 2009 2339Murphy ehird has gained at least 2 rests due to sentencing in CFJ 2326. FALSE by ais523
21 Jan 2009 2338Murphy ehird has gained at least 1 rest as a direct result of a message published by Murphy. TRUE by ais523
21 Jan 2009 2337Murphy ehird has gained at least 1 rest as a direct result of a message published by OscarMeyr. TRUE by ais523
21 Jan 2009 2336Murphy ehird has been sentenced in CFJ 2326 as a direct result of a message published by Murphy. FALSE by ais523
21 Jan 2009 2335Murphy ehird has been sentenced in CFJ 2326 as a direct result of a message published by OscarMeyr. TRUE by ais523
21 Jan 2009 2334ais523 If a player gives consent for other players to act on eir behalf without creating or modifying a contract for the purpose, such consent actually does allow those players to act on eir behalf. TRUE by Murphy
23 Jan 2009 2333ais523 If a rule were created with the text {{Wooble SHALL NOT Dance a Powerful Dance. Neither sentence of this rule has an effect.}}, then it would be ILLEGAL for Wooble to Dance a Powerful Dance. FALSE by Murphy
04 Feb 2009 2332Murphy In the message quoted in caller's evidence, ehird acted on behalf of Wooble to judge CFJ 2321. FALSE by omd
20 Jan 2009 2331w1n5t0n The current Speaker is Michael Norrish. FALSE by omd
08 Jan 2009 2330ais523 On or about December 28, 2008, ais523 achieved a Win by Points. FALSE by Wooble
16 Jan 2009 2329Sgeo On or about December 28, 2008, comex achieved a Win by Points FALSE by Wooble
08 Jan 2009 2328Wooble ehird has failed, for 8 consecutive weeks, to publish a report as required by section 13 of the People's Bank of Agora contract. by OscarMeyr
25 Jan 2009 2327ehird Michael Norrish is obligated to be Michael Norrish IRRELEVANT by Murphy
15 Jan 2009 2326Wooble ehird violated R2169 by eir continued failure to refuse to comply with the judgment in CFJ2239. GUILTY/SILENCE by OscarMeyr
09 Jan 2009 2325omd j violated Rule 2170 by selecting (in B Nomic) a nickname that has generally been used to refer to another entity within the past three months. NOT GUILTY by Taral
08 Jan 2009 2324Murphy Craig is a player. TRUE by ais523
12 Jan 2009 2323Murphy ehird is a player. TRUE by G.
08 Jan 2009 2322Wooble It is possible for a private contract to create an ability of one party to act on behalf of another party. TRUE by Murphy
15 Jan 2009 2321G. Rule 9842 exists. FALSE by woggle
23 Jan 2009⇒2321aAppeal of CFJ 2321Final decision (REASSIGN)
15 Jan 2009 2320ehird Four days and 5 hours from the time this CFJ was/will be called, it will be possible to object to the above intent. TRUE by ais523
07 Jan 2009 2319ais523 'e' is primarily used in a mathematical context, and therefore means 'approximately 2.718281828' when used in rules. FALSE by omd
23 Dec 2008 2318ehird BobTHJ violated rule 2158 by assigning an inappropriate judgment in the message quoted in the message quoted in the message quoted. NOT GUILTY by OscarMeyr
25 Dec 2008 2317Murphy No objection made by ehird in the message labeled "Caller's evidence, part 1 of 2" remained unwithdrawn after the publication of the message labeled "Caller's evidence, part 2 of 2". UNDETERMINED by G.
26 Jan 2009 2316Murphy Objecting to the performance of a dependent action is not ineffective solely because the objection is published before the intent to perform that action is published. FALSE by G.
26 Jan 2009 2315ais523 It is legal for a judge to judge FALSE on at least one CFJ that Warrigal called between 21:00 -0500 and 22:00 -0500 on Thu, 2008-12-18. UNDETERMINED by G.
23 Dec 2008 2314Machiavelli If a CFJ were called on X on December 20 this year, it would be legal to judge FALSE on the CFJ, where X is defined as the following string, followed by a quotation mark, followed by the same string, followed by a quotation mark: "If a CFJ were called on X on December 20 this year, it would be legal to judge FALSE on the CFJ, where X is defined as the following string, followed by a quotation mark, followed by the same string, followed by a quotation mark: " FALSE by woggle
15 Jan 2009 2313Machiavelli If a CFJ were called on X, it would be legal to judge FALSE on the CFJ, where X is defined as the following string, followed by a quotation mark, followed by the same string, followed by a quotation mark: "If a CFJ were called on X, it would be legal to judge FALSE on the CFJ, where X is defined as the following string, followed by a quotation mark, followed by the same string, followed by a quotation mark: " Pre-trial phase ended
22 Dec 2008 2312omd root violated Rule 2143 by not publishing the Conductor's report last week. GUILTY/SILENCE by OscarMeyr
09 Jan 2009 2311ehird I have some rests. TRUE by G.
05 Jan 2009 2310ais523 Warrigal informed the PerlNomic server that e wished to be a party to the PNP (by taking a PerlNomic game action), and yet claimed to Agora that e was not party to the contract. by Taral
28 Dec 2008 2309ehird ehird is a party to the Vote Market TRUE by Wooble
23 Dec 2008 2308ehird The PNP violated rule 1607 by distributing a retracted proposal. GUILTY/DISCHARGE by Taral
19 Dec 2008 2307Machiavelli The PerlNomic Partnership violated Rule 2215 by announcing that I am a party to it in the quoted message. NOT GUILTY by OscarMeyr
19 Dec 2008 2306Sgeo P17 has the Patent Title of Left in a Huff TRUE by omd
23 Dec 2008 2305ais523 If BobTHJ does not retract nor cast any further votes on the Agoran decision on whether to adopt proposal 6011 for the rest of its voting period, nor explicitly define eir current votes on that proposal in the future, e will have at least one valid vote on that decision" TRUE by Murphy
23 Dec 2008 2304Machiavelli It is a thing. UNDETERMINED by Wooble
10 Dec 2008 2303OscarMeyr ehird successfully changed eir name to a null string on or about 5 December 2008 21:53:02 UTC. FALSE by ais523
15 Jan 2009⇒2303aAppeal of CFJ 2303Final decision (REMAND)
18 Dec 2008 2302ehird Warrigal MAY transfer assets TRUE by G.
12 Dec 2008 2301Wooble BobTHJ violated Rule 2143 by not publishing the Scorekeepor's report last week. GUILTY/FINE by OscarMeyr
10 Dec 2008 2300ais523 The Executor of the public message that purported to initiate the Agoran Decisions on whether to adopt proposals 5686-5687 cannot be determined with reasonable effort, other than via a judicial declaration. FALSE by Murphy
11 Dec 2008 2299Sgeo Pavitra has won on or about December 3rd, 2008. TRUE by BobTHJ
11 Dec 2008 2298Wooble Pavitra has a Violet ribbon. TRUE by ais523
07 Jan 2009 2297omd The office of Notary has at least one Vote Point. TRUE by Wooble
07 Dec 2008 2296Murphy Pavitra gained 20 points due to the Werewolves contract within the past week. TRUE by harblcat
07 Dec 2008 2295Sgeo BobTHJ failed to assign prerogatives for December in a timely fashion before the beginning of the month, as required by Rule 2019. GUILTY/FINE by Taral
11 Dec 2008 2294Wooble Warrigal has a Red Ribbon. FALSE by Elysion
13 Dec 2008 2293omd I violated Rule 1742 by violating the P100 contract by causing P100 to register with the same basis as another player. ALREADY TRIED by Taral
28 Nov 2008 2292Machiavelli Right now, I send a message to a public forum explicitly stating that I do not deregister. TRUE by G.
04 Dec 2008 22910x44 Are 100 chaos potential mass chaos? FALSE by Machiavelli
28 Nov 2008 2290ais523 The Ambassador CAN flip Wooble's Recognition to Friendly without objection. UNDETERMINED by BobTHJ
27 Nov 2008 2289ehird The PRS is a contest TRUE by Elysion
01 Dec 2008 2288ehird The Vote Market is a contract. TRUE by ais523
30 Nov 2008 2287Wooble Fookiemyartug is a party to the Vote Market contract. FALSE by omd
26 Nov 2008 2286Machiavelli As Rule 1023 defines the terms, a unit of text consisting entirely of the string "CHAPTER I" is enumerated. TRUE by Murphy
11 Dec 2008 2285Machiavelli As Rule 1023 defines the terms, a unit of text consisting entirely of the string "1993:" is enumerated. TRUE by Murphy
11 Dec 2008 2284OscarMeyr Pet A is a player. FALSE by Murphy
25 Nov 2008 2283Machiavelli Becoming a player of B Nomic constitutes Agoran agreement to its ruleset. FALSE by G.
25 Nov 2008 2282ehird comex's annotation to Rule 1367 worked. FALSE by Murphy
23 Jan 2009⇒2282aAppeal of CFJ 2282Final decision (REMAND)
19 Jan 2009 2281Murphy CFJ 2252 exists. TRUE by BobTHJ
05 Dec 2008 2280ais523 Wooble violated rule 2215 by making a public statement in the above-quoted message designed to mislead others as to its effectiveness. SLIPPERY by Taral
30 Nov 2008 2279Murphy ehird did not create a rule titled "Last Resort" on or about Tue, 18 Nov 2008 16:34:39 +0000. TRUE by G.
19 Nov 2008 2278Murphy Proposal 5962 has not been adopted. AFFIRMED on Appeal
12 Dec 2008⇒2278aAppeal of CFJ 2278Final decision (AFFIRM)
12 Dec 2008 2277Murphy Proposal 5961 has not been adopted. AFFIRMED on Appeal
12 Dec 2008⇒2277aAppeal of CFJ 2277Final decision (AFFIRM)
12 Dec 2008 2276Murphy Proposal 5956 has not been adopted. OVERRULED to FALSE on Appeal
12 Dec 2008⇒2276aAppeal of CFJ 2276Final decision (OVERRULE/FALSE)
12 Dec 2008 2275Sgeo "P2, at least you get the little lowercase w in the Registrar's Report, and a Patent Title, as compensation." correctly awards P2 the Patent title Left in a Huff FALSE by ais523
22 Nov 2008 2274root The Agoran decisions of whether to adopt proposals 5956 and 5962 are democratic. TRUE by Elysion
13 Dec 2008⇒2274aAppeal of CFJ 2274Final decision (REASSIGN)
03 Dec 2008 2273woggle comex violated rule 1742 by violating the P100 contract by causing P100 to register with the same basis as another player. AFFIRMED on Appeal
04 Dec 2008⇒2273aAppeal of CFJ 2273Final decision (AFFIRM)
04 Dec 2008 2272Murphy Rule 2192 does not allow ehird to act on its behalf to create a new Rule by announcement which includes the title, text, and power of the new rule. IRRELEVANT by Elysion
22 Nov 2008 2271Elysion None of the attempted registrations (P1 through P100) in comex's quoted message were succesful. FALSE by BobTHJ
20 Nov 2008 2270Murphy Neither Proposal 5956 nor Proposal 5962 has been adopted. FALSE by ais523
08 Dec 2008 2269omd ehird is a Walrus. IRRELEVANT by Murphy
17 Nov 2008 2268omd ehird is a Walrus. IRRELEVANT by Murphy
17 Nov 2008 2267ais523 P9 is a contest FALSE by Wooble
15 Nov 2008 2266root The Burgundy Contract is a partnership. TRUE by omd
26 Nov 2008 2265Wooble The Corleone Partnership was a player at some time in the past. TRUE by omd
26 Nov 2008 2264Wooble Contracts CAN be amended by a mechanism other than unanimous consent of all parties. TRUE by ais523
22 Nov 2008 2263ehird SDONATE(1VP - FOR) is a valid conditional vote. TRUE by Murphy
11 Nov 2008 2262ais523 Warrigal submitted exactly one proposal in the quoted message TRUE by root
13 Nov 2008 2261ehird (see evidence) UNDETERMINED by Machiavelli
11 Nov 2008 2260ehird If the purported backing document for Annoyances as specified in the message purporting to define them existed, at least one Annoyance would exist IRRELEVANT by G.
15 Jan 2009⇒2260aAppeal of CFJ 2260Final decision (REMAND)
20 Nov 2008 2259Wooble A passed proposal CAN flip a switch to a value to which, by rule, the switch CANNOT be flipped. FALSE by BobTHJ
11 Nov 2008 2258root The proposal submitted by root at or around Wed, 5 Nov 2008 22:03:48 UTC has been distributed. TRUE by Murphy
08 Nov 2008 2257Murphy Creating a pledge in a public message constitutes an implicit but nevertheless clear indication that it will be public when it forms, unless published with an explicit and clear indication to the contrary. FALSE by ais523
14 Nov 2008 2256Murphy Creating a contract in a public message constitutes an implicit but nevertheless clear indication that it will be public when it forms, unless published with an explicit and clear indication to the contrary. FALSE by ais523
14 Nov 2008 2255BobTHJ The buggy automated WRV enforcement e-mail should not have been sent. by OscarMeyr
25 Nov 2008 2254Sgeo ehird, comex, Quazie, and myself have failed to meet their obligations per section 10 of the Vote Market agreement. by OscarMeyr
23 Nov 2008 2253omd Filling out this form and forwarding the result to a Public Forum would cause a person to become a player: http://www.registrar.uwaterloo.ca/forms/LetterOfPermission.pdf FALSE by BobTHJ
10 Nov 2008 2252ehird (the rules of Agora) IRRELEVANT by omd
25 Nov 2008 2251Murphy At least one Annoyance exists. FALSE by Wooble
08 Nov 2008 2250G. All non-public pledges with no more than one party that existed at the time of passage of Proposal 5817 are null and void (i.e. no longer exist). FALSE by root
13 Nov 2008 2249Machiavelli There is an asset known as the Terre Haute TRUE by ais523
14 Nov 2008 2248G. Goethe is required by the GREETINGS TO YOU SIR pledge to send a United States Dollar that is issued/backed by the United States government (outside of Agora) to root asap. AFFIRMED on Appeal
12 Nov 2008⇒2248aAppeal of CFJ 2248Final decision (AFFIRM)
12 Nov 2008 2247ais523 The Notary SHALL publish the fact that ais523 owns a Pain called "xyzzy" as part of eir weekly report. FALSE by G.
08 Nov 2008 2246Taral CFJ 2245 was retracted. FALSE by ais523
10 Nov 2008 2245BobTHJ The Protection Racket was clearly not envisioned as an entrapment scheme for one or more of its parties. by Taral
25 Nov 2008 2244G. "CFJ 2223" is an equity case. FALSE by Murphy
30 Oct 2008 2243BobTHJ ais523 should only have gotten 1 point from the above cashout since e only had 1 PV. He attempted to withdraw a second PV from the PBA, but this transaction failed (something which I only now discovered). by Taral
11 Nov 2008 2242ais523 The Internomic Investment Bank is a player FALSE by root
13 Nov 2008 2241ais523 due to comex's actions with respect to the PBA, it is now very difficult to determine the number of AAA-defined assets comex and the PBA hold without unreasonable effort on the part of multiple recordkeepors. by OscarMeyr
13 Nov 2008 2240OscarMeyr The player ais523 sent the above message. TRUE by ais523
30 Oct 2008 2239Wooble ehird and BobTHJ are, and have been for quite some time, in material breach of Section 11 of the contract by remaining Supine and thus ineligible to judge CFJs. by root
13 Nov 2008 2238omd When a person performs an action that takes parameters, e must unambiguously specify the parameters. TRUE by Wooble
04 Nov 2008 2237ais523 Warrigal is party to a public contract called the UNDAD FALSE by root
27 Oct 2008 2236Wooble The Ambassador CAN, without objection, flip the recognition of the nomic played in the IRC channel ##nomic with the name 'One True Agora' to Hostile. TRUE by BobTHJ
02 Nov 2008 2235Wooble The IADoP SHALL initiate an Agoran Decision to choose the Registrar with the options of Bayes and ais523. TRUE by root
13 Nov 2008 2234Wooble The Monster is the Registrar. FALSE by root
13 Nov 2008 2233G. HAL is a first-class player. FALSE by omd
27 Oct 2008 2232Machiavelli A moment ago, I satisfied the Winning Condition of Renaissance. FALSE by ais523
27 Oct 2008 2231ais523 Ivan Hope CXXVII was a player at the time e most recently attempted to ratify the Registrar's Report. FALSE by Murphy
26 Oct 2008 2230Murphy The Mad Scientist CAN act on behalf of the Monster to take an action that the Monster MAY, but CANNOT, take. FALSE by root
29 Oct 2008 2229ais523 Goethe violated rule 2173 by neither informing the Notary of the text and set of parties of UNDEAD, nor understanding and carefully weighing the full implications of failing to do so. INNOCENT by OscarMeyr
21 Oct 2008 2228root ais523 or the Monster resolved the Agoran Decision to to choose the holder of the Mad Scientist office on or around October 13, 2008. FALSE by Wooble
30 Oct 2008 2227Machiavelli I created a pledge in the above quote from ##nomic. FALSE by ais523
20 Oct 2008 2226Taral People who do not control the bayes.py script CANNOT join Bayes. FALSE by Murphy
23 Oct 2008 2225Taral Taral's attempted vote of SELL(3VP) on the most recent Mad Scientist election constitutes a pledge. FALSE by omd
30 Oct 2008 2224Taral Taral directly or indirectly voted for someone in the most recent Mad Scientist election. FALSE by omd
30 Oct 2008 2222ais523 Ivan Hope CXXVII has the Patent Title of Left in a Huff. FALSE by Wooble
16 Oct 2008 2221Wooble Wooble caused the Reformed Bank of Agora to transfer 3 crops to em a moment ago. FALSE by G.
08 Nov 2008 2220Wooble If Ivan Hope takes actions in the PerlNomic game which cause em to become an active player of PerlNomic, e will become a party to the PerlNomic Partnership contract. UNDETERMINED by G.
20 Oct 2008 2219Machiavelli Nomic 217 is a nomic. FALSE by root
16 Oct 2008 2218ehird It was clearly not envisioned that the Russian Roulette text inside the zip would be revealed. by OscarMeyr
13 Nov 2008⇒2218aAppeal of CFJ 2218Final decision (REASSIGN)
02 Nov 2008 2217Murphy If only comex had been given the password referenced in the Russian Roulette contract and a reasonable amount of time to review the section of the contract encrypted using that password, then the AFO would be bound by that contract. FALSE by woggle
20 Oct 2008 2216Murphy If only Murphy had been given the password referenced in the Russian Roulette contract and a reasonable amount of time to review the section of the contract encrypted using that password, then the AFO would be bound by that contract. FALSE by woggle
20 Oct 2008 2215woggle BobTHJ created 11 crops in ais523's possession when e should have only created 9 [3 for harvesting 911, 6 for harvesting 869]. by Taral
12 Nov 2008 2214ehird Wooble violated 2170 for claiming to be tusho (an old name of mine). INNOCENT by Taral
13 Oct 2008 2213omd The Patent Title Scamster has been revoked from come. FALSE by G.
07 Nov 2008⇒2213aAppeal of CFJ 2213Final decision (REASSIGN)
24 Oct 2008 2212Wooble An IRC channel is a forum. TRUE by Murphy
16 Oct 2008 2211root It is POSSIBLE to perform game actions via the #really-a-cow forum. TRUE by omd
22 Oct 2008 2210woggle The Law-abiding Partnership broke Rule 2148 by claiming to be the ambassador. GUILTY/APOLOGY by Taral
22 Oct 2008 2209omd There exists at least one partnership that is a person. TRUE by root
13 Oct 2008 2208omd The Law-abiding Partnership is a person. TRUE by root
13 Oct 2008 2207omd I am Dvorak Herring. UNDETERMINED by Wooble
23 Oct 2008 2206ais523 I transferred at least 2 Chits to the PerlNomic Partnership today FALSE by G.
09 Oct 2008 2205ehird This CFJ was initiated or will be initiated at midnight, 1 July 2008. FALSE by woggle
15 Oct 2008 2204ais523 At the end of the voting period of the Agoran Decision on whether to adopt proposal 5707, BobTHJ had 5 valid unretracted conditional votes that resolved to votes FOR that decision. FALSE by Wooble
09 Oct 2008 2203root root cast at least one unretracted vote of AGAINST on Proposal 5707. OVERRULED to FALSE on Appeal
29 Oct 2008⇒2203aAppeal of CFJ 2203Final decision (OVERRULE/FALSE)
29 Oct 2008 2202Wooble Proposal 5707 is a democratic proposal. FALSE by root
07 Oct 2008 2201Wooble The ratification of the Short Logical Ruleset CAN cause the text of a rule to change. TRUE by ais523
08 Oct 2008 2200Machiavelli This CFJ will exist one second from now. TRUE by Sir Toby
04 Oct 2008 2199Machiavelli Including "From: root " in the email header constitutes a claim to be Ian Kelly (a.k.a. root). FALSE by Murphy
28 Sep 2008 2198root BobTHJ and root won the game on September 26, 2008 UTC. FALSE by ais523
24 Oct 2008 2197ais523 The CotC CAN assign a judge to a CFJ initiated in the quoted message. FALSE by G.
29 Sep 2008 2196Wooble The nomic in which this CFJ is being judged is a foreign nomic. OVERRULED to FALSE on Appeal
23 Oct 2008⇒2196aAppeal of CFJ 2196Final decision (REMAND)
16 Oct 2008⇒2196bAppeal of CFJ 2196Final decision (OVERRULE/FALSE)
23 Oct 2008 2195ehird The computer by which I am sending this email is a nomic. FALSE by ais523
28 Sep 2008 2194ais523 Phill has a White Ribbon. FALSE by G.
29 Sep 2008 2193G. tusho violated Rule 2170 by publishing a message purportedly from "phill" and registering as a player. GUILTY/CHOKEY by OscarMeyr
07 Oct 2008 2192ehird tusho has been a player at some point in time TRUE by Wooble
29 Sep 2008 2191ehird tusho is a player TRUE by Wooble
29 Sep 2008 2190ehird tusho is a person TRUE by Wooble
29 Sep 2008 2189ehird Phill is a player TRUE by Sir Toby
04 Oct 2008 2188ehird Phill is a first-class person TRUE by Sir Toby
04 Oct 2008 2187ehird Phill is a person TRUE by Sir Toby
04 Oct 2008 2186ehird Phill sent the message quoted (as evidence #1 - eir registration) TRUE by woggle
02 Oct 2008 2185ehird I am tusho. TRUE by Murphy
28 Sep 2008 2184ehird I am Phill. TRUE by Murphy
28 Sep 2008 2183Sir Toby It is impossible to assign a judge to the CFJ allegedly initiated in the message sent by "agoran@live.com" on "Tue, 16 Sep 2008 20:16:23 +0000" (see evidence 1) without revealing some information regarding who did or did not send the message. TRUE by root
07 Oct 2008 2182Sir Toby The message sent by "celestialcognition@gmail.com" on "Sat, 20 Sep 2008 22:21:09 -0500" (see evidence 1) was successful in initiating a CFJ. FALSE by omd
28 Sep 2008 2181root root broke Rule 2170 by making the statement "I am comex.". UNIMPUGNED by Taral
05 Oct 2008 2180Anonymous The message sent by "agoran@live.com" on "Mon, 15 Sep 2008 20:15:58 +0000" was successful in submitting a proposal. UNDETERMINED by Sir Toby
04 Oct 2008 2179Sir Toby The message sent by "agoran@live.com" on "Tue, 16 Sep 2008 20:16:23 +0000" (see evidence 1) was successful in initiating a CFJ. TRUE by woggle
02 Oct 2008 2178ais523 If a non-pledge contract has no parties, it can be amended by unanimous consent of its parties. FALSE by Murphy
28 Sep 2008 2177Machiavelli I am Mr. Elbow. FALSE by Wooble
28 Sep 2008 2176Machiavelli Wolfram Blitzen is the owner of a Twin Sister. TRUE by G.
29 Sep 2008 2175Machiavelli Mr. Elbow SHALL register as soon as possible. FALSE by woggle
01 Oct 2008 2174Machiavelli Ivan Hope CXXVII can act on behalf of Mr. Elbow by announcement TRUE by woggle
01 Oct 2008 2173Machiavelli Mr. Elbow is a person. TRUE by woggle
01 Oct 2008 2172ais523 The Monster is a person FALSE by root
13 Nov 2008⇒2172aAppeal of CFJ 2172Final decision (REMAND)
02 Nov 2008 2171Sgeo If a person who is bound by an equity agreement fails to fulfill eir obligations to the agreement, and the judge attempts to act on eir behalf, but there are 3 or more objections to the attempt, the person who failed to fulfill eir obligations may be liable for a criminal punishment other than discharge. TRUE by ais523
28 Sep 2008 2170ais523 There is a contract called The Agoran Civil Service. FALSE by woggle
23 Sep 2008 2169Machiavelli If two persons agreed to Normish, it would become a contract. FALSE by root
25 Sep 2008 2168Machiavelli Normish is a nomic. TRUE by root
25 Sep 2008 2167ais523 ais523 is the Monsterkeepor. TRUE by Murphy
16 Oct 2008 2166G. This is a CFJ. FALSE by ais523
26 Sep 2008 2165omd Attributes of a person such as whether e is biological, wearing a hat, the same as another person, etc. can be ratified. UNDETERMINED by G.
23 Sep 2008 2164omd I submitted a proposal in my recent post UNDETERMINED by Sir Toby
23 Sep 2008 2163omd The text of a proposal cannot have any effect whatsoever on whether the proposal takes effect, except by influencing votes on the proposal, and as explictly stated by the Rules. TRUE by Murphy
28 Sep 2008 2162root A proposal that takes retroactive effect does so by modifying the gamestate of the present, not by altering events in the past. TRUE by omd
20 Sep 2008 2161root If Rule 1742 is upmutated to power 2, and the /dev/null contract continues to have no parties, it will remain a contract. TRUE by Wooble
23 Sep 2008 2160root The /dev/null contract has at least one party. OVERRULED to FALSE on Appeal
24 Sep 2008⇒2160aAppeal of CFJ 2160Final decision (OVERRULE/FALSE)
24 Sep 2008 2159root /dev/null is a contract. TRUE by Wooble
23 Sep 2008 2158omd Goethe pledged to lead / an effort to grant title / but no new Bard yet. by woggle
23 Sep 2008 2157ais523 Any player may terminate the above-quoted pledge by announcement. FALSE by Wooble
08 Oct 2008 2156ais523 Sgeo may terminate the above-quoted pledge by announcement. FALSE by Wooble
08 Oct 2008 2155Machiavelli The Speaker for the current game of Agora shall be Michael Norrish. FALSE by Murphy
20 Sep 2008 2154Machiavelli The Speaker for the first game shall be Michael Norrish. TRUE by Murphy
20 Sep 2008 2153omd Randy Pausch is a person. FALSE by Wooble
14 Sep 2008 2152G. pikhq violated rule 2019 by failing to assign prerogatives for August 2008 in a timely fashion before August 1. GUILTY/APOLOGY by OscarMeyr
28 Sep 2008 2151Machiavelli A moment ago, I revealed that my age is a composite number by announcement. TRUE by G.
08 Oct 2008 2150Machiavelli A moment ago, I landed on the moon by announcement. FALSE by G.
20 Oct 2008 2149Machiavelli A moment ago, I celebrated by announcement. TRUE by G.
08 Oct 2008 2148omd tusho has violated section 15 of the AAA agreement. by Wooble
03 Nov 2008 2147ais523 This CFH has ID number 1. FALSE by omd
14 Sep 2008 2146ais523 This CFJ has ID number 2146. TRUE by omd
14 Sep 2008 2145ehird People will thank me for this fifth CFJ. UNDETERMINED by BobTHJ
08 Sep 2008 2144ehird People will thank me for this fourth CFJ. UNDETERMINED by BobTHJ
08 Sep 2008 2143ehird People will thank me for this third CFJ. UNDETERMINED by BobTHJ
08 Sep 2008 2142ehird People will thank me for this second CFJ. UNDETERMINED by BobTHJ
08 Sep 2008 2141ehird People will thank me for this first CFJ. UNDETERMINED by BobTHJ
08 Sep 2008 2140Machiavelli The rulesets of Agoroo A and Agoroo B are separate nomic rulesets. TRUE by Murphy
08 Sep 2008 2139Machiavelli Agoroo A and Agoroo B are separate nomics. TRUE by Murphy
08 Sep 2008 2138Murphy If a partner acts on behalf of a partnership to transfer an asset, it is still the partner's asset that is transferred (provided that e has such an asset, and that the transfer is otherwise POSSIBLE). FALSE by G.
15 Aug 2008 2137Murphy If a partner acts on behalf of a partnership to cast a vote, that vote is still cast by that partner, and is thus subject to that partner's voting limit. FALSE by G.
15 Aug 2008 2136omd CFJ 2050 was filed by ehird TRUE by Murphy
08 Sep 2008 2135Quazie Quazie's activity switch was flipped to inactive by the above message. FALSE by Murphy
22 Aug 2008 2134cmealerjr Gender Neutral pronouns(e.g eir, e, and e's) are words granted meaning and usage under the set of rules excluding 754(4). UNDETERMINED by root
08 Sep 2008 2133ehird ". The previous sentence is false." results in being performed. FALSE by Wooble
15 Aug 2008 2132ehird I am sitting. FALSE by omd
09 Oct 2008⇒2132aAppeal of CFJ 2132Final decision (REASSIGN)
02 Oct 2008 2131ehird I am a player. TRUE by omd
10 Aug 2008 2130ehird tusho is a player. TRUE by omd
10 Aug 2008 2129ehird A player can be nominated to be Rulekeepor. TRUE by Wooble
09 Aug 2008 2128Sgeo I violated Rule 2149 by claiming that I lie when I did not, in fact lie. UNDETERMINED by G.
09 Aug 2008 2127Wooble The devolution of the AFO's obligations onto comex means that the AFO is in breach of the AAA agreement if comex calls CFJs for the clear purpose of allowing the CFJ to harvest their ID numbers. FALSE by Murphy
09 Aug 2008 2126omd I need more Water Rights Vouchers! IRRELEVANT by BobTHJ
10 Aug 2008 2125omd I need more Water Rights Vouchers! IRRELEVANT by BobTHJ
10 Aug 2008 2124omd I need more Water Rights Vouchers! IRRELEVANT by BobTHJ
10 Aug 2008 2123omd I need more Water Rights Vouchers! IRRELEVANT by BobTHJ
10 Aug 2008 2122omd I need more Water Rights Vouchers! IRRELEVANT by BobTHJ
10 Aug 2008 2121G. The Speaker CAN assign prerogatives for September 2008. FALSE by woggle
14 Aug 2008 2120G. The Speaker CAN assign prerogatives for August 2008. TRUE by woggle
14 Aug 2008 2119ehird ihope has not ascended the game and is not performing the action of ascending the game at this moment. by woggle
14 Oct 2008 2118Wooble A judicial finding has determined that X, for the purposes of R2125 and R2161, if and only if a CFJ directly inquiring into the veracity of either X or not X has a judgment of TRUE or FALSE respectively. FALSE by G.
