RESOLUTION OF PROPOSALS 8574-8593 ================================= THIS IS AN AUTOMATICALLY GENERATED REPORT. SOME INFORMATION MAY DIFFER FROM THE HISTORICAL REPORT. THE ASSESSMENT SENT TO THE PUBLIC FORUM IS THE DEFINITIVE SOURCE OF HISTORICAL INFORMATION. The official historical report is located at https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-official/2021-June/015044.html ID Title Result ------------------------------------------------- 8574 mending the quill ADOPTED 8575 Stone Win Delay v2 ADOPTED 8576 "By announcement" loosening ADOPTED 8577 Festival intent eligibility REJECTED 8578 Auction limitation ADOPTED 8579 AI voting method clarification v2 ADOPTED 8580 Strength Buying Separation v2 ADOPTED 8581 Grants on Resets ADOPTED 8582 The Artistry Lies in the Art ADOPTED 8583 Clarify switches ADOPTED 8584 Effective deference REJECTED 8585 Clarify variable voting period ADOPTED 8586 Clarify deputisation REJECTED 8587 Clarify nomination period REJECTED 8588 Clarify stone retrieval REJECTED 8589 Secret proposal A REJECTED 8590 Secret proposal B ADOPTED 8591 Secret proposal C REJECTED 8592 Secret proposal D REJECTED I hereby resolve the Agoran decisions to adopt the below proposals. The quorum for all below decisions was 7. The following sponsored adopted proposals have the highest popularity (1.000): 8574 (by Trigon). VOTING STRENGTHS ================ Strength is 3 unless otherwise noted. +: player has voting strength 9 PROPOSALS ========= PROPOSAL 8574 (mending the quill) AUTHOR: Trigon CLASS: ORDINARY FOR (9): Falsifian, G.+, Janet, Murphy, R. Lee, Telna, Trigon, ais523, nix AGAINST (0): PRESENT (0): BALLOTS: 9 AI (F/A): 33/0 (AI=1.0) POPULARITY: 1.000 OUTCOME: ADOPTED [ Falsifian: Endorsement of Trigon ] PROPOSAL 8575 (Stone Win Delay v2) AUTHOR: Janet CLASS: ORDINARY FOR (7): Falsifian, G.+, Janet, R. Lee, Telna, Trigon, ais523 AGAINST (0): PRESENT (2): Murphy, nix BALLOTS: 9 AI (F/A): 27/0 (AI=2.0) POPULARITY: 0.778 OUTCOME: ADOPTED [ Falsifian: Endorsement of Janet ] PROPOSAL 8576 ("By announcement" loosening) AUTHOR: Janet CLASS: DEMOCRATIC FOR (8): Falsifian, G., Janet, Murphy, Telna, Trigon, ais523, nix AGAINST (1): R. Lee PRESENT (0): BALLOTS: 9 AI (F/A): 24/3 (AI=3.0) POPULARITY: 0.778 OUTCOME: ADOPTED [ Falsifian: Endorsement of Janet Janet: Endorsement of G. Trigon: Endorsement of Janet nix: Endorsement of G. ] PROPOSAL 8577 (Festival intent eligibility) AUTHOR: Janet CLASS: DEMOCRATIC FOR (5): Murphy, R. Lee, Telna, Trigon, ais523 AGAINST (3): Falsifian, G., Janet PRESENT (1): nix BALLOTS: 9 AI (F/A): 15/9 (AI=3.0) POPULARITY: 0.222 OUTCOME: REJECTED [ Falsifian: Endorsement of Janet ] PROPOSAL 8578 (Auction limitation) AUTHOR: Janet CLASS: ORDINARY FOR (7): Falsifian, G.+, Janet, Murphy, Telna, Trigon, ais523 AGAINST (1): R. Lee PRESENT (1): nix BALLOTS: 9 AI (F/A): 27/3 (AI=2.0) POPULARITY: 0.667 OUTCOME: ADOPTED [ Falsifian: Endorsement of Janet ais523: Endorsement of G. ] PROPOSAL 8579 (AI voting method clarification v2) AUTHOR: Janet CLASS: DEMOCRATIC FOR (7): Falsifian, G., Janet, Murphy, Telna, Trigon, ais523 AGAINST (1): R. Lee PRESENT (1): nix BALLOTS: 9 AI (F/A): 21/3 (AI=3.0) POPULARITY: 0.667 OUTCOME: ADOPTED [ Falsifian: Endorsement of Janet ] PROPOSAL 8580 (Strength Buying Separation v2) AUTHOR: Janet CLASS: DEMOCRATIC FOR (8): Falsifian, G., Janet, Murphy, R. Lee, Trigon, ais523, nix AGAINST (0): PRESENT (1): Telna BALLOTS: 9 AI (F/A): 24/0 (AI=3.0) POPULARITY: 0.889 OUTCOME: ADOPTED [ Falsifian: Endorsement of Janet ] PROPOSAL 8581 (Grants on Resets) AUTHOR: Aris CLASS: ORDINARY FOR (3): G.