RESOLUTION OF PROPOSALS 9373-9374
=================================

THIS IS AN AUTOMATICALLY GENERATED REPORT.
SOME INFORMATION MAY DIFFER FROM THE HISTORICAL REPORT.
THE ASSESSMENT SENT TO THE PUBLIC FORUM IS THE DEFINITIVE SOURCE OF HISTORICAL INFORMATION.

The official historical report is located at https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-official/2026-August/019555.html

ID    Title                   Result 
-------------------------------------
9373  Dim Prospects v1.1      ADOPTED
9374  Tying Up White Ribbons  ADOPTED

I hereby resolve the Agoran decisions to adopt the below proposals.

The quorum for all below decisions was 7.

VOTING STRENGTHS
================

Strength is 3 unless otherwise noted.
#: player has voting strength 3
$: player has voting strength 4
%: player has voting strength 5
^: player has voting strength 6

PROPOSALS
=========

PROPOSAL 9373 (Dim Prospects v1.1)
AUTHOR: Mischief
CLASS: ORDINARY
FOR (5): Galle, Mischief^, juan%, msh210, snail%
AGAINST (0): 
PRESENT (2): Janet^, Murphy^
BALLOTS: 7
AI (F/A): 22/0 (AI=1.5)
POPULARITY: 0.714
OUTCOME: ADOPTED

PROPOSAL 9374 (Tying Up White Ribbons)
AUTHOR: Galle
CLASS: DEMOCRATIC
FOR (6): Galle, Janet, Mischief, Murphy, juan, snail
AGAINST (1): 4st
PRESENT (0): 
BALLOTS: 7
AI (F/A): 18/3 (AI=3.0)
POPULARITY: 0.714
OUTCOME: ADOPTED

The full text of each ADOPTED proposal is included below:

//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
ID: 9373
Title: Dim Prospects v1.1
Adoption index: 1.5
Author: Mischief
Co-authors: snail


[Adding new terms to make the various antecedants more obvious. The one
in the current third bullet is borderline ambiguous, for example; the
intent -- I think -- is to refer to the winning player but it could get
misread as referring to "each other player" in the prior bullet. This
should also reduce the risk of a subsequent amendment breaking an
antecedant somewhere. Additionally, changes a singular "their" to "eir"
in the fifth bullet.]

Amend rule 2711 (Outshining the Sun) by replacing the text reading:

       When a player Outshines the Sun, e wins the game. When a player
       wins the game this way, the following happen in order:

       * Eir radiance is set to 0.

       * The radiance of each other player is set to half its current
         value (rounded down).

       * All Pyrite in eir possession is destroyed.

       * Half of all Pyrite in each other player's possession, rounded
         up, is destroyed.

       * For each player with more than 4000 Pyrite, all but 4000 Pyrite
         in their possession is destroyed.

       * The Fields Wither.

       * All Hectares are destroyed.

       * Each player is granted 16 Hectares.

with:

       When a pure player Outshines the Sun, the following happen in
       order:

       * That player (the Luminary) wins the game.

       * The Luminary's radiance is set to 0.

       * The radiance of each other player (each: a Dim One) is set to
         half its current value (rounded down).

       * All Pyrite in the Luminary's possession is destroyed.

       * Half of all Pyrite in each Dim One's possession, rounded up, is
         destroyed.

       * For each player with more than 4000 Pyrite, all but 4000 Pyrite
         in eir possession is destroyed.

       * The Fields Wither.

       * All Hectares are destroyed.

       * Each player is granted 16 Hectares.

//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
ID: 9374
Title: Tying Up White Ribbons
Adoption index: 3.0
Author: Galle
Co-authors: 


Amend Rule 2438 ("Ribbons") by replacing the following text:
---
White (W): A player qualifies for a White Ribbon if e has never
previously owned a White Ribbon (including under previous rulesets). A
player who has been registered for the past 30+ days or 180+ cumulative
days and has never acted on eir own behalf to cause another person to
gain a White Ribbon (including under a previous ruleset) CAN act on eir
own behalf to cause another person to earn a White Ribbon by announcement.
---

With the following text:
---
White (W): A player qualifies for a White Ribbon if e has never
previously owned a White Ribbon (including under previous rulesets). A
player who has been registered for the past 30+ days or 180+ cumulative
days and has never acted on eir own behalf to cause another person to
earn or gain a White Ribbon (including under a previous ruleset) CAN act
on eir own behalf to cause another person to earn a White Ribbon by
announcement.
---

[The current version of White Ribbons has a possible loophole: players
"gift" White Ribbons by causing other players to EARN White Ribbons, and
then in response Rule 2438 itself causes the earning player to GAIN a
White Ribbon. However, the "you can only do this once" clause only
checks to see if the player has previously directly caused another
player to gain a White Ribbon. You could argue that the current
mechanism counts, because there's a clear chain of causality from
earning to gaining, but given the technical nature of the language here
I think there's definitely a case to be made that the blocking clause
simply doesn't work as-is. The "gain" wording is kept in to make sure
everyone who was already blocked is still blocked.]

//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////