15 Sep 2008 2117Machiavelli Posting the string [ed: moved to evidence due to length] to a Public Forum would be Monstrous Consent. TRUE by Sgeo
04 Aug 2008 2116Wooble The contract quoted above currently has Ivan Hope CXXVII as a party. UNDETERMINED by omd
10 Aug 2008 2115Machiavelli Immediately after a judge is assigned to this case, it will be legal for that judge to judge FALSE on its question on veracity. UNDECIDABLE by woggle
18 Aug 2008 2114Quazie If an entity is not elgible to own a particular type of asset, then they own zero of that asset TRUE by BobTHJ
04 Aug 2008 2113Wooble Sgeo violated Rule 1742 by leaving the contract "The Winning Team" when the contract forbid leaving the contract. INNOCENT by ais523
04 Aug 2008 2112omd Publishing the message "I object", in response to an attempt to perform a dependent action, causes an action to be taken by announcement. FALSE by woggle
01 Aug 2008 2111ehird tusho violated rule 2149 by stating that the initiation of this CFJ will fail. UNIMPUGNED by Murphy
02 Aug 2008 2110Murphy At least two of the valid votes on Proposal 5648 were cast by the same player. FALSE by ais523
15 Aug 2008 2109OscarMeyr A non-player can violate a rule of Agora. TRUE by Murphy
25 Jul 2008 2108BobTHJ Ivan Hope has failed to increase eir VP holdings above 50 within the allotted 60 day timeframe. by Wooble
09 Sep 2008 2107G. Ivan Hope violated R2149 by making the untruthful statement "UNDECIDABLE is never appropriate." AFFIRMED on Appeal
15 Sep 2008⇒2107aAppeal of CFJ 2107Final decision (REMAND)
10 Aug 2008⇒2107bAppeal of CFJ 2107Final decision (AFFIRM)
15 Sep 2008 2106Machiavelli Goethe violated rule 2158 by judging UNDECIDABLE on CFJ 2087. ALREADY TRIED by Wooble
09 Aug 2008 2105Machiavelli Goethe violated rule 2158 by judging UNDECIDABLE on CFJ 2086. GUILTY/DISCHARGE by Wooble
09 Aug 2008 2104G. ihope changed eir Registrar-recorded nickname to avpx on or about Jul 19th. FALSE by BobTHJ
25 Jul 2008 2103Sgeo I violated Rule 2149 by claiming that I lie when I did not, in fact lie. INNOCENT by OscarMeyr
18 Aug 2008⇒2103aAppeal of CFJ 2103Final decision (REMAND)
15 Aug 2008 2102omd OscarMeyr violated Rule 2149 by claiming that tusho could not have violated any rules because e was not a player. SLIPPERY by ais523
01 Aug 2008 2101Sgeo Equity case judgements violate R101(iv). FALSE by ais523
20 Sep 2008⇒2101aAppeal of CFJ 2101Final decision (REASSIGN)
16 Sep 2008 2100Wooble upon Ivan Hope transferring to em all eir VPs, Sgeo did not, as soon as possible, transfer all eir VPs to Ivan Hope. by Murphy
09 Aug 2008 2099Pavitra I transfer all my crops to the PNP. FALSE by Wooble
28 Jul 2008 2098ais523 No matter what their contents, all public messages contain at least one game-relevant action FALSE by Wooble
19 Jul 2008 2097Quazie The Executor of a message that contains a CFJ is also the Initiator of that CFJ, even if the Executor says E submits the CFJ on behalf of someone/something else FALSE by woggle
26 Jul 2008 2096root There is an inquiry case with the ID number 2073. TRUE by Murphy
25 Jul 2008 2095G. The statement labeled by the CotC as the CFJ statement for CFJ 2080 was a CFJ statement called by Quazie. UNDETERMINED by ais523
29 Jul 2008 2094G. The statement labeled by the CotC as the CFJ statement for CFJ 2079 was a CFJ statement called by root. UNDETERMINED by ais523
29 Jul 2008 2093Murphy Human Point Two bears the patent title Minister Without Portfolio FALSE by G.
21 Jul 2008 2092ehird tusho violated rule 101 by abridging, reducing, limiting, or removing Blind, Deaf and Mute's rights. INNOCENT by omd
10 Aug 2008 2091ehird Quazie violated rule 101 by abridging, reducing, limiting, or removing Blind, Deaf and Mute's rights. INNOCENT by omd
10 Aug 2008 2090Quazie CFJ 2019 is a valid CFJ. TRUE by ais523
11 Aug 2008⇒2090aAppeal of CFJ 2090Final decision (REMAND)
08 Aug 2008 2089woggle The PerlNomic Partnership transferred 150 chits to woggle as a result of the quoted message. TRUE by Quazie
19 Jul 2008 2088Wooble tusho violated Rule 2029 by changing eir posture to sitting. INNOCENT by OscarMeyr
20 Jul 2008 2087ehird I CFJ on the following statement. TRUE by ais523
03 Oct 2008⇒2087aAppeal of CFJ 2087Final decision (REASSIGN)
08 Sep 2008⇒2087bAppeal of CFJ 2087Final decision (REMAND)
02 Oct 2008 2086ehird I CFJ on the previous statement. FALSE by ais523
03 Oct 2008⇒2086aAppeal of CFJ 2086Final decision (REASSIGN)
08 Sep 2008⇒2086bAppeal of CFJ 2086Final decision (REMAND)
02 Oct 2008 2085omd comex breached rule 2149 by thinking up statements that will be public although they are not true before e has sent them UNIMPUGNED by OscarMeyr
01 Aug 2008 2084omd comex breached rule 2149 by sending a message with message-id <6bf32280807151511sfca8f7dveb137ee7d95c576@mail.gmail.com> in which e did not tell the truth (because e did not say anything) SLIPPERY by OscarMeyr
27 Jul 2008 2083omd root breached rule 2149 by claiming that the precedent from CFJ 1738 is that speech acts carry truth values INNOCENT by OscarMeyr
27 Jul 2008 2082omd ehird breached rule 2149 by claiming to kill Goethe in eir message with message-id <784a579e0807151341l7123d535wdfcc5376130d2cb2@mail.gmail.com> AFFIRMED on Appeal
08 Sep 2008⇒2082aAppeal of CFJ 2082Final decision (AFFIRM)
08 Sep 2008 2081omd Goethe breached rule 2149 by claiming to dance in eir message with message-id INNOCENT by OscarMeyr
27 Jul 2008 2080Quazie I CFJ on this statement. TRUE by Murphy
17 Jul 2008 2079root I CFJ on this statement. TRUE by woggle
19 Jul 2008 2078Wooble Two contracts CAN have the same name. FALSE by Machiavelli
08 Sep 2008 2077Machiavelli Ivan Hope is a player FALSE by G.
08 Sep 2008⇒2077aAppeal of CFJ 2077Final decision (REMAND)
21 Jul 2008 2076ehird tusho has 24 VP. FALSE by Quazie
20 Jul 2008 2075ehird ehird is a player. FALSE by Quazie
20 Jul 2008 2074ehird tusho is a player. FALSE by Quazie
20 Jul 2008 2073Machiavelli Either the sky is always red or, if I do not hereby initiate an inquiry case on this sentence, then the sky is always green. TRUE by Wooble
17 Jul 2008 2072BobTHJ the CotC (Murphy) violated R2019 by not assigning the Default Justice (myself) to be member of this appeals panel. UNAWARE by OscarMeyr
18 Jul 2008 2071omd If there had been no disclaimer in the message sent by comex with Message-ID <6bf32280807111120s54788104x1e5e3a3001cb1be5@mail.gmail.com>, and Rule 2208 did not exist, comex would have taken at least one action besides submitting a CFJ by sending it. TRUE by G.
17 Jul 2008 2070omd If there had been no disclaimer in the message sent by comex with Message-ID <6bf32280807111120s54788104x1e5e3a3001cb1be5@mail.gmail.com>, comex would have taken at least one action besides submitting a CFJ by sending it. TRUE by G.
17 Jul 2008 2069G. There are no game-relevant actions or intents of action in the message sent by comex with Message-ID: <6bf32280807111120s54788104x1e5e3a3001cb1be5@mail.gmail.com> FALSE by ais523
15 Aug 2008⇒2069aAppeal of CFJ 2069Final decision (REMAND)
13 Aug 2008 2068Sgeo Sgeo is obligated to give Ivan Hope CXXVII an amount of VP TRUE by Murphy
25 Jul 2008 2067Machiavelli Sgeo could stash all the currency I didn't give him, then claim he only has to give back what he has after stashing. This is clearly a great injustice. by Wooble
20 Jul 2008 2066G. Goethe won by extortion on or about July 7, 2008. FALSE by woggle
17 Jul 2008 2065ehird Sgeo has won today or yesterday (relative to the initiation of this CFJ). FALSE by woggle
17 Jul 2008 2064ais523 The message quoted in the evidence section of this CFJ changed the text of a public contract FALSE by Quazie
17 Jul 2008 2062Machiavelli The contract Ivan Hope just agreed to is a pledge because it states "Guvf vf n cyrqtr.", which is "This is a pledge." in rot13. TRUE by ais523
07 Jul 2008 2061root The Reformed Bank of Agora is a partnership. TRUE by ais523
21 Jul 2008 2060Sgeo The CotC MAY NOT refuse cases based on cases being excess as defined by Rule 2175 FALSE by G.
04 Jul 2008 2059G. BobTHJ holds the Patent Title Left in a Huff. FALSE by ais523
04 Jul 2008 2058ais523 If an officer attempts to post a self-ratifying report to a public forum, but it does not arrive until over a week after it left the officer's technical domain of control, the report nonetheless self-ratifies even though none of the other players are aware of what its contents are. TRUE by cmealerjr
18 Aug 2008⇒2058aAppeal of CFJ 2058Final decision (REMAND)
03 Aug 2008 2057Murphy ehrid is a player. TRUE by G.
02 Jul 2008 2056Taral A message containing one action sent to multiple fora is still only one action. TRUE by Wooble
09 Jul 2008 2055Wooble ais523 was a person on Agora's birthday. TRUE by woggle
05 Jul 2008 2054ais523 ais523 has a Magenta Ribbon FALSE by Murphy
02 Jul 2008 2053ehird ehird violated rule 2149 by lying. ALREADY TRIED by pikhq
11 Aug 2008⇒2053aAppeal of CFJ 2053Final decision (REMAND)
21 Jul 2008 2052BobTHJ OscarMeyr has explicitly refused to join the Agoran Slavery pledge, and the other players have implicitly refused to do so by their inaction. by woggle
26 Jul 2008 2051BobTHJ ais523 can fill the Buy Ticket specified in the evidence more than once. FALSE by woggle
05 Jul 2008 2050ais523 This CFJ was filed by ehird FALSE by Wooble
06 Jul 2008 2049ehird This CFJ exists. TRUE by Murphy
27 Jun 2008 2048omd ehird violated Rule 2149 by saying that e joins. AFFIRMED on Appeal
15 Aug 2008⇒2048aAppeal of CFJ 2048Final decision (REASSIGN)
25 Jul 2008⇒2048bAppeal of CFJ 2048Final decision (AFFIRM)
15 Aug 2008 2047ehird notehird is a registered player. FALSE by BobTHJ
27 Jun 2008 2046ehird ehrid devolves its obligations onto at least two people. TRUE by G.
27 Jun 2008 2045Quazie Comex objected to the termination of the pledge which allows anything to act on behalf of ehird. TRUE by Murphy
12 Jul 2008 2044ais523 comex violated rule 2185 by failing to assign a judgement to an open and applicable judicial question of CFJ 2006 as soon as possible. UNIMPUGNED by OscarMeyr
04 Jul 2008 2043ais523 comex violated rule 2185 by failing to assign a judgement to an open and applicable judicial question of CFJ 1996 as soon as possible. UNIMPUGNED by OscarMeyr
04 Jul 2008 2042G. If a partnership dissolves after having incurred obligations from another contract, the former members may be required by an equity settlement involving the second contract to be a parties to the settlement. TRUE by Quazie
02 Jul 2008 2041G. If a partnership incurs contract obligations from another contract while a particular member is a member, and that member departs the partnership, the member in question may be required by an equity settlement involving the second contract to be a party to the settlement, even if the partnership agreement does not explicitly allow this. TRUE by Quazie
02 Jul 2008 2040G. If a partnership is party to another contract, individual members of the contract may be required, by an equity settlement involving the second contract, to be parties to the settlement, even if the partnership agreement does not explicitly allow this. TRUE by Quazie
02 Jul 2008 2039Quazie The Judgement of CFJ 2029 indicates that BobTHJ is in violation of point 12 of the AAA contract by not creating a mill in the possession of Quazie after revoking 3 points from em. by Sgeo
28 Jul 2008 2038BobTHJ Due to eir deregistration ehird has not acted in the manner envisioned by section 11 of the contract. by Murphy
12 Jul 2008 2037BobTHJ ehird violated R1742 by not acting in accordance with section 11 of the Protection Racket agreement when he posted a pledge allowing anyone to act on eir behalf. INNOCENT by OscarMeyr
27 Jun 2008 2036omd Murphy took all of the AFO's assets. by Wooble
06 Jul 2008 2035G. If the previous CFJ is found TRUE, its judge CAN and SHOULD award comex the Patent Title Scamster by announcement. FALSE by Wooble
12 Jul 2008 2034G. comex has shown great enthusiasm, persistence, or skill in the perpetrating of scams. TRUE by Wooble
12 Jul 2008 2033Quazie The Agoran Agricultural Association is a contest TRUE by Murphy
24 Jun 2008 2032omd The hypothetical contract in the evidence section, if made a contest, would be effective, because neither Rule 101 (vi.) nor Rule 478 would prevent its operation. FALSE by woggle
01 Jul 2008 2031ais523 ehird violated rule 2149 by knowingly or recklessly making a false statement. UNIMPUGNED by Taral
05 Jul 2008 2030woggle It is possible for ehird to cause woggle to vote by announcing 'On behalf of woggle: woggle retracts eir votes on proposal 5568 and votes AGAINST x 6 on proposal 5568'. FALSE by ais523
24 Jun 2008 2029Quazie As a result of removing 3 points from Quazie on Jun 17, 2008 at 12:00 PM BobTHJ must create a mill, other than land #98, in Quazie's possession or BobTHJ is in violation of the AAA contract TRUE by BobTHJ
24 Jun 2008 2028root the Reformed Bank of Agora violated R2144 by registering while having the same basis (BobTHJ and Ivan Hope CXXVII) as the Protection Racket, a registered player. GUILTY/APOLOGY by ais523
03 Jul 2008 2027Machiavelli The Notary is the recordkeepor of public contracts. OVERRULED to TRUE on Appeal
15 Aug 2008⇒2027aAppeal of CFJ 2027Final decision (OVERRULE/TRUE)
15 Aug 2008 2026root The Left Hand is a public contract. TRUE by Wooble
01 Jul 2008⇒2026aAppeal of CFJ 2026Final decision (REMAND)
24 Jun 2008 2025ehird comex violated rule 2149 by lying in the quoted message. SLIPPERY by ais523
23 Jun 2008 2024ehird comex deregistered sometime around or on Thursday, June 19th, 2008 at 8:06:36pm MDT. FALSE by BobTHJ
22 Jun 2008 2023ais523 root broke rule 1742 by failing to act in accordance with the Brainfuck Golf contract. INNOCENT by OscarMeyr
20 Jul 2008 2022Murphy comex violated Rule 1504 by failing to publish an apology for CFJ 1942. GUILTY/CHOKEY by woggle
21 Jun 2008 2021ais523 If an entity is both a public message and a forum, it is necessarily a public forum. FALSE by Quazie
16 Jul 2008 2020Machiavelli BobTHJ violated Rule 2158 by judging CFJ 2005 UNDECIDABLE. AFFIRMED on Appeal
24 Jun 2008⇒2020aAppeal of CFJ 2020Final decision (AFFIRM)
24 Jun 2008 2017ehird I am a first-class partnership. FALSE by Quazie
02 Jul 2008 2016Zefram Quazie violated rule 2149 by publicly claiming in message that Echidna and Typhon are coauthors (or a coauthor) of the proposal that e submitted in that message. UNIMPUGNED by Taral
01 Jul 2008 2015Quazie BobTHJ successfully created land #98 in Quazie's possession On or about Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 12:59 PM. TRUE by Pavitra
18 Jun 2008 2014Quazie If ehrid was able to act on my behalf at the time CFJ 1999 and CFJ 2000 were called one or more of the set of {CFJ 1999, CFJ 2000} would've been TRUE. FALSE by cmealerjr
18 Jun 2008 2013Machiavelli Rule 2141 implies that a rule can destroy the universe. FALSE by Wooble
18 Jun 2008 2012BobTHJ comex breached Rule 1742 by continued failure to comply with the terms of the binding Equation of CFJ 1915 GUILTY/CHOKEY by OscarMeyr
04 Jul 2008⇒2012aAppeal of CFJ 2012Final decision (REMAND)
03 Jul 2008 2011BobTHJ comex breached Rule 1742 by continued failure to comply with the terms of the binding Vote Market contract. GUILTY/CHOKEY by OscarMeyr
04 Jul 2008⇒2011aAppeal of CFJ 2011Final decision (REMAND)
03 Jul 2008 2010ais523 OscarMeyr violated rule 2149 by claiming there was "nothing to see here" when in fact there was. UNIMPUGNED by Taral
19 Jul 2008 2009Machiavelli Ivan Hope violated rule 1742 by initiating this CFJ. UNIMPUGNED by Murphy
21 Jun 2008 2008Wooble Ehird deregistered on June 13, 2008, at or around 19:31 UTC FALSE by Murphy
21 Jun 2008 2007root Ivan Hope CXXVII is in the chokey. FALSE by Murphy
17 Jun 2008 2006avpx ehird's vote in the Assessor election is valid. FALSE by G.
26 Jun 2008 2005ehird Schrodinger's Cat is a player. OVERRULED to TRUE on Appeal
21 Jun 2008⇒2005aAppeal of CFJ 2005Final decision (OVERRULE/TRUE)
21 Jun 2008 2004Murphy Ivan Hope breached Rule 2149 (Truthfulness) by saying "By the way, did I mention I didn't have 50 pens in the first place, so you just gave me free stuff?" while believing e did have at least 50 pens at the time (on or about Mon, 09 Jun 2008 13:11:46 -0400) e claimed to transfer 50 pens to comex. UNIMPUGNED by OscarMeyr
17 Jun 2008 2003omd Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton breached rule 101 by failing to treat Agora right good forever SLIPPERY by Taral
21 Jun 2008 2002Pavitra Rule 2193 is at least one of: (1) a Monster; (2) the Monster. TRUE by Wooble
13 Jun 2008 2001Machiavelli Murphy violated rule 1871 by rotating the bench while the Pineapple Partnership is qualified to judge. INNOCENT by OscarMeyr
22 Jun 2008 2000Quazie ehird was deregistered when ehrid posted the following message: "I perform the following action on behalf of Quazie: {I deregister.}" FALSE by Murphy
17 Jun 2008 1999Quazie Quazie was deregistered when ehrid posted the following message: "I perform the following action on behalf of Quazie: {I deregister.}" FALSE by Murphy
17 Jun 2008 1998Quazie No change will occur to the OBJECTIONABLE contract based on comex's statement: 'Without 3 OBJECTIONS (I don't have any, for that matter), I hereby amend the OBJECTIONABLE contract to read: {{ 1. Any person can join this contract by announcement. 2. Any person other than Quazie can leave this contract by announcement. 3. Any person other than Quazie can perform any action on behalf of Quazie by announcement. }}' regardless of the number of objections that occur TRUE by Wooble
17 Jun 2008 1997Quazie The following two statements have different meanings, 1 - Without 3 OBJECTIONS, I hereby amend the OBJECTIONABLE contract to read: {{ 1. Any person can join this contract by announcement. 2. Any person other than Quazie can leave this contract by announcement. 3. Any person other than Quazie can perform any action on behalf of Quazie by announcement. }} 2 - Without 3 objections , I hereby amend the OBJECTIONABLE contract to read: {{ 1. Any person can join this contract by announcement. 2. Any person other than Quazie can leave this contract by announcement. 3. Any person other than Quazie can perform any action on behalf of Quazie by announcement. }} TRUE by Wooble
17 Jun 2008 1996Murphy On or about Mon, 09 Jun 2008 15:03:27 -0400, comex gave Ivan Hope 50 pens TRUE by Machiavelli
27 Jun 2008 1995Murphy Ivan Hope breached Rule 2149 (Truthfulness) by claiming (on or about Mon, 09 Jun 2008 13:11:46 -0400) to give comex 50 pens. INNOCENT by OscarMeyr
17 Jun 2008 1994ais523 The PerlNomic Partnership has voted FOR on the Agoran decision on whether to adopt proposal 5545. TRUE by root
21 Jun 2008 1993ais523 Murphy breached rule 2158 by failing to recuse the judicial panel of comex, Pavitra and pikhq with cause. GUILTY/APOLOGY by OscarMeyr
20 Jun 2008 1992Quazie It is an entity, where the aforementioned 'it' is any thing. TRUE by Machiavelli
13 Jun 2008 1991ais523 ehird has apologised as required by the judgement of the question on sentencing of CFJ 1943. TRUE by BobTHJ
09 Jun 2008 1990root The CotC CAN assign a poorly qualified player to judge a case. TRUE by Machiavelli
13 Jun 2008 1989root All actions are regulated. FALSE by Machiavelli
13 Jun 2008 1988Machiavelli It's an entity. UNDETERMINED by Murphy
09 Jun 2008 1987Machiavelli The Lost and Found Department owns the oddball {2/3,3/4} TRUE by omd
13 Jun 2008 1986Machiavelli Ivan Hope CXXVII owns the oddball {2/3,3/4} FALSE by omd
13 Jun 2008 1985omd The first paragraph of Rule 1586 has no effect. FALSE by Pavitra
13 Jun 2008 1984omd At least one of the following statements is true: - War is Peace. - Freedom is Slavery. - Ignorance is Strength. AFFIRMED on Appeal
22 Jun 2008⇒1984aAppeal of CFJ 1984Final decision (AFFIRM)
22 Jun 2008 1983ais523 There is a CFJ with ID number 1934 TRUE by Murphy
09 Jun 2008 1982ehird comex CAN initiate an equity case concerning the Gnarlier Contract UNDECIDABLE by Wooble
05 Jun 2008 1981omd If I am judged GUILTY in CFJ 1935, a sentence other than DISCHARGE is appropriate TRUE by BobTHJ
01 Jun 2008 1980ais523 comex CAN initiate an equity case concerning the Gnarlier Contract UNDECIDABLE by omd
03 Jun 2008 1979woggle When CFJ 1972 was called, it was possible for Pavitra to make Kiwi into a contest without 3 objections. FALSE by root
30 May 2008 1978woggle Wooble has a Cyan ribbon. FALSE by Machiavelli
03 Jun 2008 1977Pavitra If a player announces "I pledge {this is the Pear contract}; the following sentence has no effect. I pledge {this is the Papaya contract}; the preceding sentence has no effect.", and no attempt is made to dissolve the Pear contract, then another player CAN join the Pear contract by announcement. FALSE by Murphy
29 May 2008 1976ehird ais523 could, at the time this CFJ was called, leave The Gnarly Contract by announcement OVERRULED to FALSE on Appeal
13 Jun 2008⇒1976aAppeal of CFJ 1976Final decision (OVERRULE/FALSE)
13 Jun 2008 1975ais523 ais523 could, at the time this CFJ was called, leave The Gnarly Contract by announcement OVERRULED to FALSE on Appeal
13 Jun 2008⇒1975aAppeal of CFJ 1975Final decision (OVERRULE/FALSE)
13 Jun 2008 1974omd When CFJ 1972 was called, it was possible for Pavrita to leave Kiwi. FALSE by Murphy
29 May 2008 1973Pavitra Pavitra is a party to Kiwi. OVERRULED to FALSE on Appeal
02 Jul 2008⇒1973aAppeal of CFJ 1973Final decision (OVERRULE/FALSE)
02 Jul 2008 1972Pavitra Pavitra is a party to Mango. OVERRULED to FALSE on Appeal
02 Jul 2008⇒1972aAppeal of CFJ 1972Final decision (OVERRULE/FALSE)
02 Jul 2008 1971ais523 It is possible to take a game action even in a message which includes the disclaimer in the evidence section. TRUE by BobTHJ
25 May 2008 1970ehird "A few CFJs" accurately describes the amount of CFJs I have recently called. IRRELEVANT by Murphy
23 May 2008 1969ehird "A few CFJs" accurately describes the amount of CFJs I have recently called. IRRELEVANT by Murphy
23 May 2008 1968ehird "A few CFJs" accurately describes the amount of CFJs I have recently called. IRRELEVANT by Murphy
23 May 2008 1967ehird "A few CFJs" accurately describes the amount of CFJs I have recently called. IRRELEVANT by Murphy
23 May 2008 1966omd R101 item i. reads: i. The map being obviously the most important rule, every person has the right to move it back up to the top of the ruleset if the Rulekeepor put it down near the bottom again. FALSE by Wooble
26 Jun 2008⇒1966aAppeal of CFJ 1966Final decision (REMAND)
30 May 2008⇒1966bAppeal of CFJ 1966Final decision (REASSIGN)
13 Jun 2008⇒1966cAppeal of CFJ 1966Final decision (REASSIGN)
24 Jun 2008 1965ais523 ehird's Announcement of Chaos caused at least one contract to terminate. FALSE by omd
29 May 2008 1964Machiavelli Ivan Hope violated rule 2149 by making a public statement that two plus two is five. UNIMPUGNED by omd
08 Jun 2008 1963ehird Ivan Hope violated Rule 2173 by revealing the text of that private contract. INNOCENT by OscarMeyr
30 May 2008 1962ais523 In the quoted message, ehird sent an infinite number of messages. FALSE by Murphy
23 May 2008 1961G. Proposal A is distributed and is filibustered (and remains filibustered) during emergency session; given no rule changes, a week and a day later, a vote cast on it may be valid. TRUE by Pavitra
26 May 2008 1960ais523 If a player's voting limit on an Agoran decision reduces during that decision's voting period, then all votes that that player has already cast on that decision are no longer valid. FALSE by Machiavelli
22 May 2008 1959ais523 If a player's voting limit on an Agoran decision reduces during that decision's voting period, then all votes that that player has already cast on that decision are still valid. FALSE by Machiavelli
22 May 2008 1958Murphy There exists at least one rule with Power = 1. TRUE by Wooble
22 May 2008 1957Machiavelli There is a pen that owns at least 1 crumpet. FALSE by Wooble
09 Jun 2008 1956Machiavelli There is a pen that owns at least 5 crumpets. FALSE by Wooble
09 Jun 2008 1955omd If Rule 101 gives me the right to perform an action in this game, but the Rules do not define a mechanism for performing that action, I can perform it by announcement. FALSE by G.
16 May 2008 1954ehird In the message archived at the URL , ehird won the game. FALSE by Murphy
18 May 2008 1953G. A individual player may be found GUILTY in a criminal case for an action performed by a judicial panel of which e is a member, if the judicial panel performs the action as described in R2157. FALSE by ais523
16 May 2008 1952G. comex violated Rule 101(vii) and Goethe's defined rights by initiating a criminal case against Goethe, when Goethe is already being punished for the same single action (by having to defend emself in a separate, previously-initiated criminal case). UNIMPUGNED by Machiavelli
16 May 2008 1951omd Goethe violated Rule 217 by submitting a judgement (on behalf of an appeal panel) for the appeal case CFJ 1932a. UNIMPUGNED by root
13 Jun 2008 1950root Wooble breached Rule 2157 by failing to ensure that the panel met all of its obligations in appeal case 1932a. Specifically, the panel failed to meet its obligation to assign an appropriate judgement in that case. INNOCENT by OscarMeyr
30 May 2008 1949root Murphy breached Rule 2157 by failing to ensure that the panel met all of its obligations in appeal case 1932a. Specifically, the panel failed to meet its obligation to assign an appropriate judgement in that case. INNOCENT by OscarMeyr
30 May 2008 1948root Goethe breached Rule 2157 by failing to ensure that the panel met all of its obligations in appeal case 1932a. Specifically, the panel failed to meet its obligation to assign an appropriate judgement in that case. INNOCENT by OscarMeyr
30 May 2008 1947G. If an appealed equity case judgement is REMANDED or REASSIGNED, the original (prior) judgement remains a binding agreement. FALSE by Murphy
16 May 2008 1946ais523 In the message found at , ihope agreed to something. FALSE by G.
12 May 2008 1945ehird Wooble violated Rule 101 by alienating new players by insulting eir religion. INNOCENT by ais523
14 May 2008 1944Blaise Pascal If I were to post to a public forum any of the following statements, I would be a player: 1. I am a player. 2. I declare myself to be a player. FALSE by Pavitra
26 May 2008 1943Wooble ehird breached Rule 1742 by not acting in accordance with eir obligations under the Ducks & Platypuses agreement, by being a party to that agreement. GUILTY/APOLOGY by OscarMeyr
30 May 2008 1942Wooble comex breached Rule 1742 by not acting in accordance with eir obligations under the Ducks & Platypuses agreement, by being a party to that agreement. GUILTY/APOLOGY by OscarMeyr
30 May 2008 1941Machiavelli A contract can allow arbitrary persons to act on behalf of its parties. TRUE by Murphy
16 May 2008 1940Machiavelli Ivan Hope violated Rule 1742 by not transferring one pen to Murphy as soon as possible after making this pledge. GUILTY/CHOKEY by Wooble
13 May 2008 1939ais523 If a rule states that an action is regulated, that does not prevent that action from taking place, but only prevents that thing from taking place under rule 101(ii) (and therefore makes it impossible to take that action unless another rule makes it possible). FALSE by G.
16 May 2008 1938Wooble ais523 violated Rule 2158 by assigning an inappropriate judgement to CFJ 1932. INNOCENT by omd
28 May 2008 1937woggle root is the contestmaster of the equation of CFJ1932. FALSE by Wooble
05 Jun 2008⇒1937aAppeal of CFJ 1937Final decision (REMAND)
21 May 2008 1936Wooble The judge in an equity case CAN make the equation a contest by stating it is one. AFFIRMED on Appeal
13 Jun 2008⇒1936aAppeal of CFJ 1936Final decision (AFFIRM)
13 Jun 2008 1935Wooble comex violated Rule 1742 by failing to act in accordance with eir obligations under the CFJ 1915 equation. AFFIRMED on Appeal
14 Jun 2008⇒1935aAppeal of CFJ 1935Final decision (AFFIRM)
14 Jun 2008 1934ais523 Hello! IRRELEVANT by Pavitra
31 May 2008 1933G. Due to the LAND GRAB pledge, Goethe is the recordkeeper for the types of crops currencies referenced by the Agoran Agricultural Association contract. FALSE by Machiavelli
02 Jun 2008 1932root I haven't left the contract at my first opportunity, as is expected of me. by ehird
16 May 2008⇒1932aAppeal of CFJ 1932Final decision (REASSIGN)
13 May 2008 1931omd IRCNomic is a public contract. FALSE by G.
08 May 2008 1930ais523 It is impossible for a player to become Referee within the meaning of the public contract that is the backing document for XP without failing to do something that its paragraph 8 specifies that the Referee SHALL do in that situation, under the current set of rules. TRUE by root
08 May 2008 1929omd comex breached Rule 1742 by claiming that contract R requires that we "*pretend*" that it's a rule, which is not treating it like a rule, but rather a pretend rule, thereby violating its terms INNOCENT by Murphy
08 May 2008 1927BobTHJ comex has failed to submit Sell Tickets as required by section 2 of this Equation. The other parties have failed to suggest suitable tickets as required in section 3 of the equation. by Wooble
07 May 2008 1926G. If a pledge contains no explicit exit clause, a party may leave it by announcement. FALSE by Murphy
25 Apr 2008 1925woggle In eir report, the Notary is required to list Agora's Child as a member of the set of parties to a public contract concerning Trouts and Jester's Caps. FALSE by Murphy
18 May 2008⇒1925aAppeal of CFJ 1925Final decision (REMAND)
01 May 2008 1924omd The message in the evidence section (1) would be invalid because "30 days, or until e updates the player list..." is not a valid duration (ignoring any other problems with the message) FALSE by G.
25 Apr 2008 1923Murphy pikhq has a bean. FALSE by root
22 Apr 2008 1922Murphy Murphy has at least one bean. FALSE by root
22 Apr 2008 1921G. If I publish the following statement 'I'll give a quatloo to you, comex, if you give me a dingbat', and quatloos and dingbats are Agoran quantities, and comex publishes 'Okay' in reference to the statement, it forms a binding agreement (a contract). TRUE by Iammars
03 May 2008 1920omd If the offer in the evidence section (1) were published by me, then accepted, any person would be able to become a party to the resultant contract by announcement. FALSE by G.