+, Murphy, Trigon AGAINST (4): R. Lee, Telna, ais523, nix PRESENT (2): Falsifian, Janet BALLOTS: 9 AI (F/A): 15/12 (AI=1.0) POPULARITY: -0.111 OUTCOME: ADOPTED [ Falsifian: Endorsement of non-voter Aris: Inextricable ] PROPOSAL 8582 (The Artistry Lies in the Art) AUTHOR: Aris CLASS: ORDINARY FOR (3): G.+, Murphy, R. Lee AGAINST (0): PRESENT (6): Falsifian, Janet, Telna, Trigon, ais523, nix BALLOTS: 9 AI (F/A): 15/0 (AI=2.0) POPULARITY: 0.333 OUTCOME: ADOPTED [ Falsifian: Endorsement of non-voter Aris: Inextricable Janet: Endorsement of nix ] PROPOSAL 8583 (Clarify switches) AUTHOR: Murphy CLASS: DEMOCRATIC FOR (7): Falsifian, G., Janet, Murphy, R. Lee, Telna, ais523 AGAINST (0): PRESENT (2): Trigon, nix BALLOTS: 9 AI (F/A): 21/0 (AI=3.0) POPULARITY: 0.778 OUTCOME: ADOPTED [ Falsifian: Endorsement of Murphy ] PROPOSAL 8584 (Effective deference) AUTHOR: Murphy CLASS: DEMOCRATIC FOR (3): Falsifian, Janet, Murphy AGAINST (3): G., ais523, nix PRESENT (3): R. Lee, Telna, Trigon BALLOTS: 9 AI (F/A): 9/9 (AI=3.0) POPULARITY: 0.000 OUTCOME: REJECTED [ Falsifian: Endorsement of Murphy G.: Endorsement of ais523 R. Lee: Endorsement of non-voter Aris: Inextricable nix: Conditional resolved: G. and ais523 both AGAINST ] PROPOSAL 8585 (Clarify variable voting period) AUTHOR: Murphy CLASS: DEMOCRATIC FOR (7): Falsifian, G., Janet, Murphy, R. Lee, Telna, ais523 AGAINST (0): PRESENT (2): Trigon, nix BALLOTS: 9 AI (F/A): 21/0 (AI=3.0) POPULARITY: 0.778 OUTCOME: ADOPTED [ Falsifian: Endorsement of Murphy ] PROPOSAL 8586 (Clarify deputisation) AUTHOR: Murphy CLASS: DEMOCRATIC FOR (3): G., Murphy, R. Lee AGAINST (4): Falsifian, Janet, Telna, ais523 PRESENT (2): Trigon, nix BALLOTS: 9 AI (F/A): 9/12 (AI=3.0) POPULARITY: -0.111 OUTCOME: REJECTED PROPOSAL 8587 (Clarify nomination period) AUTHOR: Murphy CLASS: ORDINARY FOR (3): Falsifian, Murphy, Telna AGAINST (2): G.+, Janet PRESENT (4): R. Lee, Trigon, ais523, nix BALLOTS: 9 AI (F/A): 9/12 (AI=2.0) POPULARITY: 0.111 OUTCOME: REJECTED [ Falsifian: Endorsement of Murphy R. Lee: Endorsement of non-voter Aris: Inextricable ] PROPOSAL 8588 (Clarify stone retrieval) AUTHOR: Murphy CLASS: ORDINARY FOR (4): Falsifian, G.+, Janet, Murphy AGAINST (4): R. Lee, Telna, Trigon, ais523 PRESENT (1): nix BALLOTS: 9 AI (F/A): 18/12 (AI=2.0) POPULARITY: 0.000 OUTCOME: REJECTED [ Falsifian: Endorsement of Murphy ] PROPOSAL 8589 (Secret proposal A) AUTHOR: ATMunn CLASS: ORDINARY FOR (3): Murphy, R. Lee, Trigon AGAINST (4): Falsifian, Janet, Telna, ais523 PRESENT (1): G.+ BALLOTS: 8 AI (F/A): 9/12 (AI=1.0) POPULARITY: -0.125 OUTCOME: REJECTED PROPOSAL 8590 (Secret proposal B) AUTHOR: ATMunn CLASS: ORDINARY FOR (4): G.+, Murphy, R. Lee, Trigon AGAINST (4): Falsifian, Janet, Telna, ais523 PRESENT (0): BALLOTS: 8 AI (F/A): 18/12 (AI=1.0) POPULARITY: 0.000 OUTCOME: ADOPTED PROPOSAL 8591 (Secret proposal C) AUTHOR: ATMunn CLASS: ORDINARY FOR (3): Murphy, R. Lee, Trigon AGAINST (5): Falsifian, G.+, Janet, Telna, ais523 PRESENT (0): BALLOTS: 8 AI (F/A): 9/21 (AI=1.0) POPULARITY: -0.250 OUTCOME: REJECTED PROPOSAL 8592 (Secret proposal D) AUTHOR: ATMunn CLASS: ORDINARY FOR (3): Murphy, R. Lee, Trigon AGAINST (4): Falsifian, Janet, Telna, ais523 PRESENT (1): G.+ BALLOTS: 8 AI (F/A): 9/12 (AI=1.0) POPULARITY: -0.125 OUTCOME: REJECTED The full text of each ADOPTED proposal is included below: ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ID: 8574 Title: mending the quill Adoption index: 1.0 Author: Trigon Co-authors: Janet, Aris [ Comment: It is not unusual for the final draft of a proposal to be submitted by someone other than the person who did most of the drafting for that proposal. These proposals have, in several instances, made it to the finals. Notably, during the Silver Quill 2020 discussions, an honorable mention was given to Interesting Chambers, which I wrote and did revisions on but