RESOLUTION OF PROPOSALS 9249 ============================ THIS IS AN AUTOMATICALLY GENERATED REPORT. SOME INFORMATION MAY DIFFER FROM THE HISTORICAL REPORT. THE ASSESSMENT SENT TO THE PUBLIC FORUM IS THE DEFINITIVE SOURCE OF HISTORICAL INFORMATION. The official historical report is located at https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-official/2025-October/018726.html ID Title Result ------------------------------- 9249 Streamlined fees ADOPTED I hereby resolve the Agoran decisions to adopt the below proposals. The quorum for all below decisions was 3. PROPOSALS ========= PROPOSAL 9249 (Streamlined fees) AUTHOR: Murphy CLASS: DEMOCRATIC FOR (2): Murphy, juan AGAINST (0): PRESENT (2): Cosmo, Mischief BALLOTS: 4 AI (F/A): 6/0 (AI=3.0) POPULARITY: 0.500 OUTCOME: ADOPTED [ Cosmo: Janet is the Rulekeepor: Endorsement of non-voter Janet: Inextricable Mischief: Janet is the Rulekeepor: Endorsement of non-voter Janet: Inextricable ] The full text of each ADOPTED proposal is included below: ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ID: 9249 Title: Streamlined fees Adoption index: 3.0 Author: Murphy Co-authors: Amend Rule 2579 (Fee-based Actions) by replacing this text: To use a fee-based method, an entity (the Actor) who is otherwise permitted to perform the action must announce that e is performing the action; the announcement must specify the correct set of assets for the fee and indicate intent to pay that fee for the sole purpose of using that method to perform that action. with this text: To use a fee-based method, an entity (the Actor) who is otherwise permitted to perform the action must announce that e is performing the action; such an announcement indicates intent to pay that fee for the sole purpose of using that method to perform that action, and e SHALL specify the correct set of assets for that fee, though simplified wording such as "I buy X" is sufficient if the fee paid is reasonably unambiguous. [This month, there were half a dozen announcements like "I buy X" or "I plant X" where there was no ambiguity what was intended. This proposal may open up some obscure loopholes, but that still seems preferable to repeatedly tripping over wording that seems like it ought to work.] //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////