07 Apr 2008 1919Iammars pikhq breached Rule 2135 by neglecting his duty to update the Nomic Wiki page in the month of February. GUILTY/CHOKEY by OscarMeyr
09 Apr 2008 1918Iammars pikhq breached Rule 2135 by misrepresenting Agora on the Nomic Wiki by failing to include my name in the players list. GUILTY/CHOKEY by OscarMeyr
09 Apr 2008 1917Machiavelli Goethe violated rule 2143 by not publishing a Notary report last month. GUILTY/APOLOGY by Iammars
03 Apr 2008 1916omd In the quoted message, Iammars consented to something. FALSE by Zefram
13 Mar 2008 1915BobTHJ comex has breached the Vote Market agreement by failing to restore his VP to a level at or above 50 within 60 days of when it first fell below that threshold. by woggle
27 Mar 2008 1914omd Rule 2166 exists. TRUE by Machiavelli
12 Apr 2008 1913omd Bob is a first-class person. FALSE by Murphy
30 Mar 2008 1912omd Bob is a player. FALSE by Murphy
30 Mar 2008 1911omd Bob is a person. FALSE by Murphy
30 Mar 2008 1910root One or more partnerships exist. TRUE by Murphy
15 Mar 2008 1909woggle CFJ 1903a has been judged. FALSE by Iammars
12 Mar 2008 1908woggle A concurring opinion has been published by the judicial panel in CFJ 1903a. FALSE by Iammars
12 Mar 2008 1907omd pikhq violated Rule 208 by failing to resolve eir intent to appeal CFJ 1856. GUILTY/CHOKEY by Zefram
07 Mar 2008 1906Zefram comex violated rule 2149 by claiming in message <6bf32280802080851i14c79ea9oa8fc2768a80bc7af@mail.gmail.com> that proposal 5419 passed while not believing that to be true. GUILTY/FINE by Wooble
18 Feb 2008 1905omd There is a Rule 9999. FALSE by Murphy
16 Feb 2008 1904pikhq comex violated Rule 2149/8, Truthfulness, by falsely claiming that there exists a rule 9999. INNOCENT by Iammars
22 Feb 2008 1903Pavitra The above question initiated an inquiry case. AFFIRMED on Appeal
16 Mar 2008⇒1903aAppeal of CFJ 1903Final decision (AFFIRM)
16 Mar 2008 1902Levi Making the public statement 'This statement is not true' would cause the person making that statement to violate Rule 2149. TRUE by omd
20 Feb 2008 1901omd Y is a contract. TRUE by Zefram
05 Feb 2008 1900Murphy Zefram CAN register. FALSE by G.
21 Feb 2008 1899Murphy BobTHJ CAN register. FALSE by G.
22 Feb 2008 1898Murphy Zefram is a player. TRUE by G.
21 Feb 2008 1897omd BobTHJ is a player OVERRULED to TRUE on Appeal
19 Mar 2008⇒1897aAppeal of CFJ 1897Final decision (OVERRULE/TRUE)
19 Mar 2008 1896omd There exists a R2160 'position' that is not an office OVERRULED to TRUE on Appeal
04 Feb 2008⇒1896aAppeal of CFJ 1896Final decision (OVERRULE/TRUE)
04 Feb 2008 1895omd BobTHJ is an R2160 'position' FALSE by G.
22 Feb 2008 1894Zefram an inquiry case CAN be initiated with a question taking the role of the statement to be inquired into TRUE by pikhq
04 Feb 2008 1893root comex successfully caused at least one player other than emself to cast a vote on Proposal 5419. FALSE by Wooble
04 Feb 2008 1892pikhq comex's non-binding agreement 'X' is a contract. FALSE by G.
04 Feb 2008 1891G. If the Speaker fails to assign prerogatives for the upcoming month in the seven days before the beginning of a month, e CAN assign prerogatives (for that month) after the month has begun. FALSE by Wooble
01 May 2008⇒1891aAppeal of CFJ 1891Final decision (REMAND)
19 Apr 2008 1890G. The Speaker CAN assign prerogatives for the upcoming month in the seven days before the beginning of a month. FALSE by Wooble
01 May 2008⇒1890aAppeal of CFJ 1890Final decision (REMAND)
19 Apr 2008 1889Wooble Zefram violated Rule 2149 in the above message by making the statement "I intend to deputise for BobTHJ to deregister em." while not reasonably believing it to be true. UNIMPUGNED by woggle
11 Feb 2008 1888pikhq The above message was a public message. FALSE by OscarMeyr
01 Feb 2008 1887Levi Making the public statement 'This statement is a lie' would cause the person making that statement to violate Rule 2149. TRUE by BobTHJ
01 Feb 2008 1886Murphy BobTHJ has not deregistered. by Zefram
11 Feb 2008 1885Taral Eris' votes of ROOT on Proposal 5412 were valid. TRUE by Zefram
31 Jan 2008 1884BobTHJ Where the above referenced decision on amending the Vote Market agreement able to be validly resolved as of the calling of this CFJ would pikhq's vote of OBJECT be valid? UNDECIDABLE by Murphy
26 Jan 2008 1883BobTHJ Where the above referenced decision on amending the Vote Market agreement able to be validly resolved as of the calling of this CFJ would Pavitra's vote of OBJECT be valid? UNDECIDABLE by Murphy
26 Jan 2008 1882omd watcher is a Player TRUE by woggle
05 Feb 2008⇒1882aAppeal of CFJ 1882Final decision (REMAND)
30 Jan 2008 1881pikhq rule 2029 requires Agorans to always Dance a Powerful Dance. FALSE by omd
07 Feb 2008 1880omd The Agoran Agricultural Association is a contract. TRUE by Iammars
30 Jan 2008 1879pikhq Canada is a nomic. FALSE by Wooble
05 Mar 2008⇒1879aAppeal of CFJ 1879Final decision (REMAND)
07 Feb 2008 1878woggle It is possible to, by announcement, cease to be a party to a contract which has exactly 1 party and which is both a location and a pledge when the contract explicitly permits this. FALSE by root
23 Jan 2008 1877woggle It is possible to cease to be a party to a location which has exactly 1 party by announcement when the text of the location explicitly permits this. FALSE by root
23 Jan 2008 1876woggle It is possible to cease to be a party to a pledge which has exactly 1 party by announcement when the text of pledge explicitly permits this. FALSE by root
23 Jan 2008 1875Levi Levi is The Speaker. FALSE by OscarMeyr
25 Jan 2008 1874Levi Murphy is The Speaker. TRUE by OscarMeyr
25 Jan 2008 1873Levi Human Point Two Bears the patent title Minister Without Portfolio. FALSE by OscarMeyr
25 Jan 2008 1872pikhq The Vote Market is a contract. TRUE by BobTHJ
15 Jan 2008 1871G. If a judge makes the right judgement but for the wrong reasons, then e has made an inappropriate judgement. FALSE by Zefram
18 Jan 2008 1870Zefram where a prerogative has been assigned to a person for a particular month, and no assignment of prerogatives has yet been made for the following month, that person loses that prerogative at the end of that month TRUE by pikhq
16 Jan 2008⇒1870aAppeal of CFJ 1870Final decision (REMAND)
15 Jan 2008 1869pikhq it is possible to join the Vote Market while already a member of the Vote Market. FALSE by Murphy
15 Jan 2008 1868BobTHJ woggle breached Rule 911 by assigning an inappropriate judgment to CFJ 1860a. INNOCENT by pikhq
16 Jan 2008 1867BobTHJ root breached Rule 911 by assigning an inappropriate judgment to CFJ 1860a. INNOCENT by pikhq
16 Jan 2008 1866BobTHJ Murphy breached Rule 911 by assigning an inappropriate judgment to CFJ 1860a. INNOCENT by pikhq
16 Jan 2008 1865Zefram the Patent Title of Champion CAN be awarded by announcement of the Herald to a person who has not won the game FALSE by root
14 Jan 2008 1864root The Left Hand is a partnership. TRUE by Taral
21 Jan 2008 1863Zefram BobTHJ violated rule 2158 by failing to assign an appropriate judgement to the question on veracity in CFJ 1860 when obliged to, by means of assigning an inappropriate judgement instead. EXCUSED by G.
29 Jan 2008⇒1863aAppeal of CFJ 1863Final decision (REMAND)
21 Jan 2008 1862Murphy Human Point Two bears the Patent Title of Minister Without Portfolio. FALSE by Iammars
17 Jan 2008 1861Iammars Players may always be referred to by eir legal name along with eir nickname. FALSE by OscarMeyr
16 Jan 2008 1860pikhq It is a violation of rule 2159 to falsely claim that something is a protective decree to Steve Wallace (the biological person, not necessarily the player). FALSE by Iammars
21 Jan 2008⇒1860aAppeal of CFJ 1860Final decision (REASSIGN)
14 Jan 2008 1859omd At least one of the votes in root's message with message-id <3fc761710712310956p646fddd3h9ca3b5ceb0c16fe4@mail.gmail.com> is valid. FALSE by Murphy
08 Jan 2008 1858woggle root violated rule 1769 by assigning, during a Holiday, judgement to the judicial question on culpability in CFJ 1838 in the above-quoted message. OVERRULED to GUILTY on Appeal
14 Jan 2008⇒1858aAppeal of CFJ 1858Final decision (OVERRULE/GUILTY)
14 Jan 2008 1857woggle root violated rule 1769 by assigning, during a Holiday, judgement to the judicial question on culpability in CFJ 1837 in the above-quoted message. OVERRULED to GUILTY on Appeal
14 Jan 2008⇒1857aAppeal of CFJ 1857Final decision (OVERRULE/GUILTY)
14 Jan 2008 1856Zefram Steve Wallace is a player FALSE by G.
08 Jan 2008 1855pikhq The AFO is not part of the basis of Agora's Child, but is a partner of Agora's Child. FALSE by woggle
15 Jan 2008 1854avpx It is possible to spend VCs that one does not own. FALSE by root
14 Jan 2008 1853G. comex has violated Rule 2149 in his communication of voting on proposal 5380. UNIMPUGNED by Taral
14 Jan 2008 1852G. comex has violated Rule 2149 in his communication of voting on proposal 5375. UNIMPUGNED by Taral
14 Jan 2008 1851Murphy Proposal 5373 was adopted in Message-ID: <476D30DB.6040804@socal.rr.com> TRUE by OscarMeyr
10 Jan 2008 1850Murphy pikhq won in Message-Id: <200712202153.34050.josiahw@gmail.com> FALSE by root
07 Jan 2008 1849Zefram BobTHJ violated rule 2149 by publishing in message <56732cfd0712210825i54c896f7n9f4795405528894e@mail.gmail.com> a statement that e did not believe was true. AFFIRMED on Appeal
14 Jan 2008⇒1849aAppeal of CFJ 1849Final decision (AFFIRM)
21 Jan 2008 1848Murphy Futuremyartug is a player. FALSE by Zefram
21 Dec 2007 1847Zefram when a person calls for judgement, and has already done so at least five times in the same week, e is awarded one blue mark by section (+b) of rule 2176 FALSE by omd
20 Dec 2007 1846BobTHJ The sentence issued by BobTHJ (prior to appeal) in CFJ 1812 included a valid set of prescribed words. OVERRULED to TRUE on Appeal
07 Jan 2008⇒1846aAppeal of CFJ 1846Final decision (OVERRULE/TRUE)
07 Jan 2008 1845Murphy comex initiated two criminal cases in Message-Id: <200712181706.58039.comexk@gmail.com> FALSE by OscarMeyr
09 Jan 2008 1844pikhq submitting a protective decree to Steve Wallace is a violation of rule 2159. TRUE by Iammars
07 Jan 2008 1843WALRUS It is possible for joining a contract to take effect retroactively. FALSE by G.
20 Dec 2007 1842WALRUS It is possible for a contract change to take effect retroactively. UNDETERMINED by G.
20 Dec 2007 1841WALRUS It is possible for a game action to take effect retroactively. TRUE by G.
20 Dec 2007 1840pikhq WALRUS is a player. FALSE by Zefram
14 Jan 2008⇒1840aAppeal of CFJ 1840Final decision (REASSIGN)
07 Jan 2008 1839pikhq Zefram violated Rule 2149/8. ("A person SHALL NOT make a public statement unless e believes in doing so e is telling the truth.") In message <20071219230243.GL17928@fysh.org>, Zefram claimed that the attempt to register WALRUS was ineffective, since 'WALRUS does not adequately identify any particular entity'. INNOCENT by Iammars
07 Jan 2008 1838omd BobTHJ breached Rule 2149 by, as a knight, publishing a statement that e believed to be false in eir message with Message-ID <56732cfd0711041449h23dcc500id9e643c76643d597@mail.gmail.com> INNOCENT by root
31 Dec 2007⇒1838aAppeal of CFJ 1838Final decision (REMAND)
21 Dec 2007 1837omd BobTHJ breached Rule 2149 by, as a knight, publishing a statement that e believed to be false in eir message with Message-ID <56732cfd0710291242h67fc331and43dd1076934828@mail.gmail.com> INNOCENT by root
31 Dec 2007⇒1837aAppeal of CFJ 1837Final decision (REMAND)
21 Dec 2007 1836omd Fookiemyartug is a player. AFFIRMED on Appeal
07 Jan 2008⇒1836aAppeal of CFJ 1836Final decision (REMAND)
21 Dec 2007⇒1836bAppeal of CFJ 1836Final decision (AFFIRM)
07 Jan 2008 1835omd In this message, comex submitted a CFJ on the statement "Who am I?" FALSE by Zefram
20 Dec 2007 1834omd In this message, comex submitted a proposal with the text "No, I'm Spartacus!" TRUE by Zefram
20 Dec 2007 1833omd In this message, comex submitted a CFJ on the statement "I'm Spartacus!" TRUE by Zefram
20 Dec 2007 1832omd The AFO violated a contract not to vote on Proposal 5365. by BobTHJ
20 Dec 2007 1831pikhq The above was a valid vote on the stability of Rulekeepor. FALSE by Iammars
05 Feb 2008⇒1831aAppeal of CFJ 1831Final decision (REMAND)
12 Dec 2007⇒1831bAppeal of CFJ 1831Final decision (REMAND)
20 Jan 2008 1830omd There are elephants over there. IRRELEVANT by OscarMeyr
13 Dec 2007⇒1830aAppeal of CFJ 1830Final decision (REMAND)
12 Dec 2007 1829pikhq The Accountor is an office. FALSE by Wooble
10 Dec 2007 1828Agora's Child pikhq, as Ambassador, is in violation of rule 2159 by claiming the following to be a protective decree to Steve "cheesworshiper" Wallace: "There is now such a thing as a suffusion of yellow." UNIMPUGNED by omd
21 Jan 2008⇒1828aAppeal of CFJ 1828Final decision (REMAND)
14 Jan 2008 1827Murphy The AFO's VVLOP changed 104 times as a result of comex's message with Message-ID <6bf32280711281839g6adde4a4wdf21f00d231c776b@mail.gmail.com> FALSE by root
20 Dec 2007 1826Murphy The AFO's VVLOP changed as a result of comex's message with Message-ID <6bf32280711281839g6adde4a4wdf21f00d231c776b@mail.gmail.com> FALSE by root
20 Dec 2007 1825Levi Murphy violated a contract to transfer one Green Mark to Levi. by pikhq
10 Dec 2007 1824omd Goethe violated Rule 2149 by recklessly (and falsely) claiming that I violated Rule 2149. INNOCENT by Taral
17 Dec 2007 1823G. comex violated Rule 2149 by recklessly (and falsely) claiming that I recklessly claimed a false thing. INNOCENT by Taral
17 Dec 2007 1822BobTHJ The inclusion or exclusion of invalid votes can invalidate the resolution of an Agoran Decision. TRUE by Zefram
04 Dec 2007 1821BobTHJ Message-Id <56732cfd0712022332k5826ec06o3b92fd665a1e2751@mail.gmail.com> was a valid resolution of an Agoran Decision. FALSE by Zefram
10 Dec 2007 1820omd Goethe violated Rule 2149 by publishing the quoted message (with message-id ). INNOCENT by Taral
10 Dec 2007 1819pikhq On Dec. 3, 2007, Fookiemyartug, comex, and BobTHJ won the game. FALSE by Wooble
04 Dec 2007 1818pikhq pikhq won the game. FALSE by OscarMeyr
05 Dec 2007 1817pikhq Win 1-10 were contests. FALSE by root
05 Dec 2007 1816pikhq pikhq was able to define dependent contracts via a contract. FALSE by root
05 Dec 2007 1815Association of Federated Organizations The AFO is a player and a partnership. TRUE by omd
03 Dec 2007 1814root The AFO won the game as a result of pikhq's message with Message-ID <200711281949.16555.josiahw@gmail.com>. FALSE by G.
06 Dec 2007 1813root The AFO won the game as a result of comex's message with Message-ID <6bf32280711281839g6adde4a4wdf21f00d231c776b@mail.gmail.com>. FALSE by G.
06 Dec 2007 1812Levi pikhq breached rule 2172 by attempting to register Agora as a B Nomic faction without Agoran Consent. OVERRULED to EXCUSED on Appeal
05 Dec 2007⇒1812aAppeal of CFJ 1812Final decision (OVERRULE/EXCUSED)
05 Dec 2007 1811pikhq Murphy is in breach of our contract concerning marks by not sending me 1 blue mark and 1 black mark. by omd
16 Dec 2007 1810Murphy The AFO resolved the Agoran decisions for Proposals 5293 and 5294 in Message-ID: <4745305E.8090405@socal.rr.com> TRUE by Taral
01 Dec 2007 1809pikhq sentencing someone to APOLOGY without giving a set of prescribed words means that the apology has a null set of prescribed words. TRUE by root
29 Nov 2007 1808pikhq sentencing someone to APOLOGY without giving a set of prescribed words means that the apology has a null set of prescribed words. TRUE by root
29 Nov 2007 1807root root won the game at or around Sat, 24 Nov 2007 23:29:13 UTC. TRUE by BobTHJ
07 Dec 2007⇒1807aAppeal of CFJ 1807Final decision (REMAND)
03 Dec 2007 1806pikhq In rule 2126, spending N+1 or N+2 VCs of different colors means that more than one color must be involved. UNDETERMINED by Zefram
01 Dec 2007⇒1806aAppeal of CFJ 1806Final decision (REMAND)
01 Dec 2007 1805BobTHJ CFJ 1799 is an inquiry case on the permissibility of an action. OVERRULED to FALSE on Appeal
05 Dec 2007⇒1805aAppeal of CFJ 1805root moves to OVERRULE/FALSE
05 Dec 2007 1804omd pikhq breached Rule 2158 by assigning an inappropriate judgement to the question on veracity in CFJ 1711 EXCUSED by G.
29 Nov 2007 1803Wooble B Nomic is a Player. FALSE by Murphy
23 Nov 2007 1802Levi pikhq obtained Agoran Consent to have Agora join B Nomic as a B Nomic faction FALSE by G.
19 Nov 2007 1801Levi Agoran Consent is required to have Agora join B Nomic as a B Nomic faction TRUE by omd
28 Nov 2007 1800Murphy Goethe initiated an Agoran decision in Message-id: TRUE by root
27 Nov 2007 1799omd It is permissible to nkeplwgplxgioyzjvtxjnncsqscvntlbdqromyeyvlhkjgt eaqnneqgujjpwcbyfrpueoydjjk AFFIRMED on Appeal
05 Dec 2007⇒1799aAppeal of CFJ 1799Final decision (AFFIRM)
05 Dec 2007 1798G. Goethe is a coauthor on the Proposal Contests Fix Mk II TRUE by Zefram
19 Nov 2007 1797Murphy The Bake The Traitor agreement is fair to all contestants while there are no contestants other than comex. FALSE by pikhq
16 Nov 2007 1796Murphy comex can join the Bake The Traitor agreement. TRUE by Taral
17 Nov 2007 1795omd CFJ 1794 is an inquiry case on the possibility of a rule-defined action TRUE by Murphy
17 Nov 2007 1794omd It is possible for Beverly to deregister. TRUE by Murphy
17 Nov 2007 1793omd If the announcement of Partnership 1's Contest had been received by the listserver sixty minutes before the announcement dissolving it, all other factors being equal, Partnership 1's Contest would have allowed any first-class player to become a party FALSE by G.
19 Nov 2007 1792omd If the announcement of Partnership 1's Contest had been received by the listserver sixty seconds before the announcement dissolving it, all other factors being equal, Partnership 1's Contest would have allowed any first-class player to become a party FALSE by G.
19 Nov 2007 1791Murphy Eris's VC holdings as reported in the Assessor's report on or about November 3, 2007 have been ratified. FALSE by root
12 Nov 2007 1790Murphy Zefram's VC holdings as reported in the Assessor's report on or about November 3, 2007 have been ratified. FALSE by root
12 Nov 2007 1789Murphy The Voting Credit holdings reported in the Assessor's report on or about November 3, 2007 have been ratified. FALSE by Taral
11 Nov 2007 1788Murphy The Assessor's report published on or about November 3, 2007 has been ratified. FALSE by root
11 Nov 2007 1787root It is permissible to judge the question on veracity in this case FALSE. UNDECIDABLE by Murphy
17 Nov 2007⇒1787aAppeal of CFJ 1787Final decision (REMAND)
13 Nov 2007 1786G. Goethe, while holding the office of Notary, did breach the terms of eir office contained in Rule 2173 by identifying the membership of the private contract known as the AFO without the consent of its members or as allowed by the contract. INNOCENT by Murphy
29 Nov 2007⇒1786aAppeal of CFJ 1786Final decision (REASSIGN)
29 Nov 2007 1785BobTHJ BobTHJ breached R1504, Criminal Cases, by failing to issue an Apology within 72 hours. GUILTY/APOLOGY by Zefram
07 Nov 2007 1784omd The message with subject "BUS: I say I pseudo-judge (fwd)", message-id that purported to judge CFJs 1774 and 1775) had the effect of assigning a judgement. TRUE by Zefram
19 Nov 2007 1783Zefram comex breached rule 2149 by knowingly or recklessly claiming, while e was a knight, in message <6bf32280711041554v63a82c17vc2925d02ad455298@mail.gmail.com>, that Fookiemyartug's personness was part of the CotC's weekly report. GUILTY/APOLOGY by pikhq
16 Nov 2007 1782Murphy pikhq initiated a criminal case in Message-id: <200711041446.04509.josiahw@gmail.com> TRUE by G.
06 Nov 2007 1781pikhq proposal 5269 was never submitted, and therefore should not have been distributed. Since the Promoter did this without a submission to the proposal pool, he made a proposal outside of rule 106, and is therefore in violation. UNIMPUGNED by omd
17 Nov 2007 1780pikhq proposal 5269 was not submitted by pikhq, and it was instead authored by the Promoter. FALSE by Zefram
07 Nov 2007 1779Zefram Fookiemyartug is a person TRUE by omd
07 Nov 2007 1778root Judging UNDECIDABLE is permissible. FALSE by Murphy
10 Nov 2007 1777Zefram Partnership 1's Contest allowed any first-class player to become a party AFFIRMED on Appeal
18 Nov 2007⇒1777aAppeal of CFJ 1777Final decision (AFFIRM)
18 Nov 2007 1776omd It is possible to deputise for the purpose of changing all sitting players to standing TRUE by root
06 Nov 2007 1775Murphy comex initiated exactly one inquiry case in Message-id: <200710281809.40881.comexk@gmail.com> FALSE by G.
05 Nov 2007 1774Murphy comex did not initiate any inquiry cases in Message-id: <200710281809.40881.comexk@gmail.com> TRUE by G.
05 Nov 2007 1773Murphy comex initiated a criminal case in the message with Message-id: <200710221616.45845.comexk@gmail.com> FALSE by pikhq
04 Nov 2007 1772omd comex initiated an equity case in eir message dated Mon, 22 Oct 2007 16:16:40 -0400 FALSE by Zefram
28 Oct 2007 1771G. If an inquiry case revolves around the interpretation of a specific action, and the caller does not provide, in arguments, evidence, or the statement, one of (a) a direct quote of the action; (b) a link or email reference to the action; or (c) an approximate time and date the action was performed in a specified forum, then the judge is acting reasonably if e judges UNDETERMINED. TRUE by root