never wrote the final version of. This kind of stuff has happened before. It isn't too worrying, but it would be nice to not have to work around it. Plus, proposals are cheap. ] Amend Rule 2582 by replacing: - Silver Quill, awardable by the Promotor to the author of a proposal of outstanding merit and influence on the game (additional information: ID Number of the proposal). with: - Silver Quill, awardable by the Promotor to the author of a proposal of outstanding merit and influence on the game, or to a coauthor, although e SHOULD only do so if it is generally agreed that that coauthor contributed more to that proposal than the person who submitted it (additional information: ID Number of the proposal). ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ID: 8575 Title: Stone Win Delay v2 Adoption index: 2.0 Author: Janet Co-authors: Gaelan Amend Rule 2644 to read, in whole: { A player CAN, by announcement, Notice the Gauntlet, specifying a single player that owns 5 or more stones, provided that no person has done so in the past 30 days. When the Gauntlet is Noticed, the specified player wins the game. If the Gauntlet was Noticed 4 days ago, then all existing stones are transferred to Agora. } [Adds a delay to stone wins to bring it inline with VP wins. Also adds a prevention for rapid-fire stone wins. This doesn't allow the bearer of many stones to prevent the win, in order to maintain a balance of stone power.] ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ID: 8576 Title: "By announcement" loosening Adoption index: 3.0 Author: Janet Co-authors: Aris, Murphy Amend Rule 478 by replacing the following: { Where the rules define an action that a person CAN perform "by announcement", that person performs that action by unambiguously and clearly specifying the action and announcing that e performs it. } with the following: { Where the rules define an action that a person CAN perform "by announcement", that person performs that action by, in a single public message, specifying the action and setting forth intent to perform that action by sending that message, doing both clearly and unambiguously. } [This unambiguously makes "CFJ: X" and "Proposal: X" work, even though neither explicitly says they are performing an action, since they both clearly and unambiguously set forth intent to perform the associated action. The "by sending that message" part was suggested by Aris, and prevents "I want to CFJ X at some point" from accidentally taking an action, even though it arguably sets forth intent to initiate a CFJ. This also brings the standard for "by announcement" in line with initiating a decision and casting a ballot, which both require a notice that "sets forth intent".] ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ID: 8578 Title: Auction limitation Adoption index: 2.0 Author: Janet Co-authors: Trigon Amend Rule 2545 by appending the following to the paragraph beginning "The rule that authorizes": { The rule that authorizes the auction further authorizes the transfer or destruction of currency from persons who have bid voluntarily, as specified by the chosen auction method. The authorization to conduct the auction does not provide any further authorization than that explicitly described in this rule. } ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ID: 8579 Title: AI voting method clarification v2 Adoption index: 3.0 Author: Janet Co-authors: Trigon If Rule 1950 contains the text 'For any Agoran decision with an adoption index', amend Rule 1950 by replacing the text 'For any Agoran decision with an adoption index' with 'For any Agoran decision with a non-"none" adoption index'. [Legislates the decision in CFJ 3746. All Agoran decisions possess an adoption index switch, but some of them have the value "none". Now with less ambiguous quotation marks!] ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ID: 8580 Title: Strength Buying Separation v2 Adoption index: 3.0 Author: Janet Co-authors: ais523, Trigon Amend Rule 2422 by deleting the following text: { A player CAN Buy Strength by paying a fee of 1 Extra Vote. A player's Voting Strength on an ordinary referendum is 1 greater for every time e Bought Strength during that decision's voting period. } Enact a new Rule entitled "Buying Strength" with power 2 and text as follows: { A player CAN Buy Strength by paying a fee of 1 Extra Vote. A player's Voting Strength on referendum on an ordinary proposal is 1 greater for every time e Bought Strength during that decision's voting period. } [Fixes the ambiguity that ais523 pointed out, and also removes the usage of the undefined term "ordinary referendum", replacing it with the well-defined but clunky "referendum on an ordinary proposal".] ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ID: 8581 Title: Grants on Resets Adoption index: 1.0 Author: Aris Co-authors: Amend Rule 2621, "VP Wins", by replacing: When a player takes over the economy, e wins the game. If a player Took Over the Economy 4 days ago, all Cards and all Products are destroyed, then each active player is granted 1 card of each type. with: When a player takes over the economy, e wins the game. Four days later, all Cards and all Products are destroyed. Then, each active player gains 1 card of each type and eir grant (if any). ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ID: 8582 Title: The Artistry Lies in the Art Adoption index: 2.0 Author: Aris Co-authors: [I used "Artistry" rather than "Art" to distinguish it from references to the liberal arts. Later, I realized that those references use "Arts" as in "Bachelor of Arts". So we're fine to just use Art here.] Amend Rule 1367, "Degrees", by replacing each instance of "Artistry" with "Art". Change each instance of the patent title "Associate of Nomic Artistry" to "Associate of Nomic Arts". ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ID: 8583 Title: Clarify switches Adoption index: 3.0 Author: Murphy Co-authors: Amend Rule 2162 (Switches) section 2 by replacing "if no default is specified" with "if no default is otherwise specified". ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ID: 8585 Title: Clarify variable voting period Adoption index: 3.0 Author: Murphy Co-authors: Amend Rule 107 (Initiating Agoran Decisions) by replacing this text: The publication of such a valid notice initiates the voting period for the decision. The voting period lasts for 7 days. The minimum voting period for a decision with at least two options is five days. The voting period for a decision cannot be set or changed to a duration longer than fourteen days. Changing the length of a decision's voting period is secured at power 2. with this text: The publication of such a valid notice initiates the voting period for the decision. The default length of the voting period is 7 days. Changing the length of a decision's voting period is secured at power 2, and it CANNOT be set or changed to more than 14 days, or less than 5 days for a decision with at least two options. ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ID: 8590 Title: Secret proposal B Adoption index: 1.0 Author: ATMunn Co-authors: If ATMunn has published a document entitled "Secret document B" with the SHA-256 hash of bf9e005c5f78e9dda0b3ffe7bef9d78b58a11fe7f3452b8cffc02de1a78b0b20 before the enactment of this proposal, then the effects described in that document take place. //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////