RESOLUTION OF PROPOSALS 9367-9370 ================================= THIS IS AN AUTOMATICALLY GENERATED REPORT. SOME INFORMATION MAY DIFFER FROM THE HISTORICAL REPORT. THE ASSESSMENT SENT TO THE PUBLIC FORUM IS THE DEFINITIVE SOURCE OF HISTORICAL INFORMATION. The official historical report is located at https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-official/2026-August/019497.html ID Title Result --------------------------------------------------------- 9367 Divestment ADOPTED 9369 Oops ADOPTED 9370 Probably shouldn't leave this lying around ADOPTED I hereby resolve the Agoran decisions to adopt the below proposals. The quorum for all below decisions was 7. VOTING STRENGTHS ================ Strength is 3 unless otherwise noted. #: player has voting strength 3 $: player has voting strength 4 %: player has voting strength 5 ^: player has voting strength 6 PROPOSALS ========= PROPOSAL 9367 (Divestment) AUTHOR: Kate CLASS: DEMOCRATIC FOR (5): Galle, Janet, Mischief, ais523, snail AGAINST (1): 4st PRESENT (4): Cosmo, Murphy, juan, pizza723 BALLOTS: 10 AI (F/A): 15/3 (AI=3.0) POPULARITY: 0.400 OUTCOME: ADOPTED [ Murphy: Endorsement of non-voter Kate: Inextricable juan: Endorsement of non-voter Kate: Inextricable ] PROPOSAL 9369 (Oops) AUTHOR: snail CLASS: DEMOCRATIC FOR (8): Galle, Janet, Mischief, ais523, juan, msh210, pizza723, snail AGAINST (0): PRESENT (2): Cosmo, Murphy BALLOTS: 10 AI (F/A): 24/0 (AI=3.0) POPULARITY: 0.800 OUTCOME: ADOPTED [ Cosmo: Trigon is the Numerator: Endorsement of non-voter Trigon: Inextricable Janet: Endorsement of ais523 Murphy: Trigon is the Numerator: Endorsement of non-voter Trigon: Inextricable ] PROPOSAL 9370 (Probably shouldn't leave this lying around) AUTHOR: Galle CLASS: ORDINARY FOR (10): Cosmo^, Galle, Janet^, Mischief^, Murphy^, ais523%, juan%, msh210, pizza723%, snail% AGAINST (1): 4st PRESENT (0): BALLOTS: 11 AI (F/A): 50/3 (AI=2.0) POPULARITY: 0.818 OUTCOME: ADOPTED [ Janet: Endorsement of ais523 ] The full text of each ADOPTED proposal is included below: ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ID: 9367 Title: Divestment Adoption index: 3.0 Author: Kate Co-authors: Set the Indigo Ribbon Ownership of the author of this proposal to False. [Many, many years ago, I acquired an Indigo Ribbon through a scam, without realising this was considered Poor Form, and later used it in a Win by Renaissance. Since then I have desperately been trying to account for it by achieving degrees and declining to award myself the ribbon, but people keep "helpfully" awarding it to me anyway to allow for my "forgetfulness". This just happened again and I do not want to go through yet another round of this. Can we fix it by proposal, please?] ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ID: 9369 Title: Oops Adoption index: 3.0 Author: snail Co-authors: Mischief Amend Rule 2713 (Scoring Numbers) by replacing the text: { Whenever a player scores a number as described in this rule, the Numerator CAN once, and SHALL in a timely fashion, grant that player (and, if the number was scored due to the adoption of a proposal, also a randomly chosen other player who voted FOR on a referendum to adopt that proposal) a number card for each digit in that number, whose type is that digit. } with the text: { Whenever a player scores a number as described in this rule, the Numerator CAN once by announcement, and SHALL in a timely fashion, grant that player (and, if the number was scored due to the adoption of a proposal, also a randomly chosen other player who voted FOR on a referendum to adopt that proposal) a number card for each digit in that number, whose type is that digit. } The following statement is hereby ratified: { Each attempt to grant a player a number card that occured prior to the adoption of this proposal took effect as if the text "CAN once," in Rule 2713 instead read "CAN once by announcement,". } [This should work for each version of Rule 2713 that has existed. I'm doing this instead of changing the past text of the rule because doing that retroactively would have caused proposals that amended that specific text to fail.] [I also considered expunging the Numerator's duties to avoid shenanigans, but that might do more harm than good, and the ratification should already cover that issue.] ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ID: 9370 Title: Probably shouldn't leave this lying around Adoption index: 2.0 Author: Galle Co-authors: Repeal the rule entitled "Purchased Re-enactment". //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////