04 Nov 2007 1770root Primo Corporation is a person and a player. FALSE by Zefram
24 Oct 2007 1769omd comex has initiated an equity case UNDETERMINED by G.
28 Oct 2007 1768omd Rule 2149's obligation on a knights to not publish statements that e believes are false is in conflict with the knight's right of participation in the fora. FALSE by Zefram
22 Oct 2007 1767pikhq When comex gave his consent in agora-discussion (not a public forum) on a panel ruling, this was *not* sufficient to actually be an agreement to the ruling on CFJ 1748a. FALSE by Taral
21 Oct 2007 1766Zefram when the CotC has recused with cause a judge who is a non-supine player, and at least a week has passed since the recusal, and the recused player's posture has not changed during that time, the CotC CAN flip that player's posture to supine by announcement TRUE by root
20 Oct 2007 1765Zefram within the week after the CotC has recused with cause a judge who is a non-supine player, e CAN flip that player's posture to supine by announcement TRUE by root
20 Oct 2007 1764omd pikhq voted FOR a proposal on or about Sun, 7 Oct 2007 16:19:46 -0600. TRUE by root
24 Oct 2007 1763Taral Eris can resolve the Agoran decision e started on 9/17 without violating a rule. TRUE by omd
08 Oct 2007 1762omd The Variety Show does not meet the definition of a contest because it is not fair to all contestants. TRUE by pikhq
07 Oct 2007 1761Murphy The AFO published the message with Message-id: <46FFFFB9.4070306@socal.rr.com> FALSE by Zefram
08 Oct 2007 1760Murphy Murphy published the message with Message-id: <46FFFFB9.4070306@socal.rr.com> TRUE by Zefram
08 Oct 2007 1759Murphy The AFO was the vote collector for the Agoran decision on whether to adopt Proposal 5222 as of the publication of Message-id: <46FFFFB9.4070306@socal.rr.com> TRUE by Zefram
03 Oct 2007 1758Murphy Murphy was the vote collector for the Agoran decision on whether to adopt Proposal 5222 as of the publication of Message-id: <46FFFFB9.4070306@socal.rr.com> FALSE by Zefram
03 Oct 2007 1757root At or within one minute of Thu, 27 Sep 2007 16:49:15 GMT, root initiated a criminal case. FALSE by Taral
31 Oct 2007 1756root At or within one minute of Thu, 27 Sep 2007 16:49:15 GMT, root initiated an inquiry case. FALSE by Taral
31 Oct 2007 1755Zefram message <46F75B65.3070304@socal.rr.com> had the effect of resolving the Agoran decision on proposals 5224 TRUE by Wooble
29 Sep 2007 1754Zefram message <46EE1408.50406@socal.rr.com> had the effect of resolving the Agoran decisions on proposals 5222 and 5223 FALSE by Taral
29 Sep 2007 1753Murphy Murphy left The Variety Show in the message in which this CFJ was called. FALSE by root
20 Oct 2007 1752Murphy Murphy left The Variety Show when e deregistered. FALSE by root
20 Oct 2007 1751Murphy Murphy caused the AFO to act in Message-ID: <46F73781.6020303@socal.rr.com> TRUE by Taral
08 Oct 2007 1750Murphy Murphy is a member of the AFO's basis. TRUE by Taral
08 Oct 2007 1749pikhq Upon joining Agora as a first-class player, Pikhq obtained one white VC, and is of the white party. TRUE by Zefram
03 Oct 2007 1748root The ratification of an announcement of the resolution of an Agoran decision can change the decision's outcome. FALSE by Zefram
25 Oct 2007⇒1748aAppeal of CFJ 1748Final decision (REMAND)
21 Oct 2007 1747omd The judicial panel of Murphy, root, and Wooble would be a person if the hypothetical Rule in the evidence section were enacted. FALSE by Murphy
24 Sep 2007 1746omd The judicial panel of Murphy, root, and Wooble is a person. FALSE by Murphy
24 Sep 2007 1745Murphy It is possible for a judicial case to have more than one subclass. OVERRULED to IRRELEVANT on Appeal
22 Oct 2007⇒1745aAppeal of CFJ 1745Final decision (OVERRULE/IRRELEVANT)
29 Oct 2007 1744Wooble Big Brother is a Player. UNDETERMINED by Taral
25 Sep 2007 1743Murphy Eris initiated an Agoran decision to determine a new holder for the office of Scorekeepor in the message with Message-id: TRUE by Zefram
24 Sep 2007 1742Pavitra It is possible for a judicial case to exist that has no subclass. TRUE by Murphy
17 Sep 2007 1741Peekee Peekee is a player. TRUE by root
18 Sep 2007 1740Zefram BobTHJ violated rule 1504 by failing to notify the defendant in CFJ 1735 as soon as possible while assigned as judge of that case during the pre-trial period. OVERRULED to APOLOGY on Appeal
21 Sep 2007⇒1740aAppeal of CFJ 1740Final decision (OVERRULE/APOLOGY)
22 Sep 2007 1739omd A part of a message sent to a Public Forum that is quoting another message (even if the quote is intended to perform an action) is never a violation of Rule 2149 to publish. UNDETERMINED by Taral
05 Sep 2007 1738Zefram rule 2149's obligation on a knave to not publish statements that e believes are true is in conflict with the knave's right of participation in the fora. TRUE by root
29 Aug 2007 1737Murphy The pre-trial phase of a criminal case does not end until one week after the judge informs the defendant of the case and invites em to rebut the argument for eir guilt. TRUE by root
21 Sep 2007 1736omd The Pineapple Partnership failed to hail Eris UNIMPUGNED by Murphy
29 Aug 2007 1735omd Eris published a statement that e thinks is true UNIMPUGNED by Zefram
21 Oct 2007 1734omd comex sucks IRRELEVANT by Taral
24 Aug 2007 1733omd Eris violated a rule SLIPPERY by root
04 Sep 2007 1732omd if an inquiry case with the statement "the holder of the office of Clerk of the Courts is Zefram" was judged FALSE, the holder of the office of Clerk of the Courts would be Zefram TRUE by Zefram
23 Aug 2007 1731Zefram it is possible for a person to bear more than one instance of a patent title simultaneously. TRUE by Murphy
29 Aug 2007 1730Pavitra The player Goddess Eris assigned judgements to the CFJs 1716, 1710, 1711, 1724, and 1725. TRUE by Zefram
30 Aug 2007 1729Zefram The Host has awarded Levi a total of 100 points so far. TRUE by root
28 Aug 2007 1728BobTHJ A player who is an eligible voter may submit an infinite number of votes on a proposal. FALSE by Murphy
20 Aug 2007 1727Murphy BobTHJ lost one VC for recusing emself from CFJ 1712. FALSE by Wooble
18 Aug 2007 1726Murphy BobTHJ lost one Blue VC for recusing emself from CFJ 1712. FALSE by omd
17 Aug 2007 1725Peekee hedgehogcull is a Player. UNDETERMINED by Taral
22 Aug 2007 1724Peekee eekeeP is a Player. UNDETERMINED by Taral
22 Aug 2007 1723root On or around August 15, 2007, root initiated an Agoran decision to approve the action of making bd_ inactive. FALSE by Murphy
21 Aug 2007 1722root On or around August 15, 2007, root initiated an Agoran decision to make bd_ inactive. FALSE by Zefram
20 Aug 2007 1721Wooble The Person known to Agora as Peekee recently sent a message to the Public Forum containing the text "I did not send the message." TRUE by Zefram
21 Aug 2007 1720Zefram in CFJ 1715, the alleged act is illegal but impossible. FALSE by root
14 Aug 2007 1719root Peekee is a player. FALSE by Zefram
15 Aug 2007 1718Peekee Peekee submitted an email to the agora-discussion forum containing "Fnord!" IRRELEVANT by root
13 Aug 2007 1717Peekee Murphy submitted a proposal in eir recent post with subject "What is the title of this proposal?" TRUE by Murphy
13 Aug 2007 1716omd Peekee has violated Rule 2149 by deliberately or recklessly making the false statement "maybe" UNIMPUGNED by Taral
22 Aug 2007 1715omd Peekee has violated Rule 754 by sending communication with little regularity. UNIMPUGNED by Wooble
14 Aug 2007 1714Wooble A Player of Agora who is not the Ambassador CAN unilaterally take Game Actions in a foreign nomic on Agora's behalf if it is legal for Agora to take those Actions in the foreign nomic. AFFIRMED on Appeal
07 Aug 2007⇒1714aAppeal of CFJ 1714Final decision (AFFIRM)
07 Aug 2007 1713Zefram CFJ 1712 is a criminal case. TRUE by Wooble
02 Aug 2007 1712Murphy CotC Zefram violated Rule 1871 (The Standing Court) by changing all sitting players to standing on or about Mon, 30 Jul 2007 22:11:48 +0100. UNIMPUGNED by Wooble
15 Aug 2007 1711Murphy Proposal 5085 was adopted on or about Mon, 23 Jul 2007 06:25:41 -0700. OVERRULED to FALSE on Appeal
22 Oct 2007⇒1711aAppeal of CFJ 1711Final decision (REMAND)
09 Oct 2007⇒1711bAppeal of CFJ 1711Final decision (OVERRULE/FALSE)
22 Oct 2007 1710Murphy Proposal 5085 was adopted on or about Sun, 22 Jul 2007 20:31:06 -0700. FALSE by Taral
22 Aug 2007 1709Zefram rule 1742's obligation to act in accordance with contracts is binding on non-player parties to R1742 contracts. IRRELEVANT by omd
05 Aug 2007 1708Zefram comex violated rule 2149 by falsely claiming in message <6bf32280707091136l373a0b37m7e5516a9279d2335@mail.gmail.com> that eir nickname is "Murphy". UNIMPUGNED by Murphy
29 Aug 2007 1707Zefram B Nomic met rule 2147's requirements at the time of BobTHJ's message on 2007-06-14 in which e claimed to make B Nomic a protectorate. TRUE by Human Point Two
23 Jul 2007 1706BobTHJ Gunner Nomic 2.0 is not a non-natural person by the rules of Agora. TRUE by Pineapple Partnership
23 Jul 2007 1705Murphy It is possible for the Speaker to hold the office of Clerk of the Courts. TRUE by BobTHJ
24 Jul 2007 1704Zefram Primo Corporation is a protectorate. TRUE by Murphy
19 Jul 2007 1703OscarMeyr Comex successfully changed eir nickname to Murphy on 9 July 2007. FALSE by root
19 Jul 2007 1702Murphy A requirement to submit something to an officer is satisfied by publishing it, even if that office is vacant at the time. TRUE by Zefram
01 Aug 2007 1701Zefram to qualify as a member of a partnership one must be responsible for all of the partnership's obligations. FALSE by Human Point Two
21 Jul 2007 1700Zefram Peekee's colleague Jon is a person. Appealed by Murphy
19 Jul 2007 1699Zefram comex has violated rule 2149 by falsely claiming in message <6bf32280707091136l373a0b37m7e5516a9279d2335@mail.gmail.com> that eir nickname is "Murphy". FALSE by BobTHJ
25 Jul 2007 1698omd The player with the email address emurphy42@socal.rr.com has violated Rule 1586 by having the same nickname as me (the caller of this CFJ). FALSE by Zefram
24 Jul 2007 1697BobTHJ Since the repeal of Gunner Nomic 2.0 rule 357.3 Gunner Nomic no longer satisfies the conditions of a Player of Agora. Appealed by root
20 Jul 2007 1696BobTHJ Since the repeal of Gunner Nomic 2.0 rule 357.3, Gunner Nomic no longer satisfies the conditions of a Partnership. TRUE by Pineapple Partnership
20 Jul 2007 1695Levi BobTHJ can vote on behalf of Primo Corporation TRUE by root
13 Jul 2007 1694BobTHJ Gunner Nomic 2.0 has allowed Agora unrestricted access to change its ruleset. Appealed by Zefram
19 Jul 2007 1693root CFJ 1684 has been judged. TRUE by Murphy
28 Jun 2007 1692root A CFJ that was called on or around May 25, 2007 is identified by the index 1684. TRUE by Murphy
28 Jun 2007 1691omd The Pineapple Partnership is a person. TRUE by Murphy
29 Jun 2007 1690G. Prior to this CFJ, the results of Proposal 4977 were not challenged. TRUE by Zefram
28 Jun 2007 1689omd root changed his Primo Corporation share holdings to 1 million on or about Wed, 6 Jun 2007 21:35:18 -0600. FALSE by root
28 Jun 2007 1688Murphy Murphy is the author of Proposal 4939. TRUE by root
06 Aug 2007 1687Zefram a binding agreement created under the laws of the state of Colorado can form a partnership that constitutes a person in Agoran law SUSTAINED on Appeal
19 Jul 2007⇒1687aAppeal of CFJ 1687Final decision (SUSTAIN)
19 Jul 2007 1686BobTHJ root has violated the agreement titled "Primo Corporation Charter" FALSE by Murphy
13 Jun 2007 1685G. root's keyboard is a player. FALSE by Zefram
08 Jun 2007 1684root The Pineapple Partnership is a person. OVERRULED to TRUE on Appeal
02 Aug 2007⇒1684aAppeal of CFJ 1684Zefram moves to OVERRULE/TRUE
02 Aug 2007 1683Zefram a binding agreement under rule 1742 can be made among a set of exactly zero players (the empty set) Appealed by root
26 May 2007 1682Zefram a binding agreement under rule 1742 can be made among a set of exactly one player Appealed by root
26 May 2007 1681omd Within three minutes before Mon, 21 May 2007 20:19:27 -0500, Yin Corp was a person distinct from Quazie Appealed by Quazie
02 Jun 2007 1680omd Yin Corp and Yang Corp are the same person FALSE by Human Point Two
26 May 2007 1679omd Yang Corp is a person FALSE by Human Point Two
26 May 2007 1678omd Yin Corp is a person FALSE by Human Point Two
26 May 2007 1677omd this is not a CFJ FALSE by Pineapple Partnership
29 Jun 2007 1676omd this is a CFJ TRUE by BobTHJ
07 Jun 2007 1675Murphy Quorum for a proposal is based on the maximum number of eligible voters at any time during the voting period. FALSE by The Hanging Judge
23 May 2007 1674Murphy Quorum for a proposal is based on the number of eligible voters at the end of the voting period. FALSE by The Hanging Judge
23 May 2007 1673Murphy Quorum for a proposal is based on the number of eligible voters at the start of the voting period. FALSE by The Hanging Judge
23 May 2007 1672Quazie The International Associate Director of Personnel is the Director of Personnel. TRUE by The Hanging Judge
07 Jun 2007 1671omd Second-System Effect registered on or about Sun, 13 May 2007 16:09:28 -0700 TRUE by BobTHJ
07 Jun 2007 1670Zefram where a proposal's distribution has a different text from the proposal's submission, and the proposal is adopted, the version of the proposal that takes effect is the distributed version TRUE by Murphy
08 Jun 2007 1669Zefram where a purported distribution of a proposal has a text that is slightly and non-obviously different from the text of the proposal as submitted, and otherwise conforms to the rules' requirements on proposal distribution, this constitutes a distribution of the submitted proposal FALSE by Murphy
08 Jun 2007 1668Zefram if a partnership agreement allows for the set of partners to change, and such a change occurs from one set of natural persons to a different set of natural persons, then the partnership defined before the change is a different legal person from the partnership defined after the change. FALSE by The Hanging Judge
23 May 2007 1667Zefram if there is a partnership agreement A, defining a partnership PA, for which the partners are a partnership PB and one of PB's members M, then PA is the same legal person as PB. FALSE by The Hanging Judge
23 May 2007 1666Zefram if two binding agreements each purport to construct a partnership, and the set of partners is the same for both, then the two agreements construct and govern a single partnership. FALSE by The Hanging Judge
23 May 2007 1665Murphy Immediately after Goethe's message with Message-ID , one or more of (BobTHJ, Eris, Levi, Maud, Peter, Sherlock) were Partners as described by the Pineapple Partnership agreement. TRUE by BobTHJ
28 Jun 2007 1664Murphy Immediately after Goethe's message with Message-ID , one or more of (comex, Eris, Manu, Maud, Quazie, Sherlock) were Partners as described by the Pineapple Partnership agreement. TRUE by BobTHJ
28 Jun 2007 1663Murphy Immediately after Goethe's message with Message-ID , one or more of (GreyKnight, Levi, Manu, Maud, sproingie) were Partners as described by the Pineapple Partnership agreement. FALSE by BobTHJ
28 Jun 2007 1662Murphy Immediately after Goethe's message with Message-ID , one or more of (OscarMeyr, Peter, Quazie, Sherlock, sproingie) were Partners as described by the Pineapple Partnership agreement. FALSE by BobTHJ
28 Jun 2007 1661Murphy Immediately after Goethe's message with Message-ID , there were exactly two Partners, including Zefram, as described by the Pineapple Partnership agreement. TRUE by BobTHJ
28 Jun 2007 1660Murphy The words "Office" and "Officer" used by the charter of Primo Corporation, when qualified by the additional phrase "of Primo Corporation", are not bound by the Rule definition of the words "Office" and "Officer". TRUE by root
13 Jun 2007 1659Murphy The phrase "by announcement" and similar phrases used by the charter of Primo Corporation, when qualified by the additional phrase "to the Corporate Forum", are not bound by the standard Rule definition of the phrase "by announcement". FALSE by root
13 Jun 2007 1658omd The term 'contract' as used in R2136 should be interpreted as synonymous with 'binding agreement'. TRUE by Zefram
28 Jun 2007 1657omd The term 'contract' as used in R2136 should be interpreted as synonymous with 'Agoran Contract'. FALSE by Zefram
28 Jun 2007 1656Zefram the Promotor has distributed a proposal under the description "proposal 4963" which includes the text "Change the Power of rule 2126 to 2." TRUE by root
13 Jun 2007 1655Zefram the Promotor has distributed the proposal titled "mostly-random judicial assignments" submitted by Zefram FALSE by root
13 Jun 2007 1654Zefram item (a) in rule 683 requires that for a ballot to be valid its submitter must be an eligible voter at the time that that the ballot's validity is determined TRUE by omd
14 May 2007 1653Zefram item (a) in rule 683 requires that for a ballot to be valid its submitter must be an eligible voter at the time that the ballot is submitted FALSE by omd
14 May 2007 1652Zefram the set of eligible voters on an Agoran decision can change during its voting period TRUE by omd
14 May 2007 1651Zefram if a R107 notice initiating an Agoran decision does not contain an explicit list of the eligible voters, and there is later a dispute (evidenced by submission of a CFJ) over which voters were eligible at that time, then the notice's description of the class of eligible voters was necessarily insufficient to enable public agreement on which persons are eligible TRUE by Murphy
07 Aug 2007⇒1651aAppeal of CFJ 1651Final decision (REASSIGN)
12 Jul 2007 1650Zefram a message labelled as a "distribution of proposals" and detailing the text and other attributes of proposals, as has been periodically published during the first quarter of 2007, in the absence of public disagreement over voter eligibility, qualifies as a set of R107 notices initiating the Agoran decisions on the adoption of those proposals TRUE by Murphy
11 May 2007 1649BobTHJ BobTHJ is an eligible voter on proposals 4947-4957 TRUE by Zefram
13 Jun 2007 1648Murphy BobTHJ registered on or about Mon, 30 Apr 2007 12:06:41 -0600. TRUE by Maud
14 May 2007 1647Taral Murphy's message with datestamp Sun, 29 Apr 2007 16:59:19 -0700 had the effect of submitting a proposal. FALSE by Murphy
29 Jun 2007 1646Zefram Quazie's VC spending in the message identified by message ID <4635317D.8030401@gmail.com> took effect in the Agoran week beginning at 00:00 UTC on 30 April 2007. TRUE by Taral
18 May 2007 1645Zefram where a proposal attempts two separate rule changes affecting the same rule, if one of the attempted rule changes is not possible and the other is then the possible rule change does in fact occur, even if both attempted rule changes were specified in a single sentence, unless the proposal explicitly requires a different resolution Dismissed by G.
29 Apr 2007 1644Zefram where a proposal contains the form of words "Change the power of rule NNNN to P and amend it by XXX.", where XXX specifies a text change, this constitutes two attempted rule changes TRUE by G.
29 Apr 2007 1643Zefram where a proposal specifies a single rule amendment in two parts, and one of the parts is not possible, the whole attempted amendment fails, even if the other part could have been applied if it stood alone Appealed by Taral
30 Apr 2007 1642Zefram where a proposal contains the form of words "Amend rule NNNN by XXX. Further amend rule NNNN by YYY.", where both XXX and YYY specify text changes, this constitutes a single attempt at a rule change, even though it is specified in two parts in separate sentences FALSE by G.
29 Apr 2007 1641Zefram where a proposal contains the form of words "Amend rule NNNN by XXX and by YYY.", where both XXX and YYY specify text changes, this constitutes a single attempt at a rule change, even though it is specified in two parts TRUE by G.
29 Apr 2007 1640Zefram where a proposal contains the form of words "Amend rule NNNN by XXX and YYY.", where both XXX and YYY specify text changes, this constitutes a single attempt at a rule change, even though it is specified in two parts TRUE by G.
29 Apr 2007 1639Zefram where a proposal attempts two separate amendments of the text of the same rule, if one of the attempted amendments is not possible and the other is then the possible amendment does in fact occur, unless the proposal explicitly requires a different resolution TRUE by G.
29 Apr 2007 1638Zefram where a proposal contains the form of words "Amend rule NNNN by XXX. Amend rule NNNN by YYY.", this constitutes two separate attempts at rule changes, even though both attempt to amend the same rule TRUE by G.
29 Apr 2007 1637G. If no punishment is proscribed for a given action, that action is not illegal. Dismissed by Zefram
29 Apr 2007 1636G. If an action can not be punished, than no punishment is proscribed. FALSE by Zefram
29 Apr 2007 1635G. If an action is not performed, it can not be punished. TRUE by Zefram
29 Apr 2007 1634G. If an action is ineffective, it is not performed. FALSE by Zefram
29 Apr 2007 1633G. If an action is illegal, it is considered ineffective. Dismissed by Zefram
29 Apr 2007 1632G. If the rules proscribe a punishment for a given action, that action is illegal. FALSE by Zefram
29 Apr 2007 1631Murphy comex registered on or about Sat, 28 Apr 2007 22:00:01 -0400. AFFIRMED on Appeal
24 Oct 2010⇒1631aAppeal of CFJ 1631Final decision (AFFIRM)
24 Oct 2010 1630G. We're all mad, here. Appealed by G.
01 May 2007 1629G. There are elephants to the left. Dismissed by Pineapple Partnership
11 May 2007 1628G. Zefram is wearing a hat. Dismissed by Zefram
29 Apr 2007 1627Zefram the text in exhibit A, if enacted into a Rule, would conflict with Rule 101 FALSE by Maud
05 May 2007 1626Murphy A rule cannot directly enact, modify, or repeal a rule (including itself), unless it takes precedence over the last paragraph of Rule 105. Order(s) issued
11 Apr 2007 1625Zefram proposal 4805 succeeded in amending rule 2101 (prior to repealing it) FALSE by Pineapple Partnership
29 Apr 2007 1624Zefram neither rule 2009 nor rule 2037 has been repealed TRUE by Levi
11 Apr 2007 1623Murphy The Pineapple Partnership is a person. Appealed by root
30 May 2007 1622Pineapple Partnership the Pineapple Partnership is a person TRUE by G.
13 Mar 2007 1621Murphy GreyKnight is a player. TRUE by OscarMeyr
23 Jul 2007⇒1621aAppeal of CFJ 1621Final decision (REMAND)
26 Jun 2007 1620Quazie The following statement from the judgment of CFJ 1589 is true 'All players that were inactive when 4866 was adopted are considered inactive for any such rule until they next participate in Agora, from which point they should be considered active.' FALSE by Zefram
22 Feb 2007 1619Quazie Any actions Quazie has preformed since september 18th 2006 that are limited to active players never happened FALSE by Zefram
22 Feb 2007 1618Quazie Quazie is inactive FALSE by Zefram
22 Feb 2007 1617Murphy Rule 2024 should be interpreted such that "same Agoran Week" means "same Agoran Week as the possibly-Excess CFJ". TRUE by G.
11 Apr 2007 1616G. Zefram is a person. TRUE by Sherlock
28 Feb 2007 1615G. Zefram successfully called for judgement on or about Fri, 2 Feb 2007 10:06:14 +0000. TRUE by Sherlock
28 Feb 2007 1614Zefram Zefram is an avocado. Dismissed by OscarMeyr
25 Feb 2007 1613G. Zefram is a pineapple. Dismissed by Peter
27 Feb 2007 1612Zefram Rule 1871 should be interpreted such that it is possible to publish a Notice of Rotation, and that such a Notice has the effect of making all turned players unturned, even if there is no open CFJ with no Trial Judge assigned to it TRUE by Murphy
11 Apr 2007 1611Zefram GreyKnight has violated Rule 1868 by failing to assign a Trial Judge to CFJs 1600 to 1604 TRUE by omd
26 Jun 2007 1610Zefram this is an Excess CFJ FALSE by G.
06 Apr 2007 1609Maud Michael's message, on or about 11 January 2007, reading in part "I hereby vote AGAINST all proposals currently up for vote", did not have the effect of submitting any ballots. FALSE by Cecilius
28 Feb 2007 1608G. Unanimous (Voting index = Unanimity) Proposals may be adopted. TRUE by Maud
29 Mar 2007 1607G. Non-Unanimous (Voting index not Unanimity) Agoran Decisions may not be adopted. FALSE by Cecilius
02 Feb 2007 1606G. Goethe was deregistered in a Writ of FAGE in December 2006. Dismissed by Murphy
30 Mar 2007 1605Zefram Rule 955 should be interpreted such a voting index of "Unanimity" cannot meet or exceed any numerical adoption index. FALSE by Murphy
06 Feb 2007 1604Zefram it is impossible to assign to Judge this CFJ any player who was registered at the time it was called. FALSE by Murphy
26 Feb 2007 1603Zefram being Barred from judging a CFJ does not constitute being Barred from judging a set of Linked CFJs containing that CFJ, even though it has the effect of making the Barred person ineligible to Judge such a set of Linked CFJs under some circumstances. TRUE by Murphy
26 Feb 2007 1602Zefram a set of Linked CFJs is an entity distinct from the individual CFJs from which it is composed. TRUE by Murphy
26 Feb 2007 1601Zefram when a Judge is to be assigned to a set of Linked CFJs as required by Rule 2024, references in Rule 698 to "that CFJ" or "that increasingly annoying CFJ" must be interpreted as references to the set of Linked CFJs. FALSE by Murphy
26 Feb 2007 1600Zefram in Rule 698 the phrase "all barred players" means all Players that are Barred from Judging the increasingly annoying CFJ. TRUE by Murphy
26 Feb 2007 1599Murphy Rule 402 (Church and State) may cause the Clerk of the Courts to become Speaker. Appealed by Murphy
18 Jul 2007 1598Sherlock Murphy received more than one Patent Title of Champion on December 30th, 2006 FALSE by GreyKnight
31 Jan 2007 1597G. An appeal of the Trial Judgement for CFJ 1594 may not be initiated. FALSE by Michael
31 Jan 2007 1596Quazie CFJ 1594 has been judged. FALSE by OscarMeyr
29 Mar 2007 1595Murphy Agora is dead. Dismissed by Quazie
24 Jan 2007 1594Murphy Players cannot be deregistered due to Rule 1789. REVERSED on Appeal
30 Mar 2007⇒1594aAppeal of CFJ 1594Final decision (REVERSE)
30 Mar 2007 1593G. Evantine is a Fugitive from Justice. FALSE by Murphy
30 Mar 2007 1592G. Evantine holds the patent title Fugitive. TRUE by Murphy
30 Mar 2007 1591G. Evantine is a Fugitive. TRUE by Murphy
30 Mar 2007 1590Murphy Quazie is eligible to be a Judge. FALSE by GreyKnight
09 Nov 2006 1589Murphy Quazie is inactive. REVERSED on Appeal
02 Feb 2007⇒1589aAppeal of CFJ 1589Final decision (REVERSE)
02 Feb 2007 1588G. An Appeal may not be initiated twice for the same trial judgement. FALSE by Murphy
24 Jul 2006 1587G. If, as part of eir duties with respect to the Speaker's Veto, the Assessor publishes a copy of a vetoed proposal with clear indication that it become a proposal, then the Assessor is the Proposer of that new Proposal. Dismissed by Taral
02 Aug 2006 1586G. The text in the most recent Proposal Pool Report, purporting to be Proposal 06-017 ("Fixing Your Turn"), is a Proposal. TRUE by Taral
02 Aug 2006 1585G. The Deckmastor may legally deal a card to Goethe, thus satisfying a pending draw, but e may not legally deal a card to Quazie. FALSE by OscarMeyr
18 Jun 2006 1584G. Sherlock has made an infinite number of notes that The Library held a winning hand. FALSE by Michael
20 Mar 2006 1583Sherlock Sherlock played Corporate Bankruptcy on February 10th, 2006. FALSE by Taral
06 Mar 2006 1582G. Conclaves have a quorum of 5. FALSE by Manu
01 Mar 2006 1581root Proposal 06-006, titled "Quick Conclave Fix" and submitted by root on February 20, 2006, is democratic. FALSE by G.
01 Mar 2006 1580G. Maud performed a regulated action in this message: http://www.agoran omic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2006-January/005510. html FALSE by Murphy
13 Feb 2006 1579Taral Eris gained an albatross of the Thief from eir play of Thieves in the Night naming Riail. FALSE by Michael
16 Jan 2006 1578Taral Eris's play of Thieves in the Night naming Riail was successful. FALSE by Michael
16 Jan 2006 1577Sherlock The Registrar has not legally resolved the Rebellion that occurred on December 15th, 2005. FALSE by OscarMeyr
13 Feb 2006 1576G. Goethe successfully played Corporate Bankruptcy on or about Oct. 31, 2005. TRUE by Maud
17 Nov 2005 1575G. root is required to deliver a legal judgement for CFJ 1278. TRUE by Taral
26 Sep 2005 1574Manu All Cards curently defined in the Onepower Cardbook that change Kudos (other than fees) are invalid and have no effect. FALSE by OscarMeyr
14 Aug 2005 1573Maud OscarMeyr became Speaker on or about 22:58:35 on 30 June 2005. FALSE by G.
11 Jul 2005 1572Maud The phrase "no Votes were cast AGAINST it" in rule 2095 should be interpreted as "any vote cast AGAINST it either was cancelled or at the end of the voting period had a vote value besides AGAINST". TRUE by Murphy
26 Jun 2005 1571root The orders executed by Goethe in the second message submitted as evidence are improper. TRUE by Sherlock
17 Jun 2005 1570root The legality of at least one of the transfers referenced by Goethe in the first message submitted as evidence cannot be determined with finality, as required by the rule "Win by Paradox". TRUE by Sherlock
17 Jun 2005 1569Manu Manu successfully transfered a Kudo from a Contract to emself at least once. FALSE by Maud
08 Jun 2005 1568OscarMeyr root is Noisy. TRUE by Michael
25 May 2005 1567G. If Sherlock has a One Share card, then Goethe errored in good faith in determining the cards to deal, and the errors did not greatly change the probability of the cards that were selected. TRUE by Manu
27 May 2005 1566Quazie Eris is guilty of Delay of Game after Quazie played Your Turn indicating Eris. FALSE by root
22 May 2005 1565Maud The holder of power of attorney for a player who is not the speaker may deregister that player. FALSE by G.
13 Jun 2005 1564Sherlock Goethe possesses a Not Your Turn card. Dismissed by Murphy
15 May 2005 1563Sherlock Goethe possesses a Discard Picking card. Dismissed by OscarMeyr
14 May 2005 1562G. A cancelled vote on a Proposal does not count towards quorum. TRUE by Michael
05 May 2005 1561Manu The Library can not receive Boons and/or Patent Titles TRUE by G.
05 May 2005 1560Sherlock The Justiciar's report was not ratified in 2003. Appealed by root
05 May 2005 1559Quazie Quazie successfully played Library Renewal on April 21st FALSE by Manu
27 Apr 2005 1558Quazie When gazebo_dude deregistered, Thieves in the Night was returned to the deck TRUE by Maud
24 Apr 2005 1557G. Quazie's private Orders to Goethe on or about Mon, 11 Apr 2005 22:41:06 were improperly executed. Appealed by root
20 Apr 2005 1556G. Goethe's private Orders to Quazie on or about Mon, 11 Apr 2005 19:27:50 were improperly executed. FALSE by Manu
20 Apr 2005 1555G. Quazie's private Orders to Goethe on or about Sat, 9 Apr 2005 04:28:32 were improperly executed. TRUE by Manu
19 Apr 2005 1554Quazie At least one proposal containing a rule change, that was submitted after Rule 1561 was created, has taken effect. TRUE by root
25 Apr 2005 1553root The Assessor may refuse to assign a voting index to an aborted proposal. FALSE by OscarMeyr
21 Apr 2005 1552root The Assessor may refuse to publish the votes cast on an aborted proposal. Appealed by Maud
03 Jun 2005 1551root An aborted proposal necessarily fails. FALSE by OscarMeyr
21 Apr 2005 1550root When a proposal is aborted, all votes cast on it are canceled. REVERSED on Appeal
19 Jun 2005⇒1550aAppeal of CFJ 1550Final decision (SUSTAIN)
03 Jun 2005⇒1550bAppeal of CFJ 1550Final decision (REVERSE)
19 Jun 2005 1549root When a proposal is aborted, its voting period immediately ends, if it has not ended already. TRUE by OscarMeyr
21 Apr 2005 1548Quazie root successfully played 'drop your weapon' on saturday april 16th TRUE by root
05 May 2005 1547Murphy Multiple CFJs are not linked unless they are clearly labelled as Linked CFJs within the message in which they are submitted. TRUE by Michael
20 Apr 2005 1546root In reports and distributions, the Promotor is permitted to add or delete whitespace or other formatting text to or from a proposal, provided that the substance of the proposal is not altered. TRUE by Kolja
20 Apr 2005 1545Quazie Goethe's order to Quazie, ordering Quazie to withdraw eir orders because they were invalid, was a valid order Dismissed by Murphy
26 Apr 2005 1544Quazie Quazie's order to Goethe, ordering Goethe to publicly announce that e is a Ninny, was a valid order TRUE by Kolja
21 Apr 2005 1543Quazie Quazie's order to Goethe, ordering Goethe to dance, was a valid order TRUE by Maud
24 Apr 2005 1542Kolja The rules currently define no card with the caption "Your Turn". FALSE by Sherlock
19 Apr 2005 1541Murphy On or about Sun, 10 Apr 2005 23:46:45 -0400, root submitted a Call for Judgement with the statement "Quazie attempted to declare Presence on several Ordinary proposals". FALSE by G.
18 Apr 2005 1540Murphy On or about Sun, 10 Apr 2005 23:46:45 -0400, root submitted a Call for Judgement with the statement "e attempted to declare Presence on several Ordinary proposals". FALSE by G.
18 Apr 2005 1539Murphy On or about Sun, 10 Apr 2005 23:46:45 -0400, root submitted a Call for Judgement. FALSE by G.
18 Apr 2005 1538G. A successful play of the Corporate Bankruptcy card causes any shares cards not in the Deck to be discarded. TRUE by Riail
17 Apr 2005 1537root Goethe has a Two Shares card. TRUE by Quazie
11 Apr 2005 1536Murphy Murphy is not a Contestant in Pakaran's Contest. FALSE by Michael
17 Mar 2005 1535Sherlock Sherlock did not gain 15 Blots on June 15th, 2004. FALSE by root
18 Mar 2005 1534Quazie Michael Norrish is the Speaker. FALSE by Kolja
24 Mar 2005 1533G. Rule 1561 cannot prevent an adopted Rule Change from taking effect. FALSE by Murphy
18 Apr 2005⇒1533aAppeal of CFJ 1533Final decision (REMAND)
06 Apr 2005⇒1533bAppeal of CFJ 1533Final decision (REMAND)
17 Apr 2005 1532Quazie Proposals containing rule changes that were submitted after Rule 1561 was created have taken effect. FALSE by Sherlock
11 Mar 2005 1531root Proposal 4639 was Aborted. FALSE by Maud
12 Mar 2005 1530G. Quazie's Hand is Free. TRUE by Manu
22 Feb 2005 1529G. Goethe was a Corporate Raider when Proposal 4639's voting period ended. FALSE by OscarMeyr
26 Feb 2005 1528G. Proposal 4639 was a Takeover Proposal when its voting period ended. FALSE by OscarMeyr
26 Feb 2005 1527root Goethe has nine Pennies. FALSE by OscarMeyr
23 Jan 2005 1526Murphy No player's Voting Potential has increased due to Proposal 4618 (Battery packs). TRUE by Riail
13 Dec 2004 1525OscarMeyr The Patent Title of Champion defined in R2075 is different from the previous Patent Title of Champion. FALSE by RedKnight
27 Nov 2004 1524G. A Corporate Bankruptcy card has been legally dealt to root. FALSE by Maud
12 Nov 2004 1523G. If It's A Surprise is played when the hand size is above the maximum, the play wholly fails. TRUE by root
10 Nov 2004 1522G. A Player may NOT draw two cards without fee by playing It's A Surprise, if eir hand size is above the maximum. TRUE by root
10 Nov 2004 1521Murphy Eris has a beard. TRUE by Taral
19 Aug 2004 1520root Reasonable Doubt achieved a Team Win on Thursday, July 29, 2004. FALSE by G.
20 Aug 2004 1519root There is a Contest named Claustronomic, and its Contestmaster is root. TRUE by G.
20 Aug 2004 1518G. Elysion was awarded 5 points on or about 29-Jul-04. FALSE by Michael
08 Oct 2004 1517G. Claustronomic is not currently an Agoran Contest. TRUE by Michael
08 Oct 2004 1516G. Murphy's honor, immediately before e attempted to increase eir Voting Potential by 41, can not be determined by reasonable effort. FALSE by Elysion
23 Jul 2004 1515Murphy Murphy's Voting Potential is 1. FALSE by Elysion
23 Jul 2004 1514Murphy Murphy's Voting Potential is 42. FALSE by Elysion
23 Jul 2004 1513G. Riall holds a Debate-o-matic card. TRUE by OscarMeyr
01 Aug 2004 1512G. Proposal 4588 is in its voting period. TRUE by OscarMeyr
01 Aug 2004 1511G. Proposal 4588 is Democratic. FALSE by OscarMeyr
01 Aug 2004 1510root Riail currently possesses one or more Debate-O-Matic cards. TRUE by Taral
04 Jul 2004 1509root Goethe is the Prime Executor of the Deck with respect to the the requirement to post "Hot Potato" to a public forum as a result of root's play of the Hot Potato card on Sunday, May 16 2004. FALSE by Murphy
20 Jun 2004 1508root The Deck is guilty of the class 1 Infraction of Dropping the Potato. TRUE by Murphy
20 Jun 2004 1507root Goethe's delegation of the Deckmastor Office to Wes on Tuesday, May 18 2004 extended the deadline of the Deck's requirement to post the phrase "Hot Potato" to "as soon as possible" after the delegation. FALSE by Murphy
20 Jun 2004 1506root The Deckmastor is not empowered to post messages on behalf of the Deck. TRUE by Murphy
20 Jun 2004 1505root root successfully played the Hot Potato card on Sunday, May 16 2004. TRUE by Murphy
20 Jun 2004 1504Murphy At least one of (Cainech, Oerjan, Pakaran, Steve, t) is a Politician. Dismissed by Maud
28 May 2004 1503Murphy At least one of (Kolja, Maud, Sherlock, Sir Toby, Wes) is a Politician. Dismissed by Maud
28 May 2004 1502Murphy All Players are Politicians. FALSE by Maud
28 May 2004 1501Murphy All Players who are Electee to one or more Offices are Politicians. Dismissed by Maud
28 May 2004 1500G. Goethe is a Politician. TRUE by Michael
13 May 2004 1499G. Rule 2050 has been repealed. Appealed by root
19 Jun 2005⇒1499aAppeal of CFJ 1499Final decision (SUSTAIN)
04 Jul 2004 1498Wes No two Rules may legally have the same Title. SUSTAINED on Appeal
30 Apr 2004⇒1498aAppeal of CFJ 1498Final decision (SUSTAIN)
30 Apr 2004 1497Maud If a person who is a player of both Agora and Claustronomic ceases to be a player of Agora, then e also ceases to be a player of Claustronomic. FALSE by Murphy
16 May 2004⇒1497aAppeal of CFJ 1497Final decision (REMAND)
05 May 2004 1496Elysion CFJ 1495 constitutes a challenge under rule 1941 to Eris's attempt to increase eir Lobbying Strength in eir message dated Thu, 1 Apr 2004 17:23:35 -0600. FALSE by OscarMeyr
11 Apr 2004 1495Taral Eris successfully increased eir Lobbying Strength by 3 in eir message dated Thu, 1 Apr 2004 17:23:35 -0600. TRUE by Elysion
04 Apr 2004 1494Taral Eris is Immaculate. TRUE by root
02 Apr 2004 1493Kolja The position of Speaker defined in the regulations of the Contest 'Claustronomic' is currently filled by Goethe. TRUE by RedKnight
06 Apr 2004 1492root Cainech, not root, is the Trial Judge of CFJ 1490. TRUE by Michael
19 Mar 2004⇒1492aAppeal of CFJ 1492Final decision (REMAND)
14 Mar 2004 1491Cainech CFJ's 1482 to 1487 are not valid CFJ's, as the text was never submitted to the CotC. FALSE by G.
19 Mar 2004 1490OscarMeyr Cainech's statement of 11 Feb 2004 14:10:04, reading "I lay a COE on OscarMeyer for accepting a COE that was not made in a public forum, thereby contravening R1431. ("A Claim of Error is a public message.....")" is NOT a valid COE. FALSE by Cainech
17 Feb 2004 1489Cainech Watchers are not a rule-defined elemeent of the game. TRUE by Maud
28 Mar 2004 1488Cainech Bringing about a situation other than one explicitily allowed in the rules in which other Players are unable to follow rule n is, in and of itself, breaking rule n. FALSE by Sherlock
20 Feb 2004 1487Cainech A Watcher is still an active Player. Dismissed by OscarMeyr
20 Feb 2004 1486Cainech All references in public forum to "Kolja" should refer to the original bearer of that name, Kolja A. This should be applicable retroactively. Dismissed by OscarMeyr
20 Feb 2004 1485Cainech "Kolja" is not entitled to the benefits assosciated with being a completely new player, as the player has been registered under a different name in the past 365 days. FALSE by OscarMeyr
20 Feb 2004 1484Cainech OscarMeyer issued an invalid order by requesting that "Klaus" be globally changed to "Kolja". TRUE by OscarMeyr
20 Feb 2004 1483Cainech when referring to Kolja in public forum, it is ambiguous as to whether Klaus or Kolja A is referred to, thereby entailing an infraction of R754. FALSE by OscarMeyr
20 Feb 2004 1482Cainech Kolja and Kolja A are not eligible for any responsibilities as described under R1755 until the following linked CFJ is resoloved. Dismissed by G.
