RESOLUTION OF PROPOSALS 8922-8925
=================================

THIS IS AN AUTOMATICALLY GENERATED REPORT.
SOME INFORMATION MAY DIFFER FROM THE HISTORICAL REPORT.
THE ASSESSMENT SENT TO THE PUBLIC FORUM IS THE DEFINITIVE SOURCE OF HISTORICAL INFORMATION.

The official historical report is located at https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-official/2023-March/016896.html

ID    Title                       Result  
------------------------------------------
8922  What's a paragraph anyway?  ADOPTED 
8923  Department of Defense       ADOPTED 
8924  A Populist PM               REJECTED
8925  Codify Conditionality       ADOPTED 

I hereby resolve the Agoran decisions to adopt the below proposals.

The quorum for all below decisions was 5.

VOTING STRENGTHS
================

Strength is 3 unless otherwise noted.
#: player has voting strength 3
$: player has voting strength 4
%: player has voting strength 5
^: player has voting strength 6
&: player has voting strength 7
*: player has voting strength 8
?: player has voting strength 12

PROPOSALS
=========

PROPOSAL 8922 (What's a paragraph anyway?)
AUTHOR: G.
CLASS: ORDINARY
FOR (6): G.&, Janet^, Murphy%, juan$, nix^, snail?
AGAINST (0): 
PRESENT (1): 4st*
BALLOTS: 7
AI (F/A): 40/0 (AI=1.0)
POPULARITY: 0.857
OUTCOME: ADOPTED
[
4st: Endorsement of non-voter cuddlybanana: Inextricable
]

PROPOSAL 8923 (Department of Defense)
AUTHOR: G.
CLASS: ORDINARY
FOR (6): 4st*, G.&, Janet^, Murphy%, nix^, snail?
AGAINST (1): juan$
PRESENT (0): 
BALLOTS: 7
AI (F/A): 44/4 (AI=2.0)
POPULARITY: 0.714
OUTCOME: ADOPTED
[
4st: Endorsement of snail
]

PROPOSAL 8924 (A Populist PM)
AUTHOR: G.
CLASS: ORDINARY
FOR (4): 4st*, G.&, Murphy%, nix^
AGAINST (3): Janet^, juan$, snail?
PRESENT (0): 
BALLOTS: 7
AI (F/A): 26/22 (AI=2.0)
POPULARITY: 0.143
OUTCOME: REJECTED
[
4st: Endorsement of Murphy
]

PROPOSAL 8925 (Codify Conditionality)
AUTHOR: G.
CLASS: DEMOCRATIC
FOR (6): 4st, G., Janet, Murphy, nix, snail
AGAINST (0): 
PRESENT (1): juan
BALLOTS: 7
AI (F/A): 18/0 (AI=3.0)
POPULARITY: 0.857
OUTCOME: ADOPTED
[
4st: Endorsement of G.
]

The full text of each ADOPTED proposal is included below:

//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
ID: 8922
Title: What's a paragraph anyway?
Adoption index: 1.0
Author: G.
Co-authors: 


Amend Rule 2429 (Bleach) by replacing:
      Replacing a non-zero amount of whitespace with a different
      non-zero amount of whitespace is generally insignificant, except
      for paragraph breaks.
with:
      Replacing a non-zero amount of whitespace with a different
      non-zero amount of whitespace is generally insignificant, except
      if doing so substantially changes the semantic, logical, or
      artistic structure of the text.

//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
ID: 8923
Title: Department of Defense
Adoption index: 2.0
Author: G.
Co-authors: 


Amend Rule 2451 (Executive Orders) by appending the following list item:
      - Research Funding (Mad Engineer): The Prime Minister specifies
an existing
      Rule.  Rules to the contrary notwithstanding, the Mad Engineer CAN and
      SHALL use that rule instead of making a random rule selection as
part of eir weekly
      duties for the following week.

//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
ID: 8925
Title: Codify Conditionality
Adoption index: 3.0
Author: G.
Co-authors: Janet, Murphy


[Since a recent win was performed with a slightly-complex conditional
action, there has been discussion in DIS and on discord about
codifying conditional actions.  There is much debate and difference of
approach in the Discord discussion, but it would be good not to stall
out.  This paragraph is intended to essentially change no mechanics,
and legislatively codify our current common-law precedent - thus
acknowledging that conditionals exist at least, which can be changed
in later proposals].

Amend Rule 2518 (Determinacy) by appending the following paragraph:
      A communication purporting to express conditional intent to
      perform an action is considered unclear and ambiguous unless, at a
      minimum, the conditional is determinate, true, and reasonably
      straightforward to evaluate with publicly-available information at
      the time of communication. The communicator SHOULD explain
      specific reasons for being uncertain of the outcome when e makes
      the communication.

//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////