19 Feb 2004 1481G. A Player's score is deemed to change at the time a Scorekeepor is notified of a scoring event, not at the time of the scoring event itself. TRUE by root
28 Mar 2004 1480G. A Speaker Transition did *not* commence on January 1. FALSE by Murphy
06 Jan 2004 1479Murphy A is not B. TRUE by Taral
17 Oct 2003 1478Murphy A is A. Order(s) issued
17 Oct 2003 1477Murphy Team Dovesdar has achieved a Team Win within the past 24 hours. FALSE by Pakaran
26 Oct 2003 1476Murphy Oerjan is silent. TRUE by G.
15 Oct 2003 1475G. The above message contains a valid Notice of Award. TRUE by Murphy
15 Oct 2003 1474root A Points Contest named Eris' Contest has awarded a positive number of points to some player during the month of October. FALSE by RedKnight
15 Nov 2003⇒1474aAppeal of CFJ 1474Final decision (REMAND)
07 Nov 2003 1473root There was a Points Contest named Eris' Contest at the beginning of the month of October. FALSE by RedKnight
17 Oct 2003 1472root There is a Points Contest named Eris' Contest. TRUE by RedKnight
17 Oct 2003 1471OscarMeyr The GWotO is allowed to remove from the Oligarchy an Oligarch whose term of service has expired. TRUE by Steve
06 Oct 2003 1470Murphy If a player attempts to perform multiple fee-based actions by paying a single amount of kudos, but one of the actions fails, then they all fail. Appealed by Murphy
18 Oct 2003 1469Murphy A player may perform multiple fee-based actions by paying a single amount of kudos equal to the total fees for those actions. Appealed by root
19 Oct 2003 1468Murphy A player may perform multiple fee-based actions (e.g. extending eir Oligarchic Term of Service by the Oligarchic Term twice) by announcing the net effect of those actions. FALSE by Taral
15 Oct 2003 1467Murphy If a player attempts to spend N kudos to pay a fee, but the fee is smaller than N, then N kudos are still paid. FALSE by Taral
15 Oct 2003 1466Murphy If a player attempts to spend N kudos to pay a fee, but the fee is smaller than N, then the fee-based action succeeds (assuming it is not otherwise prohibited). TRUE by Taral
15 Oct 2003 1465Murphy If a player attempts to spend N kudos to pay a fee, but the fee-based action fails (e.g. the fee is larger than N), then the kudos are still spent. Dismissed by Taral
15 Oct 2003 1464RedKnight RedKnight sucessfuly entered the Oligarchy through at least one of the above statements. TRUE by Taral
15 Oct 2003 1463Pakaran Pakaran is presently eligible to judge one or more CFJs. Dismissed by OscarMeyr
10 Oct 2003 1462root The Oligarchy Charge Requirement, as defined by the Grand Warden of the Oligarchy's Budget, is 6. TRUE by Sir Toby
17 Oct 2003 1461root One or more tax debts of one or more bouncy balls were created as a result of a message sent by root on May 27, 2003. FALSE by Taral
19 Jul 2003 1460G. The public message sent by Goethe on April 1st created a requirement for at least one Officer to act as soon as possible [after the message]. FALSE by Maud
01 May 2003 1459Peekee If a Contest has no Entry Fee or does not specify an Entry Fee, then players are considered to have paid the Entry Fee without having to make a statement specifically to pay the Entry Fee. TRUE by OscarMeyr
28 Mar 2003 1458Peekee If a Contest has no Entry Fee or does not specify an Entry Fee, then players may join that Contest without paying an Entry Fee. TRUE by OscarMeyr
28 Mar 2003 1457Peekee Murphy is a member of Scribes' Collegium. TRUE by OscarMeyr
28 Mar 2003 1456Peekee If a Contest does not specify a quantity of some particular Currency as an Entry Fee, then a player is not required to pay a Fee (as in Rule 1941) to join that Contest. TRUE by OscarMeyr
28 Mar 2003 1455Sir Toby Sir Toby did not join The Evil Scam Contest in a message sent to agora-business on Fri, 14 Mar 2003 08:53:40 -0800, with the following subject: This message brought to you by the letter "a". TRUE by Steve
27 Mar 2003 1454Peekee New York is the capital of England Dismissed by Michael
23 Mar 2003 1453root As a result of the formation of root's Pay Out Scam Contest (rPOSC), the Bank incurred a debt to root consisting of one or more properties. SUSTAINED on Appeal
11 Aug 2005⇒1453aAppeal of CFJ 1453Final decision (SUSTAIN)
11 Aug 2005 1452Peekee Peekee has published a message containing the text "This is a single message", in emails with titles A and B. TRUE by root
18 Mar 2003 1451Peekee Peekee has published a message containing the text "MessageXX", in emails with titles 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9. TRUE by root
18 Mar 2003 1450Maud A fee may be paid by announcement. TRUE by Sherlock
12 Mar 2003 1449Cecilius The Proposal entitled "Full Discretion Fix" would have been Rubberstamped by the message sent by Cecilius today under the subject line "Rubberstamping, Take Two," if that Proposal had not already been Rubberstamped. REVERSED on Appeal
28 Mar 2003⇒1449aAppeal of CFJ 1449Final decision (REVERSE)
28 Mar 2003 1448Cecilius The Proposal entitled "Full Discretion Fix" was Rubberstamped by a message sent by Cecilius today under the subject line "Rubberstamping, Take Two". REVERSED on Appeal
28 Mar 2003⇒1448aAppeal of CFJ 1448Taral moves to REMAND
28 Mar 2003 1447Murphy The Proposal "Try Again, Part 2 of 3" is distributable. FALSE by Peekee
29 Apr 2003 1446Murphy The Proposal "Try Again, Part 1 of 3" is distributable. FALSE by Peekee
29 Apr 2003 1445Maud Cecilius's first attempt on 1 March, 2003 to rubberstamp a proposal failed. Appealed by Taral
10 Mar 2003 1444Maud A player cannot perform an action with 0 support. FALSE by Peekee
10 Mar 2003 1443Maud The rules regulate rubberstamping proposals. TRUE by Peekee
10 Mar 2003 1442Maud Rubberstamping with 0 support is not a dependent action. TRUE by Peekee
10 Mar 2003 1441Peekee London is the capital of England Dismissed by RedKnight
08 Mar 2003 1440Sherlock Proposal 4453 had an Adoption Index of 1. Appealed by OscarMeyr
11 Mar 2003 1439G. Goethe has successfully absolved 1 Blot from emself this Agoran week. TRUE by root
11 Mar 2003 1438G. The Order issued by Steve, 'I order the Bank to forgive RedKnight's Oligarchy upkeep debt.' (http://www.escribe.com/games/agora-business/m9000.html) is not a properly-issued Order. TRUE by Murphy
15 Apr 2003 1437Steve Where the Bank has been properly ordered to forgive a debt denominated in a Bank Currency, only the Treasuror is both permitted and required to act on the Bank's behalf to forgive the debt. TRUE by Sherlock
20 Feb 2003 1436Steve The Grand Warden of the Oligarchy is not empowered to remove from the Oligarchy a player who is not ineligible to be an Oligarch. TRUE by G.
20 Feb 2003 1435Murphy The method used by Goethe in the message with Message-ID is reasonably close to the probability distribution required for the action e attempted to perform in that message (i.e. determine the Weather for February 2003). FALSE by Steve
10 Feb 2003 1434Cecilius The registration of a Player and the expiration of eir Grace Period are both "events" for the purposes of Rule 1769 (Holidays). TRUE by Pakaran
02 Feb 2003 1433Sir Toby In a message sent at Fri, 17 Jan 2003 10:05:51 -0800, with message id , Goethe tried to resign as Contestmaster of the Support Your Secret Leader Contest, but was prohibited from doing so. TRUE by OscarMeyr
30 Jan 2003 1432Sir Toby In a message sent at Fri, 17 Jan 2003 10:05:51 -0800, with message id , Goethe tried to transfer 2 Stems from Support Your Scret Leader to both Sir Toby and Steve, but the transfers were invalid and did not occur. TRUE by Murphy
28 Jan 2003 1431Sir Toby In a message sent at Fri, 17 Jan 2003 10:05:51 -0800, with message id , Goethe tried to transfer 0.05 VEs, 0.1 Indulgences, 0.15 Papyri, and 2 Fish from Support Your Secret Leader to both Sir Toby and Steve, but the transfers were invalid and did not occur. FALSE by Taral
31 Jan 2003 1430G. Goddess Eris is not Immaculate. FALSE by Steve
16 Jan 2003 1429G. Goddess Eris has less than zero Blots. FALSE by Steve
16 Jan 2003 1428G. Goethe succeeded in removing exactly and only 0.68 Blots from Goddess Eris in the same message as this CFJ. TRUE by Steve
16 Jan 2003 1427G. Goethe succeeded in removing exactly and only 1.00 Blots from Goddess Eris in the same message as this CFJ. FALSE by Steve
16 Jan 2003 1426G. Absolving (removing) a Blot as per Rule 1986 is not the same as Expunging Blots as per Rule 2017. FALSE by Steve
16 Jan 2003 1425Murphy Pakaran transferred 10 Stems from the Bank to Murphy in the message with Message-ID <407606326.1041695839@[192.168.1.100]>. TRUE by Sir Toby
16 Jan 2003 1424RedKnight The Goddess Eris has commited the class 2 crime of Disobedience. Order(s) issued
23 Jan 2003 1423Murphy Parakan transferred 10 of eir own Stems to Murphy in the message with Message-ID <407606326.1041695839@[192.168.1.100]>. FALSE by Taral
06 Jan 2003 1422Sir Toby In a private message (submitted as evidence) sent to Sir Toby on Fri, 20 Dec 2002 11:23:32 +1100 (EST), Steve made a valid bid of 0.25 Indulgences for (+4, 0) in the December Land Auctions initiated in a public message (also submitted as evidence) sent by Sir Toby on Tue, 17 Dec 2002 10:03:39 -0800 (PST). TRUE by Murphy
31 Dec 2002 1421Sir Toby In a private message (submitted as evidence) sent to Sir Toby on Fri, 20 Dec 2002 11:23:32 +1100 (EST), Steve made a valid bid of 0.25 Indulgences for (+8, +6) in the December Land Auctions initiated in a public message (also submitted as evidence) sent by Sir Toby on Tue, 17 Dec 2002 10:03:39 -0800 (PST). FALSE by Murphy
31 Dec 2002 1420Cecilius A Claim of Error arising from an error in the list of Watchers contained in the Registrar's Census Report would be invalid. FALSE by OscarMeyr
22 Dec 2002 1419Murphy Steve did not lose, on or about December 6, 2002, eir right to purchase an Indulgence by paying the debt arising from eir bid in the Indulgence Auction initiated on or about November 3, 2002. TRUE by RedKnight
08 Jan 2003⇒1419aAppeal of CFJ 1419Final decision (REMAND)
31 Dec 2002 1418Murphy If, after the end of an Election's Nominating Period, the Vote Collector fails to publish a list of Candidates as soon as possible, then the Election has no Winner - even if there was exactly one Candidate at the end of the Nominating Period. TRUE by t
13 Nov 2002 1417G. A Frozen Player who is a Member of a Contest may perform Actions explicitly allowed to Contestants by that Contest's Regulations. TRUE by Michael
25 Oct 2002 1416G. A Frozen Player may transfer Property. FALSE by Michael
25 Oct 2002 1415G. A Frozen Player cannot be eir own Prime Executor. FALSE by Michael
25 Oct 2002 1414G. Frozen Players may Call CFJs. TRUE by OscarMeyr
04 Oct 2002⇒1414aAppeal of CFJ 1414Final decision (REASSIGN)
27 Sep 2002 1413Steve Rule 1016 prohibits a frozen Player from becoming a Contestant in a Contest. TRUE by Taral
27 Sep 2002 1412Peekee If a player is deregistered and then registers again without there being a Win since e was deregistered e returns with the same number of points as e had when e was deregistered. Appealed by RedKnight
19 Sep 2002 1411Steve OscarMeyr is Michael's Opposite on RedKnight's Thesis Committee. TRUE by Murphy
28 Aug 2002 1410root The Order executed by RedKnight in the message archived at http://www.escribe.com/games/agora-business/m7451.html was improperly or invalidly executed. FALSE by Steve
19 Aug 2002 1409OscarMeyr Sir Toby's COE in http://www.escribe.com/games/agora-business/m7478.html was not a valid Claim of Error. Appealed by OscarMeyr
22 Sep 2002 1408RedKnight Rulekeepor Michael has committed the Class 2 Crime of Unlawful Nondisclosure, as defined by Rule 1064/9. SUSTAINED on Appeal
05 Sep 2002⇒1408aAppeal of CFJ 1408Final decision (SUSTAIN)
05 Sep 2002 1407RedKnight The Registrar has not fulfilled eir duty under Rule 478/12 in eir last report. TRUE by teucer
17 Jul 2002 1406teucer Pseudorandom numbers do not qualify as Random under the rules of Agora. FALSE by Murphy
10 Aug 2002 1405Blaise Four frivolous CFJs has been made by a non-Player. Dismissed by Murphy
12 Jul 2002 1404Blaise Three frivolous CFJs has been made by a non-Player. Dismissed by Sir Toby
11 Jul 2002 1403Blaise Two frivolous CFJs has been made by a non-Player. Dismissed by Steve
11 Jul 2002 1402Blaise One frivolous CFJ has been made by a non-Player. Dismissed by Murphy
12 Jul 2002 1401Blaise No frivolous CFJs have been made by a non-Player. Dismissed by Steve
11 Jul 2002 1400Steve Only the Treasuror is empowered to forgive debts to the Bank denominated in Bank Currencies. FALSE by root
12 Jul 2002 1399G. A Provision of an adopted Proposal that does not change the Ruleset may destroy a Stem in any Player's possession by its adoption. TRUE by OscarMeyr
15 Jul 2002 1398G. A Provision of an adopted Proposal that does not change the Ruleset may create a Stem in any Player's possession by its adoption. TRUE by OscarMeyr
15 Jul 2002 1397G. A Provision of an adopted Proposal that does not change the Ruleset may change a Player's Vote on a previous Proposal. TRUE by OscarMeyr
15 Jul 2002 1396teucer Craig submitted 5 CFJs on Friday, July 5. TRUE by Taral
05 Jul 2002 1395teucer This is not a CFJ. FALSE by Sir Toby
08 Jul 2002 1394teucer This CFJ's judge is the Goddess Eris. SUSTAINED on Appeal
10 Jul 2002⇒1394aAppeal of CFJ 1394Final decision (SUSTAIN)
10 Jul 2002 1393teucer This CFJ was submitted by Craig. TRUE by Taral
05 Jul 2002 1392teucer This CFJ is TRUE. Dismissed by Murphy
08 Jul 2002 1391G. Only one valid Notice of Infraction may be announced for a single given commission of an Infraction. SUSTAINED on Appeal
04 Jul 2002⇒1391aAppeal of CFJ 1391Final decision (SUSTAIN)
04 Jul 2002 1390teucer If Goethe becomes Lawless and is thus deregistered before Eris actually blesses the proposal, the proposal will not have the needed support to Bless it. FALSE by OscarMeyr
20 Jun 2002 1389root The Bank incurred a debt of 0.1 Papyri to Steve as a result of Opposite Proposal 4332. FALSE by Steve
24 Jun 2002 1388teucer Goethe has failed to award three bonuses of one papyrus each to Craig ASAP after the passage of eir proposals "EPIMENIDES", "INSANE STEM DISTRIBUTION", and "SpLittable Boni"; this violates rule 1479. Order(s) issued
21 Jun 2002 1387teucer Goethe has failed to pay three bonuses of 1 papyrus each to Craig for eir passed proposals: "EPIMENIDES", "INSANE STEM DISTRIBUTION", and "SpLittable Boni". This is a violation of rule 1678. FALSE by Murphy
21 Jun 2002 1386Taral The following provision of Proposal 4329 is without effect: "all outstanding potential debts arising from past transfers are deemed, for the purposes of future debts, to have not occurred" TRUE by Sir Toby
19 Jun 2002 1385G. Proposal 4323 contains an Invalid Legislative Order. TRUE by OscarMeyr
09 Jun 2002 1384teucer Craig's transfer of an instance of a nameless currency to the name 'Beverly' was valid. Dismissed by G.
16 Jun 2002 1383teucer root's transfer of an instance of a nameless currency to nothing was valid. FALSE by root
09 Jun 2002 1382teucer Steve has committed Misrepresentation. FALSE by Sir Toby
09 Jun 2002 1381G. A Stem Tax Assessed or to be Assessed by the Payroll Clerk within the next 24 hours, was/will be legal. FALSE by root
04 Jun 2002 1380teucer The player Goethe has committed four counts of the Class Four Crime of Misrepresentation. FALSE by Steve
10 Jun 2002 1379t root committed the Crime of Misrepresentation when e sent a message with the subject 'Transfers' to Crito and t on Mon, 27 May 2002 22:36:41 -0400. FALSE by OscarMeyr
11 Jun 2002 1378root The player root won the game on or around May 10, 2002. TRUE by Steve
31 May 2002 1377G. The passage of Proposal 4318 created at least one legal VE debt. Appealed by Taral
04 Jun 2002 1376Steve The Rules do not explicitly permit Players to transfer their own Property. FALSE by OscarMeyr
29 May 2002 1375teucer root's transfer of an instance of a nameless currency to France was valid. TRUE by root
31 May 2002 1374teucer root's creation of a nameless currency was valid. TRUE by Crito
22 May 2002 1373teucer Michael's Pot-Plants' transfer of one HereYouGoKezom to the Short Logical Ruleset was valid. FALSE by Sir Toby
24 May 2002 1372teucer Craig's transfer of three HereYouGoKezomi to a bond was valid. TRUE by Sir Toby
16 May 2002 1371teucer Craig's transfer of one HereYouGoKezom to Michael's Pot-Plant was valid. Dismissed by t
15 May 2002 1370Murphy The message <3CD83F68.3070804@syllepsis.org> contains two valid, successful Notices of Transfer. FALSE by Taral
22 May 2002 1369teucer Craig's transfer of two HereYouGoKezomi to the Coca-Cola corporation was valid. TRUE by OscarMeyr
15 May 2002 1368teucer OscarMeyr's transfer of one Vote "Sir Toby" for Speaker-Elect Pamphlet to a piece of land was valid. TRUE by G.
14 May 2002 1367teucer Craig's transfer of one Vote "Sir Toby" for Speaker-Elect Pamphlet to eir own insane proposal was valid. TRUE by root
14 May 2002 1366teucer Syllepsis' transfer of one Vote "Sir Toby" for Speaker-Elect Pamphlet to a Vote "Sir Toby" for Speaker-Elect Pamphlet was valid. TRUE by Steve
14 May 2002 1365teucer root's transfer of one Vote "Sir Toby" for Speaker-Elect Pamphlet to Rule 1467 was valid. TRUE by Crito
14 May 2002 1364Syllepsis Once any Bond of a given species becomes redeemed, all Bonds of that species become redeemed. FALSE by G.
31 May 2002⇒1364aAppeal of CFJ 1364Final decision (REASSIGN)
28 May 2002 1363Sir Toby Rule 1969 does not prohibit redeeming Bonds that have already been redeemed. FALSE by OscarMeyr
16 May 2002 1362Syllepsis In the context of the rules, fungible means indistinguishable by any value other than ownership. FALSE by G.
14 May 2002 1361G. ALL of the following are True: (1) On or about May 7 2002, Goethe transferred 0.010 VEs to root. (2) On or about May 7 2002, Goethe transferred 0.010 VEs to Beverly. (3) The Registrar is required to track the nickname Beverly for the Player also known as root. FALSE by Steve
13 May 2002 1360teucer Murphy should not be penalized for eir recent failure to judge CFJ 1348. TRUE by t
15 May 2002 1359Sir Toby The proposal submitted in the message with Message ID: <200205010219.g412Jw062775@ke.earlham.edu> is insane. TRUE by root
12 May 2002 1358root Proposal 4253 was not adopted. FALSE by G.
09 May 2002 1357Maud If rule 1467 were repealed, currencies would still be properties. SUSTAINED on Appeal
16 May 2002⇒1357aAppeal of CFJ 1357Final decision (SUSTAIN)
16 May 2002 1356root The proposal titled "A MODEST PROPOSAL" has no obvious and direct attempt to coerce a Player into voting against eir conscience. TRUE by Crito
09 May 2002 1355Maud Calls for Judgement (CFJs) can have titles. TRUE by Crito
13 May 2002 1354teucer Insane proposals, if adopted, have no effect. FALSE by root
06 May 2002 1353Murphy Craig has more than 200 Stems. FALSE by t
04 May 2002 1352Sir Toby The last paragraph of rule 1969 does not prohibit transferring Bonds that have already been redeemed. Appealed by Maud
12 May 2002 1351Sir Toby Proposal 4285 is insane. Appealed by Sir Toby
04 May 2002 1350Maud Sir Toby's first insane proposal submitted on 18 April 2002 is a null proposal. TRUE by Sir Toby
26 Apr 2002 1349Syllepsis The Judgement of CFJ 21 was incorrect. Dismissed by Taral
02 May 2002 1348root No Justices have been appointed in Appeal 1346a. Appealed by Crito
14 May 2002 1347root Murphy is not a Justice in Appeal 1346a. TRUE by t
26 Apr 2002 1346G. The Bank is deemed to have incurred a debt of 3.0 Voting Entitlements to: (a) any and every judge who returns a judgment of TRUE on this CFJ, and; (b) any and every member of a Board of Appeals who Overturns a judgment of FALSE on this CFJ or sustains a judgment of TRUE on this CFJ. REVERSED on Appeal
28 May 2002⇒1346aAppeal of CFJ 1346Final decision (REVERSE)
28 May 2002 1345Murphy The ratification of the Payroll Clerk's Report of Tue 29 Jan 2002 caused at least one debt of a Judicial Salary to change from outstanding to not outstanding. Motion 1345.422 DENIED by Murphy
22 Mar 2002 1344root Proposal 4243 was adopted. FALSE by Steve
14 Feb 2002 1343G. The Payroll Clerk may pay out 50 Stems to Neil for Neil's holding of the Promoter Office in January 2002. TRUE by Crito
13 Feb 2002 1342Murphy If an Election ends in the middle of its Voting Period because there remains only a single Candidate, then the winner may be Awarded Points for winning a contested Election. Motion 1342.398 DENIED by Murphy
24 Jan 2002 1341Murphy neil committed the Crime of Misrepresentation in the message with Message-ID <15422.32050.200019.402505@tarski.2y.net>. FALSE by G.
06 Feb 2002 1340neil At the time of the Speaker Transition occurring at 01:27:48 on 10 January 2002, neil was Electee to the Office of Speaker-Elect. TRUE by Crito
01 Feb 2002 1339neil At the time of the Speaker Transition occurring at 01:27:48 on 10 January 2002, neil held the Office of Speaker-Elect. FALSE by root
06 Feb 2002 1338G. Two Speaker Transitions have commenced since 18-Nov-01, and neither have concluded. TRUE by Murphy
13 Jan 2002 1337root hooloovoo transferred 1.81 Indulgences and 3.15 Papyri to AgorEx Offshore just before eir most recent Deregistration. TRUE by Steve
08 Jan 2002 1336Murphy Murphy declined the Office of Speaker-Elect in the message http://www.escribe.com/games/agora-business/m5768.html TRUE by Crito
03 Jan 2002 1335Crito The Notice of Speaker Transition issued Sat, 8 Dec 2001 was incorrect in its particulars. Appealed by neil
10 Jan 2002 1334root Ten Land Auctions began on December 11, 2001 using VEs as the Auction Currencies. FALSE by Steve
21 Dec 2001 1333root hooloovoo transferred 0.7 VEs, 1.81 Indulgences, and 3.15 Papyri to AgorEx Offshore just before eir most recent Deregistration. FALSE by Murphy
23 Dec 2001 1332neil Immediately after neil became Electee to the Office of Speaker-Elect (at approximately 00:23:21 on 21 Nov 2001 GMT), Steve held the Office of Speaker-Elect. REVERSED on Appeal
15 Jan 2002⇒1332aAppeal of CFJ 1332Final decision (REVERSE)
15 Jan 2002 1331neil Steve is the Holder of the Office of Speaker-Elect. TRUE by root
04 Jan 2002 1330neil neil is Electee to the Office of Speaker-Elect. TRUE by root
01 Dec 2001 1329neil neil is Speaker-Elect. Appealed by Crito
29 Nov 2001 1328G. The AgoraEx exists in the eyes of the Rules. TRUE by Steve
03 Dec 2001⇒1328aAppeal of CFJ 1328Final decision (REASSIGN)
23 Nov 2001 1327G. A looting auction for Peekee began on or about Sun 14 Oct 2001. FALSE by Crito
21 Nov 2001 1326neil On or around 19:40:00 12 Nov 2001, neil successfully Nominated for the Office of Speaker-Elect. TRUE by Murphy
15 Nov 2001 1325Taral The listed Trading Accounts on the AgorEx web page are sufficient evidence of an Agreement between each listed Player and Lindrum in which the Player may demand that Lindrum pay em the specified amounts at any time. TRUE by G.
13 Nov 2001 1324Crito Steve is NOT the Limited Executor for either Peekee or Ian. FALSE by root
17 Nov 2001 1323Maud If each of two entities owes the other some amount of the same fungible property, then by agreement of the Prime Executors for the two entities and without either entity forgiving the other's debt: (a) if the debts are of equal amounts, both may be satisfied; and (b) if the amount of one debt is less than that of the other, then the amount of the latter debt may be reduced by that of the former, and the former debt may be satisfied. Motion 1323.300 DENIED by Maud
16 Oct 2001 1322G. The Player, former Player, or Dissolute Blob has at least one Blot. FALSE by Oerjan
20 Sep 2001 1321neil There do not exist any Bonds issued by David. SUSTAINED on Appeal
26 Sep 2001⇒1321aAppeal of CFJ 1321Final decision (SUSTAIN)
26 Sep 2001 1320neil There do not exist any Bonds issued by Steve's Bond Scam Contest. FALSE by Crito
17 Sep 2001 1319neil There exist no entity known as Steve's Bond Scam Contest. TRUE by Lindrum
19 Sep 2001 1318Murphy Rule 1470 explicitly permits all transfers of Property from the Bank, and therefore no transfer of Property from the Bank is unauthorized for the purpose of Rule 1981. TRUE by solublefish
18 Sep 2001 1317root A Zombie cannot own another Zombie. FALSE by Syllepsis
24 Aug 2001 1316neil Zombies may not be Players. REVERSED on Appeal
11 Sep 2001⇒1316aAppeal of CFJ 1316Final decision (REVERSE)
11 Sep 2001 1315neil In publishing with the Voting Report for Proposals 4184-4194 incorrect text for Proposal 4190, Blob committed the Class 4 Crime of Misrepresentation. Order(s) issued
19 Aug 2001 1314Peekee Peekee is an Active Player TRUE by pTang
20 Aug 2001 1313G. If a Zombie Master emself becomes a Zombie, e loses Power of Attorney over eir own Zombie. TRUE by Murphy
18 Aug 2001 1312G. The final auction price in the most recent Indulgence Auction was 50 Stems. Appealed by Oerjan
13 Aug 2001 1311G. No Proposals have passed during the current Nomic Week. FALSE by Steve
19 Jul 2001 1310Syllepsis Proposal 4168 caused Ian, root, and solublefish to owe the Bank 120 Stems TRUE by solublefish
25 Jul 2001 1309Maud If the Vizier of a Group casts on behalf of the Group one or more votes on an Insane Proposal in a Public Forum, e has not thereby bended or violated Rule 1729. TRUE by Syllepsis
21 Jul 2001 1308Murphy If a non-Player entity may Vote on an Insane Proposal, then it may do so in public. FALSE by Lindrum
08 Aug 2001 1307Kelly Annabel's message, on or about 31 May 2001, reading in part "So I transfer all of my currencies to the Bank, and then deregister" did not have the effect of transferring any Currencies. TRUE by Elysion
08 Aug 2001 1306Murphy The Basic Officer Salary is 50 Stems TRUE by Oerjan
09 Jul 2001 1305G. A Player, while on Hold, may not be made silent by Rule 1042 until two months after going on Hold. TRUE by pTang
05 Jul 2001 1304Murphy If the Executor of an entity posts to the Public Forum - clearly stating that e posts to the Public Forum on behalf of the entity, as if e were the entity - then the entity is considered to have posted to the Public Forum. FALSE by Taral
08 Jul 2001 1303G. Razl is Noisy. FALSE by Blob
01 Jul 2001 1302Kelly In eir message on or about 11 Jun 2001 14:57:38 -0400, player solublefish did not transfer 120 Stems to the Bank. TRUE by Hooloovoo
26 Jun 2001 1301root Rule 1479 should be interpreted such that an Order, which requires a Player to pay out one or more Properties to some entity, and which is valid and proper under the Rules, causes the Bank to incur one or more debts to the named entity. Order(s) issued
15 Jun 2001 1300G. A Limited Executor of the Bank may be issued a valid and proper Private Order to satisfy the Bank's debt for a property e has the authority to transfer from the Bank. Appealed by Oerjan
11 Jun 2001 1299G. The Bank has incurred an infinite number of debts to Goethe for each Bank Currency, and each of these debts is a debt for a minimum of 1 MUQ of one of the Bank Currencies. FALSE by root
05 Jun 2001 1298G. 'Distributor' is a Patent Title which may be changed at the opinion of the Registrar. FALSE by Razl
12 Jun 2001 1297lee lee cast 5 votes against proposal 4158. REVERSED on Appeal
09 Jun 2001⇒1297aAppeal of CFJ 1297Final decision (REVERSE)
09 Jun 2001 1296Blob In eir judgement of CFJ 1293, Peekee violated Rule 217. Judgement distributed
29 May 2001 1295Razl The Orders issued by Blob in <20010508144200.E5865@cse.unsw.edu.au> http://www.escribe.com/games/agora-business/m3682.html are improperly or invalidly executed. TRUE by solublefish
18 Jun 2001⇒1295aAppeal of CFJ 1295Order(s) issued
24 May 2001⇒1295bAppeal of CFJ 1295Final decision (REASSIGN)
12 Jun 2001 1294Razl The Administrative Orders issued by the Executor of the Bank in <20010508144200.E5865@cse.unsw.edu.au> http://www.escribe.com/games/agora-business/m3682.html are improperly or invalidly executed. Order(s) issued
12 Jun 2001 1293Razl Kelly's Order to Razl <15095.12486.922540.638717@ozma.pyrzqxgl.org> was improperly or invalidly executed. Order(s) stayed
14 May 2001 1292Kelly Kelly cast a nonzero number of Votes on Proposal 4139. Appealed by Maud
12 May 2001 1291G. The Clerk of the Courts, Wes, has broken Rule 991, "Invoking Judgement". Judgement distributed
11 May 2001 1290G. Goethe is a Contestant in the Agora the Beautiful Contest. Judgement distributed
11 May 2001 1289Razl The ACO submitted by Tim to create the contest "Agora the Beautiful" is invalid. Judgement distributed
03 May 2001 1288Hooloovoo The Bank transfered 100 stems to me on April 3, 2001. Judgement distributed
13 Apr 2001 1287Peekee The message (as quoted above) Goethe sent titled "Contest announcement: Bardic Gatherings" failed to create a Contest. TRUE by Tim
06 Apr 2001 1286Syllepsis The Herald is required to bill Syllepsis the Zombie Transfer Tax of 0.1 Indulgences for transfering 1 Zombie to the Bank FALSE by Elysion
03 Apr 2001 1285G. Between the time of the creation of the "Enrich the Contestmaster" Contest and this CFJ, Syllepsis, Ziggy, and Steve each successfully lowered the number of Stems they possess by 50, thus paying the Entry Fee for the Contest and successfully increasing the number of Stems possessed by the "Enrich the Contestmaster" Contest (in the Contest Fund) by 150 (total). FALSE by Kelly
22 Mar 2001 1284Hooloovoo On or about Tue, Tue, 6 Mar 2001 13:18:41 -0600,Kelly violated Rule 1729. FALSE by Evantine
10 Mar 2001 1283Kelly On or about Tue, 06 Mar 2001 16:04:06 -0800, Hoovooloo violated Rule 1729. FALSE by Murphy
18 Mar 2001 1282Syllepsis Maximum Voting Power, as referenced in Rule 1953, is a different quantity from an Entity's maximum Voting Power, as referenced in Rule 1950. FALSE by Stuart
15 Mar 2001 1281Kelly The Voting Power of Player Kelly on Proposal 4120 is two. TRUE by Hooloovoo
15 Mar 2001 1280Taral The Private, Binding Agreement knows as the Articles of Confederation of the United Nomic Dead Groups affects the Votes of the Anemocrats. Dismissed by Oerjan
08 Mar 2001 1279Murphy Proposal 4112 is Democratic. Judgement distributed
18 May 2001⇒1279aAppeal of CFJ 1279Final decision (REASSIGN)
05 May 2001 1278Murphy The Assessor has announced the results of the voting on Proposal 4111. TRUE by root
17 Oct 2005 1277Ziggy Lindrum's message was sent after the end of the Oligarch Auction announced in Murphy's message . TRUE by pTang
18 Mar 2001 1276G. An entity is a Player if, and only if, the Rules cannot distinguish that entity from a Player. FALSE by Lindrum
04 Mar 2001 1275G. An entity is a Player if the Rules cannot distinguish that entity from a Player. TRUE by Murphy
28 Feb 2001 1274Oerjan t's Order of Wed, 14 Feb 2001, "I order everyone to make fewer bids in the next auction." was improperly or invalidly executed. Appealed by Taral
22 Feb 2001 1273Wes An Appeal has been initiated with regards to CFJ 1266. TRUE by G.
14 Feb 2001 1272Evantine All Players always have at least one inherent right, regardless of any rule (for purposes of this statement, inherent right means a right that players have even when or if the rules do not explicitly grant them that right). TRUE by Chuck
19 Feb 2001 1271Syllepsis There is no ordering to the statements 'I become a scribe.' and 'I become a politician.' in first message in which Syllepsis so stated them. FALSE by Wes
12 Feb 2001 1270Syllepsis There is no ordering to the statements 'I become a scribe.' and 'I become a politician.' in first message in which Syllepsis so stated them. Assigned to Ziggy
10 Feb 2001 1269Syllepsis There is no ordering to the statements 'I become a scribe.' and 'I become a politician.' in first message in which Syllepsis so stated them. FALSE by Elysion
11 Feb 2001 1268Wes Peekee has committed the Crime of Application Fraud as described in Rule 1626 by claiming that eir Application (included in Evidence below) was signed by Players who did not actually sign that Application. SUSTAINED on Appeal
10 Apr 2001⇒1268aAppeal of CFJ 1268Final decision (REASSIGN)
17 Feb 2001⇒1268bAppeal of CFJ 1268Final decision (SUSTAIN)
10 Apr 2001 1267Grech Syllepsis is a Scribe. SUSTAINED on Appeal
04 Mar 2001⇒1267aAppeal of CFJ 1267Final decision (SUSTAIN)
04 Mar 2001 1266G. 1. That of the following two messages, http://www.escribe.com/games/agora-business/m2253.html and http://www.escribe.com/games/agora-business/m2255.html exactly ONE legally registered Goethe as a player in the game of Agora. The other one is either incorrect or superfluous. 2. That at a time 1 minute immediately BEFORE the SEND date listed in Goethe's e-mail header for m2253, normalized to GMT as Feb 5 0:22:49 (anecdotal evidence available on request), Goethe unambiguously was NOT a player. 3. That at a time 1 minute immediately AFTER the latest distribution date of m2255 listed in e-scribe, normalized to GMT as Feb 5 as 1:19:24, Goethe unambiguously WAS a player. 4. That, from these time indications, rounding to the minute, Goethe's Window of Ambiguity of Status as Player (GWASP) extends ABSOLUTELY NO LONGER than between GMT 0:21:00 and GMT 1:21:00 on Feb 5, 2001. 5. That Goethe's instant of becoming a player lies unambiguously within es GWASP. 5. While judgements on timestamps or the legality of the first message (c.f. http://www.escribe.com/games/agora-official/m967.html) may narrow the extent of this GWASP, no judgement may extend it. 6. Therefore, irrespective of the EXACT moment of Goethe's registration, and independent of any decisions further refining the exact moment, any game events, payments or adjustments, mandated by the rules to occur to Goethe's status, which must happen WITHIN a time period following registration, must use a registration date for Goethe NO LATER THAN 1:21:00 Feb. 5, 2001 in determining time of occurrence. 7. Likewise, any game events, payments, or adjustments mandated by the rules to occur a certain time AFTER Goethe's registration must use a registration date for Goethe NO EARLIER THAN 0:21:00 Feb. 5, 2001 in determining its time of occurrence. SUSTAINED on Appeal
17 Feb 2001⇒1266aAppeal of CFJ 1266Final decision (SUSTAIN)
17 Feb 2001 1265Wes The Justiciar is required by the Rules to act in some way in response to the Call for Judgement earlier in this email. Dismissed by Kelly
11 Feb 2001 1264Wes Clerk of the Courts Wes has failed to perform eir duty to distribute CFJ 1263 in a timely manner. FALSE by loh
05 Feb 2001 1263Blob Goethe is not a Player. FALSE by Steve
09 Feb 2001 1262Wes Chuck was a Justice for CFJ 1254 on Jan 24 at the time that e posted eir decision to OVERTURN and Dismiss. TRUE by Peekee
06 Feb 2001 1261Elysion Proposal 4104 passed. FALSE by Maud
30 Jan 2001 1260Elysion Elysion committed the Crime of Misrepresentation in eir message dated Mon, 08 Jan 2001 14:54:47 -0500. TRUE by Steve
29 Jan 2001 1259Peekee If this statement is true, Peekee is owed 100 Stems Dismissed by Murphy
28 Jan 2001 1258Murphy Peekee is the Notary. TRUE by loh
01 Feb 2001⇒1258aAppeal of CFJ 1258Final decision (REASSIGN)
22 Jan 2001 1257Murphy Peekee is an Oligarch. TRUE by Kelly
13 Jan 2001 1256Murphy Peekee submitted at least one CFJ to the Clerk of the Courts during November 2000; the Clerk of the Courts has not assigned a Judge to any such CFJ; and Kelly is not the Clerk of the Courts. TRUE by Wes
20 Dec 2000 1255Oerjan Rule 1586 should be interpreted such that the Rule created by Proposal 4090 (Debt Conversion) has no effect, since any outstanding debts and liabilities in Basic Currencies were canceled when Basic Currencies were abolished from the Rules. FALSE by Elysion
13 Jan 2001 1254Murphy Peekee possesses at least one Voting Token. FALSE by Ziggy
01 Feb 2001⇒1254aAppeal of CFJ 1254Final decision (REASSIGN)
24 Jan 2001 1253Andre Novalis and Harlequin are not Zombies. FALSE by Crito
12 Jan 2001 1252Peekee Peekee has a Will. FALSE by Chuck
13 Jan 2001 1251Elysion Kelly has failed to select a Judge for the CFJ called by Peekee on November 11, and Kelly is not the CotC. Dismissed by Blob
18 Dec 2000 1250Chuck Rule 1664 should be interpreted that the effects which are applied specifically to Abiding Players or specifically to Rebellious Players upon the success or failure of a Call for Revolt, are applied based on a Player's status as Abiding or Rebellious at the time the Registrar determines whether the Call for Revolt was successful or not, and not at the time the Call for Revolt is made. TRUE by Crito
10 Oct 2000 1249Chuck The paragraph of Rule 1664 which reads 'The Registar shall select a random integer from 1 to the number of Players (plus 1 if Miscreant is held) at the time of the Call for Revolt. If this number is less than or equal to the number of Rebellious Players (plus 1 if Miscreant is held by a Rebellious Player), then the Revolt succeeds; otherwise it fails.' should be interpreted such that, while the total number of Players is determined as of the time of the Call for Revolt, the number of Rebellious Players is determined as of the time the Registrar selects a random integer as described. TRUE by Peekee
09 Oct 2000 1248pTang Rule 1941 shall be interpreted as outlined in pTang's judgement on CFJ 1246. TRUE by Murphy
15 Oct 2000 1247Taral t's Order dated Wed, 20 Sep 2000 22:50:26 +0300 was improperly executed. TRUE by Crito
10 Oct 2000 1246Peekee Peekee has paid a Fee of 10 Stems since the 15th of September this year. FALSE by pTang
28 Sep 2000 1245Taral The Speaker has failed to initiate an Election for the Office of Grand Warden of the Oligarchy as required by the Rules. FALSE by Chuck
02 Sep 2000 1244Peekee A given Rule's title is a substantive property of that Rule, and so may be changed as a Rule Change. FALSE by Blob
27 Aug 2000 1243Steve Chuck is ineligible to serve as a Justice in the Appeal of CFJ 1237. REVERSED on Appeal
08 Oct 2000⇒1243aAppeal of CFJ 1243Final decision (REVERSE)
08 Oct 2000 1242Palnatoke Palnatoke is Off Hold. FALSE by Andre
23 Aug 2000 1241Taral Chuck has committed the Class 4 Crime of Contempt by Inaction by failing to abide by the Order issued by the Judge of CFJ 1237. FALSE by Peekee
11 Aug 2000 1240Kelly Kelly is not the Judge of CFJ 1234. Appealed by Steve
10 Sep 2000⇒1240aAppeal of CFJ 1240Assigned to Blob (panelist)
31 Aug 2000 1239Peekee Taral objected to both the making of the Proposal "Secret, Unknown and Hidden Proposals 2.1" disinterested and objected to the making of the Proposal "Respect for the dead" disinterested in eir message dated "Mon, 31 Jul 2000 11:33:18 -0500 (CDT)", subject "Re: BUS: disinterested". TRUE by Steve
02 Aug 2000 1238Murphy Rule 1930 "Scoring" is the only Rule allowing a Point Award or Penalty for any particular type of event, and has been the only such Rule since it and Rule 1929 "Points" were enacted. Therefore, any notification of the occurrence of such an event implicitly specifies Rule 1930 as the Rule allowing the Award or Penalty. Dismissed by Blob
02 Aug 2000 1237Taral The Order issued by Chuck on Sun, 23 Jul 2000 17:17:02 -0500 was valid. TRUE by Elysion
09 Sep 2000⇒1237aAppeal of CFJ 1237Final decision (REASSIGN)
02 Sep 2000 1236Peekee Zombies are not rewarded Indulgences for being Immaculate all Quarter. FALSE by Murphy
31 Jul 2000 1235Oerjan Peekee has not been awarded the Patent Title of Quack. TRUE by lee
25 Jul 2000 1234Murphy Kudos are Property. Kelly recused
21 Aug 2000⇒1234aAppeal of CFJ 1234Final decision (SUSTAIN)
03 Aug 2000 1233Steve Rule 1927 should be interpreted as requiring the Executor of the Bank to announce eir intent to mint Bank Currencies between seven and fourteen days prior to actually minting them. FALSE by Elysion
11 Jul 2000 1232Taral Taral currently has at least 3 Blots. FALSE by lee
23 Jun 2000 1231Steve t, acting as Executor of the Zombie Novalis, caused Novalis to cast four votes AGAINST Proposal 4018. TRUE by Peekee
21 Jun 2000 1230Taral Taral has not committed any acts of Promotor Misrepresentation. TRUE by Maud
22 Jun 2000 1229Taral Taral distributed at least one Proposal during the Nomic Week beginning May 29, 2000. FALSE by Chuck
07 Jul 2000⇒1229aAppeal of CFJ 1229lee moves to REASSIGN
29 Jun 2000 1228Murphy The Treasuror's Salary is 0.2 times the Basic Officer's Salary. TRUE by t
10 Jun 2000 1227Kelly A Low Oligarch who is entitled to cast any vote at all upon a given Ordinary Proposal may cast a vote of ABSTAIN upon that Proposal. TRUE by Murphy
03 Jun 2000 1226Peekee The Transfer Orders which Peekee issued in the email identified by Message-ID: <20000524113533.52162.qmail@hotmail.com> satisfied the Stem Payment Orders as mentioned in the same email. FALSE by Kelly
05 Jun 2000 1225Wes The Transfer Orders which Peekee issued in the email identified by Message-ID: <20000524113533.52162.qmail@hotmail.com> were improperly or invalidly executed. TRUE by Palnatoke
30 May 2000 1224Kelly Elysions's message of 11 April 2000, reading in part, 'The Bank pays all its outstanding IAT POs (50 to Michael and 75 to Chuck)', did not have the effect of executing a Transfer Order which would satisfy the Payment Order executed by lee in eir message dated 11 March 2000, reading in part, 'I order the Bank to pay Murphy 130 IATs.' REVERSED on Appeal
23 Jun 2000⇒1224aAppeal of CFJ 1224lee moves to REVERSE
23 Jun 2000 1223lee lee started eir current occupation of the Office of Notary prior to midnight GMT on May 23, 2000. TRUE by Peekee
02 Jun 2000 1222Kelly The message sent to the Business List by Elysion containing the text 'The Bank pays all its outstanding IAT POs' did not cause any Transfer Orders to be exectuted. FALSE by Crito
31 May 2000 1221Peekee There are no Payments Orders in Stems naming Peekee as the Payor[.] FALSE by Wes
28 May 2000 1220Palnatoke Blob is currently eligible to Judge CFJs concerning conditional statements. FALSE by Maud
22 May 2000 1219Wes CFJ 1217 was not Dismissed. SUSTAINED on Appeal
11 Jun 2000⇒1219aAppeal of CFJ 1219Final decision (SUSTAIN)
11 Jun 2000 1218Palnatoke The insertion of a blank line in a Rule is a Rule change[.] FALSE by t
24 May 2000 1217t TYHJÄ is not an obvious synonym of one of FOR, AGAINST or ABSTAIN, as specified in Rule 683, and therefore is not a vote upon a Proposal. Dismissed by Kelly
22 May 2000 1216Taral A Player who holds a wage-earning Office at the time Salaries are paid out is paid the Salary for that Office, regardless of the amount of time e has held that Office. FALSE by Murphy
18 May 2000 1215Wes If we post to a Public Forum a message in the form "If and only if t is standing up at the time we wrote this message, we transfer 10 VTs to t.", and t is indeed standing up at the time we wrote the message, and if there are no general conditions preventing any transfer of 10 VTs (such as a lack of funds), then 10 VTs are transferred from us to t. FALSE by Chuck
27 May 2000 1214Wes If we post to a Public Forum a message in the form "If and only if we have not transferred VTs to t in the last 2 days, we transfer 10 VTs to t.", and we have indeed made no transfers to t in the 2 days previous to sending this message, and if there are no general conditions preventing any transfer of 10 VTs (such as a lack of funds), then 10 VTs are transferred from us to t. If, however, we had transferred VTs to t 4 hours before this message reached the Public Forum, then no VTs would be transferred as a direct result of this posting. TRUE by Taral
20 May 2000 1213Murphy Rule 1927 prevents the Executor of (the Mintor of) a Bank Currency from Minting a number of units of that Currency, unless e makes an announcement as described in clause a) and specifying that e intends to Mint that number of units of that Currency. Dismissed by Palnatoke
09 May 2000 1212t Wes became the High Oligarch on Wed, 3 May 2000 12:48:35 +0300. TRUE by Elysion
25 May 2000⇒1212aAppeal of CFJ 1212Final decision (REASSIGN)
19 May 2000 1211Taral The announcement required by Rule 1927 must contain the number of new units of Currency the Executor intends to Mint. Dismissed by Kelly
04 May 2000 1210Palnatoke Kelly is not the nickname of a Player[.] TRUE by Murphy
01 May 2000 1209lee The change to the minimum wage on March 30, 2000 was invalid and the subsequent minimum wage PO's issued April 1, 2000 were incorrect. FALSE by Chuck
24 Apr 2000 1208Elysion The Herald's Report was last ratified after 01Feb2000[.] TRUE by Blob
19 Apr 2000 1207Murphy An Official Report ratified according to Rule 1791 (Ratification Without Objection) is ratified by an Officer, not by Rule 1791 itself. Rule 1791 is an Instrument, but Officers are not Instruments, so Rule 1550 (Ratification) does not attempt to prohibit this method of ratification. FALSE by Wes
15 Apr 2000 1206Peekee Peekee did not gain 2 Blots due to Tardiness, because of Oerjan's Probate. FALSE by else...if
18 Apr 2000 1205Steve Wes committed the Class 1 Crime of Promotor Misrepresentation when he distributed Proposal 3988 (Harsher Blot Penalties), on Thu, 16 Mar 2000 18:20:25 -0800. TRUE by elJefe
31 Mar 2000 1204t A message that is sent to the email address of a Public Forum but not distributed to any Players has not been sent to a Public Forum. FALSE by lee
16 Mar 2000 1203Blob The Auction for High Oligarch started on Monday, 06 Mar 2000 at 23:40:31 -0800 has ended. TRUE by Taral
05 Apr 2000 1202Blob 23:40:31 -0800 has ended. Dismissed by Steve
17 Mar 2000 1201Blob The Auction for Middle Oligarchs started on Monday, 06 Mar 2000 at 23:40:31 -0800 has ended. TRUE by Elysion
19 Mar 2000 1200Blob The Auction for Low Oligarchs started on Monday, 06 Mar 2000 at 23:40:31 -0800 has ended. TRUE by t
17 Mar 2000 1199Murphy The Rules required the Clerk of the Courts to dismiss CFJ 1198. FALSE by Crito
06 Mar 2000 1198Kelly Peekee violated Rule 1809 when he failed to vacate the Payment Order denominated as avt583 when he determined, in the course of Judging CFJ 1193, that the Order in question was improperly issued. Dismissed by Steve
01 Mar 2000 1197Kelly Wes violated Rule 1809 when he failed to stay the Payment Order denominated as avt583 when Chuck called the CFJ assigned the number 1193. TRUE by Palnatoke
15 Mar 2000 1196Anthony On Fri, 11 Feb 2000 23:39:06 +0800, [Anthony] made a legitimate proposal for a rule change. TRUE
15 Feb 2000 1195Peekee Doing what is explicitly prohibited (and possibly penalized) by the Rules is a breach of the Rules, however if something is not prohibited but just penalized by the Rules then doing it is not a breach of the Rules but merely part of the Agora. Dismissed by Wes
17 Feb 2000 1194Peekee A breach of the Rules in Agora is considered (By Agora) to be illegal. TRUE
16 Feb 2000 1193Chuck The Payment Orders, designated avt582 through avt593, and issued by t in a message dated Thu, 20 Jan 2000 15:51:29 +0200 (EET), are invalid. FALSE by Palnatoke
26 Feb 2000 1192 Clerk of the Courts Wes violated Rule 1769 when he distributed the Official Judgement of CFJ 1183 on December 26, 1999, during the Christmas Holiday designated by Rule 1870. On Hold
elJefe, Steve 1191 Wes is under no obligation to pay the above quoted PO and Steve's Private Order is therefore improperly executed. (though I'm pretty sure there weren't any)
1190Steve The Private Payment Order executed in this message is executed for the purpose of paying for votes, within the meaning given to that phrase by the Judgement (sustained on Appeal) in CFJ 1183. TRUE by elJefe
12 Jan 2000 1189Murphy A Proposal cannot be distributed by a Player other than the Promotor, unless the Rules explicitly allow or require em to do so. TRUE by Lee
21 Dec 1999 1188Murphy Kolja A. should not have been assigned to the Board of Appeals for CFJ 1183. TRUE by harvel
16 Dec 1999 1187 A Judge is considered to be assigned to Judge a particular CFJ at the time that the Clerk of the Courts announces the identity of the Judge, and no sooner. On Hold
elJefe 1186 The Clerk of the Courts is required by Rule 1868 to select a Judge who is eligible at the time that the Judge is selected, regardless of whether that Player was eligible at the time that the CFJ was actually called for or when the identity of that Player is announced. On Hold
elJefe 1185t Agora is an independent nation and not bound by the laws of any other State in existence. FALSE by Crito
08 Dec 1999 1184- Any Player who is subject to the jurisdiction of the civil courts of the United States of America and simultaneously a director, officer, employee, or agent of an American public institution, as defined by the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (as amended), is required as a matter of law to observe the Constitutional requirements of due process in the course of conducting eir business as a Judge, Justice, or Officer, or as the Speaker. FALSE by Chuck
09 Dec 1999 1183Steve The Infraction of Debt Voting cannot be committed by any Player. Kolja SUSTAINS
09 Dec 1999 1182Murphy All of these Private Orders were improperly executed: * Payment Order PO0018 for 0.1 Indulgence from me to Palnatoke Message-ID: <005601bf2b2b$46d02f20$35d652c3@opus> * t's Order for me to give em one of my Kudos Message-ID: * harvel's Order for me to vacate Payment Order PO0006 for 0.1 Indulgence from em to me Message-Id: <199910311223.HAA21045@msuacad.morehead-st.edu> TRUE by t
24 Nov 1999 1181Palnatoke Players are under no obligation to pay any 'printing fee', and Murphy's Private Orders in the Agoran Journal are therefore improperly executed. TRUE by Peekee
25 Nov 1999 1180Peekee Peekee successfully raised the Priority of eir Proposal "Secret Proposals" repeatedly in the message titled "Priority Increase" with "Message-Id: <199911181025.KAA09187@renko.ucs.ed.ac.uk>" as sent to the PF on the 18th of November 1999. FALSE by Murphy
23 Nov 1999 1179Murphy If the Rules require a Player to act on a message in a certain way upon receiving it - without restrictions on the method of delivery - and the Player receives the message via agora-discussion, then e is still required to act on it in that way. TRUE by Palnatoke
15 Nov 1999 1178 Rule 1729 permits voting on Insane Proposals by private message to the Assessor, even when the prevailing mode of voting on Proposals is Public. On Hold
elJefe, Steve 1177Peekee The Proposal "Voters and Legislators 1.1", as Proposed by Peekee on the 6th of November 1999, was made Disinterested by Peekee on the 9th of November 1999. FALSE by Lee
14 Nov 1999 1176Murphy A message sent to agora-discussion and received by the intended recipient(s) has full legal effect, unless the Rules exclude agora-discussion as a legally effective method of delivery for that message. by Kolja
13 Nov 1999 1175Peekee Peekee changed his ABC to P-Notes, in a message with, Message- Id: <199911051747.RAA18759@renko.ucs.ed.ac.uk> sent on Fri, 5 Nov 1999 17:47:29 +0000. FALSE by harvel
10 Nov 99 1174Wes The PO's issued by Payroll Clerk Lee in the email sent to agora-official time/date stamped Fri, 05 Nov 1999 16:36:15 -0600 were improperly executed, due to the fact that e had already executed PO's for the same purpose in the email sent to agora-discussion time/date stamped Fri, 05 Nov 1999 12:15:27 -0500. Justice Kolja OVERTURNS
03 Dec 1999 1173Wes Any TO which is successfully received by the Recordkeepor for the Currency being transfered is properly executed, even if it was redistributed by means of the agora-discussion mailing list. TRUE by Crito
08 Nov 1999 1172Crito The Private Orders issued by Murphy in the message with subject "BUS: Agoran Weekly Journal" dated Sun, 31 Oct 1999 were improperly executed. TRUE by Chuck
12 Nov 1999 1171Murphy Peekee resigned from The Legislators' Club in the message with Message-ID: <83c6467d.251929d3@aol.com> TRUE by Blob
08 Oct 1999 1170Peekee Players that hold official positions can choose to either accept or ignore messages sent to a-d which would require them to note an action or carry out an action themselves in the role of their official position TRUE by Crito
14 Oct 1999 1169Chuck If a Proposal fails without anyone having voted against it, then no one, even the Promotor, receives P-Notes due to the effect of Rule 1902 for that Proposal. Called by Chuck
16 Sep 1999 1168Peekee Michael has failed to comply with an agreement that e made with Peekee, and so has broken the agreement. Assigned to Wes
14 Sep 1999 1167Murphy Murphy possesses at least 100 Indulgences. FALSE by Peekee
16 Sep 1999 1166Murphy A Currency defined as a Basic Currency by a SLC, but not so defined by the Rules, is not a Basic Currency. TRUE by Palnatoke
16 Sep 1999 1165Elysion RIPO77 was improperly executed. TRUE by Murphy
11 Sep 1999 1164Peekee Peekee's ABC was neither changed or set on 1999/08/29. FALSE by Lee
04 Sep 1999 1163Wes The Priority of #235 "Removal of Blob's Coolness" is 1.0. FALSE by harvel
03 Sep 99 1162
1161Tom Mueller If all rules were repealed then any rule could be created with anyone's command. DISMISSED by Elysion
28 Aug 1999 1160Wes The phrase "We hereby perform whatever actions are necessary to cause X to happen" unambiguously indicates intent to perform said action. DISMISSED by Crito
31 Aug 1999 1159Peekee In the context of a vote denying is synonymous with voting AGAINST. FALSE by Chuck
23 Aug 1999 1158Peekee In the context of a vote appoving is synonymous with voting FOR. FALSE by Blob
18 Aug 1999 1157Peekee Denying is synonymous with voting AGAINST. FALSE by Kolja
04 Sep 1999 1156Peekee Approving is synonymous with voting FOR. FALSE by Annabel
16 Aug 1999 1155The Colonel Honourary Players of Agora are considered Registered Players of Agora by entities which exist entirely outside the Agora Nomic Rules. Assigned to Michael
10 Aug 1999 1154Morendil A Player who is On Hold may not be assigned as a Trustee for an entity in Probate. FALSE by Wes
06 Aug 1999 1153harvel If the Rules implicitly designate a Player who is a Legislator to be a Voting Entity temporarily, and that Player is not otherwise denied voting privileges, then that Player may vote. FALSE by Annabel
07 Aug 1999 1152harvel If a Rule implicitly designates a Player who is a Legislator to temporarily be a Voting Entity, then such implicit designation is sufficient to allow that Player to vote. FALSE by Palnatoke
03 Aug 1999 1151harvel R.1896 (c) (iii) implicitly designates a Player who is a Legislator to temporarily be a Voting Entity after having satisfied certain conditions (eg, transferring 6 Amoeba to the Bank). FALSE by Murphy
15 Aug 1999 1150Morendil One, or both, of the following assertions are true, to wit, firstly, that Elysion is guilty of Tardiness in not reporting to Steve regarding the ex-Player Morendil's Denaria holdings within one week of Steve being assigned as Trustee for Morendil, or secondly, that Steve is guilty of Tardiness in not posting to the Public Forum a Probate Plan for Morendil within one week of having received from all extant Recordkeepors reports regarding Morendil's holdings in the Currencies for which they were respectively Recordkeepors, the transmission of said reports being mandated by Steve's assignment as Trustee for Morendil. Decision to OVERTURN by Mighty Chuck
16 Aug 1999 1149Elysion If entity X submits a Transfer Order satisfying a Payment Order naming another entity Y as payor, entity Y will commit the Crime of Contempt by Inaction if entity Y does not submit the Transfer Order specifically required by the Payment Order. TRUE by Kolja
08 Aug 1999 1148Palnatoke Midnight of a given day is the midnight at 00:00 hours of that day. TRUE by harvel
03 Aug 1999 1147Palnatoke It must always be possible to make arbitrary modifications to the ruleset by some combination of player actions, even if Rule 114 is repealed. Kolja moves to OVERTURN
06 Sep 1999 1146harvel Morendil is a Player. FALSE by elJefe
10 Jul 1999 1145Lee The changes to the scoring Rule announced in message 740 in the egroups archive of agora-official are to be used for the current round which began June 1, 1999. FALSE by Crito
09 Jul 1999 1144Lee Vlad wrote: ". . . the changes to the scoring report I announced went into effect June 1." TRUE by Chuck
07 Jul 1999 1143Murphy The Order of the Evil Eye has been dissolved. FALSE by Elysion
12 Jul 1999 1142Wes A Payment Order may be satisfied by a Transfer Order issued by an Entity other than the Payor named in the Payment Order. Assigned to Blob
21 Jun 1999 1141Wes A Purchase Order may be satisfied by a Transfer Order issued by an Entity other than the Payor named in the Purchase Order. Assigned to Lee
21 Jun 1999 1140Elysion If no proposals are distributed in a given week, then every player has either voted or declared presence on all proposals of that distribution. Assigned to harvel
21 Jun 1999 1139Blob Judges are required to follow the reasons and arguments of past Judges and Justices when judging CFJs. Assigned to Steve
Tue, 15 Jun 1999 16 1138Wes Morendil's transfer of one Kudo from Wes to Chuck was invalid due to a lack of a valid justification for doing so. Judgement submitted
Wed, 30 Jun 1999 22 1137Chuck If a CFJ alleging that a Player has committed a Crime is initially Judged FALSE, and that decision is later reversed by a Board of Appeals, it is the duty of the original Judge to issue the Sentencing Orders associated with conviction of that Crime. Called by Chuck
Tue, 25 May 1999 19 1136Peekee Wes is currently not in eir grace period. by Elysion
Thu, 3 Jun 1999 17 1135Peekee The Order of the Evil eye was an Active Voter with effective control of more than three Voting Tokens at the time distribution of the last batch of proposals, it was not denied Voting Privileges at that time, it was Active at the end of the Voting Period of the Proposal in the batch whose Voting Period finished last, and it failed to cast a vote on any Proposal in the batch. Therefore it committed the Infraction of Failure to Vote and the Assessor should of detected and reported this infraction. FALSE by Michael
Sat, 22 May 1999 11 1134Peekee The Assessor should make determinations whether or not the Vizers of various Groups, as Players have effective control of the Group's Voting Tokens. TRUE by elJefe
Sun, 23 May 1999 14 1133Peekee A group is a voting Entity, and so is "An Active Voter" as described in Rule 1873 "A Duty to Vote". FALSE by Kolja A.
Tue, 25 May 1999 22 1132Steve Chuck has violated Rule 1434 (Default Procedure for Referendum Voting) by failing to perform his duties as Vote Collector. TRUE by Peekee
Tue, 18 May 1999 01 1131Steve The message sent to the Public Forum with headers which read in part: Message-Id:<3.0.1.32.19990406101136.009bcec- @proxy.pn.beam.com.au> Date: Fri, 16 Apr 1999 10:11:36 +1000 To: agora-busines-@gecko.serc.rmit.edu.au From: janet998-@yahoo.com Subject: Maximize your website's traffic! was sent by Steve. Murphy defaulted
Fri, 21 May 1999 21 1130Chuck In posting a message to agora-business with the subject "Maximize your website's traffic!", Steve committed the Crime of Misrepresentation by stating, on or around lines 250-252 of the body of the message, "Search Engine Success Group - Call us at: (310) 859-4659" Judge FALSE by Murhpy
Sat, 8 May 1999 00 1129Chuck In posting a message to agora-business with the subject "Maximize your website's traffic!", Steve committed the Crime of Misrepresentation by stating, on or around lines 188-189 of the body of the message, "<> Call us--we'll answer any questions you may have and provide a no-cost initial consultation. (310) 859-4659 " FALSE by Blob
Wed, 5 May 1999 12 1128Chuck In posting a message to agora-business with the subject "Maximize your website's traffic!", Steve committed the Crime of Misrepresentation by stating, on or around lines 138-155 of the body of the message, "Here's a sampling of some results we've acheived for previous clients. (These examples are for competitive keywords--not just obscure words on which no one is conducting searches.) <> 6 top-10 rankings on Infoseek for different relevant keywords <> 18 top-10 rankings across the major search engines <> 3 top-10 rankings on Alta Vista for one keyword <> 16 total *number one* rankings <> 40 top-30 rankings, spread across the different engines. <> 1 to 2 hits per week increased to 500 per day <> 45,000 hits per month grew to 108,000." FALSE by Oerjan
Mon, 3 May 1999 20 1127Chuck In posting a message to agora-business with the subject "Maximize your website's traffic!", Steve committed the Crime of Misrepresentation by stating, on or around lines 12-13 of the body of the message, "If your website isn't located in the top-30 listings of these engines, chances are your site will never be seen." FALSE by Beefurabi
Fri, 30 Apr 1999 16 1126Chuck CFJ 1126 In posting a message to agora-business with the subject "Maximize your website's traffic!", Steve committed the Crime of Misrepresentation by listing "janet998-@yahoo.com" as the "From:" address. Decision O/TRUE from Morendil
Fri, 14 May 1999 11 1125Blob Rule 1883 has not been repealed. TRUE by Crito
01 May 1999 1124Blob Votes sent to the agora-discussion mailing list are neither "sent publically" nor "sent privately", and so are not valid when voting is Unrestricted. TRUE by Elysion
Sun, 25 Apr 1999 19 1123Murphy A Player with no debts has effective control over eir Currency holdings, even if they have granted Power of Attorney over emselves to another Player. TRUE by Crito
Tue, 23 Feb 1999 11 1122Vlad Proposal "3833" (see below) was not properly distributed and is not in fact currently up for vote. FALSE by Michael
Wed, 10 Feb 1999 10 1121Vlad The Proposal known as "3830" (see below) was in fact distributed, but it has not received a number as required by Rule 109. FALSE by elJefe
Wed, 10 Feb 1999 00 1120General Chaos "Vlad's message dated 'Sun, 7 Feb 1999 23:11:01 -0600 (CST)' did not succeed in casting any Votes on either Proposal 3830 or Proposal 3833; as a result, Payment Orders avt083 and avt085 are invalid and should be vacated." FALSE by Morendil
Wed, 24 Feb 1999 09 1119Steve Kolja did not have effective control of more than three Voting Tokens at the time Proposals 3829-3830 were distributed, because he had granted Power of Attorney to Steve. Speaker Murphy Judges OVERTURN/FALSE
Wed, 03 Mar 1999 01 1118Steve General Chaos' message to agora-business, dated Thu Feb 4 04:47:07 1999, with message-id < 199902041242.HAA2542-@poverty.bloomington.in.us >, initiated a Referendum to Impeach Chancellor Andre. TRUE by Vlad
Sun, 14 Feb 1999 11 1117Michael Players may bar Players from Judgement in the sense of Rule 897 by specifying the Players to be barred at a time other than that of the submission of the CFJ. TRUE by Peekee
Sat, 06 Feb 1999 04 1116Crito The VT Payment Order labeled "RVTPO 822" in message "Message-Id: 199902031535.qaa0783-@wsinfm15.win.tue.nl Subject: OFF: Officer Salaries" (salary paid to Justiciar Crito) was improperly executed. FALSE by Murphy
Tue, 09 Feb 1999 01 1115Peekee The message I sent to the discussion forum, declaring my presence on the recent Proposals 3825 and 3826, was valid at that time. Judgement FALSE by General Chaos
Fri, 05 Feb 1999 00 1114Peekee The message I sent to the discussion forum, declaring my presence on the recent Proposals 3825 and 3826, is valid. FALSE by Blob
Fri, 05 Feb 1999 16 1113Kolja A. Morendil has not submitted the proposal titled "Ruleset Lite, II". TRUE by Macross
Mon, 25 Jan 1999 23 1112Steve In order to submit a Proposal, in the sense of R1865 and elsewhere, it is not sufficient that a collection of text "with the clear indication that that text is intended to become a Proposal" (R1483) merely be sent to the Public Forum by a Proposing Entity; the collection of text must also be received in the Public Forum. TRUE by Ørjan
Thu, 21 Jan 1999 15 1111Blob The Voting Period of Proposals 3810-3812 has ended. TRUE by Steve
Mon, 21 Dec 1998 11 1110Blob The Voting Period for Proposals 3810-3812 ended between 07:18:33 (GMT) on December 4 and 07:59:20 (GMT) on December 7. TRUE by Steve
Tue, 22 Dec 1998 16 1109General Chaos The Payment Order for VTs known as 'avt031' and executed by Malcolm in his capacity of Assessor is invalid. Crito judges FALSE
Mon, 16 Nov 1998 09 1108Kolja A. The requirement to "execute a Payment Order for 0 VTs" can be fulfilled by doing nothing. Morendil Judges TRUE
Wed, 21 Oct 1998 11 1107Kolja A. A Recordkeepor is not required to abide by a valid Transfer Order under the condition that this transfer "would result in an entity possessing a negative quantity of Currency" (R1817). However, as soon as this condition ceases to be true, the Transfer Order in question must be obeyed. Assigned to Blob, Wed, 16 Sep 1998 10
16 1106Lee In calculating the success of the Revolt of 3 Sep 1998, Swann should be counted as only one player for the purposes of determining the total number of players. FALSE, Wed, 9 Sep 1998 13
32 1105Lee The method Michael used is not sufficiently random and therefore incorrect according to the rules. TRUE, Tue, 8 Sep 1998 12
21 1104Steve The presence in a Rule of deference clause, claiming that the Rule defers to another Rule, does not prevent a conflict with the other Rule arising, but shows only how the Rule says that conflict is to be resolved when it does arise. Motion 1 granted, Wed, 9 Sep 1998 00
50 1103Steve In the case of conflict between Rules of unequal Power, the higher Powered Rule cannot defer to the lower Powered Rule, unless the higher Powered Rule takes precedence over Rule 1482. Motion 1 granted, Fri, 21 Aug 1998 01
04 1102Macross It is not possible to cast a Vote on a Proposal, Election or Referendum by sending a message to the Public Forum. TRUE, Fri, 21 Aug 1998 12
21 1101Steve Rule 1567 should be interpreted such that a Player may only make emself ineligible to Judge a CFJ which has already been called. lee SUSTAINS the judgement, Wed, 12 Aug 1998 12
56 1100Swann Player Swann committed the crime of Contempt by Action. FALSE, Mon, 17 Aug 1998 18
11 1099Macross It is not possible to satisfy a PO requiring the transfer of 0.5 Indulgences. TRUE, Mon, 6 Jul 1998 01
40 1098Kolja A. Kolja A. has bought plot "Area 44". FALSE, Thu, 18 Jun 1998 20
04 1097Macross Player Macross has issued an Order the text of which is: I hereby Order and command Player Swann to refrain from using words that are not spelled the same backwards as forwards when issuing any Administrative, Judicial, Appellate or Private Orders unless the issuing of those Orders is explicitly required of 'em by the Rules or by an Order issued by Player Macross. TRUE, Fri, 12 Jun 1998 15
34 1096Morendil An Order, as defined in Rule 1793, and of whatever type, is "a Nomic Entity created in accordance with the Rules" in the sense of Rule 1513 and as such is subject to the limitations set forth in that Rule, and in particular that Orders derive coercive power from some Rules and that the Rules take precedence over Orders whenever an Order conflicts with a Rule. FALSE, Tue, 9 Jun 1998 16
06 1095Swann The orders issued by Swann in the message to the PF entitled "Here we go..." were legal and valid Orders. FALSE, Tue, 9 Jun 1998 21
54 1094Swann The Orders issued by Player Swann in the message entitled 'Coup d'état' were valid. TRUE, Thu, 28 May 1998 14
47 1093Morendil Player Morendil did not commit the Infraction of Inciting to Riot. FALSE, Mon, 11 May 1998 11
03 1092Murphy If a Player with nonzero Score deregisters and later re-registers, eir Score is the same as it was when e deregistered. TRUE, Tue, 21 Apr 1998 10
59 1091Crito The Proposal titled "Electees" submitted by Harlequin on 02 April, 1998 had a priority of one as of 09 April, 1998. TRUE, Fri, 17 Apr 1998 17
16 1090Murphy No Proposal entitled "The Great Officer's Veto Scam Proposal" has been distributed. Final decision reported, Sat, 18 Apr 1998 12
40 1089Murphy The Proposal submitted by Swann and entitled "The Great Officer's Veto Scam Proposal" has not been distributed. Michael judges to sustain, Wed, 8 Apr 1998 08
39 1087Antimatter CFJ 1087 "The last sentence of Rule 1766 prevents the remainder of that rule from granting additional votes." Sustained by Jester, Mon, 30 Mar 1998 20
52 1086Morendil CFJ 1086 "The Proposal submitted by Crito with title Cantus Cygneus, claimed to be a Silly Proposal, is not, in fact, a Silly Proposal." Called by Morendil, 21 Feb 1998 03
30 1085Steve CFJ 1085 "Speaker Steve is not Tainted." Relevant Rules: R1648, R1664, R402 TRUE, 26 Feb 07
47 1084Chuck CFJ 1084 "Chuck did not commit the Infraction of Failure to Report at the end of the Nomic Week of Feb. 9, 1998." and 2 VT's, if Chuck paid these same amounts to satisfy RIPO1 and RVTPO11.
1083Harlequin CFJ 1083 "If a Player makes two Votes FOR a Proposal, and subsequently cancels those votes, and no other Player in any way Votes on the Proposal, the Voting Index of that Proposal at the end of its Voting Period is two." [ Elysion
the previous line is indeed incorrect ] 1082Kolja A. CFJ 1082 "Chuck incorrectly stated that Andre, Blob, Crito, ElJefe, General Chaos, Harlequin, Jester, Kolja A., Michael, Morendil, Murphy, Oerjan, Sherlock, Steve, Swann, & Time Agent were guilty of the Infraction of Delayed COE Response." TRUE, 29 Jan 1998 08
42 1081Chuck CFJ 1081 "Harlequin did not win the Game upon the conclusion of the voting period of Proposal 3640." FALSE, 17 Feb 1998 23
33 1080Blob Barred CFJ 1080 "If the rules require that a player has to perform an action at a particular time, or during a particular time period, and e fails to do so, then e is not required to perform the action at a later time." FALSE, 28 Jan 1998 09
53 1079Zefram (not a player) CFJ 1079 "Zefram's objection to the plan for the termination of Calabresi's estate, in message 199801141153.laa0969-@taos.demon.co.uk, lacks foundation." TRUE, 19 Jan 1998 21
06 1078Steve CFJ 1078 "Morendil violated Rule 1729 by voting on Proposal 3640 in the Public Forum." Insanity, inanity, profanity, calamity, Yosemite, perimetry, gee, I'm, a, tree!
1077Michael CFJ 1077 "Rule 833 should be interpreted such that it does not cause the Proposer of a failed Disinterested Proposal to be billed 1 P-Note." Relevant rules: 833, 1623 FALSE, 2 Jan 1998 13
47 1072Michael CFJ 1072 "The Rulekeepor does not have an Official Report." TRUE, 18 Nov 1997 22
14 1071Steve CFJ 1071 "Rule 1558 prevents a Player who is the Speaker from nominating in an Election for the Office of Speaker-Elect." Relevant Rules: 1558, 1647 TRUE, 17 Nov 1997 23
00 1070 CFJ 1070 "Immediately after becoming Speaker, Morendil was registered as a player." Dice roll
Vir, Swann, Steve 1069Michael CFJ 1069 "Steve is currently holding the Office of Justiciar." TRUE, 13 Nov 1997 13
29 1068 CFJ 1068 "Chaos Harlequin has violated Rule 1738." Justice Steve
overturn and judge TRUE, 18 Nov 1997 16 1067Kolja A. CFJ 1067 The sentence "If this leads to a Voting Period that is shorter than three days, the Voting Period shall instead last for three days or until two days before the InterNomic Voting Period on the relevant InterNomic Proposal is over, whichever is earliest." has been added to the third paragraph of R1632. FALSE, 10 Nov 1997 23
07 1066Swann (not a Player) Barred CFJ 1065 "I (the caller of this CFJ) am my own Executor." Kolja A. judges FALSE, 4 Nov 1997 14
17 1065elJefe "The Office of Speaker-Elect is not now being held in the normal fashion." Justice Steve
Overturn and judge TRUE, 21 Nov 1997 14 1063 "There exists at least one VT that possesses at least 1 VT." Appealed by Crito, 04 Nov 1997 09
30 1062Zefram (not a Player) "Plato possesses at least 0.9 VTs." Justice elJefe
OVERTURN/FALSE, 25 Nov 1997, 09 1061Morendil (not a player) CFJ 1061 Rule 1585 should be interpreted such that a Player who is newly installed into an Office does not commit the Infraction of Failure to Report (insofar as that Office is subject to such duties) if e posts the required Report within a week of eir being installed into Office. TRUE by Steve, 2 Nov 1997 14
10 1058Morendil CFJ 1058 elJefe committed the Crime of Persecution, a Class A Crime, in incorrectly alleging in the Public Forum that Morendil was Lawless on October 14. General Chaos judges FALSE, 31 Oct 1997 13
13 1053Murphy Barred CFJ 1053 "Elde is Blob's Executor in Probate." Justice Andre
sustain, 13 Nov 1997 16 1047Morendil CFJ 1047 "General Chaos committed the Crime of Wrongful COE denial." Final judgement
FALSE 1045Kolja A. Barred CFJs 945-970 and 972-1044 do not contain a statement of the sort required by rule 1563, and as such, must be dismissed. Called by Kolja A., Sep 23 21
26 971Antimatter (not a Player) Barred "The Clerk of the Courts is not paid enough." Called by Antimatter 22 Sep 1997 13
57 944Crito For proposals distributed during the infection of R693, the ten days immediately following the distribution of each such proposal will be designated its Voting Period immediately upon the disinfection of R693. Called by Crito, 18 Sep 1997 14
48 943Crito CFJ 943 The Clerk of the Courts failed to execute the required Payment Orders within seven days of reporting an Infraction, as required by Rule 1599, for the following three Infractions: 07/24/97 09:35:39 +0100 Failure to Judge by Blob 07/24/97 09:39:56 +0100 Failure to Judge by Elde 07/25/97 17:59:28 +0100 Failure to Judge by elJefe FALSE by ChrisM, 18 Sep 1997 22
05 942Steve CFJ 942 Rule 789 should be interpreted such that a document purporting to be a Call for Judgement alleging that a Rule should be interpreted in a certain way, but which does not include a list of Relevant Rules assembled by the Caller, which includes the Rule being interpreted, is not in fact a CFJ, and that therefore neither the Clerk of the Courts nor any other Player incur any obligations regarding it. FALSe by ChrisM, 15 Sep 97 13
58 941Kolja A. CFJ 941 All proposed Amendments to the Frankenstein Rule were made impossible by the Frankenstein Generator when the change to the Frankenstein Monster assigned to "Week 1", reported by the Mad Scientist on Mon, 11 August 1997, took effect. Andre SUSTAINs the Judgement, Fri, 26 Sep 1997 14
51 940Morendil Rule 1596 should be interpreted so that a message purporting to be a Payment Order must, in order to satisfy that Rule's requirements and qualify as a legal Payment Order, explicitly and unambiguously state that the purported Payor is ordered to effect a payment as a consequence of that message, e.g. by stating "Player X is commanded to pay Y", the mere mention of an amount of a Currency, the name or names of the Payor and Payee, or a reference to some Rule or some situation that requires a Payment Order to be executed being insufficient for a message not containing such a command or entreaty to qualify as a Payment Order. Appealed by General Chaos, 16 Sep 1997, 16
00 -0500 939Steve CFJ 939 The provision in R1504 which states that: Penalties for Infractions are applied immediately upon their legal report, and the Player making the report of the Infraction shall execute whatever Payment Order(s) are required to apply the penalty specified for that Infraction. should be interpreted such that penalties for Infractions are applied immediately upon the legal report of the *penalties*, not the legal report of the Infractions. TRUE by Zefram, 16 Sep 1997 09
59 938Murphy "Rule 1513 should be interpreted such that, if a body of text has been read by a Player, then it shall not lack the power to require that Player to perform or not perform an action solely because the Rules fail to require that it be made available to that Player." Assigned to Steve, Mon, 8 Sep 1997 10
23 937Morendil "No Player is currently required to report a change in Blots resulting from the commission of an Infraction." CotC Andre judges UPHOLD, Thu, 4 Sep 1997 10
53 936Morendil "At the time of Player's Morendil posting eir message attempting to transfer one VT to the Frankenstein Monster, no Entity authorized to possess Currencies existed which could be unambiguously referred to as 'the Frankenstein Monster'." Assigned to Antimatter, Tue, 19 Aug 1997 13
04 935Crito "Although all individual P-Note entities were destroyed by the PC proposal, the Currency class of P-Notes was re-established by R1701 immediately after their destruction by R1579, making it possible to legally issue POs for P-Notes since the PC proposal took effect." CFJ dismissed, Mon, 18 Aug 1997 00
59 934Kolja A. "The currencies created by Morendil on behalf of the Misanthropist's Group in a message of 12.07.97 to the public forum are named MMM-pounds, MMM-shillings and MMM-pence." FALSE, Mon, 18 Aug 1997 04
11 933Crito CFJ 933 "All Voting Tokens were destroyed as a result of the Pragmatic Currencies Proposal taking effect." Chuck SUSTAINs Judgement of TRUE, 7 Oct 1997 22
47 932Morendil "No Player is currently authorized to execute Payment Orders for Indulgences pursuant to penalties expressed in terms of Blots." Antimatter OVERTURNS/reverses, Wed, 13 Aug 1997 09
52 931Harlequin "A unit of the currency 'Payment Orders' is a Nomic Entity." FALSE, Wed, 30 Jul 1997 12
40 930Morendil "No Payment Orders have thus far been successfully executed, for the reason that none exist." Vlad defaults
929Morendil "No Transfer Orders have thus far been successfully executed, for the reason that none exist." TRUE, Mon, 28 Jul 1997 06
54 928General Chaos "No Currency transfers occured as a result of the application of Proposal 3482." Concurring opinion attached, Wed, 2 Jul 1997 13
49 927Chuck "The circumstances which led to the Judgement of CFJ 924 no longer prevail, thus rendering the annotation of Rule 663 required by Injunction inapplicable." TRUE, Tue, 24 Jun 1997 09
13 926Murphy "It is permissible for an Officer Salary to be defined as a positive number of P-Notes." TRUE, Mon, 23 Jun 1997 01
21 925Murphy "Rule 1671 has had the text 'No Proposed Amendment to the Frankenstein Rule shall take effect unless it is Proposed as part of a Silly Proposal.' added to it." Appealed by Steve, Fri, 27 Jun 1997 16
14 924Steve "The requirement in Rule 663 that "To be legally made, an Injunction must...[b]e sent to the CotC simultaneously with a Judgement which has been legally made by the Judge." should be interpreted such that, to be legally made, an Injunction must accompany the submission by the Judge of the very same Judgement with which the Injunction is associated, and not merely accompany some Judgement or other which has previously been legally made by that Judge." TRUE, Thu, 12 Jun 1997 21
41 923Morendil "Player favor either did not legally require a transfer of one P-Note in eir message to the Promotor herein reproduced as Exhibit A, or if e did so that transfer did not cause a Petition Fee to be paid." Antimatter SUSTAINS, Mon, 9 Jun 1997 17
13 922Morendil "A transfer of P-Notes attempting to pay the Petition Fee for a Proposal occurs as a result of a Player's sending the Promotor a message such as described in Rule 1702 and is a transfer mandated by the Rules rather than a transfer mandated by a Player." Blob REVERSES judgement, Fri, 13 Jun 1997 11
33 921Murphy "The most recent amemdment to Rule 1671 caused all Organizations to be required to be dissolved." Appeal overturned, final Judgement
FALSE 920Zefram "Rule 114 should be interpreted such that a change to the rules such that they instantaneously thereafter do not permit modification of the rules is not prevented from occurring by Rule 114 if it leaves the gamestate such that after some definite finite or infinitesemal time interval the rules will again change such that the gamestate then satisfies Rule 114's condition." TRUE, Mon, 14 Apr 1997 22
00 919Morendil "Rule 1431 should be interpreted so that when a Player posts to the Public Forum a message containing information of a nature similar to that in a previous message by the same Player, and such a message further contains statements to the effect that the previous message was in error, and such a message further contains information correcting such error or errors, and no previous Claim of Error has been made concerning that message, then for each such error, a) that message is a Claim of Error for the purposes of Rule 1431, and b) that message is a Response to that selfsame Claim of Error for the purposes of Rule 1431." TRUE, Mon, 14 Apr 1997 11
04 918Antimatter "Player Vanyel never made a CFJ 910 with the following Statement: Les règles permettent la soumission des Demands de Jugement aux autres langues qu'Anglais; en plus, le Juge de cette DdJ ne peut pas la rejeter seulement à cause de sa langue de soumission." FALSE, Thu, 10 Apr 97 12
36 917Steve "For the purposes of Rule 114, if it is not legally possible for any Proposals to be distributed and voted on, then it is not possible to make arbitrary modifications to the Ruleset." FALSE, Fri, 18 Apr 1997 16
45 916Crito "An Officer is required to take action on a message pertaining to the duties of eir office only if the message has been sent to either the Public Forum or the preferred e-mail address of said Officer, as listed in the Registrar's Report." FALSE, Wed, 26 Mar 1997 20
17 915Harlequin "If a message which must be recieved by a particular player is sent to them in a language or code which they cannot decipher, the message does not count as having been recieved by that player." FALSE, Mon, 24 Mar 1997 08
43 914Harlequin "If a Rule requires a Treasury to pay units of that currency to two or more players at once, it pays the players sequentially, in alphabetical order by Nickname." FALSE, Mon, 24 Mar 1997 20
01 913Harlequin "The Bank can have a negative number of a currency." TRUE, Mon, 24 Mar 1997 17
43 912Swann "If a Rule says a treasury loses an amount of currency due to an Infraction, and that treasury has less currency than is being lost, the full amount of currency will still be transferred, leaving a negative value in the treasury in question." TRUE, Mon, 7 Apr 1997 09
43 911Swann "A Currency directive of the form 'One Voting Token shall be placed in each Treasury for each 200 marks in that Treasury.' shall, for a negative value of Marks (less than -200) in a treasury, place a negative amount of Voting Tokens in that treasury (assuming that Voting Tokens exist and are a currency)." Final verdict to SUSTAIN judgement of FALSE
910Vanyel "Les règles permettent la soumission des Demands de Jugement aux autres langues qu'Anglais; en plus, le Juge de cette DdJ ne peut pas la rejeter seulement à cause de sa langue de soumission." VRAI, Thu, 29 May 97 10
52 909Steve "The phrase 'considered again' in Rule 1565 should be interpreted such that when a dismissal of a CFJ has been set aside, the Clerk of the Courts should assign the CFJ to a new Judge selected from among those eligible, who then has one week to deliver a Judgement." TRUE, Sun, 16 Mar 1997 23
33 908Morendil "Whenever an Extra Vote is cast on a Disinterested Proposal, no transfer of EVs from the caster's Treasury takes place." FALSE, Wed, 12 Mar 1997 21
47 907Zefram "Rule 114 should be interpreted such that if a Proposal contained one Rule Change which, if it took effect, would make it impossible to make arbitrary changes to the ruleset by some combination of player actions, and that Proposal also contained other Rule Changes that, if they took effect, would make unrelated changes, then if the Proposal were adopted, of the Rule Changes in the Proposal only that one would be prevented by Rule 114 from taking effect." TRUE, Sun, 16 Mar 1997 18
50 906Zefram "Rule 114 should be interpreted such that the term 'ruleset' as used within it refers to a set of information that includes all Rules, and not merely to a representation of that information." Injunction issued, Thu, 13 Mar 1997 09
39 905Harlequin "The wording of R1442 in P2834 will prevent any player from casting votes on Proposals." Michael OVERTURNS judgement, Fri, 14 Mar 1997
904Antimatter "The Player known as Antimatter currently possesses the Patent Title of Agoraphobe." TRUE, Mon, 3 Mar 1997 21
18 903Harlequin "The 'Frankenstein Monster' required for a valid CFJ in Rule 1671 may be an ASCII drawing of a Frankenstein Monster, and a statement appearing as words within a cartoon bubble, pointing to the ASCII drawing." TRUE, Mon, 31 Mar 1997 00
04 902Oerjan "Proposal 2818 caused the adoption of a VOC on a report wherein Proposal 2662 was reported to fail." FALSE, Wed, 26 Feb 1997 00
02 901Chuck "Rule 880 should be interpreted such that an Officer who resigns without appointing a successor appoints the Speaker to succeed em." FALSE, Sat, 15 Feb 1997 23
23 900favor "If the Registrar fails to produce a report in a given week, e violates Rule 101 and Rule 1502, and commits a Class C Crime." TRUE, Sun, 9 Feb 1997 01
48 899favor "The Player who submits an excess CFJ receives (rather than losing) 2 Frankenstein Monsters." FALSE, Mon, 10 Feb 1997 20
30 898favor "Rule 1671 does not specify the Term of Office of the Office of Frankenstein Monster." TRUE, Thu, 6 Feb 1997 16
53 897favor "The requirements in Rule 217 on Judgements apply to the determinations of the members of a Board of Appeal, as well as to the Judgements of Judges." TRUE, Thu, 6 Feb 1997 22
32 896favor "If a Rule Change contained in an adopted Proposal has insufficient power to take effect at the time of the Proposal's adoption, it may not, simply by virture of that Proposal's having once been adopted, take effect at some later time as a result of (for instance) the down-mutation of the Rule which it purports to change." TRUE, Thu, 06 Feb 1997 19
26 895Blob "The Office of Notary does not exist." FALSE, Wed, 12 Feb 1997 09
00 894Chuck "It is not possible to cast the Power of Immunity." TRUE, Wed, 5 Feb 1997 07
37 893n/a "Casting the Frankenstein Monster has no effect." FALSE, Thu, 23 Jan 1997 20
28 892Blob "The words `other Rules' in the sentence: `This Rule defers to all other Rules which do not contain this sentence.' in Rule 1504, should be interpreted as meaning `Rules other than this one'." FALSE, Tue, 21 Jan 97 08
59 891Murphy "Rule 1663 should be interpreted such that Player M would Win by its Provisions due to Proposals 5000, 5001 and 5002 in this hypothetical series of Proposals: Proposal Number Proposer FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN ----------------------------------------------------- 5000 Player M 3 4 2 5001 Player M 3 4 2 5002 Player M 3 4 2 " TRUE, Sat, 21 Dec 1996 16
31 890Murphy "Rule 1663 should be interpreted such that Player M would not Win by its Provisions due to Proposals 5000, 5001 and 5003 in this hypothetical series of Proposals: Proposal Number Proposer FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN ----------------------------------------------------- 5000 Player M 4 4 4 5001 Player M 4 4 4 5002 Player S 5 4 3 5003 Player M 4 4 4 " FALSE, Fri, 20 Dec 1996 23
56 889Swann "Morendil is guilty of the Crime of Unlawful Nondisclosure." Fri, 17 Jan 1997 12
06 888Steve "Non-Players may make Calls for Judgement." TRUE by Chuck, Wed, 27 Nov 1996 02
37 887Steve "Andre's Proposal "General Organizations", misnumbered 2744 by the Promotor, should be numbered 2759." TRUE by elJefe, Sat, 23 Nov 1996 17
04 886Zefram "At the time of eir deregistration, Scott had 8 Kudos." TRUE by Michael, Thu Nov 28 11
59 885Zefram "The Adoption Index of Proposal 2741 was 3." TRUE, Fri, 6 Dec 1996 13
50 884Zefram "The effects of Proposal 2741 included amending Rule 1339." TRUE by Oerjan, Tue, 19 Nov 1996 20
06 883Morendil "The Number Proposal entitled "General Organizations", and labeled as "Proposal 2744" in the most recent Promotor's Distribution of Proposals, actually is 2745." FALSE by KoJen, Tue, 19 Nov 96 15
17 882Morendil "Proposal 2737 failed." TRUE by Michael, Tue Nov 19 12
01 881Zefram "At the time of eir deregistration, Scott had 9 Kudos." Judgement received, Wed, 13 Nov 1996 21
14 880Zefram "Rule 755 should be interpreted such that there are no Patent Titles known as Winners' Cups." FALSE, Tue, 22 Oct 1996 17
54 879Zefram "If Proposal 2692 is Adopted then Rule 114 will prevent it from taking effect." a pre-emptive judgement. *)
878Zefram "Rule 1322 should be interpreted such that the term 'Mutation Index' is a synonym for 'Mutability Index'." Appelate decision from Michael, Sun, 13 Oct 1996 13
02 877Andre "The texts, published as being Proposals number 2646, 2647, 2650, 2651, 2652 and 2660, are not Proposals." Sun, 8 Sep 1996 16
13 876Morendil "Rule 1003 prohibited Proposal 2627 from taking effect." FALSE by Steve, Thu, 25 Jul 1996 18
54 875Morendil "Rule 1006 should be interpreted to mean that if a Rule is enacted which designates a position to be an Office, and no procedure exists to determine which Player initially holds that Office, then such a position is not an Office, unless such a Rule takes precedence over Rule 1006." its decision is to be reversed. There ends CFJ 875.
874Morendil "Rule 833 should be interpreted to mean that if either 1) a Proposal receives exactly one more Vote FOR than AGAINST, and the Assessor Voted FOR that Proposal; or 2) a Proposal receives exactly one more Vote AGAINST than FOR, and the Assessor Voted FOR that Proposal; then the Assessor's Vote does not count toward determining the F-A award or penalty for that Proposal." FALSE by Zefram, Fri, 14 Jun 1996 00
18 873Morendil "Rule 833 should be interpreted to mean that if a Proposal receives exactly one more Vote FOR than AGAINST, or exactly one more Vote AGAINST than FOR, and the Assessor Voted on that Proposal and did not abstain, then the Assessor's Vote does not count toward determining the F-A award or penalty for that Proposal." Judgement delivered, Fri, 7 Jun 96 14
17 872Zefram "Steve did not receive the Salary of the Registrar at 00:00:00 GMT on the 20th of May 1996." Judgement distributed Wed, 29 May 96 9
29 871Kelly Statement: On or about 20 April 1996, Morendil committed the Crime of Misrepresentation, by posting to the Public Forum a message which e did not specifically disclaim as possibly incorrect, but which e knew or should reasonably have known to contain falsifications. FALSE by Chuck, Thu 23 May 1996 21
51 870Morendil With the exception of Player Morendil, all currently registered Players who were Players on Apr. 20 have committed one (and possibly more) Infraction of the sort described in Rule 1599, in not reporting to the Banker transfers of Marks mandated by the Regulations of the Contest known as Morendil's Feline Orphanage within a period of seven days as required by Rule 1534 and the aforementioned Regulations. FALSE by Chuck, Sun, 5 May 1996 16
14 869Andre Anything legal Action once performed by a person being a Player, even if performed while that person was not a Player, is an Action by that Player. TRUE by ElJefe, Fri, 26 Apr 1996 13
35 868Morendil Assessor Kelly has committed a total of four (4) distinct Class D Crimes, in failing to publish the results of Voting on Proposals 2574, 2575, 2576 and 2577 within the time alloted em to do so. TRUE by Steve, Wed, 24 Apr 1996 12
17 867Chuck Rule 1597 should be interpreted such that, whenever a Rule directly requires a transfer of Currencies to take place, and when the transfer would result in the Treasury being transferred from containing a negative quantity of the Currency transferred, the transfer does not take place, unless the Rule requiring the transfer takes precedence over Rule 1597. TRUE by Andre, Sat, 20 Apr 96 10
48 866Morendil Player Jtael has cast legal Votes on Proposals 2555 through 2564. TRUE by Oerjan
09 Apr 1996 865Morendil Whenever the Rules place some significance on the time when some mail message is received by a Player, this should be interpreted to mean the time when such a message is received by the email account corresponding to that Player's email address; as a consequence, a mail message is legally received when the machine which stores this account's mail receives it, as opposed to when that Player actually reads eir mail, and further, irrespective of whether such mail is ever actually read by a Player. TRUE by Steve, Fri, 12 Apr 1996 19
17 864favor Under the Rules of Agora as they currently exist, no Player can become part of the Jurisdiction of any Compact without eir consent. TRUE by elJefe, Tue, 9 Apr 96 14
50 863Morendil Registrar Steve has committed a total of 11 Infractions under Rule 1599/0, each carrying a penalty of 1 Blot, in not reporting to the Public Forum, as mandated by Rules 1007/5 and 1475/0, transfers occurring at the beginning to the previous Nomic Week and resulting from the payment of fixed weekly Salaries, and these Infractions have not been reported by a Player required to report them. TRUE by Jtael, Sat, 6 Apr 1996 23
09 862Morendil The Rules in general should be interpreted such that a Win Token Transaction as described in Rule 1493 can cause a Player's Win Token holdings to be negative. TRUE by Zefram, Sat, 30 Mar 1996 03
37 861Kelly "Rule 1600 should be interpreted such that its condition for self-repeal can never be fulfilled, as long as the Rules themselves can be changed." Concurring opinion (appended) by Chuck and elJefe, 9 Mar 1996
860Greycell ""Where the Rules call for a Player to be nominated to perform, or not perform, any action or duty, it is sufficient to nominate an Officer to perform that action, the current holder of that Office and eir successor(s) then being responsible for the action or duty" Injunction appealed by Chuck, Wed, 6 Mar 1996 01
03 859Morendil JUDGEMENT OF CFJ 859 "Immediately prior to the adoption of Rule 1600, the Rules were interpreted in such a manner that the first two sentences of that Rule accurately describe how the Rules then governed play." TRUE by Vanyel, Wed, 6 Mar 1996 16
50 858Zefram Rule 1482 should be interpreted such that the meaning of a word used in a Rule is a part of the Rule's meaning, and therefore cannot be changed significantly by Rules of lower precedence. REVERSED on Appeal
08 Mar 1996⇒858aAppeal of CFJ 858elJefe moves to REVERSE
08 Mar 1996 857Morendil JUDGEMENT CFJ 857 " The Rule that was created by Proposal 2448 should be interpreted so that a Transfer occurs under its provisions each time a Player casts the Votes it specifies, even if such Votes have no legal effect. " FALSE by KoJen, 8 February 1996, 12
19 -0500 856favor JUDGEMENT CFJ 856 Rule 113/1 should be interpreted to mean simply that a Player may always deregister from the Game rather than continue to play. The other language in the Rule is merely a gloss on that basic content, illustrating some of its implications; it does not change the essential meaning of the Rule. TRUE by Michael, 19 February 1996, 10
20 GMT 855Swann JUDGEMENT CFJ 855 "It is legal to transfer a complex number of Currency as long as the number is evenly divisible by the Currency's MUQ and consists of a positive Real component." FALSE by KoJen, 7 February 1996, 14
51 -0500 854Steve " The Rules should be interpreted such that, if the transfers mentioned in R1451 are Class I transfers, then Morendil deregistered on Sun, 21 Jan 1996 17:58:22 +0100." TRUE by Kelly, 29 January 1996, 14
50 EST5 853Wes "Rule 113 should be interpreted such that it does not allow a Player to deregister retroactively." TRUE by Andre, 2 February 1996, 15
38 MET 852Morendil ASSIGNMENT CFJ 852 Rule 1467 should be interpreted so that only the Mintor of a Currency may destroy units of that Currency. TRUE by Wes, 7 February 1996, 18
54 -0800 (PST) 851Morendil FINAL JUDGEMENT OF APPEAL CFJ 851 "A transfer for which no Rules specify a time limit for its being reported, and which is reported later than seven days after it supposedly occurs, is illegal and thus does not occur." FALSE by Murphy, Wed, 28 Feb 1996 20
55 850Morendil JUDGEMENT OF CFJ 850 "The Transfers mandated by Rule 1451 are either Class III or illegal" FALSE by Gecko, Wed, 28 Feb 1996 19
14 849 Judge: Andre (defaulted) Chuck Judgement: FALSE Eligible: Chuck, dcuman, favor, Jtael, Kelly, KoJen, Wes, Zefram Not Eligible: Caller: Steve Barred: Morendil On Hold: Blob, Dave Bowen, elJefe 1005: Michael, Murphy, Pascal, Swann, Vanyel, Vlad Defaulted: Andre incurred.
848Swann JUDGEMENT CFJ 848 "All official duties conducted by Moerendil as a result of Swann's legal deligations were, indeed, official and legal (excepting any errors in fact.)" TRUE by Steve, 9 February 1996, 12
52 +1100 (EST) 847Swann JUDGEMENT CFJ 847 "The Rules should be interpreted that deregistration, by definition, when inintiated by the deregistering Player, occurs at the time the Player makes the request to deregister-- even when Rule 113 is invoked upon deregistration." TRUE by favor, 2 February 1996, 10
53 EST 846Swann JUDGEMENT CFJ 846 "The Rules should be interpreted that Swann is currently Speaker" Concurring Opinion supported by Michael, 30 January 1996, 11
05 GMT 845Andre RE-ASSIGNMENT CFJ 845 "Rule 1472 should be interpreted such, that Class I and Class II transfers take place at the time that the requirement of them taking place starts." TRUE by Steve, 5 February 1996, 06
04 MEt 843Morendil The Rules in general should be interpreted so that if a sentence says that 'event X happens and event Y happens', where X and Y are both modifications of some sort to the game state, the word 'and' is _not_ taken to mean that Y cannot occur if X does not occur. TRUE by favor, 15 January 1995, 08
59 EST 842Morendil Rule 1469 should be interpreted so that when the destruction of a Treasury which contains a negative amount of any Currency is required by the Rules, that Treasury is not destroyed, since the transfer of the negative Currencies within does not happen. FALSE by favor, 4 January 1996, 16
48 EST 841Morendil "Rule 1469 should be interpreted so that when the destruction of a Treasury which contains a negative amount of any Currency is required by the Rules, that Treasury is destroyed even if the transfer of the negative Currencies within does not happen." Judged FALSE by favor, 23 January 1996, 10
45 EST 840Kelly Rulekeepor Wes violated Rule 1051/3 by not publishing a Ruleset during the Nomic Week ending Jan. 1, 1996. TRUE by Jtael, Tue, 5 Mar 1996 12
40 839Kelly Rulekeepor Wes violated Rule 1454/2 by not publishing a Virus Report for the Nomic Week ending Jan. 1, 1996. Assigned to KoJen, 2 February 1996, 15
06 MET 837Swann "Rule 101 should be interpreted to prevent any other Rule from having coercive force on a person who is not a Player." TRUE by Vlad, 21 November 1995, 22
09 -0600 CST 836Wes An Organization's Compact cannot specify any method of expanding it's Jurisdiction which is not specifically and explicitly allowed for in the Rules.TRUE by Oerjan, 1 December 1995, timestamp lost
835Kelly "Rule 1023 shall be interpreted, such that..." TRUE by favor, 23 January 1996, 12
05 EST 834Wes Rule 494 shall be interpreted such that if any Move refers to a random choice, the Speaker thall make that random choice. FALSE by elJefe, 16 November 1995, 09
52 -0500 833Morendil Rule 1011 should be interpreted so that if a Player deregisters, that Player continues to exist as a Nomic Entity.FALSE by Andre, 22 November 1995, 10
18 MET 832Vanyel JUDGEMENT CFJ 832 Rule 1079 shall be interpreted such that the Dice-roll email server at dice@danpost4.uni-c.dk meets its requirements for randomness TRUE by Michael, 1 Dec 1995, 11
14 GMT 831Vanyel JUDGMENT CFJ 831 Rule 1527 should be interpreted such that all events contained in a message occur at the time of the Date: header, even though they occur sequentially 16 Nov 1995, 15
20 MET 830Steve Rule 1529 should be interpreted as granting Statutes the power to legally bind Players within the Jurisdiction of the Compact with which the Statutes are associated.TRUE by Zefram, 15 Nov 1995, 16
32 +0000 (GMT) 829Andre The Office of Promotor is vacant.TRUE by elJefe, 9 Nov 1995, 11
31 -0500 828favor The Rules generally should be interpreted such that the Mintor of the Group Coins of any given Group is the Mint, and that all Group Coins existing just prior to the adoption of Proposal 1760 still existed just after the adoption of Proposal 1760.FALSE by elJefe, 22 Nov 1995, 11
13 -0500 827Oerjan Player Favor violated 1497 when he posted to the Public Forum the message entitled "Apothecary's Romance".TRUE by elJefe, 9 Nov 1995, 12
47 -0500 826elJefe JUDGEMENT CFJ 826 Rule 113 should be interpreted such that, even if a Player considers a penalty to be worse than deregistration, e is still subject to it unless e actually deregisters or is deregistered. TRUE by Oerjan, 14 Nov 1995, timestamp lost
825elJefe Rule 101 should be interpreted such that, even if it is repealed, all players must still abide by the Rules. FALSE by Coco, Timestamp lost
824Erick Statement: The entity known as Mousetrap was not created until after Swann assumed the office of Notary, therefore, it cannot prevent Swann from assuming the office of Notary. FALSE by Oerjan, 02 Nov 1995, 20
31 +0100 (MET) 823Zefram Player Kelly has Violated the Compact of the Mousetrap.FALSE by Dave B., 15 Nov 1995, 10
24 -0600 822Morendil Parts A2, A3, A4, and A5 of the Move made by *Water under the title 'The High Horse' are illegal, even if The High Horse could legally make Moves at the time it made these Moves.TRUE by Michael, 3 Nov 1995, 18
02 GMT 820Swann Rule 1533 should be interpreted to forbid any Group of Players from forming an Organization that does not belong to a Class defined in the Rules.TRUE by Andre, 15 Nov 1995, 11
42 MET 819Swann If at any time there exists an Organization of a Class not specifically defined in the Rules, the Rules require that Organization to immediately dissolve.FALSE by Dave B., 6 Nov 1995, 12
04 -0600 818Swann The Rules in general should be interpreted that, if the alleged Compact of the Mousetrap Organization exists, it cannot contain the Player Swann within its Jurisdiction. SUSTAINED on Appeal
10 Nov 1995⇒818aAppeal of CFJ 818Michael moves to SUSTAIN
10 Nov 1995 817Morendil "As Promotor, Player KoJen has violated Rule 1036 by not distributing a Proposal submitted by Player Morendil under the title 'Fix 755', within the time alloted em to do so."TRUE by Steve, 4 Nov 1995, 12
27 +1100 816elJefe The Rules, generally, should be interpreted such that all Groups, Contests, and Contracts in existence just prior to the adoption of Proposal 1760 ceased to exist upon the adoption of that Proposal. FALSE by Chuck, 27 Oct 1995, 22
04 CDT 815 Judgement: TRUE Eligible: Andre, Chuck, Coco, Dave Bowen, favor, KoJen, Michael, Morendil, Oerjan, SugarWater, Vanyel, Vlad, wutold, Zefram Not Eligible: Caller: Swann Barred: elJefe, Kelly, Steve On Hold: Garth, JonRock Effects: favor gains 5 Points for speedy Judgement ----------------------------------------
814Morendil "The Rules should be interpreted in such a way that all Entities that existed prior to Proposal 1760 passing and were defined to be Groups, Contracts, Bearerbonds and Contests still exist, and are valid Organizations." TRUE by Michael, 27 Oct 1995, 10
42 GMT 813Morendil Rule 478 should be interpreted in such a way that a Player who wishes to register must be able to prove that e is able to receive the Pubic Forum, and that failing proof of this, eir registration is illegal.delivered 27 Oct, 14
42 MET 812Morendil Rule 755 is lacking in legal force, and as a consequence the currently attributed Champion Patent Titles should be struck from future Registrar's ReportsFALSE by Chuck, 23 Oct 1995, 06
43 CDT 811Morendil Player Ian, who was Registrar at the time of my registration, has violated Rule 1494 by failing to send me a copy of the Welcome Message.TRUE by Kelly, 02 Nov 1995, 16
18 EST5 810Morendil ASSIGNMENT CFJ 810 "The Rules ought to be interpreted so that Nucleon's deregistration precedes all Moves in the message, and that the remaining Moves are therefore null and void." FALSE by Coco, 21 October, 14
44 -0500 (CDT) 809Kelly ASSIGNMENT CFJ 809 Statement: Rule 1493/1 should be interpreted such that when one Player sends a legitimate message to the Tabulator requesting that a Win Token be removed from a second Player and destroyed, and that second Player has no Win Tokens in eir Treasury, that that second Player comes to possess a negative number of Win Tokens. FALSE by Zefram, October 18 1195, 02
28 +0100 (BST) 808Steve Ian's creation of 3 Win Tokens and transfer of them to Vanyel at Fri, 15 Sep 1995 15:38:14 -0700 did not cause Vanyel to win the game. TRUE by Andre, 25 Sep, 12
28 MET 807Steve Statement: The Assessor may choose whether Proposal 1694 passes or fails, as long as the Assessor is not Steve. TRUE by favor, Mon 11 Sep 1995, 16
40 EDT 806Steve (Caller) The Assessor may not choose whether Proposal 1694 passes or fails.Defaulted by Vanyel and SugarWater
805 Judge: Ian Judgement: FALSE Eligible: Andre, Chuck, Dave Bowen, favor, Garth, Ian, Kelly, KoJen, Michael, Steve, SugarWater, Vanyel, Vlad, Xanadu, Zefram Not Eligible: Caller: Swann Barred: none On Hold: Bryan, elJefe, JonRock, Pascal Effects of this CFJ (*: new in this report) * Ian receives 5 Points for speedy Judgement for this scam
803 CFJ 803 Caller: Zefram Statement: The second clause of the second sentence of rule 1488/0 is without legal effect. Judge: Michael power.
802 CFJ 802 Caller: Zefram Statement: The rules should be interpreted such that the Treasury belonging to the Contest known as "Jeff's Piggy Bank" still exists. Barred: none Requested Injunction: none Judge: Swann Judgement FALSE Effects reported by COTC: (* indicates new to this report) Kelly looses 2 points for declining judgeship. Dave B receives 1 point as compensation. *Swann receives 5 points for speedy judgement. still possible to transfer Currencies into.
801 CFJ 801 Caller: TAL Statement: The Confidentiality of Contracts Rule 1459, shall be interpreted such that a Judge or a Justice has the possibility to ask the Notary to disclose *all* contracts that fulfill certain conditions. Barred: Vlad Requested Injunction: none Judge: Steve Judgement: TRUE Effects reported by COTC (* indicates new to this report): *Steve receives 3 points for judgement. TRUE by Steve Tue, 8 Aug 1995 10
27 800 CFJ 800 Caller: TAL Statement: The Contest Rule 1446 must be interpretated such, that Kelly's Point Storehouse is not a Contest. Barred: Kelly, Swann, Chuck Requested Injunction: none Judge: Michael Judgement: FALSE Effects reported by COTC (* indicates new to this report) *Michael receives 3 points for his judgement. FALSE by Michael Tue, 8 Aug 95 10
23 799 CFJ 799 Caller: elJefe Statement: Sugarwater's Injunctions in CFJ 795, are illegal and invalid. Barred: none Requested Injunction: none Judge: Vanyel Judgement: TRUE Effects reported by COTC (* indicates new to this report): favor loses 2 points for declining Chuck gains 1 point for favor's declining *Vanyel receives 3 points for judgement TRUE by Vanyel Fri, 4 Aug 1995 04
49 798 CFJ 798 Caller: Chuck Statement: SugarWater's second Injunction on CFJ 795, namely "The Ninny in this situation is the Vizier of Reform Group, as e executed the illegal dissolution. Under the authority of Rule 908/3, i prescribe the following words to be used in the Formal Apology: Philharmonic boustrophedonic supersonic gin tonic chronic," was illegal. Barred: SugarWater Requested Injunction: none Judge: KoJen Judgement: TRUE Injunction: SugarWater shall make a formal apology using these prescribed words: study, understand, restraint, error, headstrong, care, violate, assimilate, comprehend, conservative Effects reported by COTC (* indicates new for this report): *KoJen receives 5 points for speedy Judgement TRUE by KoJen Thu, 3 Aug 95 12
06 797 CFJ 797 Caller: Chuck Statement: SugarWater's first Injunction on CFJ 795, namely "As per Rule 665/0, I issue the following injunction: The Move to dissolve Reform Group is retracted. Reform Group still exists. The Game State will be adjusted appropriately," was illegal. Barred: SugarWater Requested Injunction: none Judge: Vlad Judgement: FALSE Injunction: none Effects reported by COTC (* indicates new for this report): *Vlad receives 5 points for speedy Judgement FALSE by Vlad Wed, 2 Aug 1995 20
34 796 CFJ 796 Caller: elJefe Statement: The rules should be interpreted such that Player Ronald currently has more than 900 Points, and Steve's Piggy Bank has more than 700 Points. Barred: Chuck, Kelly Requested Injunction: none Judge: Zefram Judgement: FALSE Injunction: none pro-Speaker: SugarWater Judgement: UNKNOWN pro-COTC: Swann Judgement: TRUE pro-Justiciar: Vlad Judgement: FALSE Final Judgement: UNKNOWN Effects reported by COTC (* indicates new to this report): Zefram receives 3 points for Judgement * SugarWater receives 3 points for Judgement * Swann receives 3 points for Judgement * Vlad receives 3 points for Judgement * Zefram loses 3 points for being overturned FALSE by Vlad Tue, 15 Aug 1995 13
37 -0500 (CDT) 795 CFJ 795 Caller: favor Statement: The dissolution of the Reform Group violated the Rules of Agora Nomic. Barred: TAL, Steve, elJefe Requested Injunction: none Judge: SugarWater Judgement: TRUE Injunctions: As per Rule 665/0, I issue the following injunction: The Move to dissolve Reform Group is retracted. Reform Group still exists. The Game State will be adjusted appropriately. The Ninny in this situation is the Vizier of Reform Group, as e executed the illegal dissolution. Under the authority of Rule 908/3, i prescribe the following words to be used in the Formal Apology: Philharmonic boustrophedonic supersonic gin tonic chronic pro-Speaker: Swann Judgement: TRUE pro-COTC: Dave B Judgement: FALSE pro-Justiciar: Zefram Judgement: FALSE Final Judgement: FALSE Effects reported by COTC (*: new to this report) SugarWater receives 3 points for Judgement Swann receives 5 points for speedy Judgement Dave B receives 3 points for Judgement KoJen looses 10 points for defaulting on Appeal *Zefram receives 5 points for speedy Judgement (strange, in fact... Speedy Judgement, while the Judgement was 3 full weeks after the call... Although real-life judges would find that very speedy, of course). *SugarWater loses 3 points for being overturned *The Injunctions are NOT effective FALSE by Zefram Wed, 16 Aug 1995 00
25 +0100 (BST) 794 CFJ 794 Caller: Michael Statement: Rules 754/0 and 591/2 should be interpreted such that the judgement Michael attempted to make as pro-Justiciar on appeal of CFJ 784 was a valid Judgement. Barred: Andre Requested Injunction: none Judge: Xanadu Judgement: FALSE (but see arguments of Judge and COTC's note) Injunction: none Effects reported by COTC (* indicates new to this report): *Xanadu receives 5 Points for speedy Judgement. FALSE by Xanadu Sat, 22 Jul 1995 18
01 793 CFJ 793 Caller: Ian Statement: Rule 1472/0, "Transfer of Currencies", should be interpreted in such a way that reporting information to a Recordkeepor does not mean including such information in an Official Report sent to the Public Forum. Barred: none Relevant Rules: 1472 Requested Injunction: none Judge: Dave B Judgement: FALSE Injunction: none Effects reported by COTC (* indicates new for this report): *Dave B receives 5 points for speedy Judgement FALSE by Dave B Fri, 21 Jul 1995 09
40 791 CFJ 791 Caller: Kelly Statement: The Assessor's Report of 12 July 1995 is in error, in that it listed several Players as having cast extra Votes on various Proposals, when in fact it is not legally permitted for any Player whatsoever to cast an extra Vote. Barred: elJefe, Steve Requested Injunction: none Judge: Zefram Judgement: FALSE Injunction: none Effects reported by COTC (* indicates new to this report): *Zefram receives 5 points for speedy Judgement. FALSE by Zefram, Thu, 20 Jul 1995 21
27 790Chuck Steve receives 3 points for Judgement.
789 CFJ 789 Caller: Kelly Statement: Chuck violated Rule 1454, by selecting Rule 106 to be infected by the Virus in a manner other than that specified in the Rules. Barred: Chuck Requested Injunction: It is requested that the Judge enjoin Chuck to retract his illegal move. Judge: Andre Judgement: TRUE Injunction: I request Chuck to retract eir illegal move, that is, to choose, but now in the right way, a Virus Number for the Nomic Week in which this erroneous Virus Report was issued. pro-Speaker: KoJen Judgement: FALSE pro-COTC: Vanyel Judgement: FALSE Justiciar: Steve Judgement: FALSE Final Judgement: FALSE Injunction: none Effects reported by COTC (* indicates new to this report) Andre receives 5 Points for speedy Judgement Steve receives 5 Points for speedy Judgement KoJen receives 3 Points for Judgement Andre loses 5 Points for having his Judgement overturned *Vanyel receives 3 Points for Judgement FALSE by Vanyel Sun, 23 Jul 1995 02
08 788Chuck ASSIGNMENT CFJ 788 ("The Assessor's Report of July 1 is in error...") FALSE by Swann, July 14 1995, 06
51 -0400 787 CFJ 787 Caller: Andre Statement: KoJen was in Violation of Rule 663 when he issued an Injunction with CFJ 781. Barred: KoJen, TAL Requested Injunction: That the annotation, asked for in said Injunction, will be removed if already added to the Ruleset, and will not be added to the Ruleset otherwise. Judge: elJefe Judgement: TRUE Injunction: none Effects reported by COTC (* indicates new to this message): JonRock gains 3 Blots *elJefe gains 5 points due to speedy Judgement TRUE by elJefe Fri, 21 Jul 1995 12
47 786elJefe (Caller) JUDGEMENT CFJ 786 ("The rules ought to be interpreted in such a way...") TRUE by TAL, July 5 1995, 10
15 +0200 785Kelly JUDGEMENT CFJ 785 ("The first injunction issued by Judge Steve...") TRUE by SugarWater, July 14 1995, 21
12 -0700 (PDT) 783 Judgement: FALSE Judge: Vanyel Eligible: Andre, Chuck, Dave Bowen, elJefe, Ian, JonRock, Kelly KoJen, Steve, SugarWater, Swann, TAL, Vanyel, Xanadu Zefram Caller: Michael Barred: none Not Eligible: Michael (caller) Blob (1005) Coren, Pascal (1005 & On Hold) Changes: Vanyel gains 3 Points for Timely Judgement they may choose to an injunction as per 789.
782 Judge: Dave Bowen Judgement: FALSE Caller: Steve Eligible: Andre, Chuck, Dave Bowen, elJefe, Ian, JonRock, Kelly KoJen, Michael, SugarWater, Swann, TAL, Vanyel, Xanadu Zefram Barred: none Not Eligible: Steve (caller) Blob (1005) Coren, Pascal (On Hold & 1005) Changes: Dave Bowen receives 5 Points for speedy Judgement. the erroneously numbered Proposal 1607.
781Troublemaker At Large JUDGEMENT OF CFJ 781 (CORRECTED) ("The correct interpretation of Rule 1466...") FALSE by KoJen, July 6 1995, 15
56 -0400 780 Judge: Zefram Judgement: UNDECIDABLE Caller: Steve Eligible: Chuck, Dave Bowen, elJefe, Ian, JonRock, Kelly, Michael, SugarWater, Troublemaker At Large, Vanyel, Xanadu, Zefram Barred: KoJen, Andre, Swann Not Eligible: Steve (caller) Andre, KoJen, Swann (barred) Blob (1005) Coren, Pascal (On Hold & 1005) Effects of this CFJ: Zefram receives 5 points for speedy judgements 1607, and that he therefore incurs a 10 point penalty under that Rule.
779Chuck JUDGEMENT OF CFJ 779 ("Rule 1466 should be interpreted such that...") TRUE by Michael, June 23 1995, 10
53 BST 778 Judgement: FALSE Judge: Xanadu Eligible: Andre, Chuck, Dave B., elJefe, Ian, JonRock, Kelly, Michael, Steve, SugarWater, TaL, Vanyel, Xanadu, Zefram Caller: Swann Barred: KoJen Not Eligible: Swann (caller) KoJen (barred) Blob (1005) Coren, Pascal (1005 & On Hold) Effects: Xanadu receives 3 Points for timely Judgement those of the Caller.}
777 Judgement: Judge: Steve Eligible: Chuck, Dave B., elJefe, Ian, JonRock, KoJen, Michael, Steve, SugarWater, TaL, Vanyel, Xanadu, Zefram Caller: Swann Barred: Andre, Kelly Not Eligible: Swann (caller) Andre, Kelly (barred) Blob (1005) Coren, Pascal (1005 & On Hold) Effects: Steve receives 3 Points for Speedy Judgement Andre looses 10 Points for violating 1023 Andre must submit a Formal Apology as described in the injunction (The injunction issued by Judge Ian in CFJ 771 is Illegal)
776 Judge: Vanyel Judgement: FALSE Eligible: Andre, Chuck, Dave B., elJefe, Ian, JonRock, Kelly, Michael, SugarWater, Swann, Troublemaker At Large, Vanyel, Xanadu, Steve Caller: Zefram Barred: KoJen Not Eligible: Zefram (caller) KoJen (barred) Blob (1005) Coren, Pascal (On Hold & 1005) Point Changes: Vanyel gains 5 Points for speedy Judgement. did not list valid Proposals that e had received."
775 Judge: Vanyel [ CFJ text deleted for brevity ] ----------------------------------------------------------- From: Andre Engels Subject: OFF: Assignment CFJ 772 To: nomic-official@teleport.com Date: Fri, 16 Jun 95 11:02:33 METDST Mailer: Elm [revision: 70.85] Sender: owner-nomic-official@teleport.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: nomic-discussion@teleport.com ASSIGNMENT CFJ 772 (Player Swann committed an illegal act...) I sent this yesterday but it didn't appear.
774 Judge: Dave Bowen Judgement: TRUE Eligible: Chuck, Dave Bowen, elJefe, Ian, JonRock, KoJen, Michael, Steve, Troublemaker At Large, Vanyel, Xanadu Caller: Swann Not Eligible: Swann (caller) Andre, Kelly (barred) Blob (1005) Coren, Pascal (1005 & On Hold) Point changes: Dave B. gains 5 points for Speedy Judgement
772 Judge: Dave Bowen Judgement: FALSE Eligible: Andre, Chuck, Dave Bowen, elJefe, JonRock, KoJen, Michael, Steve, Vanyel, Xanadu Caller: Kelly Not Eligible: Kelly (caller) Swann, Ian, Troublemaker At Large (barred) Blob (1005) Coren, Pascal (1005 & On Hold) Point changes: Dave Bowen gains 5 points for speedy judgement "Player Swann committed an illegal act by submitting the CFJ 711."
771Swann Swann was not Tabulator when Kelly spent 5 points to erase a Blot, so Swann could not legally remove Kelly's Blot. The Speaker was not acting in the Tabulator's capacity at this time, so the Blot was not erased, and Kelly has not yet won the game. UNDECIDABLE by TAL
Jun 21 1995, 770Swann By the Rules, Swann could not assume the office of Tabulator while also performing the duties of Herald. Since Swann did not resign the Heraldship, Swann did not assume the Office of Tabulator. The Office of Tabulator is therefore vacant, and has been since the resignation of the previous Tabulator. TRUE by Chuck
Jun 28 1995, 769Chuck (Rule 1466 should be interpreted such that a Proposal...)3. Rule 993
768JonRock (The Move of the Vizier of Reform Group transferring Coins...)III. Rule 721
767Andre (The Scorekeepor's report of April 24, 1995 is in error,...)Dictator Contest Fund +0.0
766Chuck (The Rules should be interpreted, such that Proposal 1577...)II. Rule 1054.
765TAL (Swann violated Rule 1446 by not transfering all his points...)Reg. 9
The Entry fee is 1000 Points. 764TAL (Rule 113 can only be interpreted such that...)Reg. 9
The Entry fee is 1000 Points. 763TAL (The correct interpretation of 1443 is, that...)the end of the voting period.
762TAL (As only those Directives which are defined...)Proposal for which this is not true is not properly made.
761KoJen (Rule 692's correct interpretation prohibits Points...)estabilished Game custom is consistent with this.
760TAL (Rule 1446 must be interpreted as such,...)Scam Contest fund.
759TAL (The latest Score report (dated March 26) has TAL's score in error...)Amended(1) by Proposal 1336, Nov. 22 1994
758TAL (Rule 833 and 1438 must be interpretated as such...)Amended(1) by Proposal 1495, Mar. 15 1995
757Pascal (Acting Promotor Vanyel violated rule 783...)[[Caller Pascal integrates his References into his Argument]]
756Swann (Rule 1003/0 should be interpreted...)(*Was
822*) 755JonRock (Rule 1442/0 must be interpreted such that,...)manner as Votes, as described in other Rules.
753Vlad (The Move of putting Proposal 1479 up for vote was illegal.)possesses it uses it to cast a Vote on a Proposal.
752Chuck (Rule 911 should be interpreted such that CFJ 750...)10. info message for nomic-business
751TAL (Rule 1438 can only be interpretated...)Created by Proposal 1459, Mar. 1 1995
750Oerjan (Speaker ElJefe violated Rule 452 by...)Vote on that Proposal.
741
711
710Kelly The Group Votes cast by Group MAPLSIRUP on Proposals 1271 and 1273-1287 are invalid. TRUE by Coren
31 Oct 94 707Steve Steve legally voted FOR (and did not legally vote AGAINST) Proposal 1177. Hence, the votes on that Proposal were not 11 FOR, 13 AGAINST as reported by the Speaker, but in fact were tied 12 FOR, 12 AGAINST. FALSE by Vanyel
14 Oct 1994 678
677
675
674
673
671
670
668
667
61
60
59
58
57
56
55
54
53
52
51
50
49
48
47
46
45
44
43
42
41
40
39
38
37
36
35
34
33Wes The tallies for Proposals 440 through 446, inclusive did not reflect all of the properly cast votes for those Proposals, and should be re-tallied after all the properly cast votes have been accounted for. TRUE by Joe Lindsay
date unknown 32 As always, by rule 364, appointed Judges have 3 days in which to accept or decline appointment.
31
30Alexx The tallies for Proposals 440 through 446, inclusive did not reflect all of the properly cast votes for those Proposals, and should be re-tallied after all the properly cast votes have been accounted for. TRUE by Oerjan
date unknown 29
28
27
26
25
24
23
22
21
20
19
18
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7Wes Because of Rule 111, Rule 112 takes precedence over Rule 219. Therefore, Rule 219 has no legal force. FALSE by Jason
26 Mar 2020 6
5
4
3
2
1